Pension Plan Puppets: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Has Kentucky Improved Since the Non-Conference Season?

Maple Leafs 1 v. Lightning 2 (OT): I Said No More Moral Victories

"YOU'RE BOTH GOING IN AND THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT!"

More photos » NATHAN DENETTE - AP

"YOU'RE BOTH GOING IN AND THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT!"

The Toronto Maple Leafs fell, once again, in overtime to the Tampa Bay Lightning. Despite peppering Antero Niittymaki with 41 shots the Leafs only managed one goal by way of the moustachulent Ian White and a healthy deflection. Jonas Gustavsson looked good once again in stopping 30 shots. He gave up a juicy rebound for the Lightning's opener although Matt Stajan and Francois Beauchemin (aka the player that gives me ulcers) should have done a better job of picking up players after The Monster's giveaway.

But the real news was Phil Kessel's debut as a Toronto Maple Leaf and what a debut. Phil Kessel looked dangerous all night especially 13 minutes into the game. It looked like he was going to waltzed through the Lightning. Of course, Matthias Ohlund had a different idea. I have to admit that I almost passed out when he stepped up into Kessel and almost ended his life. Thank God Kessel's not made of glass so he didn't even miss a shift. He finished the night with over 23 minutes of ice-time, 10 shots on net, and highlighted just how vast the gap is between himself and the rest of the team's forwards.

So there was a lot of good tonight. Of course, they wouldn't have lost the game if there weren't any problems.

Star-divide


Shut your eyes around a minute in.

The league's best powerplay went 1-for-8 in a game that went to overtime. That was the difference right there. And what was one of the problems? As expected, Phil Kessel was run out there at every opportunity and frequently for almost the entire powerplay. While Kessel is a hell of a sniper he is pretty static which, when combined with the other players deferral to him, hmstrung the penalty kill. It was much easier to defend them than when the movement was much more dynamic. The refs actually did a pretty good job of calling some soft penalties both ways.

The overtime winner was another sign of trouble. Too often, the defence pairings seem as if they just met each other. After Matt Stajan made a Matt Stajan play (95% good, 5% falling down) the Lightning came down the ice 2-on-2. Simple enough right? Well, then the Lightning forwards crossed just inside the blueline and all hell broke loose. There are two options on that play: the defence can communicate and follow their respective forwards across the ice or the the defence can communicate and switch forwards and remain on their side. Instead, we were treated to secret option # 3 where one defenceman follows his forward across the ice and the other steps up on that same forward. The only problem is that that move leaves Ryan Malone alone in front of the net to slam the rebound (and Gustavsson) into the net. The puck doesn't go in if Malone doesn't knock Gus into the net and it's a shame to see a simple call like that get missed but based on some of the phantom calls made tonight we shouldn't be too surprised.

The penalty kill has been improving incremnetally and tonight marked the second straight game with no powerplay goals again. It's strange to think that a small change like adding a goalie that can make a save would have such a big impact. There is definitely still room for improvement. With Jonas Gustavsson in net the Leafs have killed 13 of 17 penalties (76.5%) with Gus making 21 of 25 (.840sv%) saves. Of course, even that 76.5% number is a huge improvement over the rest of the year. However, as with so much, it's about baby steps for the Leafs.

Maybe one night the Leafs will get all aspects of their game firing at the same time. If they had to choose one night to do it I'd suggest Friday night when the Leafs face their fellow basement dwellers the Carolina Hurricanes. Until then the Leafs will be busy fixing the little things.

Poll
Who was the Maple Leafs' player of the game?
Jonas Gustavsson - 30 saves on 32 shots
91 votes
Phil Kessel - 10 shots, always dangerous, and depressingly good
48 votes
Ian White - Trailing by one? Who you gonna call? The Moustache
55 votes

194 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 14 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Though the moral victories are painful to watch…Kessel’s seeming superiority to our other forwards gives me hope we won’t have to for much longer! =D

by Theodles on Nov 4, 2009 2:39 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

F$%*

This is so god damn disheartening. Win games! Please!

I want to believe it’s bad puck luck, because that implies things balance out, so at some point soon we’re going to win like, 7-8 close games in a row on lucky bounces.

But what if they’re just no good? I know they’re not 1-win-in-13-games bad in reality. But how much better do they deserve to be? I count three blowouts (Wash, Pitt, and NYR) but basically every other game they’ve been competitive. With better tending and some luck, all were winnable. So that means they deserve to be what, 4-7? 5-6? Is that a positive?

We’ve got Kessel and Gustavsson giving me much hope for the future. But damn is the present hard to take at the moment

by pevans on Nov 4, 2009 10:12 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

It's a question of odds

The team being competitive and similar in strength to the competition (as evidenced by the fact that the losses have been in OT or fairly close), the odds are that the numbers will begin to move up. I would say that what we have seen is the usual December softening that other Leaf teams have shown, but early. So odds are we will see a nice string of wins in the near future. Of course, this is true only if the team continues to play hard and smart. The wins must come. It’s mathematics (probability actually).

by leosc on Nov 4, 2009 1:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think the Leafs need to bust out the badass 3rd jersey. They always play well wearing those. I bet they wear them against Detroit on saturday

There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"

by Matt_Roberts on Nov 4, 2009 11:29 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

We play Carolina on Friday?? That’s it, I’m cancelling my plans and staying in to watch!

"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky

by Karina on Nov 4, 2009 11:42 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

damn right you are

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Nov 4, 2009 11:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Could be the night we get out of last place!
Nothin’ could be finena’ then to beat Carolina

by WendelMadeMe on Nov 4, 2009 11:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

except

they have Cam Ward, who will turn in a Conn-Smythe-like appearance on Friday.

"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky

by Karina on Nov 4, 2009 12:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The stock is going up

If you look at the Leafs record, it looks something like this right now:

                  TTTTTT
LLLLLLLL

Perhaps the final shape is:

                                WWWWWWWW….
                  TTTTTT
LLLLLLLL

Eh? Looks good!

I’m hopeful and optimistic. What? Oh!? I didn’t know that, by definition, I’m a Leafs fan!
What you gonna do? GO LEAFS GO!!!!!

by leosc on Nov 4, 2009 11:49 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I like the way you think.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Nov 4, 2009 12:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

As allways – GO GUSTY!

How a guy taller than a giraf can be so extremely agile is beyond me and my little brain.
He“ll be a franchise-goalie for the Leafs for years to come.

"I woke up from my work nap for THIS!?"

by SweKool on Nov 4, 2009 11:49 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

If we don’t beat Carolina on Friday (and suffer another overtime loss) I might cry a little.

by gooner4ever on Nov 4, 2009 12:52 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

at least we have a for sure win on saturday against detroit…. _

There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"

by Matt_Roberts on Nov 4, 2009 4:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

ha ha

maybe. 11 points by Sunday morning?
sweet.

by gooner4ever on Nov 4, 2009 4:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog for the Toronto Maple Leafs.
Start posting about the Maple Leafs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

800px-flag_of_new_brunswick
The Book of Rebuild, Chapter 35

Recent FanPosts

Ob_ax_190_1_small
Kessel vs. Malkin: A Graphical Comparison
Fml_copy_small
The top 5 reasons I'm glad I didn't trade those tickets for a used blender.
Buffalo_sabres_v_toronto_maple_leafs_3kqnv0wzt7fl_small
Leafs vs Devils February 5 (Photos)
Clipboard01_small
Can the Leafs still qualify for the Playoffs? Do I even want to know? I know you do!
Small
The Leafs need new jerseys...
Leafs_man_small
PPP Dictionary: "You're a Dick"
Axl_rose_01_small
Who had 'four days' in the pool?
Leafs_man_small
More submissions for the PPP dictionary!
Small
Giguere to start tuesday and rest of the season

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

StatCounter

wordpress visitor


Chief Blogging Officers

Calvin_small PPP

59_small Chemmy

PPP's Princesses

Alfie2_small Mattblack

Dscn1755_small wrap around curl

Mr_hanky_small Karina

Don_t_panic_small SkinnyFish

Contributing Bloggers

Clockwork_orr_cropped_small mf37

Tester_small Greener

Hitchhiker_42_small 1967ers