Rosie DiManno is Barking Mad
Editor's Note: jrwendelman reacts to another stupid Rosie DiManno article. If she isn't offending over a billion people in China she's driving almost that many Leafs fans batty with her ignorance. We'll have game recaps and FTBs up later but all of the cheering at last night's regrettable ceremony worsened my cold.
Rosie is standing out front of Torstar waving her arms and demanding, "Look at me! Look at me! I'm a dumbass too!"
In an article published in today's Toronto Star, she has opined that last night's Wendel Clark ceremonies are regrettable because they are symptomatic of a franchise that - you guessed it - hasn't "won anything substantial in 41 years." She suggests that the Leafs are so bereft of on-ice success that they have stooped to "fetishizing" former players in order to satisfy the overwhelming desire to hang banners - any banners - in the rafters of the Air Canada Centre.
Is it too much to ask that someone who is accorded the privilege of writing about hockey in a major metropolitan newspaper occasionally switch on the tube and watch a game? Obviously, Rosie didn't do that last night - or surf the web or read a newspaper, for that matter - or she would know that there was this fellow named Patrick Roy who was also honoured in a little place called Montreal last night. As much as it pains me to mention it, there have been a few Stanley Cups collected in that city since 1967 - those would qualify as winning something "substantial", wouldn't they - and somehow, the Habs still felt the need to drape a banner in the rafters of their barn to celebrate the career of their old 'tender.
It is idiotic to suggest that the impulse to honour individual players derives from a dearth of team success. The Yankees have retired player numbers. The Celtics. The Cowboys, Redskins, Steelers and Packers too. These franchises have racked up a few championships among them.
Apparently, Rosie didn't even read her own article, actually. She goes on to point out that the Leafs have honoured 11 pre-expansion players, and that 4 have been so honoured since 1967. By my math, that's 11 players honoured between 1926 (I'll forget about the St. Pats and Arenas) and '67 - about 1 every four years before expansion, and a little less than one every ten years since then. In case Ms. DiManno hasn't picked up a Leaf media guide recently, the club did win a dozen Cups in the pre-expansion years; it would seem, therefore, that the team has (if anything) restrained itself from honouring more modern players, rather than firing a painted sheet into the rafters for every twenty-goal single season phenom that happened to stop by for a cup of coffee, which is the impression Ms. DiManno means to convey in her poorly thought out article.
What a piece of crap, and what an insult to Wendel Clark to throw that piece of shite article into the paper in the wake of a ceremony that Clark richly deserved. It's obvious that Rosie just doesn't get it - the bond that sometimes develops between the fans and an athlete they love to watch play the game. Clark had the misfortune to come to town in an era when he had no chance to win the Cup. In the prime of his career, when the team did improve and take its shot, Kerry F&$%ing Fraser pulled the rug out from under its feet. Big deal. Win or lose, the fans loved watching Wendel play the way he did. Lots of folks, myself included, came to view Wendel as having paid the ultimate price for Leaf success - not only did he sacrifice his body with his style of play, but he got traded away for Sundin before the '95 season in a deal that would pave the way towards the club's successes (and yes, there was some) in the years just prior to the lockout. Everybody knew that Wendel had been sent away for a while to try to help the team, but we all hoped he would come home one day.
It's a shame that some talentless hack needs, for some inexplicable reason, to characterize everything that is good about ceremonies like this - the passion and dedication of the player, the honest affection between today's jaded sports fan and the much maligned modern professional athlete - and twist it into something wrong or embarrassing. Shame on you, Rosie, and shame on your editor for letting that chocolate mess slip by and into print.
------------
I posted my own little tribute to Wendel Clark at Heroes in Rehab: the blog.
PensionPlanPuppets.com is a fan community that allows members to post their own thoughts and opinions on the Toronto Maple Leafs and hockey in general. These views and thoughts may not be shared by the editor of PensionPlanPuppets.com.
22 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I feel like this is the sort of article I should get mad about, but I just don’t have the energy any more.
This is what the newspaper business has become. Increasingly irrelevant, so they fall back on what worked 30 years ago — controversy for the sake of controversy. Rosie is at home today, desparely checking her e-mail for hate mail she can brag about tomorrow, muttering something like"Please let them react to me. Please let them notice me."
I can’t be bothered any more. Most of the guys will be downsized out of existence within a few years, and they know it. This kind of paint-by-numbers “pay attention to me” nonsense is just the death throes.
Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.
by Down Goes Brown on Nov 23, 2008 12:52 PM EST reply actions
Godd Stuff jr
DGB, I see your point – but your comment has given me an interesting perspective on this piece. I think I’m firing up the Bloc Signal on this one… Hope you don’t mind.
YAY!!!
I was kind of hoping that this would rouse the Bloc to action!
My work is done here now. Gentlemen: Terminate, with extreme prejudice.
jrwendelman
The Artist Formerly Known as "Junior", who blogs at http://www.heroesinrehab.ca/blog
"But if someone so eager to engage into fist talk, we can always meet after season end in Minsk." (Mikhail Grabovski and a well-meaning but not particularly skillful translator)
DGB (as always) pretty much nails it.
DiManno was relevant for about three months in 1989 or so. In the 19 years she’s been filing, I don’t know that I’ve ever been able to finish a single one of her columns.
Bitter Leaf Fan: a life-long Toronto Maple Leafs fan comments on the team, the media and the exasperation...
The shocking thing is that she is apparently so important to The Star that they let her write about whatever they want including embarrassing Canada at the Olympics with her outright racists stories.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Also interesting to note that Damien Cox didn’t write anything about the Leafs this weekend (he’s doing Grey Cup articles instead). He hasn’t written a word about Wendel.
It’s as if he couldn’t think of a negative angle, so he just gave up. Quite possibly the highlight of the Leafs season, and the lead hockey writer takes the weekend off.
Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.
by Down Goes Brown on Nov 23, 2008 2:30 PM EST up reply actions
Maybe that was just Damien’s little gift to us; if so, I thank him, from the bottom of my heart. It’s EXACTLY what I wanted.
jrwendelman
The Artist Formerly Known as "Junior", who blogs at http://www.heroesinrehab.ca/blog
"But if someone so eager to engage into fist talk, we can always meet after season end in Minsk." (Mikhail Grabovski and a well-meaning but not particularly skillful translator)
Wow
Never thought of it that way. Thanks Omen.
Rosie Dimanno. What else is there to say, really?
She is beyond troll, a graduated disturber of all things fecal . She sits around, willing to wax on any topic she’s handed, and at the reader’s expense (especially ours) it sometimes includes sports.
Anyone familiar with her lack of soul could see the Wendel piece on the horizon – a flare gun salvo from her lonely dinghy in the Sea of Notice Me.
How can someone concoct an article of such contempt about an event of such pure and lasting good?
The biggest seaward ever.
Regarding the topic on hand – I despise Dimanno, not because of this article but because she’s just so **************** (extra asterisks in case somoene wants to add their own profanity).
Every articles of her is a pompous piece of shit that really doesn’t give any insight to the reader. She’s the type of person that points out the obvious things in the most embarassing and ridiculing way possible. She’d be the mom (like any sane man would ever “mate” with her) that points out a huge pimple to a suicidal child and tells her she needs to lose 5 lbs or no one will ever take her to the prom and she’ll be a loser forever.
^ I know that doesn’t completely make sense but that’s because I read the above article.
Dimmano Deserves Contempt
From another garbage article she wrote on the weekend, not about hockey at all, but about cannabis culture:
Strictly for the purpose of research, I wandered from one drug café to another, sampling the menu: hash oil, slimly rolled joints, laced brownies.
It took three days before I could recover enough to write a story.
Bullshit. No one ever took 3 days to recover from weed, ever. Not in Amsterdam, not in India, not in Jamaica. Never. That’s just not possible. That is a complete misrepresentation of the effects of marijuana.
Most chronic dope-smokers of my acquaintance are dull-witted, poor conversationalists
Nice low-blow stereotype. Is it because of their dim-wittedness that they became dope-smokers, or did dope-smoking make them dim-witted? Or is it just a callous and cruel remark directed at people you don’t really know but look down upon anyway?
Not to minimize the impact of depression or anything, but if recurrent melancholia is an accepted malady for obtaining otherwise illicit drugs legally, then I should be smoking crack.
Wow. Way to belittle honest people who have a clinically-diagnosed mental illness. It’s fucking disgusting that a newspaper would even print that offensive garbage.
So, then next time you see a hockey article written by Dimanno, I urge you to just skip over it. Don’t read a word. She’s not just a terrible sports-journalist, she’s a terrible writer, and an equally horrible person. She’s a liar, a bigot, and a sad, lonely, bitter person, who contributes nothing positive to society.
Barking Mad = Pathetic Bitch
by general borschevsky on Nov 24, 2008 10:51 AM EST reply actions
where is
Archimedes when you need him? he’d set her straight on weed
Making stuff up since real Leafs news is far too depressing
The whole 'honouring' thing
is actually pretty new. I think what she says (I won’t bother to read the source) properly translates as ‘the Leafs have honoured 11 pre-expansion players and four post-expansion players (including Gilmour).’ But they’ve done all of them in the past 15 years.
The first two were done on opening night, 1993 (Apps and Teeder).
Leaf, the universe and everything.
That's fair...
…but it still doesn’t save her argument. She is suggesting that the Leafs only “honour” players because they don’t have any other banners to put in the rafters. This still = FAIL, for the same reasons mentioned above: other teams in other sports, including those who have won championships more recently than the Leafs, have similarly commemorated the performances of their teams’ historic players.
As far as the pre- and post-expansion argument, any way you slice it, the Leafs have slowed down the pace of the banners being raised, after the initial (i.e. 1993) class of honourees. Again, there is no empirical support for her argument.
In my view, the correct way to see the “banner raising” ceremonies since 1993 is as follows: the post-Ballard Leaf organization (starting with Steve Stavro and Brian Bellmore) should be congratulated for rectifying the horrible oversights and petty slights perpetuated upon the team’s great players by an egocentric tyrant owner throughout the 70’s and 80’s. The point is the organization took steps, starting in 1993, to set things right by some of the team’s brightest stars. The current organization ought to be commended for recognizing that Clark (and Gilmour) were deserving of the honour as well, in view of their connection with the fans of this city and the major role each played in the path to reconstruction of this franchise in the post-Ballard era.
But that doesn’t sell papers.
jrwendelman
The Artist Formerly Known as "Junior", who blogs at http://www.heroesinrehab.ca/blog
"But if someone so eager to engage into fist talk, we can always meet after season end in Minsk." (Mikhail Grabovski and a well-meaning but not particularly skillful translator)
by jrwendelman on Nov 24, 2008 11:35 PM EST up reply actions
In my view, the correct way to see the "banner raising" ceremonies since 1993 is as follows: the post-Ballard Leaf organization (starting with Steve Stavro and Brian Bellmore) should be congratulated for rectifying the horrible oversights and petty slights perpetuated upon the team’s great players by an egocentric tyrant owner throughout the 70’s and 80’s. The point is the organization took steps, starting in 1993, to set things right by some of the team’s brightest stars. The current organization ought to be commended for recognizing that Clark (and Gilmour) were deserving of the honour as well, in view of their connection with the fans of this city and the major role each played in the path to reconstruction of this franchise in the post-Ballard era.
I agree with this entirely. They were righting old wrongs. I admit that it takes a bit of a mental leap for me to include guys whose entire career falls within my hockey memory, but if I were to choose two Leafs of the past 20 years, it would be those two. Sundin will be third.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
Sundin will be third.
Agreed. After that, I wouldn’t think the Leafs need to have the banner manufacturing folk on speed dial, though, unless Kabby leads them on an improbable Cup run in the next few years.
jrwendelman
The Artist Formerly Known as "Junior", who blogs at http://www.heroesinrehab.ca/blog
"But if someone so eager to engage into fist talk, we can always meet after season end in Minsk." (Mikhail Grabovski and a well-meaning but not particularly skillful translator)
If Kaberle makes it through this rebuild as a Leaf he’ll go up in the rafters.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
I agree.
I’m not so sure he’ll still be here. I don’t agree with the idea of trading him (and yes, I know, he hasn’t played very well so far this year) because between the retirement of Borje Salming and the dawn of Kabby’s career, all I ever heard was how difficult it is to find a talented puck-moving defenceman with excellent offensive skills. Kabby fits the bill, and there aren’t many like him – he should stay.
But he probably won’t, because of his contract and because of his membership in the “Muskoka Five” group of players with NMC’s.
sigh just another ridiculous consequence of JFJ’s stupidity.
jrwendelman
The Artist Formerly Known as "Junior", who blogs at http://www.heroesinrehab.ca/blog
"But if someone so eager to engage into fist talk, we can always meet after season end in Minsk." (Mikhail Grabovski and a well-meaning but not particularly skillful translator)
He'll have to pass Horton
and take a serious run at Salming, methinks.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
Yeah
But if he stays then I think that he can do that.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by 





























