Waivers 101: A Guide to the NHL Waiver Rules
Editor's Note: Quick thanks to clrkaitken for putting together this great primer on the NHL's waiver rules. This is a great example of what you guys can do with FanPosts.
In last night's GDT, Karina suggested that we should have a handy reference to the waiver rules. After a bit of digging, Karina posted a fanshot for a brief overview of the rules governing waiver transactions. I think that this topic deserves a bit more in-depth discussion, and it doesn't hurt to have a more sophisticated understanding of the rules to help our discussions about transactions involving the Leafs.
We're already a particularly knowledgable lot around here when it comes to the cap and waviers represent a significant element of NHL cap management. I'm giving waivers it's proper due in order to improve our knowledge of its mechanisms, improve our discussion of potential moves available to NHL GMs, and maybe gain insight about the difficult decisions NHL GMs have to make every day around the people who make up their team's roster.
(Glove tap to Karina for starting this topic, and tracking down Mirtle's original post, and to NHLSCAP.com for their pretty good guide to the waiver rules.)
Why Do Waivers Exist?
Waivers are essentially a tool that prevents a team from hoarding NHL talent and stockpiling it on their affiliate rosters. Technically, this is the primary function of the salary cap and the NHL roster limits, but those alone wouldn't be able to prevent an unlikely loophole; a team stockpiling as many talented players as it could on cap-friendly contracts and keeping them in the AHL to shuttle back and forth as needed.
A team like the Leafs, with all their money, could easily do this (that is, assuming they could convince all the depth players to agree to the contracts) and develop and maintain an incredible depth chart that small-market teams could never hope to match. The waiver moves restrict a team's ability to move whomever they want back and forth, and brings a little bit more parity to the league.
What Are Waivers?
There are two main forms of waivers; waivers and re-entry waivers.
When a team wishes to send a player down to their AHL affiliate, and the player is not waiver exempt (explained later), the player must first clear waivers. (The CBA only permits movement to an AHL affiliate. So sorry, we can't just fire Blake down to the ECHL.)(I have no idea how the Filatov loan to the KHL is exempt from this.)
When a player is placed on waivers, all 29 other clubs now have an opportunity to submit a claim on that player. The player doesn't officially go on waivers until 12:00 pm EST, so if a team submits a request to place a player on waivers Wednesday afternoon, it is not official until Thursday. A player remains on waivers for 24 hours from the point the waiver transaction is confirmed by the NHL (48 hours if confirmed on a Saturday or a Sunday). If one team has submitted a claim during that period, the player's contract is purchased by that team as of the end of the waiver period. If multiple teams have claimed the player, the team with the highest priority (explained later) gets the player. If nobody claims the player, the player has cleared waivers and the team is free to assign the player to their AHL affiliate.
Players are also subject to waivers if the team wishes to bring someone up from their AHL affiliate to the NHL roster. These are referred to as re-entry waivers. (Makes sense; given the player re-enters the NHL) The mechancis of the re-entry system work the same as those of waivers, with one difference. the team who claims the player is only responsible for half of the player's salary and cap hit for the duration of the contract, and the team who waived the player picks up the other half. (Most of us became familiar with this rule when Sean Avery was claimed by the Rangers from Dallas).
Re-call waivers also cover the rare instance when a player joins a club during the NHL season from a club in Europe. Before being eligible the player must clear re-entry waivers.
When Do Waivers Operate?
The first day of the season which players are subject to waivers is twelve days prior to the start of the regular season, until the last day after the end of the team's season. It should be noted that the league resets all waiver transactions at the beginning of the next season's waiver period. So say that a player was waived and cleared waivers in the previous season, and was not re-called at any point for the remainder of the season. In the current season, that player rejoins the NHL roster and he must clear waivers again to be assigned to an AHL team.
There is a mandatory roster freeze between December 19 and December 27, where any claims on waivers are nullified. There are also several limitations placed on waivers after the Trade Deadline until the end of the season. Teams are no longer able to loan players to AHL affiliates, unless they were recalled under one of the circumstances described below. Teams cannot recall players except for the following circumstances.
- Teams are only allowed four recalls of players from the period between the Trade Deadline and the end of the season.
- A player can be recalled under an Emergency Recalled (explained later)
- If the AHL's team season has ended, the team can recall a player.
Compensation
A team who makes a successful claim for a player on waivers must compensate the team giving up the player for purchasing the player's contract. The prices are set out in Article 13.16 (a) of the CBA, and are based on years of service and position. Basically they range from $3,375 US (any player with more than 9 years experience) to $90,000 (a goaltender with 2 years experience).
Waiver Priority
If more than one team puts in a claim on a player during the waiver period, then the team with the higher waiver priority's claim is accepted.
If the claim is before November 1, waiver priority is based on the previous year's standings, with the team with the worst record having first priority and the team with the best record having last priority.
If the claim is after November 1, waiver priority is based on the current year's standings, defined as the lowest percentage of possible points. Toronto currently has 2nd priority on all waiver transactions.
Waiver Exemptions
There are four ways in which a player can be exempt from waivers; they have been recently exposed to waivers, they are on emergency recall, they are on a conditioning assignment, or they have not met the experience requirement.
The Player Has Recently Been Exposed to Waivers
If a player cleared waivers and is subsequently recalled during the same year, he does not have to clear waivers again unless he has either played 10 or more NHL games or has spent 30 or more days on an NHL roster since last clearing. Otherwise, he will have to re-clear waivers to be assigned.
Emergency Recall
We've become very familiar with this one lately with Joey Mac. The NHL permits each team to carry up to 23 players on its active roster, subject to the constraints of the salary cap. However, it also requires a minimum of 2 goaltenders, 6 defenceman and 12 forwards on its active roster at all times. A player is not considered on the active roster if they have been placed on the Injured Reserve List or are suspended by the NHL.
If the team falls below any of these minimum categories, they are permitted to recall a player without subjection to waivers in order to meet the NHL minimum roster requirements. However, the player must be returned to the affiliate when the player he is replacing returns from their inactive status.
(Note: This is why Calgary was forced to play with less than the minimum required players last season. They had a number of players who were hurt but were not on the Injured Reserve, and the team did not have cap space to recall additional players to fill their lineup. Had the team placed players on the IR, they could have used the Emergency Recall to call up enough players to fill out the minimum lineup (again subject to the cap), but then they wouldn't have been allowed to use the players until they completed the minimum period on the IR.)
Conditioning Assignments
A player who has been on IR or otherwise incapicated (and the team must be able to demonstrate cause) can agree to be assigned to an affiliate for a conditioning stint that cannot last longer than 14 days. At the end of the 14 days, the player must either return to the NHL roster or be placed on waivers to remain with the affiliate. (This just happened with Jay Rosehill.)
Exempt Due to Experience
This is the meat and potatoes of determining waiver eligibility. Three key factors determine whether a player is waiver eligible; age, years of experience, and # of games played..
Age is defined as the age of the player when he signs his entry-level contract with an NHL club. This is used to determine the thresholds for the players' waiver eligibility. The thresholds are the number of years from signing a professional contract, and the number of professional games played.
Depending on the age as determined above, a player is waiver eligible for a certain number of years from the year in which he signed his first contract, as shown below.
Goalies Skaters
Age Years Age Years
18 6* 18 5*
19 5* 19 4*
20 4 20 3
21 4 21 3
22 4 22 3
23 3 23 3
24 2 24 2
25+ 1 25+ 1
For anyone 20 or older, the year in which they play their first professional game is considered the first year counting towards the number of years they are exempt from waivers.
*If an 18 or 19 year old plays in 11 or more NHL games in a season, then the eligible period drops to 4 years for a goalie and 3 years for a skater, with the first year of that period being the year in which the player played 11 or more games.
(Example: Nazem Kadri & John Tavares both signed their first NHL contract as 18 year olds. However, Tavares has played more than 11 games as an 18 year-old. Therefore, Tavares is now waiver-exempt for 4 years (this year, and the 3 ensuing years), while Kadri is waiver-exempt for 6 (this year and the 5 ensuing, although this could change if he plays next season).
The other factor is games played. Once a player reaches the threshold (again based on the age at which they signed their first professional contract), they are eligible for waivers. The language of the CBA is very clear that while there are two distinct thresholds, this is an "earliest of" scenario. If a player reaches their games played mark before the reach the years mark (or vice versa), they become eligible for waivers.
Goalies Skaters
Age Games Age Games
18 80 18 160
19 80 19 160
20 80 20 160
21 60 21 80
22 60 22 70
23 60 23 60
24 60 24 60
25+ 25+
Professional Games is typically defined as all NHL regular season and playoff games. However, for players older than 20 years of age, the definition expands to include AHL regular season and playoff games, as well as any other professional game played in Europe while the player is under contract to an NHL team but on loan to a European club. A 25 year old or older basically gets his first year waiver eligible and that's it.
Edited to add: Karina pointed out that I didn't touch on how 2-way contracts affect waivers. Simply put, they don't. A 1-way or 2-way contract has no bearing on a player's waiver status, it dictates how much a player gets paid if they play in the AHL. I blame EA Sports for this misconception, because that's pretty much the only way they determine waivers in their game. (Hey EA, maybe instead of making sure that each person in the crowd has individual animations, you should focus on keeping your rosters as accurate as possible and making sure the salary cap actually works correctly.)
If a player on a one-way contract goes to the AHL, they receive the same compensation that they would if they played in the NHL (with the obvious exception of any bonuses that would be likely calculated based on the performance in the NHL, as stipulated in the contract.)
Conversely, a 2-way contract stipulates that the player receives compensation at $X if they play in the NHL, and $Y if they play in the AHL. The minimum salary in the AHL is signficantly lower than that of the NHL. In some cases, it's not uncommon for the players' AHL salary to be 10% of their NHL salary.
So why would a player ever agree to a 2-way contract? For many players on the fringe of NHL rosters, a 2-way deal might be their only legitimate chance to squeeze their way on to an NHL roster. If the options are schlepping by bus around the AHL for far less salary, or accepting a 2-way deal with an NHL club where you might have to do Option1 but you might have a shot at a big raise if you stick in the NHL, why wouldn't you choose Option 2?
So that's it. That should give you a clearer understanding of just what happens when a team decides to put a player on waivers.
PensionPlanPuppets.com is a fan community that allows members to post their own thoughts and opinions on the Toronto Maple Leafs and hockey in general. These views and thoughts may not be shared by the editor of PensionPlanPuppets.com.
14 recs |
39 comments
|
Comments
I am in awe. Great job, clraitken.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
by Karina on Nov 26, 2009 12:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Filatov
I believe he’s still waiver exempt, given the age/games requirements you have listed. Last year when the Flames loaned someone to the KHL (I forget who, but he had played a lot of NHL games and was much older) he first had to be put through waivers before being loaned. I think that’s how it works, anyways.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
by Karina on Nov 26, 2009 12:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
question
maybe I missed it, but do you explain the difference between 2-way contract and waivers? This seems to be a continuous source of confusion, maybe add a little blurb so that we can point people to this as a definitive resource.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
by Karina on Nov 26, 2009 12:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This could be the same site where most of the above data came from, but hopefully this summarizes the difference between 2-way contracts and waiver exemption: (Had me confused too)
Assumption – "The waiver status of a player is determined by whether he has a 1-way or 2-way contract."
Answer: False. Whether a player has a 1-way or 2-way contract has absolutely no effect on his waiver status – it has to do with the number of years since the player signed his first NHL contract and the number of NHL games he’s played since signing. In fact, there are ten (10) players who have 1-way contracts for 2007-08 and are exempt from waivers.
and
Re-entry waivers – new to this CBA is the provision that certain players recalled to the NHL must clear waivers to join the team holding his NHL rights; any other team may claim said player for 50% of his cap hit and salary, with the team attempting to recall taking the other 50% of each. In general, players are not subject to re-entry [recall] waivers unless:
1. The player is on a 1-way contract and is subject to waivers when assigned to the minors; or
2. The player is on a 2-way contract whose minor league salary is in excess of
2007-08: $100,000
2008-09: $100,000
2009-10: $105,000
2010-11: $105,000
2011-12: $105,000
#2 above does not apply to a player who
a) If a goalie, the goalie has played in 180 or more professional games [NHL, AHL, or ECHL; regular season and playoffs] or, if a skater, 320 or more professional games; AND
b) Has not spent more than 80 games on an NHL roster in the prior 2 seasons or 40 or more games on an NHL roster in the immediately prior season
Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.
by nhlcheapshot on Nov 26, 2009 1:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
cool!
so we can’t really waive toskala because joey mac would be subject to re-entry waivers and would probably be snatched up? bummer
Go Houston Rockets!
by Duster on Nov 26, 2009 12:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Of note – James Reimer is 6-1-1 with a 1.96 GAA and .932 SPCT.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
by 1967ers on Nov 26, 2009 12:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
In the ECHL though…
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 26, 2009 2:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
?
Those are his stats with the Marlies this year.
Resident Capologist
by clrkaitken on Nov 26, 2009 2:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I meant he’s in the ECHL now. Isn’t he?
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 26, 2009 2:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He’s running the show at Ricoh. Played yesterday.
Resident Capologist
by clrkaitken on Nov 26, 2009 2:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I somehow managed to severely confuse myself. Quel surprise.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 26, 2009 2:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you’re thinking of Adam Munro, maybe.
KENSEI TAKEZO!
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
by Karina on Nov 26, 2009 3:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Those be Marlies numbers.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
by 1967ers on Nov 26, 2009 2:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
7th in the A in GAA
8th in the A in SV%
Resident Capologist
by clrkaitken on Nov 26, 2009 2:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Weird
Because when Justin Pogge wasn’t in the top 10 in either stat we never heard the end of it yet nary a peep about Reimer’s play.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Nov 26, 2009 2:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I want to get down to Ricoh once or twice in December and get a good look at Reimer.
Resident Capologist
by clrkaitken on Nov 26, 2009 2:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That raises an interesting question. If, somehow, Toskala were dealt, and no goalie came back, would MacDonald be eligible for an emergency recall, since that would leave the NHL roster with only one goalie? Seems loopholey.
Leafs Rumination: hockey and sesquipedalianism.
by puckurgently on Nov 26, 2009 1:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
My understanding of emergency recall waivers are they are designed to be temporary. i.e. Replacing somebody who is incapacitated from dressing.
If we trade Toskala (I know, stop laughing) my feeling is emergency waivers wouldn’t apply. Although I get the feeling that before the league approved the trade we would have to recall another goalie to meet the minimum roster requirements.
Resident Capologist
by clrkaitken on Nov 26, 2009 1:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I wish everyone who called into leafs lunch and after the horn would brush up on their knowledge of waiver rules as well.
Every call goes something “Send down Blake, Toskala and Stempniak and bring up Bozak, Hanson and Stalberg and that will fix everything”
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Nov 26, 2009 1:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
bozak, hanson and stalberg can’t be snapped up on waivers because they’re too new to the nhl, right? I would still send down blake and toskala, i wouldn’t care if someone takes them at half-price. stempniak i would keep.
Go Houston Rockets!
by Duster on Nov 26, 2009 1:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
well if my understanding is correct.. that is entirely possible still it would just make blake, toskala and stemp open to other teams.. (only they could end up trapped down there because we won’t wanna pay half their salary for nothing) and those young’ns would not be subject to waivers due to their lack of exp… correct me if i’m wrong??
also the i think just to hammer the point home on 1 way vs 2 way.. the difference is in terms of NHL and AHL salary, if a player has a 1 way he gets the same salary in the AHL or NHL and if he has a 2 way he sees his pay rate change based on whether he’s in the NHL or AHL
The choo-choo train left right on time. A ticket costs only your mind.
The driver said, "Hey, man, we go all the way. Of course we were willing to pay.
- My name is Jonas (Gustavsson)- - - Weezer are clearly leafs fans.
by AkiSchennberg on Nov 26, 2009 1:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I updated the article to reflect the effect of 2-way contracts.
Bozak, Stalberg and Hanson are all waiver exempt this season.
The other problem that’s been touched on about sending all the vets down is that I believe the AHL has rules regarding how many games played players on loan from the NHL can have. I think I’d have to go hunt down the AHL Constitution to find out that one.
Resident Capologist
by clrkaitken on Nov 26, 2009 1:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, the AHL does have something about experience, someone posted about it earlier this week…
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
by Karina on Nov 26, 2009 1:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Huh boy.
I never even considered that the AHL would have its own rules about what NHL players could play. I think I just assumed that the AHL was the NHL’s bee-hotch and accepted whatever players they were told to.
by Fleet Fox on Nov 26, 2009 2:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It was the AHL that made the decision to suspend Anaheim’s affiliate this season.
Resident Capologist
by clrkaitken on Nov 26, 2009 2:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What caused them to do that?
by Its Cold In Here on Nov 26, 2009 2:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Financial difficulties.
Resident Capologist
by clrkaitken on Nov 26, 2009 2:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think I heard anything about that. Where are the Ducks’ prospects playing? I need to look this story up.
by Fleet Fox on Nov 26, 2009 2:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
some are with the Marlies actually. Burke burns no bridges.
Brain: The irony of it all, Pinky. Years of trying to take over the world, and all I had to do was say "truculence".
Follow me I'm Boring!
by blindfolded tank driver on Nov 26, 2009 3:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Majority are in San Antonio, but they have a few in Toronto and I believe Portland.
Resident Capologist
by clrkaitken on Nov 26, 2009 3:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
that’s got to add a level of complexity to managing a team’s prospects. But I assume a team will sprout up to fill the gap one day for Anahiem
Brain: The irony of it all, Pinky. Years of trying to take over the world, and all I had to do was say "truculence".
Follow me I'm Boring!
by blindfolded tank driver on Nov 26, 2009 3:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I believe the expectation is that Iowa will resume operations next season. Which would mean that the AHL will finally have a 30 team league and each team will affiliate with an NHL team.
Resident Capologist
by clrkaitken on Nov 26, 2009 3:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Great Read. Learning truly is half the battle.
Brain: The irony of it all, Pinky. Years of trying to take over the world, and all I had to do was say "truculence".
Follow me I'm Boring!
by blindfolded tank driver on Nov 26, 2009 2:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
WIth posts like these...
…people are going to make some very serious mistakes about the quality of fan hanging around Triple P’s Mom’s Basement. They might think we can read, write and, you know, “think”. Well, some of us, anyway. :-)
Nicely done, clrkaitken, and Rec’d by me for thoroughness. Thank you.
jrwendelman
The Artist Formerly Known as "Junior", who blogs at heroesinrehab.ca/blog
"But if someone so eager to engage into fist talk, we can always meet after season end in Minsk." (Mikhail Grabovski and a well-meaning but not particularly skillful translator)
by jrwendelman on Nov 26, 2009 3:25 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Nice work all around – the material posted by NHLCheapshot (salary requirements for re-entry waivers) is what usually trips me up.
TMLFans has a wonderful sticky thread called The CBA – 101 Things People Should Know. Well worth reading to understand cap calculations, buyouts, bonuses and other issues.
Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...
by mf37 on Nov 26, 2009 4:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Good Job, def gold-star worthy.
I had a basic understanding of the waiver rules, but I was somewhat hazy on the details.
And Karina is right, the fans should occasionally do a synopsis of other aspects of the CBA that affect player movement, signings, cap and tagging issues etc.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."
Albert Einstein
by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Nov 26, 2009 4:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Great Read
You do deserve the title of resident capologist
Space Weed Says Telling it like it is without a care about the mainstream's feelings
"DO NOT get stuck behind Kyle Wellwood in the buffet line. This isn't really etiquette, but it will prevent you from starving to death"- Down Goes Brown on Etiquette for Jason Spezza's wedding
by Space Weed on Nov 26, 2009 5:37 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
This is great stuff!
A hearty well done to you mon frere.
And yeah, EA has their priorities WAY out of whack when it comes to game design.
Why do we do this to ourselves?
by Kenjamin on Dec 9, 2009 2:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 





















