Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Celtics, Heat Score On Purpose In Super Sunday Wins

Damien Cox Will Condemn Luke Schenn To A Cupless Career!

Editor's Note: All it takes to pick The Omen apart is some patience and an aversion to paying for his entire articles. Read this great fanpost by one of the iconic parts of Wendel Clark to see proof that Damien is multi-talented. Not only can he contradict himself within the same paragraph or the same article but over time his opinion morphs like a Vichy Frenchman.

Call it the Cox Curse but every defenseman picked in the first round that Damien Cox has claimed was ruined by the Leafs rushing them along never won a Stanley Cup after leaving the team, no matter how illustrious a post-Toronto career they had.  And when printing this list of never-got-theres for the first time very early in young Carlo Colaiacovo's career, he might very well have sentenced the kid to a lifetime of never drinking from the silver chalice.  What's worse, he's now starting to make the same noises about Luke Schenn.  

Will his poison pen (or word processor, as it were) condemn both of these poor souls to the hell of a Cupless existence?  TIme will tell, but in the meantime I'll present you with some evidence (gleaned from the one or two paragraphs I'm able to read that appear in the "FREE" section when I do an archive search of old Damien Cox columns on thestar.ca, as I'm too cheap to pay for full access) of why I think Cox may be in the process of using voodoo columnist black magic to mess up the hockey lives of these innocent young men.  

Star-divide

Cox typed the following sentence:

Should Colaiacovo sign by next week and stay for some or all of the regular season, it would be the ninth time the Leafs have started a defenceman taken in the first round in the NHL before his 20th birthday.

- October 4, 2002

He doesn't go on to name those eight other men in the paragraphs that aren't only available to paid subscribers, but a photo caption without the accompanying photos does appear, with THESE NAMES:

Jeff Ware, Luke Richardson, Al Iafrate, Jim Benning, Gary Nylund, Kenny Jonsson, Drake Berehowsky

Being too lazy to do too much research, I am going to assume the other defenseman taken in the first round who started before his 20th birthday is the greatest hockey player in the history of the universe, but also a non-Cup winner, the recently honoured Wendel Clark (who of course was drafted first overall as a defenseman and played his first game as Leaf at 18).  If it's not Wendel, then I will change my theory to be about the PICTURES instead of the NAMES, but the basic premise holds (in this increasingly ridiculous scenario).

Cox was also incensed, as he is today about Schenn, that Colaiacovo was not being returned to his junior team.  Compare the eerily similar sentiments expressed in the following two quotes: 

As the Leaf defence continues to have problems, it's perplexing why [Pat Quinn] won't give rookie Carlo Colaiacovo a single start given that he also refuses to send the young man back to junior hockey.

- October 22, 2002

It was a mistake to keep Schenn in the NHL - minus-five on this western road swing - and burn the first year of his entry level contract, but again, we'll give Fletcher this one.

- November 17, 2008

Yes, a difference exists in that Ron Wilson is playing Schenn while Pat Quinn was catering to his beloved veterans and sitting Carlo but the fact remains that Cox is saying the same things today as he was six years ago.  Can an article grouping Schenn with the above-mentioned walking jinxes be far behind?

Well, we'll know when suddenly Cox goes all Sybil on our asses, starts contradicting himself week-to-week, and espouses two COMPLETELY, DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED PHILOSOPHIES AT EXACTLY THE SAME TIME.  Oh, wait, that's already started, just as it was back in 2002.

When Carlo was sent back to junior that year, and selected for the Canadian entry to the 2003 World Junior Championship, Cox wrote a number of articles that appear in the few sentences I can see to promote the blueliner as the leader of Canada's defense corps  and the future of the Toronto Maple Leafs, a kid to hold on to at all costs. 

Then, three weeks after Canada fell to the Russians and settled for the silver medal, Cox decided that in fact Carlo should have been shipped out months before in a future-mortgaging push to win it all in 2002:

Well, it seems fair to suggest that Alexei Kovalev or a similar player (Pavel Bure?) could have made a crucial difference in the Eastern Conference final against Carolina last spring. The Leafs just might have made it to the Stanley Cup final.

If the Leafs had sacrificed, say, Carlo Colaiacovo back then, or Nik Antropov, just how different would their prospect stable look right now? Antropov's stock is higher today, but Colaiacovo is regarded as the same top-quality prospect he was last year.

- January 25, 2003

A few weeks later, he was at it again, pushing for Colaiacovo to be traded for immediate defensive help:

Now defenseman needed, maybe two

Aaron Miller, 31, Los Angeles Kings: He has the size that Teppo Numminen and Alexei Zhitnik don't, but far less of an offensive game. He can handle the puck effectively and make the first pass, and plays with a superior level of enthusiasm and combativeness.

Glen Wesley, 34, Carolina Hurricanes: Leaf fans watched this veteran help the Hurricanes past the Leafs in last spring's conference final. He doesn't have the offensive game any more and lacks a physical component, but he's cagey and can move the puck efficiently and help out on the power play.

Of all these players, Wesley is the likeliest to end up in Toronto and a player who would come at a moderate cost. Even if Numminen, Zhitnik or Miller can be had, the Leafs would have to be prepared to sacrifice either Nik Antropov or Carlo Colaiacovo.

- March 7, 2003

Now keep in mind, this is the same Damien Cox who just today wrote an article about why trading a six-years-older, six-years-more-damages, underachieving healthy scratch of a defenseman who was sitting eighth on the depth chart of a blueline crew that isn't exactly blowing the league away with either their solid defensive play or their ability to chip in on offense, along with a forward who had regressed in every year he played for the team and was currently sitting pretty with four points in his first 20 games, for a point-a-game player of the exact same age, playing a position they were much thinner in, who had scored more goals and points than either of the players he was traded for, who had played in more than TWICE the games as Colaiacovo in fewer seasons, was a terrible move and indicative of just how ridiculous an organization the Toronto Maple Leafs are.

Of course, Damien Cox would never trade the future for the present:

With Tanenbaum as chairman, the Leafs have, as has been the case for much of their history, squandered first round draft picks and prospects in search of the quick fix.

- September 26, 2008

Unless of course the present is actually the 2003 trade deadline:

I've never dumped on the Leafs for the [Owen] Nolan deal because I argued at the time it was a good deal for the team...

- March 19, 2008

So apparently, according to Cox, trading top-level prospects for washed-up veterans in order to make immediate runs for the Stanley Cup is okay, and when the Leafs don't do it they're guilty of  "yakking and not acting" (January 25, 2003), .  But trading former top-level prospects who have proven themselves to be anything but elite at the NHL level after being given several seasons to show that they were worthy of their high draft numbers for a relatively cheap young player who has scored significantly in the top league and is on pace to score 68 points (according to my rudimentary head math), or 48 more than the combined  total Steen and Colaiacovo are on pace to score in the highly unlikely circumstance in which they actually play in all of the Blues' remaining games is evidence that the Leafs organization is "behaving as though it was one of the many over-served fans at last weekend's Grey Cup in Montreal" (November 25, 2008).  

So Brad Boyes (future 40-goal-scorer) and Alyn McCauley (excellent defensive forward, playoff hero and heart and soul player) for Owen Nolan (42 points in 61 games for San Jose the season he was traded to Toronto) = good; Carlo Colaiacovo (one point in 10 games, regular healthy scratch, 101 games played in last 5 NHL seasons) and Alex Steen (four points in 20 games, decreasing goal totals since rookie season) for Lee Stempniak (13 points in 14 games, 27-goal scorer two seasons ago, same age as Colaiacovo and played in 160 of 162 games in last two seasons to Carlo's 76) = bad. 

Now that I've rambled on and on and on about what a weird, schizo, hypocritical ass-covering, logic-impared (did I mention he uses Stempniak's 16 goals scored in his last 97 games as the pertinent offensive fact to prove his worthlessness as opposed to his proportionally MASSIVE production this season as compared to the people he was traded for?) dillhole.  I want to tie this all together succinctly because most of this is non-sensical and I really need some sleep.  Basically Damien Cox is the devil.  When he mentions first-round-drafted players in the context of being ruined by the Toronto Maple Leafs, he's specifically using black magic to taint young Leafs blueliners with the Cup-defying jinx that ruined the lives of defensemen like Al Iafrate and Luke Richardson. 

This is because he's pure, unadulterated evil, and this is evidenced by his speaking in many different voices at once (like Linda Blair).  You know that he's amping up his evil powers to destroy another young  Leaf rearguard's career when his contradictions and seductive-but-flawed, illogical siren song of trading away the future for help now and holding on to prospects at the expense of immediate veteran help are both the reason that the Leafs are the worst organization in professional sports.  This is because he hates you, and me, and everyone else who is stupid, naive and good-hearted enough to love the Toronto Maple Leafs.  Also, he killed Jesus and probably hangs out with Dick Cheney.  He will destroy us all!!!

Wendel's Moustache

P.S. I just reread this before posting it.  I really fucking need to sleep...

PensionPlanPuppets.com is a fan community that allows members to post their own thoughts and opinions on the Toronto Maple Leafs and hockey in general. These views and thoughts may not be shared by the editor of PensionPlanPuppets.com.

Comment 25 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Pension Plan Puppets

Lock & Load

Feb 2012 by birky - 93 comments

Leafs Smother Pens 1-0

Feb 2012 by JP Nikota - 30 comments

Shut Down Defensemen - Part 2

Feb 2012 by Steve Burtch - 62 comments

Joffrey Lupul Is Pretty Cool

Jan 2012 by PPP - 286 comments

Liles Linkage

Jan 2012 by JP Nikota - 898 comments

The Leafs Best Shot Blockers

Jan 2012 by Steve Burtch - 32 comments

Comments

Display:

Awesome

Wendel’s Moustache is to Damien Cox’s writing as Wendel’s fist was to Bob Brooke’s face.

Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.

by Down Goes Brown on Nov 25, 2008 9:53 PM EST reply actions  

The other defenseman (defensemen?)

By my count, there are two possibilities – Ian Turnbull and Bob Neely.

Ian was born Dec 22, 1953 and Bob was Nov 9, 1953. Both were 1973 first rounders and made their debuts in 1973-74. Neely only played 54 games, though, so I can’t say for sure he played before Nov 10.

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Nov 26, 2008 10:53 AM EST reply actions  

Not to get too defensive about The Omen, but you do understand the difference between the 2002 Leafs and the 2008 Leafs, don’t you? The Leafs finished 2002 third overall in the league (would have been first in the East without the charity point) and went to the semi-finals. They were genuine Stanley Cup contenders, the real deal.

Now, I’ll admit up front that I’m the kind of guy who thinks Calgary made a decent move when they dealt away Brett Hull. They got burned in the long run, but they won a Cup (and the Blues didn’t). I liked the Nolan trade even though in hindsight it was a disaster – he couldn’t stay healthy as a Leaf, and they should have held onto Boyes instead of Colaiacovo (whom I’m sure San Jose would gladly have accepted at the time). The window of opportunity can be small – it’s long gone now – take it when you can get it.

I didn’t like Cox’s suggestion of Carlo for Teppo at the time, but certainly the circumstances were different than they are now (and it’s not really relevant, but with hindsight about what they’ve done since it would have been a great deal).

I've been looking at the sky

by Back In Black on Nov 26, 2008 11:26 AM EST reply actions  

Sure

Except that for all of The Omen’s back-tracking I remember him panning that Nolan trade at the time.

And your argument could be fair except for this part:

With Tanenbaum as chairman, the Leafs have, as has been the case for much of their history, squandered first round draft picks and prospects in search of the quick fix.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Nov 26, 2008 12:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm confused then

…because the original post quotes Cox as claiming to have been in favour of the Nolan trade even though it didn’t work out. It seems odd that Cox would say that if he’d panned the trade, but I don’t remember exactly what he wrote in 2003.

To be strictly technical, Tanenbaum didn’t become chairman until after the Nolan trade, so it could be excluded. A more reasonable way of looking at it is that, again, sometimes trading first round picks and prospects is perfectly reasonable, but in the last few years there really are multiple examples (Raycroft, Toskala, Leetch) where the Leafs have traded first round picks or top prospects for quick fixes. That’s enough to identify a pattern – especially considering the Leafs acquired zero first round picks in that time – whether or not individually those trades were any good.

This is not to say that Cox is being fair here with the “much of their history” comment. He’s particularly and consistently unfair to Cliff Fletcher’s first tenure, IMHO. But I’m not trying to defend him so much as I’m trying to dispute the premise that it’s inconsistent to support the Nolan trade in 2002 while still dumping on, say, trading Schenn for Pronger in 2008.

I've been looking at the sky

by Back In Black on Nov 26, 2008 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

His talking smack on one of my hockey boyfriends is unacceptable.

Ain't nothing but puck drops and poke checks, babydoll.

by Wrap Around Curl on Nov 26, 2008 1:03 PM EST reply actions  

Also the first time I read the headline too fast and though it said something about Schenn not being allowed to have cupcakes.

I would totally bake him cupcakes.

Ain't nothing but puck drops and poke checks, babydoll.

by Wrap Around Curl on Nov 26, 2008 1:23 PM EST reply actions  

Cupless?

Damn, Schenn better wear a cup, it’s a dangerous sport.

by LeafFanInVan on Nov 26, 2008 1:37 PM EST reply actions  

Complaining that 9 players the Leafs drafted haven’t won a Cup is pretty goofy if you consider that a) the Leafs themselves haven’t won a Cup since any of them were drafted and b) most players don’t win a Cup and c) 9 players is a ridiculous sample size.

Other suspicious coincidences about those 9 players:

- None are more than 6’6", or less than 5’3"
- None are named Fred, or Biff, or Tad
- None have gone on to do colour commentary for full-contact championship tiddlywinks

It’s a conspiracy, I tells ya.

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Nov 26, 2008 1:45 PM EST reply actions  

Besides, who’s to say that Richardson won’t win a Cup? He’s still active. He plays for the…

Oh. Yeah, OK, I guess that rules him out too.

Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.

by Down Goes Brown on Nov 26, 2008 2:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Of course it’s okay to trade for a piece if you’re making a push for the cup. But were the Leafs pushing for a cup two years ago when they decided not to trade Steen as part of the potential Pronger trade? Not even close. And yet as recently as YESTERDAY Cox was bringing that up to deride the team for making the Stempniak deal. The point is that two years ago Steen was coming off an 18 goal rookie season and seemed to be the so-called future Cox is always going on about. He was probably right in pushing for a trade in 2002 (although I doubt Bure or Kovalev would have made it through that Islanders series), but you can’t say the team should trade the future for now, and then bitch that all the team has done is trade the future for quick fixes, and then complain about a trade of an underachieving player or two for point-per-game forward, and THEN bring up how the team could have gotten a better player with that underachiever two years ago when that underachiever hadn’t actually underachieved yet and appeared to be a promising two-way forward with offensive potential (and killer bloodlines).

And uh, yeah, obviously 9 players is a small sample size and goofy to use as the basis for a complaint about them not winning a Cup. That sort of falls into the same category as claiming he’s the devil and the mere mention of a young defenseman’s name by him is a curse that will damn them to never winning a cup. I don’t really think he killed Jesus either (although I have my suspicions…)

by Wendel's Moustache on Nov 26, 2008 3:34 PM EST reply actions  

(although I have my suspicions…)

I’d investigate just to make sure.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Nov 26, 2008 3:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, if any of them had been named Biff or Tad, they’d have won one for sure.

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Nov 26, 2008 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

“specious” was the word you were looking for, by the way.

by Wendel's Moustache on Nov 26, 2008 3:55 PM EST up reply actions  

It wasn't, really

but it’s a very good word, all the same. ;)

“Specious” would have changed the entire tone of my comment….

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Nov 26, 2008 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Specious – “Seemingly well-reasoned or factual, but actually fallacious or insincere”

As in “I don’t have cancer and I’m wearing a black shirt, therefore black shirts prevent cancer”

or “Damien Cox mentioned nine Leafs first-round defensemen who played their first game before their 20th birthday in a column, and none of those players has won a Stanley Cup, therefore Damien Cox prevents Leafs first-round defensemen who play their first game before their 20th birthday from winning Stanley Cups.”

by Wendel's Moustache on Nov 26, 2008 4:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh, I know what it means

It’s just that ‘goofy’ did all it needed to.

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Nov 26, 2008 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

The real reason that those nine never won a Cup

is that they are the only nine Leaf defensemen in history not to be picked up at some point by the Detroit Red Wings. Sad but true.

Well, them and Dave Ellett.

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Nov 26, 2008 4:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess I’m just sick, as I know everyone else is on here, of Damien Cox taking such pleasure in hating the Leafs and everyone who doesn’t hate them. Obviously MLSE is a shitty corporation that cares more about the bottom line than winning and screws its fans over at every chance to make a few more bucks. But can’t he just accept that as read and move on to judging specific hockey decisions on their merits instead of going out of his way to find suspect numbers to prove how every decision is further proof of ridiculous the front office is? Badmouthing the Raycroft trade or the McCabe no-movement clause is fine. But pulling weird stats like “16 goals in his last 97 games” out of his ass to justify an argument that derides the Stempniak trade when a perfectly reasonable stat like 13 points in 14 games is staring him right in the face is the worst form of polemic journalism. We all know you hate the fucking Leafs Damien, we don’t need weird stats out of left field from you to prove it. Did you know in 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 Detroit was respectively 21st with 9.1% 22nd with 8.9% in scoring percentage? Fuck, I guess I should have picked Dallas to win the Cup last year since they were first with 10.8%. Does that mean anything? Of course not. Numbers can do anything you want them to, and what Damien wants them to do is prove that everything the Leafs do is stupid. Well I’m tired of it, just like I was tired of it when Al Strachan used to do the same thing. If Richard Peddie held a press conference today and announced that ice is cold, Cox would write a column tomorrow about how much he loves ice fishing in a speedo and question Peddie’s sanity. Going against the grain is one thing, but being contrarian just for the sake of showing your non-homer bona fides is annoying and, to be honest, unprofessional. I’m not saying he should be sucking Pension Plan dick, I just wish he’d call things like they are instead of always looking to badmouth everything all the time.

by Wendel's Moustache on Nov 26, 2008 3:52 PM EST reply actions  

Detroit had a lousy record in shootouts, IIRC

That should cost them the Cup.

Oh, wait….

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Nov 26, 2008 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

A number of years ago, the Leafs had that team that they claimed “was built for the playoffs”. They ended up stumbling through the regular season and only clinching a spot with about three games to go.

This earned them a first round matchup against the mighty Ottawa Senators.

Cox, on the radio, positively crowed about how, once and for all, this would dispel this “ridiculous notion that you could build a team for the playoffs”. The smarm positively dripped from the radio, It’s amazing it didn’t short out.

Four games later, the Sens were out.

Any word from Cox?

No.

There is no point in getting bent out of shape by Damien Cox. His thoughts don’t need to be coherent even within the same sentence, as there is no accountability for what he writes.

The day after writing that a McCabe to Florida deal would be good for Toronto, he wrote what a bad deal it was.

Don’t waste your time.

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Nov 26, 2008 4:35 PM EST reply actions  

I know. It’s futile. It’s also blogged to death in Toronto. But what the hell, it makes me feel better.

by Wendel's Moustache on Nov 26, 2008 4:46 PM EST reply actions  

And that’s all that matters :)

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Nov 26, 2008 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Now, I should mention that I attributed the observation about the lack of Cups won by the Toronto 9 to Cox rather than you. Should read more carefully next time.

It just seemed like such a Coxian thing to say. “Look! Nylund never won a Cup!”

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Nov 26, 2008 5:23 PM EST reply actions  

Oh. Haha. No I was just demonstrating the ridiculousness of Cox by being ridiculous myself.

by Wendel's Moustache on Nov 26, 2008 5:41 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your best source for quality Toronto Maple Leafs news, rumours, analysis, stats and scores from the fan perspective.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Frank_serpico_by_drawmanou_small
How to Value Mikhail Grabovski
Globeatar_small
What's The Problem With The Leafs' PK? (Part 2)

Recent FanPosts

Black_sox_small
First-time jersey purchase
Blawrie_small
Irresponsible Speculation Time
Syrupglleaf17lg_small
The Stretch Drive Schedule: DIY Analysis (AKA I have way too much time on my hands)
Leafs_small
Heartbreaking S-O Loss to Penguins
N907005365_1934770_7971_small
Complaining like an All-Star
Small
Mental Health and Kevin Bieksa
Leafs_small
AllStar Fantasy Draft........P'neuf Already
Frank_serpico_by_drawmanou_small
Team Defense Cap Hit vs. Performance

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

StatCounter

wordpress visitor


Chief Blogging Officers

Calvin_small PPP

Aen1_small Chemmy

PPP's Girlfriends

Don_t_panic_small SkinnyFish

Picture_1_small JP Nikota

Fg_small birky

Christian-hanson-wrecks-brian-o_1__small Bower Power