The "Intent to Blow" whistle strikes again this time in overtime as the Leafs' don't get the winning goal.
Things to note:
- Hagman getting tackled and no penalty being called despite the ref standing two feet away
- The ref watching the puck trickle into the net
- The ref checking his watch
- The ref looking at the dueling banjos in the crowd
- The ref blowing the whistle
This rule has to end right now.
Follow @Jeffler for up-to-the-second Leafs videos
2 months ago
PPP
48 comments
0 recs |
Comments
BULLSHIT
Leafs can’t catch a fucking break. I’d rant, but I’m tired. >.<
Pumps out more male with one thrust of the pelvis than the United States postal service over the last 146 years.
by Blinky on Nov 19, 2009 10:45 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Arrrrgh!!!
I don’t know what pisses me off more about the finish to this game; the fact that the Leafs played poorly enough to put themselves in a position to lose the game on a bad call, or the fact that it actually happened at least twice in this game (the “high stick” call on White and the “I don’t want that to be a goal” call in OT). Actually, we have another candidate for the focus of my supreme rage: the fact that NOBODY on the Leafs seemed to even give a shit about any of these things happening (with the possible exception of White himself). Leadership fail.
Oh, and brutal effort by both Stempy and Philthy Phil in the shootout.
jrwendelman
The Artist Formerly Known as "Junior", who blogs at heroesinrehab.ca/blog
"But if someone so eager to engage into fist talk, we can always meet after season end in Minsk." (Mikhail Grabovski and a well-meaning but not particularly skillful translator)
by jrwendelman on Nov 19, 2009 10:45 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
You know, it would be nice to see some fire, after being jobbed out of so many wins late in the game due to bad call/sloppy goaltending/rotten bounces, I wonder if the players are getting to be as apathetic as the fans?
Grabo's virtual linemate.
by Sergei Puckizin on Nov 20, 2009 10:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Intent to blow.
Oh, you blew it alright. Let me teeeell you.
by Fleet Fox on Nov 19, 2009 10:48 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
You corrupt bastards.
Go gamble on your junior league games, you blind jerks.
by Kavel Pubina on Nov 19, 2009 10:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And for the record
I was referring to the so-called “Referees”.
by Kavel Pubina on Nov 19, 2009 10:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It does indeed, for all intents and purposes, blow.
and the Mustache of Truculence (formerly Canada4Mizzou)
by Wan Ihite on Nov 20, 2009 4:28 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I swear these refs must have attended the Kerry Fraser Screw The Leafs referee camp. How could they miss those two calls?
by Rock Outta SoCal on Nov 19, 2009 11:20 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The MLB Playoffs officiating was terrible
and now comes officiating that makes that crap look passable. Goddamnit. >:O
by Kavel Pubina on Nov 19, 2009 11:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
excuses
i’m sorry, but fuck that.
this team has 3 wins in the first 1/4 season. They blew a 3 goal lead to the only team theoretically worse, missing its No 1 centre and No 1 goalie.
I know people dislike the negativity around here lately, so I’ll stop now, because i have absolutely nothing positive to say for how fucked this team is. Good night.
by pevans on Nov 20, 2009 12:24 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hard to be positive when things are so bad.
The team definitely did a lot wrong on their own to lose the game but this play highlights a problem that the league has to deal with that was a problem last night!
The fake high stick was a bullshit play but the Leafs still have to kill the penalty.
It’s definitely not the root cause but when things aren’t going well on the ice the little things take on greater importance
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 20, 2009 12:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If someone not on a steady diet of lithium has anything positive to say about this team they’re welcome to say it.
I won’t wait up.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
by Chemmy on Nov 20, 2009 10:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hagman not moving even though his presence made it impossible for Legace to make a save (I know he was thrown into him by Cole, but he still didn’t try and move until the puck was in the net) might have had something to do with it, too. That’s the best explanation I could come up with for the no goal call. Or the refs blew it. Of course, no one on Toronto complained or lobbied for the play to be reviewed. In fact, no one even celebrated as if a goal had occured.
In fact, it might have crossed the line off Hagman’s glove, so I’m not sure that would’ve counted. Strange play all around.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
by saskhab on Nov 20, 2009 12:09 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Definitely weird all around but if Hagman’s presence kept the goal from counting then call goalie interference.
I think the players didn’t lobby because they all seemed to be waiting on that whistle that never came.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 20, 2009 12:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Goalie interference doesn’t have to be called. Remember in Game 1 of the season, Moen was bumped into Toskala and the Habs scored (I think Metropolit) but it was waived off since Moen didn’t immediately get out of Vesa’s way. It was the correct call by the rulebook.
But they didn’t explain this one, so I don’t think Hagman’s presence WAS the determining factor here. But I also don’t see the puck fully across the line until Hagman gets up, so it could have been even partly on the goal line before he did that. Again, bizarre play.
Hockey blogging can't get any flatter.
by saskhab on Nov 20, 2009 11:25 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Good catch. I forgot that play. Strange and frustrating all around.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 20, 2009 11:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Loved the ref's tonight
always good to see the officials having an impact in the game it really adds to my torturing my neighbours cat while crying tears of frustration post game celebration.. my favorite part was when they ref blew his whistle when he saw the puck go in and disallowed the goal.. i cannot count how many times i have been outraged by an opposing forward sitting on a leafs goalie while the puck gets shoveled in only to hear “well thats a hockey goal, that is the gritty dirty play that wins games”.. tonight: the whistle had not blown, i have seen goals reviewed with the purpose of listening to see if a whistle had been blown in order to determine whether goals will count.. they are not listening for the ref’s decision they listen for the whistle and it pisses me off to no fucking end.. sorry Billy looks like Mittens ran away
also has anyone else noticed linesmen getting hit with pucks more frequently than ever in the past.. are officials getting careless, or are players aiming for them?
The choo-choo train left right on time. A ticket costs only your mind.
The driver said, "Hey, man, we go all the way. Of course we were willing to pay.
- My name is Jonas (Gustavsson)- - - Weezer are clearly leafs fans.
by AkiSchennberg on Nov 20, 2009 12:16 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I say fire more pucks at the refs. Anything that give their heads a shake, cause their damn eyeballs are stuck.
I like to eat the yellow snow behind the zamboni
by Kerry Fraser on Nov 20, 2009 12:45 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Presumably the purpose of an intent rule
is to cover in case the ref has the whistle knocked out his hand, or is otherwise tied up, and takes a while before he can physically blow it, you can say "well look, this is when he WOULD have done it, it’s what he intended, even if he physically couldn’t act quickly enough.
Of course, depending on refs intentions assumes that their intentions are reasonable… which most of us used to do.
and the Mustache of Truculence (formerly Canada4Mizzou)
by Wan Ihite on Nov 20, 2009 4:33 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Then I don’t get why there isn’t language in the rule specifying “if the official has no access to his whistle” then. Just assume if he has the whistle and it works and he can get to it, then the actual sound of the whistle is the only cue that matters; only invoke “intent to blow” if he actually doesn’t have a whistle. That can be easily determined on video.
It’s the 21st century, NHL, for god’s sake – USE the technology you have to improve the officiating.
"While there's life, there's hope." --Cicero
by Baroque on Nov 20, 2009 4:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, not arguing with that
just suggesting it was INTENDED as a somewhat poorly written dodge to try to give them carte blanche for “spirit of the law” to win over “letter of the law”…
and the Mustache of Truculence (formerly Canada4Mizzou)
by Wan Ihite on Nov 20, 2009 1:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The ref already had the whistle in his mouth. How long does it take for the message to go from his brain to his stupid lying lips?
by Screaming Will on Nov 20, 2009 6:09 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I dont care what the NHL says that was a goal. From what I can see, the puck is loose right in front of legace, then the carolina player tries to tuck into Legaces pads only to shovel it into his own net. How the fuck is that not a goal?!
The Leafs should have won obviously, and we could keep spewing out excuses because there are a couple of them from tonights game, but the bottom line is that these guys blew 3 good leads and deserve to be where they are in the standings.
I dont even know how to feel about this team anymore….. jesus fuck this is going to be a long season
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Nov 20, 2009 9:17 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
White for Captain...
This one reminded me of the Pony crease violation that cost us the playoffs..
I was surprised that there was never a review for that goal…
And lastly as the only leader, and perhaps their most complete player, I nominate Ian White as captain.
by hallandnash on Nov 20, 2009 9:37 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
There was no review because it wouldn’t matter what the War Room told the ref.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 20, 2009 10:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
no kidding, whats the point anymore if the refs are too pigheaded to reverse a decision
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Nov 20, 2009 10:31 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
When have you EVER seen a hockey ref reverse a decision?
Grabo's virtual linemate.
by Sergei Puckizin on Nov 20, 2009 10:48 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
it happened last night. a linesman called an icing, then they changed their minds and had the faceoff at centre ice
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Nov 20, 2009 11:07 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ive also seen players be put into the penalty box, only to have to refs discuss said call, then pull the player out of the box
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Nov 20, 2009 11:09 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
and goals get called back or called for with video review all the time, despite the refs on ice call
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Nov 20, 2009 11:13 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Leafs @ Ottawa, something like two or three years ago.
Refs call one on Ottawa – might have been a Too Many Men, though I can’t remember
What I DO remember is Murray just flipping out, going nuts, flooding the ice in front of the Sens bench with his saliva…
…and then, mysteriously, the refs pull whichever sen it was out of the box, and retract the penalty.
by Vent on Nov 20, 2009 11:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
YES, i remember that as well. Me and my buddy were screaming at the TV “WTF!!! how can you call back a penalty like that!”
It was truley the first time I had seen a legit call taken back because a coach bitched out the ref
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Nov 20, 2009 1:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’d be more upset about this non call if the Leafs weren’t terrible.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
by Chemmy on Nov 20, 2009 10:13 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
you’ve got a point chemmy….. getting mad about tough breaks is pretty pointless when your team sucks ass anyways
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Nov 20, 2009 10:31 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
True. Unfortunately, it’s not like they were in a back and forth battle with the Caps or anything. They blew a 3-0 first period lead to the goddamn hurricanes. Gross.
Grabo's virtual linemate.
by Sergei Puckizin on Nov 20, 2009 10:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
These friggin guys might as well officiate in the WWE. Same amount of credibility. Used to be the NHL had the best officials of any professional sports league. Not any more. And that is saying something.
by Tracey P on Nov 20, 2009 1:05 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think that the game is just too fast for them to maintain a high accuracy percentage
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Nov 20, 2009 2:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Welcome
Thanks for joining.
Games are just too fast now. They need a replay ref.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 20, 2009 2:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
WOW, puck daddy mentions this blog post and the comments there are just atrocious. Everyone keeps saying the legace had the puck frozen and hagman tackled legace. Just brutal.
The puck was at least a foot in front of legce, in plain view for a few seconds before being shoveled in by his own player and Hagman was absolutley steamrolled into the net.
Just brutal how bias against the leafs people are
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Nov 20, 2009 3:27 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
That’s par for the course on Puck Daddy’s comments. It’s a shame for Wysh.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 20, 2009 4:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wysh and the MLHS crew, two great blogs that are almost ruined by their comentors
Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That
by JaredFromLondon on Nov 20, 2009 5:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Just goes to show you
that even the best blogs can be ruined by a few dozen idiots who make dumbass comments.
by Kavel Pubina on Nov 20, 2009 6:56 PM EST up reply actions 9 recs
I’m just gonna let that one stand
Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That
by JaredFromLondon on Nov 20, 2009 7:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
.
I am Mikhail Grabovski's smirking revenge.
by kidkawartha on Nov 20, 2009 7:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This
Space Weed Says Telling it like it is without a care about the mainstream's feelings
"DO NOT get stuck behind Kyle Wellwood in the buffet line. This isn't really etiquette, but it will prevent you from starving to death"- Down Goes Brown on Etiquette for Jason Spezza's wedding
by Space Weed on Nov 21, 2009 1:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Really really strange play
The ref just misses it. He loses sight of the puck but does’t realize it’s already in the net. Hagman doesn’t realize it either. Seems like everyone didn’t realize where the puck was (except maybe Mitchell, who points at it) until after the whistle and since no one knew how it got there, they just shrugged their shoulders and carried on.
I was amazed that Cole didn’t get a penalty on the play. It was basically the exact same thing Blake did when he injured Vesa. Blake was given 2 minutes for cross-checking. The refs could have saved face by giving Cole a penalty and saying it was no goal because of incidental interefence with the goaltender.
I agree with jrwendalman’s comment that it’s equally frustrating to see the lack of passionate response in these situations from the Leafs. Seems like no one wants to stand out. Maybe Wilson’s program of destroying their sense of entitlement went too far and no one on the team thinks they deserve to win, they just want to look like they’re trying to.
by general borschevsky on Nov 20, 2009 11:35 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
the fact that NOTHING was called is what pisses me off the most, hell even goaltender interference on Hagman would have made me less mad. I mean then at least we get an idea of the ref was thinking.
Now all I can think of is that “oh well i probably should have blown my whistle, but I didnt, so ill pretend nothing happened at all”
Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That
by JaredFromLondon on Nov 21, 2009 9:22 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs






















