The Fallout
The dust has settled on a hectic final hour on deadline day. Hilariously, Marian Hossa did not end up in either Ottawa or Montreal but with the Penguins. It's a sad day when two such devoted fanbases are not rewarded by a legitimate push for the Cup as both team's GMs decided to stand pat with teams that have shown that they have huge flaws that will keep them from winning the Cup. Instead of trying to improve their teams in order to compete with the Western Conference teams they decided to sit idly by and hope that in the future the West will get worse.
As for the Leafs, Fletcher moved Kilger and Belak to the Panthers for Florida's 3rd and 5th round picks in 2008 and moved Hal Gill to the Penguins for a 2nd in 2008 and a 5th in 2009. In terms of salary The Silver Fox managed to clear $2.975M from next year's cap. More importantly, those moves opened up two roster spots for young players to step into and audition for their futures. Penaltyshotsca's comment reminds me of one of Tyler Dellow's recent post in which he discussed the possibility of the Oilers trading Garon in light of the Oakland Athletics' recent moves:
I took some jabs at Lowe last year for trying to bring the Billy Beane when he doesn't quite get it. Beane made an interesting series of trades this offseason that Lowe should be paying some attention to. He traded Dan Haren (15-9, 137 ERA+, 222.7 IP last year) and Nick Swisher (127 OPS+ in 539 AB last year), despite the fact that the A's owned those guys on cheap contracts for a bit longer. Why did he do this? He did it because the A's weren't going to be competitive with those guys in the lineup and it made sense to transfer what value they might have to the future, when the A's anticipate being a stronger team. The return was a rather large haul of prospects. He's trying to build a team that can compete for a World Series, Haren and Swisher weren't going to be cheap contributors in the window when he perceives success to be likely - they're cashed in for guys who might be. It's the absolute right move to make.
If the optimistic timeline for the Leafs being back to respectability is the 2011-2012 then why would it make sense to keep both players? They were only signed through next season, albeit cheaply, so their value right now would not be higher. Their contributions would have been made during the rebuilding phase so they would be taking a roster spot away from players like Stralman, Kronwall, or any of the Marlies forwards during the time when they should be getting experience. Plus, Kilger and Gill will be 32 and 33 respectively next year. They would be even older by the time fans expect the rebuilding to be over. Why would the team want those guys in 2011-2012 when they are over 35? These deals were the right ones. Not only did the Leafs clear cap space for next season but they also moved Gill's and Kilger's contributions forward to a time when the Leafs will hopefully be challenging for the Cup again.
The Omen once again shows his tenuous grasp on his readers/detractors' ability to remember what happened just over a month ago. While Damien was being embarrassed by Trader Cliff, The Silver Fox was pointing out that the team's significant assets had no-trade clauses in their contracts. He made it very clear that the players were driving the bus since they had negotiated in good faith with the club for that security. Fans, and I was one of them, began dreaming of the moves that could be made but at no point did MLSE or Cliff lead us to believe anything other than that he was following a process and would explore all of his options.
He did his job in asking them if they would consider any moves and he came close with one and ultimately was not able to do anything today. In his post-deadline interview Cliff made it very clear that this was the first step in the process. Part of his job description was to set the table for his successor. He brought in 4 draft picks, cleared roster spots, will move youngsters in to audition, and has gauged interest in four of the other NTC-players. The Omen acts as if this was the trade deadline forever, as if this was the final moves that the Leafs would be able to make. The summer may not bring any significant trades but Cliff made it clear that it would bring significant changes to the team that would start next season. MLSE has put aside money for buyouts or moving players to the minors. This was not a process that would be finished in one day despite what every reporter in Toronto will say. Fletcher did a good job with the hand that he was dealt. How the team finishes the year, who is hired to permanently head the Leafs, and what that person does in the summer will be the next steps.
One thing about the no-trade clauses, Mats and Tomas earned their right to refuse to waive them. Darcy Tucker has either been terrible or injured for the most of the season. If it's the former then he has been stealing his paycheque. If it's the latter then he cheated his team of the chance to have a healthy player in the lineup while he recovered. Either way, he needs to get operated on or smarten up for next year. Same goes with Bryan McCabe and Pavel Kubina. Since they decided to stand in the way of the team's rebuilding because they want to be Leafs and want to be a part of the franchise going forward then they need to show a renewed commitment to their fitness and their hockey otherwise they better waive those NTCs.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Disaster...
The entire season can now officially be written off. Time to start looking to next year. Or next decade, I guess, since the NTC 5 apparently plan to stick around and screw up our cap situation through 2010.
Ah well... what's another few years?
by Down Goes Brown on Feb 26, 2008 5:25 PM EST reply actions
Patience
Like you mentioned, Kubina's no-trade clause is limited. This summer he can be moved anywhere. He can't possibly play well enough to not be moved and in the summer the other 29 teams will have a much cleared sense of what kind of team they are compared to right now.
It also allows guys like McCabe, Tucker, and Blake some time to think about what they want to do and there is the possibility that some of those three could be moved.
Don't get me wrong, today is hugely disappointing but it's not the end of the world.
And the Leafs are just 6 points out of 8th...
maybe i'm crazy...
i don't know why i like this team, and i don't know why i'm willing to give them all a mulligan...
i guess i am crazy.
we could win with these guys, but.....
Thinking it over, the moves will free up some ice time for some of our youngsters of which I advocated a mere few days ago. Problem is that it will increase Ian White's ice time, not a good thing, whilst Jay Harrison continues to wither in the minors.
p.s.
Sundin does not want to be a rental. Does he want to be part of a rebuilding phase in Toronto where he will not be around to see the benefits? He may decide in the summer that no, he doesn't, and that retiring in a Leafs uniform isn't nearly as important as retiring a champion and next season he wouldn't be a rental.
Same goes for Tucker, McCabe, Kaberle, and Kubina. Apparently, the Leafs are no longer going to be trying to win with these guys in place, so wouldn't it be better for their careers to go to a team that will? Do they want to be on a team that can't/won't compete with them in place for the next three years?
In my opinion, they can win with the group in place now that the goaltending has improved, which means that Gill and Kilger should have been retained. However, it looks as though Richard Peddie is not of the same mind, but he should know, or be told, that if he can't get value out of the four to five player above in the form of prospects or picks, there will be no rebuilding that will translate into winning.
by penaltyshotsca on Feb 26, 2008 5:46 PM EST reply actions
Gill
I'm kind of scared, does Gill's departure mean Wozniewski will be brought back up? Sweet lord no!
Also McCabe, Tucker and Kubina are douches. If I have to see McCabe say "we have a good shot at the playoffs" or "I can't control what the fans think" in an interview I'm going to rage. I would have WAY rather seen Gill stay and McCabe/Kubina go for the exact same draft picks. Douche!
Don't forget...
... the mandatory "we've lost a lot of games to injury this year, but once we're healthy..."
by Down Goes Brown on Feb 26, 2008 6:12 PM EST up reply actions
Nightmares!
I won't be able to sleep for a while now thinking Woz could be back. Terror movie for sure.
If the NTC club
won't waive, and we are still going to try to rebuild, we will be a middling to last place team for a decade.
by penaltyshotsca on Feb 26, 2008 5:54 PM EST reply actions
what
Darcy Tucker has been a monster the past two weeks. He was obviously playing hurt, and now he's better.
tucker
well, maybe if you make him angry, then he's better? He did awesome after that old guy said he wasn't worth a 7thround draft pick, maybe Tucker is just a masochist. Instead of a trainer they should hire someone to tell him how much he sucks.
P.s.--I could totally do that and I could use teh extra money...
Tucker
My point with Tucker is that what would have been in the best interest of the team would have been for him to get operated on as soon as he knew it was an option rather than dick around for the season (minus the two weeks where he's been a monster).
The Darcy of the last two weeks I can deal with for the next 3 years. Otherwise...ship him out.
Hal Gill
aside from beating the crap out of Colby Armstrong this season, what can you tell me about him? I know many people say he's a slow skater, but is he in as high regard on the PK as many people are saying?
Lumbering
He keeps things simple. If he lines up with Gonchar (which I have seen suggested) you'll probably laugh at how often his first pass will be to Sergei so that he can break it out.
The Pens have picked up a very solid defenceman and hopefully he can play a part in beating Montreal or Ottawa in the playoffs.
Hossa may be the sexier pickup but I think Gill will have the bigger impact.
Commitment to Fitness - McCabe?
I agree with everything written above EXCEPT for the bit in the very last line about McCabe (and, to be fair, others) needing to show renewed commitment to their fitness and their hockey in the future.
Surely McCabe can't be blamed for his arm busting this year (and yes, I know I shouldn't call you Shirley). That wasn't a "fitness" issue - it was bull$@#! luck, right? At the end of the day, I think McCabe has earned some deference to his decision not to go too - after what he's been through, especially in the early portion of this year, it shows character that he wants to stay and prove people wrong.
McCabe
His missed time was certainly not his fault and not a result of a lack of commitment to fitness.
However, I don't think it's unfair to say that they have to go above and beyond what they have done so far. They were absolutely within their rights to refuse to be traded but it's time to put their money where their mouths are in terms of their dedication to the team. Doing that would be part of him staying and proving people wrong which I sincerely hope he does.
Nothing would make me happier than having to lavish praise on McCabe.

by 























