Another Team in Ontario?
Unless you've been living under a rock, and to those of you that have thank you for making this site your first contact with the outside world, you're well aware that the Coyotes are in trouble and Jim Balsillie already has his hands in the mix. Mirtle makes a few good points about why the Coyotes won't move to Ontario, but I'd like to throw something else into the mix.
A lot has been made about having to pay the Leafs and the Sabres to move into their current territories. Buffalo draws a lot of fans from Southern Ontario for Leafs games and as Sabres fans so it's easy to see that they don't want another team to move into their territory and take away their revenue stream.
The Leafs, on the other hand, sell out every game and are printing money. They'd probably be happy to have another team pay them three or four hundred million dollars to move into their area, right?
I don't think so. I think MLSE is becoming increasingly aware of the diminished cultural relevance of the Leafs. From an article posted in September of last year in the Star:
Half the citizens of Toronto are new Canadians, many of whom have not warmed up to hockey. And by 2018, more than half the city will be visible minorities, meaning the sport has to lose its WASP-ish image.
It may not be that new Canadians see hockey as a WASP hotbed (though it almost certainly is, but that's a discussion for another day) and in fact this quote from the Globe and Mail would suggest that new Canadians like hockey:
Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment was amazed to discover that South Asians love hockey. Now, the sports conglomerate is adjusting its marketing strategy to fit the country's rapidly changing demographics, ensuring hockey remains Canada's national game.
It's more of an issue of future fans. Things are fine now, but as more and more people move to Toronto who didn't grow up with hockey or grow up with the Leafs, MLSE's stranglehold on the city will begin to weaken. MLSE knows this, their broadcasting of games in Punjabi to market to a large Indian demographic are done solely because MLSE wants to pull people in to their brand.
"The future of soccer and basketball concern me less than hockey. We need to be start thinking about the long term."
The city's highest profile sports franchise has a waiting list of 3,000 names for season tickets, and isn't worried about filling seats for the short term. - The Star
Think also of the people that move to the GTA because of work or school from elsewhere in Canada who are hockey fans but not Leafs fans. They'll be the people that latch on strongest to a non-Leafs team in Toronto, Kitchener, or Hamilton.
"Young kids are less connected to hockey," said [MLSE COO Tom] Anselmi. "They get connected through playing, winning and access. Well, we haven't been doing enough winning. And they haven't been getting access via tickets." - The Star
Consider also kids who can't get access to Leafs tickets. Instead of being on the outside looking in, so to speak, families who can't get Leafs tickets will go watch the Hamilton Usurpers in person and on TV.
Jim Balsillie is an outsider amongst the NHL's ownership group who have vocally expressed their displeasure with him and have supported Bettman everywhere he's tried to block Balsillie, and I wouldn't be surprised if MLSE was at the forefront of that group making sure that someone doesn't drop a new Canadian franchise on their doorstep.
Would the new franchise do well? Probably. Would MLSE be fine in the short run? Probably. This isn't about that though, this is about MLSE blocking a franchise move to ensure their own future survival. I think it's clear though that MLSE is thinking long term and they're worried about fans in the future. They're not going to let another team come in and erode that position even more.
Toronto has the financial and political support in the NHL to block a move like this, and I'd expect them to.
130 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yes
just because i want to be an optimist for once
Because Taking The Leafs Seriously Is Not An Option
This post isn’t about what you want to happen. I’m neutral on another team moving in. MLSE is absolutely concerned about the changing demographic of Toronto undermining their position in the future, they’re not going to let their core demographic splinter off to other teams.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
i just ment that yes is more positive than no
plus im a rebel
Because Taking The Leafs Seriously Is Not An Option
by JaredFromLondon on May 6, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions
From yesterday's Vancouver Sun
A week ago, NHL Players’ Association executive director Paul Kelly issued a statement saying he believes the issue of a second franchise for Ontario is worth further study.
Now is he talking about us or the Sens?
the sens barely qualify as a team let alone a franchise
Because Taking The Leafs Seriously Is Not An Option
by JaredFromLondon on May 6, 2009 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Good post
“Toronto has the financial and political support in the NHL to block a move like this”
But do they? I haven’t seen any evidence they do. They certainly didn’t have the pull during the lockout.
There are very real questions about the nature of what territorial rights are, what they mean, and what, if any, compensation teams get if they are infringed upon.
There’s definitely cash compensation for territorial rights, and I believe that Buffalo would seek to block this move too. Toronto + Buffalo blocking along with Bettman not liking Balsillie to begin with probably gets the Leafs enough pull.
Remember that financially the Leafs bail out a lot of teams with revenue sharing. Toronto can probably make a convincing argument that a lot of teams are out of luck if their revenue dries up.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Definitely? Really? Got any proof? I’m not being a dick, I just really don’t see any clarity, and I’m not gonna trust Cox or Simmons to explain this.
For example, I found this post on Mirtle’s piece very interesting. It’s from when the CDN Competition Bureau investigated the matter during the Nashville effort.
he Bureau understands that applications for relocation of NHL franchises are considered as a last resort when a team is no longer financially viable in its present location or is unable to secure appropriate arrangements for arena facilities. As outlined in greater detail above, restrictions on the relocation of a franchise can serve a number of legitimate interests of the league; including, ensuring spectator interest by preserving traditional team rivalries and encouraging investment by municipalities in arena construction and related infrastructure.
The Bureau found no instance where a "veto" was exercised by an incumbent team to protect its local territory from entry by a competing franchise. Since at least 1993, no franchise has been permitted to exercise a veto to prevent a team from entering into its local territory. Further, under the NHL’s rules and procedures, in respect of the proposed relocation of a franchise to Southern Ontario, the NHL would not permit any single team to exercise a veto, but would only require a majority vote. The Bureau may have concerns under the Act if a single team were entitled to exercise a veto to prevent a franchise from entering into its local region within Canada, but such concerns would have to be evaluated having regard to the facts and law applicable at the time such an event occurred.
I don’t mean that the Leafs have a solitary veto, I mean that they have veto power in the sense that they can probably rally enough support to get the measure shot down.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
I think that’s something we just don’t know. I have a hard time seeing owners volunteering to spend league money during tough times on court battles and running the Coyotes when Balsillie makes it all go away.
They’ve been doing it for a year already. This move puts a lot more pressure on them but Buffalo and Ottawa both survived similar scares.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on May 6, 2009 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions
The Leafs pay out a lot of money in revenue sharing, but that doesn’t necessarily give them power, they’re obligated to do so. The owners of the franchise are obligated to make their owners the most money, period. If it turns out that moving a franchise into the area will cost them equal or less money than simply throwing millions at Phoenix yearly, there’s no reason for them to object.
I was under the impression a super-majority was needed ie. 2/3
A Nation of Masochists a blog dedicated to Leafs Nation, who are continually punished but keep coming back for more.
I don’t know that MLSE didn’t get exactly the outcome that they wanted from the lockout. Why would they be against a salary cap? Yes, they would make much more money as a winner and the cap handicaps them some but imagine the money they’d make as a winner in a capped league?
The question of territorial rights I think depends more on whether the Leafs are willing to flex their financial muscle in the legal arena.
Maybe MLSE will read one of 1967ers posts and breakaway into their own league.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on May 6, 2009 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions
JimB’s not a stupid man, and he can’t like getting embarrassed by constantly being denied his team. Plus, his end-run around the League via the Bankruptcy Courts will be sure to enrage Bettman even more than he already is. When you add in the PR money he’s throwing at it (makeitseven.ca) and that he’s openly saying he’ll move the team to S. Ontario, this seems like the last time he’s going to try this.
If that’s the case, then you’ve gotta think that he’s made some level of understanding with the Sabers and the Leafs – they’re the two teams who have the most at stake. The other owners probably don’t care that much; they should be happy to have someone who wants to throw money at the sport, and who will pay back the X mil that the League is in for with the Coyotes.
There’s no reason this had to come out right now – it could have come out a few months in either direction. Since it came out now, I’ve gotta be thinking that JimB has finally got enough pieces in place to make his move.
by FutureMrStronach on May 6, 2009 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions
i say no
i don’t believe MLSE would have a problem with another team in Toronto, renting out the ACC. But a team with it’s own facilities would be more problematic for them.
I agree with the “protecting the brand” argument though. At the end of the day, these are businessmen, and they understand the need for continued economical growth.
"Ninety percent of the game is half mental."
The Left Coast Lock
by blurr1974 on May 6, 2009 1:37 PM EDT reply actions
MLSE wouldn’t mind a second team that they owned, but I think MLSE would go to enormous lengths to keep their future earnings safe.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
I vote no, but I think they will relent if they can find advantage in having this second team. If it’s renting the ACC to them, to providing them access to TV, like use of Leafs TV to broadcast games, protection rights over TV contracts.
Mee-Mee-Meep Meep Go Leafs Go Meep Meep! MEEP!!!
by blindfolded tank driver on May 6, 2009 1:41 PM EDT reply actions
we get their draft picks for the first 10 years
Mee-Mee-Meep Meep Go Leafs Go Meep Meep! MEEP!!!
by blindfolded tank driver on May 6, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Half The Citizens of Toronto Are New Canadians...
But that’s not where this team is going. Fact is, the area surrounding the Tri-Cities/Hamilton region is still predominantly white. (I grew up in Brantford)
true, but that’s changing as well, not as fast as toronto, but it is.
Mee-Mee-Meep Meep Go Leafs Go Meep Meep! MEEP!!!
by blindfolded tank driver on May 6, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions
the same could be said for any major population base in canada
Because Taking The Leafs Seriously Is Not An Option
by JaredFromLondon on May 6, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions
do you know what keeps new fans away?
elitism.
so many hockey fans are so wrapped up in it being “their” game. they’re like Gollum, chanting obsessively over and over about their “precious”
"Ninety percent of the game is half mental."
The Left Coast Lock
by blurr1974 on May 6, 2009 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions
one rink to rule them all?
Mee-Mee-Meep Meep Go Leafs Go Meep Meep! MEEP!!!
by blindfolded tank driver on May 6, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
the absolute rabidness of some fans is definetly a deterrent, say a team opens up in Brantford and a new hockey fan decides that is going to be his team, proudly declares this and is assaulted by leafs, sens, habs, and nucks fans that his team is terrible etc, i bet that alone, not even bringing up how terrible a new team usually is would drive away new hockey fans
Because Taking The Leafs Seriously Is Not An Option
by JaredFromLondon on May 6, 2009 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions
plus...
how embarrassing would it be to be picked on by a Sens fan….
"Ninety percent of the game is half mental."
The Left Coast Lock
by blurr1974 on May 6, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions
well they’d get middle child syndrome so it would be worse
I guess as the eldest we’d have to watch out for baby brother
Because Taking The Leafs Seriously Is Not An Option
by JaredFromLondon on May 6, 2009 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Right but the Leafs are going to want to lean heavily on their more traditional demographic in outlying markets. Putting a new team there endangers that.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
under a rock = in finland…
and they shouldn’t move the team
"miss u, CR baby...u want 2 get back 2gether?"
the Helsinki Nokias? sounds competitive
Mee-Mee-Meep Meep Go Leafs Go Meep Meep! MEEP!!!
by blindfolded tank driver on May 6, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions
My question
Someone brought up Al Strachen’s interesting point that if SOW got a new team, the NHL really isn’t expanding their fan base because you’re not going to create new hockey fans in SOW by injecting another team there.
So now I’m wondering, just because Toronto has such a high population density and because it does have so many existing hockey fans here, everyone assumes that Toronto would easily support a second NHL team…
But could it really?
Everyone hockey fan I know in Toronto is either a fan of the Leafs, or a fan of another existing NHL team already. The logic behind introducing two teams into Florida was that they would naturally attract all the Canadian snow birds who flock down there every year to their fan base… but than you don’t really see that happening do you? The only time either the Lightning or Panthers ever really attract them is when the Leafs are in town… hell you don’t ever see Sens or Habs fans packing their arenas when those teams are playing there do you?
So what if a second Toronto team suffers the same effect? What if, Toronto hockey fans don’t bother showing up to the home games of the second team unless the Leafs are playing? I think its worth considering especially when you take notice at how passionate about hockey Canadians are… I don’t think they are willing to change allegiances that easily.
Just my two cents.
"God's in His heaven. All's right with the world." - Robert Browning (1812-1889)
it makes sense, but again, it comes down to dollars
the new team will get fans, weather they be jumpers from other teams or new hockey fans growing up with another option, it worked for the sens (eventually).
there is enough people to support the franchise, after a more than probable slow start it is pretty much guarenteed to gain popularity if managed right (IE dont fuck up like the sens did and almost lose your team)
Because Taking The Leafs Seriously Is Not An Option
by JaredFromLondon on May 6, 2009 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Whether it’ll work or not isn’t the question. There’s a 100% chance a team could do well in SWO.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
unless that team is called the Marlies
Because Taking The Leafs Seriously Is Not An Option
by JaredFromLondon on May 6, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions
but there is a finite number of fans here, all the new teams’ fans would be jumpers. It splits another team in on the tv contracts, doesn’t make the CBCs TSNs & SNs offer more. what the league wants is new fans, there are not new fans here, just people willing to bail on their current team
Mee-Mee-Meep Meep Go Leafs Go Meep Meep! MEEP!!!
by blindfolded tank driver on May 6, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Al Strachan is an idiot, the entire reason we’re debating this is because the NHL couldn’t expand their fan base in a new market anyway.
I don’t think that getting fans would be an issue, my questions all lie in location (arena building/retrofitting, transit and traffic, etc). People like to talk Hamilton but, well, it’s not exactly a big place nor is it as easy to get to as some imply. And if the new team were to try to share the ACC with the Leafs I guarantee you that this city would not be able to take double the amount of home games.
I don’t know Winkle. I know some people who are fans of hockey in general and hate the Leafs. Also people in Hamilton who have been clamouring for a team for ages would unite over a new team. Not to mention you have younger people who have not determined their allegiance yet. Look what happened in NOttawa. Almost all those people who are now “Sens fans” were Leafs and Habs fans.
A Nation of Masochists a blog dedicated to Leafs Nation, who are continually punished but keep coming back for more.
Right, but this still isn’t about whether are not fans are there for a “second” Ontario team.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Yes
But according to Forbes, the Sens are the least profitable Canadian NHL team by a wide margin
I don’t really doubt that a second GTA team will have trouble attracting fans, it will be a stable franchise but I don’t see it adding a significant amount of extra money to the league or expanding its fan base.
"God's in His heaven. All's right with the world." - Robert Browning (1812-1889)
Disagree. Okay, I agree on the fanbase point, because a new team in SWO doesn’t increase the fanbase, it just increases access to the existing fanbase. But it absolutely increases revenue over what they were doing in Phoenix.
If the Leafs and GTA Team To Be Named Later both play at home on the same night, rather than a couple million customers clamoring for 20,000 tickets, now a couple million customers clamor for 40,000 tickets. That’s a significant revenue increase that wasn’t there before in terms of ticket sales.
Don’t forget, under the current CBA, the PA has been made a partner in the economic success. The cap is tied to revenues, for which I’m sure largely relies on ticket sales. If you can create an opportunity to increase both volume and price of ticket sales for one of your 30 franchises, that has a monumental impact on total revenues, the cap, and ultimately the players salaries.
The players’ had to forfeit 22% of their salaries this season to the escrow. They’re probably more pissed off than we are about the failures of Phoenix and other franchises.
But the league needs stability right now. The Yotes aren’t the only team in fiscal trouble, and could easily be a precursor for worse times ahead. It’s in the owner’s best interests to bring in a stable franchise that they don’t need to pay money into and could actually lighten the revenue sharing load.
Yes but...
Will MLSE allow it?
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on May 6, 2009 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions
There may be
another way of looking at this….
post-Lockout, when the Leafs moved the Marlies to Toronto from St. John’s, a lot of fans in NFLD were extremely upset. My uncle hasn’t watched an NHL game since. He was an avid Leafs fan for years, had season’s tickets to the St. John’s Maple Leafs, but was fed up with MSLE taking his team for no reason. He refuses to support the teams he’s long hated – Habs, Sens, etc. – but still loves hockey.
I doubt he’s the only one that feels this way- there are hockey fans out there who have no team. They’re caught by their disappointment in a once great franchise and hate the other teams who are geographically nearby. Perhaps this team would find support there.
by Karina on May 6, 2009 2:12 PM EDT reply actions
Well...
It wasn’t for no reason it was beacuse if they were going to subsidise losses it made more sense to do it in Toronto than NFLD.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on May 6, 2009 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions
subsidise losses?
I mean, I understand the move to Toronto – especially for player access etc. But they consistently sold out in St. John’s and it pisses my uncle off to no end that the Marlies were moved and no longer sell out.
Whatever his reasoning (I’m not really on board with it, I’m loyal to the Leafs to a fault) I can definitely see there being a lot of fans who would support another team in SOW just to spite the Leafs.
by Karina on May 6, 2009 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions
It was my understanding that they were losing money on that team when they decided to make the move.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on May 6, 2009 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah
It’s a shitty situation and if I lived in NFLD I think I’d probably come to the same conclusion as your uncle.
It’s easier for me to rationalise it because from a player development standpoint there is an advantage (in theory).
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on May 6, 2009 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions
They did, and while I wish they could have left them there for the fans, there were a number of reasons for moving them, including being able to call up players easily, and the fact that all the other teams that had been close by were gone, so every road trip was a huge ordeal. They held out as long as they could, but once it becomes so big a deal to see your closest opponent and you are losing money, it is easy to see why they did it.
I still wish they hadn’t though, as I hate seeing fans lose teams.
"If rubbing frozen dirt in your crotch is wrong, hey, I don't wanna be right."
but
said fans could easily support a team that may seem to be infringing upon MSLE’s massive profit
by Karina on May 6, 2009 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions
St. Mike's Majors
that team doesn’t exist anymore, right? Well, except as the Missisauga Majors.
What’s their old rink like? Size/ use wise?
by Karina on May 6, 2009 2:15 PM EDT reply actions
Seats about 1000 people if you’re lucky. It’s not even regulation size.
A Nation of Masochists a blog dedicated to Leafs Nation, who are continually punished but keep coming back for more.
Yes
I voted yes but it comes with a bunch of heavy caveats:
- The Leafs would have to get a one-time payment for territorial rights. I read the Canadian Competition Bureau decision but I don’t trust any legal decisions based on hypotheticals (is that irony?). Also, it doesn’t really apply in this instance. This would not be a league-mandated move that the Leafs were trying to block on their own. The head office would be preventing a franchise from moving which every other granter of franchises is allowed to do
- The Leafs would have to be able to buy some of the television rights for the new team. Right now, the Leafs broadcast a dozen or so games a year along with old games, really old games, and random NCAA games. The station would get a massive boost and increased range possibly with the deal and I’d imagine that MLSE would push for that.
- I could see having the team use the ACC being an incentive. They’d make a killing on the concessions and it makes sense for at least the first while for the team to use that building. Balsillie has a deal in place with Copps so this one probably won’t happen.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
I think there are two issues that impact MSLE with respect to a second team in the area. First is the fan base as discussed. You won’t get a rush of Leaf fans changing allegiance, but you will get a rush of hockey fans going to the new team. This new team will have to price themselves (way) below the Leaf price point. And they are going to attract a flock of fans who just can’t get Leaf tickets, either because they are too expensive or just can’t be found. In terms of cultivating future fans, this would hurt the Leafs.
Second, and I think more importantly, is the risk to no other events at the ACC. If the team plays out of Copps, it is not an issue since the arena is already there and far enough away from the city as it is. However, build a new arena in Mississauga or Vaughan or somewhere closer to the city, and then you start draining other sources of revenue away from the arena. MLSE is probably more scared of that in the short term. Melnyk wanted to buy the Gardens a few years back and convert it into a smaller arena for his St Mike’s team, but MLSE refused fearing competition for concerts and what not. They rather turn it into a Loblaws or Home Depot.
Great Point
The one about another big concert venue is another good angle.
And they are going to attract a flock of fans who just can’t get Leaf tickets, either because they are too expensive or just can’t be found. In terms of cultivating future fans, this would hurt the Leafs.
If it’s official my dad and I will buy season’s tickets to the new team and sell every game except the Leafs games. I think that I will not be alone.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on May 6, 2009 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions
3,000 on the waiting list
ya gotta think that a lot of them would just buy for another team rather than wait…
by Karina on May 6, 2009 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions
I would buy tickets to see the Leafs play them, but that’s it. I chose my team, and I’m sticking to them
Mee-Mee-Meep Meep Go Leafs Go Meep Meep! MEEP!!!
by blindfolded tank driver on May 6, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions
It’d be impossible for me to abandon the Leafs.
A Nation of Masochists a blog dedicated to Leafs Nation, who are continually punished but keep coming back for more.
Yeah, Kim and I just became Habs fans, it’ll be tough to switch again.
Seriously, I can’t quit the Leafs.
I don’t understand how people in ottawa changed sides.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on May 6, 2009 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions
I can see the kids grasping the new team, but once you chose a team, I think you’d have to be a real fencesitter to flip flop on your team.
Mee-Mee-Meep Meep Go Leafs Go Meep Meep! MEEP!!!
by blindfolded tank driver on May 6, 2009 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Getting a team in your home town when there has never been one before is a real rules-changer.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
i say thats horse shit, but then since ive lived in 7 cities growing up and dont really have a home town, my point is moot
Because Taking The Leafs Seriously Is Not An Option
by JaredFromLondon on May 6, 2009 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions
I’ve seen it happen twice. Lived in Calgary in 1980 and Ottawa in 1992. The fever takes hold and does it quick.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
I believe in this in a big way.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure!
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 6, 2009 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree with you on that. If I lived in Columber or Atlanta when those franchises showed up, I would have immediately bought season tickets and been a huge supporter. But then again, I’m a die hard hockey fan, and I’m sure most of you would have done the same thing.
Wings fan by birth. Leafs fan by empathetic association.
no, id buy season tickets and sell off the games that didnt involve the Leafs or other teams with players i wanted to see live (Penguins, Washington, Detroit) and even those would be up to the highest bidder on a whim (except the leafs)
Because Taking The Leafs Seriously Is Not An Option
by JaredFromLondon on May 6, 2009 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions
i dont
i am more stubborn than granite
Because Taking The Leafs Seriously Is Not An Option
by JaredFromLondon on May 6, 2009 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Age is a factor, though. The 25-year-olds furcifer hangs with would have been 7-8 when the Sens came around. I was 10 when the Flames arrived.
Had I been 40, would I have been as much of a fan? Can’t say.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
true, were i a young pup when said team came, i cannot say. it is easy for youngins to get caught up in the hype especially if they are told something is THEIRS.
Because Taking The Leafs Seriously Is Not An Option
by JaredFromLondon on May 6, 2009 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions
If you’re in a city that doesn’t have a major-league team, you’re always rooting for someone else’s team. The prospect of your own team isn’t something to sneeze at. There’s a pull there, whether folks want to admit it or not.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
i dont disagree, just for me personally, unless i was wronged by the Leafs on some epic life changing level, there is no way I would shed my allegiance
Because Taking The Leafs Seriously Is Not An Option
by JaredFromLondon on May 6, 2009 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Now, I’m presuming that this goes to a city that always wanted a team – say Hamilton. If this goes to Vaughan or Mississauga, then they’re just a Mets to the Yankees and I see less pull.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
I’d like DGB’s take on that. Most of the Sens fans I know are around my age (25) so they never really had an allegiance to another team.
A Nation of Masochists a blog dedicated to Leafs Nation, who are continually punished but keep coming back for more.
I don’t know. At the age of 5, I knew that the Leafs were the way to go, and the Habs were not. And the Leafs weren’t exactly great at the time.
"If rubbing frozen dirt in your crotch is wrong, hey, I don't wanna be right."
my dad thought me that the Leafs were “the team” and I have been following them ever since
Mee-Mee-Meep Meep Go Leafs Go Meep Meep! MEEP!!!
by blindfolded tank driver on May 6, 2009 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions
You know… I can’t even figure out how I became such a die hard Leafs fan. My brother’s a fan and I would watch sports with him, but I’d say I’m about 10X more passionate about the Leafs than he is now.
by Karina on May 6, 2009 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions
I became a Leafs fan at age 9. I moved to Canada when I was 5 and only really started watching any sports when I was 9 starting with the Jays during the 1993 season. They won the World Series that year and I sort of expected the Leafs to do the same.
A Nation of Masochists a blog dedicated to Leafs Nation, who are continually punished but keep coming back for more.
I think that some would buy them for another team but still be Leafs fans.
Some will obviously convert immediately, some will convert over time.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on May 6, 2009 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions
great idea.
A Nation of Masochists a blog dedicated to Leafs Nation, who are continually punished but keep coming back for more.
However, if they are stuck in the Western conference, you’ll only get to see the Leafs once every two years.
they’d get the Canadian team deal that the Western teams get 3 games per season no matter what
Mee-Mee-Meep Meep Go Leafs Go Meep Meep! MEEP!!!
by blindfolded tank driver on May 6, 2009 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah
They’d probably change it so that they met at least once. But I think that it would be a huge temptation to get the team playing against Buffalo, Ottawa, and Toronto as often as possible.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on May 6, 2009 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions
especially if they are hoping for higher revenues.
Mee-Mee-Meep Meep Go Leafs Go Meep Meep! MEEP!!!
by blindfolded tank driver on May 6, 2009 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions
They’d have to do a re-allignment eventually. Imagine our division? Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal, Buffalo and Ontario. Boston would move to the Atlantic etc. Atlanta would be the Western most team and would have to move West.
A Nation of Masochists a blog dedicated to Leafs Nation, who are continually punished but keep coming back for more.
I think they’d do a more thorough re-alignment. Possibly move Detroit and Columbus east too.
Mee-Mee-Meep Meep Go Leafs Go Meep Meep! MEEP!!!
by blindfolded tank driver on May 6, 2009 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions
They’d have to maintain the balance though. I don’t want Detroit in the East. I’d like the Leafs to eventually win our division.
A Nation of Masochists a blog dedicated to Leafs Nation, who are continually punished but keep coming back for more.
Getting repeatedly pummelled by the Red Wings has helped every other team in that division.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on May 6, 2009 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions
for selfish reasons, I understand that detroit in the east would hinder the Leafs success, but it makes more sense to me to play the red wings over the thrashers. And Columbus gets jobbed by being the most eastern team in the western conference, the proximetry to the pens would make a better rivalry option and drive interest
Mee-Mee-Meep Meep Go Leafs Go Meep Meep! MEEP!!!
by blindfolded tank driver on May 6, 2009 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions
problem is
Dallas was promised a division change when it was feasable.
They’re in the Pacific division, without a single team in their division playing in the same time zone.
Columbus also gets the shaft, and Nashville, and Detroit, or at least, their fans do when it comes to away games.
I see more teams in the west, like Vegas, Kansas City and such before that happens. I’m also VERY curious to see how the league handles the NYI situation. It’s looking less and less like that team is going to be sticking around…
"Ninety percent of the game is half mental."
The Left Coast Lock
by blurr1974 on May 6, 2009 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions
oddly the Phoenix problem has overshadowed their problem a bit…time will tell if they survive. What they need is a newer rink, where the team could make some money
Mee-Mee-Meep Meep Go Leafs Go Meep Meep! MEEP!!!
by blindfolded tank driver on May 6, 2009 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Losing Detroit as a rival was the worst thing that happened to Toronto. Gaining Montreal and Ottawa is nothing by comparison. I’d take Detroit in the east in a heartbeat. Those were the best games the Leafs played, bar none.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
even when the leafs are shit and detroit is a force, there never seems to be a domination either
Because Taking The Leafs Seriously Is Not An Option
by JaredFromLondon on May 6, 2009 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions
As a Wings fan first, I would love it if the Wings moved into the Eastern Conference. The rivalry with Colorado is dead and when they play on the West Coast, most of the games are too late for me to watch and against teams I don’t care/know about.
Seeing them play 4 or so games a year against the Leafs would be awesome. (Chemmy would say that’s awesome because the Leafs would win every game, a la the first game of the season.)
Wings fan by birth. Leafs fan by empathetic association.
Wings need to stay west
Sorry. As much as I’d love to see the Leafs every year…I think the Chicago-Detroit rivalry will soon trump any one we might have with the Leafs. Not to mention the dormant rivalry we have with the Blues that I can also see heating up with that young St. Louis team as well as the natural Michigan-Ohio St….I mean, Wings/Jackets rivalry.
What they need to do is just change the schedule to have the east and west teams play home and home series EVERY year. Because, really, the Leafs are probably the only East team Detroit fans would really care about seeing every year.
The only solution is the revive the Norris.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
As much as I think Bettman would not want this to go through
I don’t think the NHL has much of a choice. If they reject Balsillie’s (sp?) offer, who else is going to buy the Coyotes? I think this is, really, their only chance of saving the franchise.
I also heard that Balsillie bought an empty lot in Cambridge, which I heard is outside the region where he would have to pay the Leafs to hold a team, when he was trying to buy the Predators back in ’07. Is this true?
I heard that too, seems like a conspiracy theory though.
Thanks for joining!
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Faraway brought that up on the FAN this afternoon. Somebody emailed him that the land in question is essentially earmarked for manufacturing purposes.
Good update. I’d guess that land has more to do with expanding RIM.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on May 6, 2009 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Welcome
Thanks for joining. I have no idea if that story is true but one rumour I heard was along those same lines: that Balsillie was going to get around the territorial rights by building in Cambridge because it’s just out of both the Sabres and Leafs’ territories.
The problem there is that getting to the rink would be impossible and he’d be cutting the team off from the huge population base which is the entire reason behind putting another team in SWO.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on May 6, 2009 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions
the best location for the rink would be between KW and Guelph, there is a ton of unused land there, plus you could put easy access of the 401
Because Taking The Leafs Seriously Is Not An Option
by JaredFromLondon on May 6, 2009 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions
They’d also want a place easily accessible by public transportation (in that case the GO)
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on May 6, 2009 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah, but that isnt likely to happen unless they build it somewhere north of TO
Because Taking The Leafs Seriously Is Not An Option
by JaredFromLondon on May 6, 2009 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s pretty much right where Cambridge is (well, the part of Cambridge that’s close to the 401). While there’s no GO line that far out – although there are persistent rumors of one coming to Kitchener this fall – there’s a very frequent Greyhound service, which I’m sure could be modified for his purposes. Add a high-capacity road from the nearest 401 exit and a lot of parking and you’re sorted.
As for the land (assuming it exists) being for RIM offices, I doubt it. Check out their corporate map – the location of the main RIM campus is pretty obvious, and the area up near what’s indicated as RIM 22 is where they’re building a few new buildings (which you can find noted in the KW Record). There’s no reason for them to put offices in Cambridge.
And if push comes to shove, the land being zoned as manufacturing won’t be an issue (unless it’s surrounded by other factories, which I doubt he would buy) – the man’s got a good record in the community and a solid business plan, not to mention that there are no residents to object – so getting a variance shouldn’t be hard.
by FutureMrStronach on May 6, 2009 7:58 PM EDT up reply actions
A post about the Cambridge land from ’07
The Cambridge Times article it links to no longer work and I couldn’t find anything on their website regarding the land sale. Still looking though.
Wings fan by birth. Leafs fan by empathetic association.
If the description of the location is right, I would wager that it’s probably the plot of land shown in the upper-right of this map, SW of Pinebrush and Townline, which also goes with the line above about it being zoned for manufacturing (looks like light industry up there). Could be the green area south of Can-Am, but that’s forest in between two subdivisions – it’s probably owned by the developer, and even if it wasn’t, there’s no way you’d be allowed/want to build an area there.
If that’s it, it’s a good connection to the 401, although they’d have to widen up Townline a few lanes. Highway bridge could be a problem, but it looks like it’s three lanes, which is OK.
by FutureMrStronach on May 6, 2009 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Any urban planners on this board? (Karina might be the closest we come, sorry if that’s considered a professional disparagement). I can’t imagine it’s hard to get land re-zoned when you’re talking about a major infrastructure project like a professional hockey rink.
Bitter Leaf Fan: a life-long Toronto Maple Leafs fan comments on the team, the media and the exasperation...
I’d be much more supportive of Balsillie if he wanted this team somewhere else in Canada. “Fans” of the Leafs are ditching the Leafs and already jumping on the bandwagon
A Nation of Masochists a blog dedicated to Leafs Nation, who are continually punished but keep coming back for more.
Good riddance to the bandwagon.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Amen
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on May 6, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions
as a coach i once had said ’If you aint willing to bleed for this team, then be prepared to bleed because this team"
Because Taking The Leafs Seriously Is Not An Option
by JaredFromLondon on May 6, 2009 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions
thats a good thing, the best thing the Senators ever did was rid us of those ner-do-wells
Because Taking The Leafs Seriously Is Not An Option
by JaredFromLondon on May 6, 2009 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions
A few things:
1. If the hypothetical team is situated outside of the Leafs’ and Sabres territorial rights, I’m not sure what power or influence MLSE or the Sabres even have. If the team is in the GTA the Leafs have a case and precedence for compensation from previous franchise relocations in Anaheim, Long Island and New Jersey, but if it’s in Guelph? I don’t see them having anyting more than one lone voice at the table.
.
2. Speaking of lone voices…the Leafs have never been able to rally any teams to support them. The Leafs lost on pushing for an early end to the lock-out, the Leafs lost on having franchises control their web-sites and there has been open friction between Betteman and Tannenbaum at NHL governor meetings in the past. I wouldn’t be surprised if more team’s rally to support another team in Ontario just to dilute the Leafs’ standing and stick it to one of the wealthiest teams and best known brands in hockey.
3. There is near insatiable demand for pro-hockey in Southern Ontario. With over seven million people, the golden horseshoe has 2.5x the population of the greater Montreal area and about the same population as the entire province of Quebec. It is the corporate capital of Canada. That’s a massive amount of people to market to and draw on. Case in point, when Balsillie put tickets and suites up for sale at Copps, they sold 64 of the 70 luxury suites in two days.
The Leafs may not like a third team in Ontario, but I don’t know that they’ll have much of a say in stopping it.
Bitter Leaf Fan: a life-long Toronto Maple Leafs fan comments on the team, the media and the exasperation...
Fair, but I don’t think Bettman wants to let Balsillie into the old boys club and Toronto’s displeasure with this move combined with Bettman’s dislike for Balsillie will probably prevent this from happening.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Yeah, I don’t think Betteman wants Balisillie either, which is a bad move for hockey. It’s not like there are many billionaire hockey fans clamouring for a team. Sadly, I think that’s enough to keep Canada from getting a 7th team.
Bitter Leaf Fan: a life-long Toronto Maple Leafs fan comments on the team, the media and the exasperation...

by 
























