Pension Plan Puppets: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Interview With UMD Athletic Director, Dr. Debbie Yow

The Trouble with Scoring?

Editor's Note: This is an excellent Fanpost with a great breakdown of the issue at hand. For once my halfwit roommate does something good with his life. Enjoy! ps. Suck it Burnside we've got your number.

ESPN's recent 2009-2010 NHL power rankings marks the umpteenth time the Leafs' supposed inability to light the lamp has been mentioned this off-season.  Amazingly, this continues to happen even with our benevolent overlords PPP and Chemmy pointing to statistics which say the Leafs have no scoring problem; as they finished 10th in the league last year.  But then the mitten stringers point to the losses of Nik Antropov, Dominic Moore, and Pavel Kubina and ask the question, "How will the Leafs make up for the goals those guys had?"

Well I'm here to answer that one.  After the jump, I'll use the wonderful powers of "The Internet" to track down some elusive "statistics" that the MSM can never seem to find in order to make my case that the Leafs should have no problem finding the back of the net this season.

Star-divide

Below is a chart showing the current Maple Leafs' roster (which can be found here); and their goals, assists, and points from the 2008-2009 season. (Stats found on hockeydb.com)  Let's have a look shall we?

 

Current TML Roster G A P
Jason Blake   25 38 63
Tyler Bozak   0 0 0
Mikhail Grabovski   20 28 48
Niklas Hagman   22 20 42
Phil Kessel   36 24 60
Nikolai Kulemin   15 16 31
Jamal Mayers   7 9 16
John Mitchell   12 17 29
Colton Orr   1 4 5
Alexei Ponikarovsky   23 38 61
Wayne Primeau   0 4 4
Jay Rosehill   0 0 0
Matt Stajan   14 40 54
Viktor Stalberg   0 0 0
Lee Stempniak   14 30 44
Jiri Tlusty   0 4 4
Rickard Wallin   0 0 0
Francois Beauchemin   4 1 5
Garnet Exelby   0 7 7
Jeff Finger   6 17 23
Carl Gunnarsson   0 0 0
Tomas Kaberle 4 27 31
Michael Komisarek   2 9 11
Luke Schenn   2 12 14
Mike Van Ryn   3 8 11
Ian White   10 16 26
       
Team Totals 220 369 589

Ok, so 220 goals for this current Maple Leafs' roster.  According to NHL.com, that would rank them tied for 21st in the league with Columbus (a playoff team in 08-09).  That's not very good.  But wait, this chart has different colors on it.  What do those mean?

Those players highlighted in blue did not play in the NHL last year, and therefore have no previous stats to their name.  While either rookies, 3rd line defensive forwards, or defensemen; none of them will probably score more than 20 goals, but let's for say that they have the following seasons with Gunnarsson and Rosehill going to the Marlies:

  G A P
Tyler Bozak   9 24 33
Viktor Stalberg   12 17 39
Rickard Wallin   5 12 17

I don't think that's an unreasonable guess at the point production of these players do you?

Then we look at the players in green.  For these players, they either had shortened seasons last year due to injury or split time in the AHL.  Therefore, this year with a full healthy season in the NHL, their numbers should improve.  What would that look like?

  G A P
Niklas Hagman   30 25 55
Wayne Primeau   4 12 16
Jiri Tlusty   8 12 20
Francois Beauchemin   6 15 21
Garnet Exelby   2 10 12
Tomas Kaberle 7 32 39

I think Hagman has a great year, if healthy, and finds his stride on the 1st line turning him into a 30 goal scorer; Tlusty splits times with the Marlies, and the defence chip in a few here or there with Beauchemin getting bonus goals on the PP.

Then there are those in red.  Due to Kessel's injury, loss of at least two months, and without Savard as his setup man, his numbers will come down a bit.  Also, Kulemin looks to be splitting his time with the Marlies this year, resulting in a decrease in scoring for the club. Probably to something like this.

  G A P
Phil Kessel   28 16 44
Nikolai Kulemin   7 9 16

Now these might be a bit low, but I want to be conservative in my estimations.

For the players in white, I see no reason why they should be unable to replicate their numbers from the previous season.  Blake seems to have found new life at 36; and Poni and Grabs are near locks to get 20 goals again this year.  So with the new point totals, what does the Leafs' current roster look like?

2009 TML Roster G A P
Jason Blake   25 38 63
Tyler Bozak   9 24 33
Mikhail Grabovski   20 28 48
Niklas Hagman   30 25 55
Phil Kessel   28 16 44
Nikolai Kulemin   7 9 16
Jamal Mayers   7 9 16
John Mitchell   12 17 29
Colton Orr   1 4 5
Alexei Ponikarovsky   23 38 61
Wayne Primeau   4 12 16
Matt Stajan   14 40 54
Viktor Stalberg   12 17 29
Lee Stempniak   14 30 44
Jiri Tlusty   8 12 20
Rickard Wallin   5 12 17
Francois Beauchemin   6 15 21
Garnet Exelby   2 10 12
Jeff Finger   6 17 23
Tomas Kaberle 7 32 39
Michael Komisarek   2 9 11
Luke Schenn   2 12 14
Mike Van Ryn   3 8 11
Ian White   10 16 26
       
Team Totals 257 450 707

(Note:  Assists are a bit inflated, probably down around 400 in reality.)

(Author Edit:  Note:  SPECULATION!!!!!!!1  Seriously, I thought for like 15 minutes on these numbers and shit.)

So 257 goals is what I ended up with.  That puts the Leafs 13 goals ahead of last season's total of 244 (10th in the league), and into 7th place in the league; just behind Pittsburgh and ahead of San Jose.

Surprising?

It shouldn't be.  Teams like Philadelphia (5th) Washington (3rd), teams that nobody questions the offenses of, are loaded with top tier talent, but see a drastic drop off in goal production from the 3rd and 4th liners.  Toronto, on the other hand, lacks superstar goal scorers but has a more even distribution in goal scoring among its players; much like Detroit and Boston who led the league in scoring last year.

So enough of this nonsense about the nonexistent Maple Leafs offense.  They can find the back of the net with the best of them.  And to answer the question "Where will the goals come from?"  Everyone.

Poll
How many goals do you see the Leafs scoring this year?
The same as last year or more than last year.
164 votes
Fewer than last year.
23 votes
This isn't a goal scoring competition
34 votes

221 votes | Poll has closed

PensionPlanPuppets.com is a fan community that allows members to post their own thoughts and opinions on the Toronto Maple Leafs and hockey in general. These views and thoughts may not be shared by the editor of PensionPlanPuppets.com.

0 recs  |  Comment 74 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Pension Plan Puppets

Maple Leafs 2 - Sharks 3

Feb 2010 by SkinnyFish - 187 comments

1984-85 Team - Bill Derlago

Feb 2010 by 1967ers - 8 comments

Maple Leafs 5 v. Senators 0

Feb 2010 by PPP - 30 comments

Comments

Display:

I think your pretty spot on, but I’d give beauchemin a higher point total. He is going to get a lot of power play time this year and that should inflate his point totals

Refusing To Bow To Your Standards Since 2006

by JaredFromLondon on Sep 29, 2009 2:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

you’re probably spot on with Bozak, depending on how limited he is on games played. I’m thinking Stalberg might have a shot at 20 goals if he stays on the top line and continues to produce as he has in the pre-season.

"Sanity is not statistical." - George Orwell, a Leafs fan...
Stalk me here...

by blurr1974 on Sep 29, 2009 2:08 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I voted 275 + because of our historical consistency in outperforming offensive predictions, and the fact that we blew everyone else away in pre-season scoring, which is a reasonable buttress to our scoring improving this year. Plus Kessel. Plus Stalberg.

"We've had an ongoing problem with Grabovski this year." Bob Gainey, 4/04/09

by kidkawartha on Sep 29, 2009 2:11 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I voted the same because I am nervous but I would point out that Beauchemin’s numbers could be pretty low considering he’ll be on PP 1 and Kaberle’s represent about 0.5ppg when he’s a career 0.75ppg player so those could increase.

If the Leafs completely blow that out of the water however I wouldn’t be surprised either. They’ve had an avg pp for the past 3 years so a good one could bump them up a few spots.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Sep 29, 2009 2:18 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

if it’s anything like it was in the pre-season, then i’m not holding my breath

"Sanity is not statistical." - George Orwell, a Leafs fan...
Stalk me here...

by blurr1974 on Sep 29, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

who, Beauchemin or Kaberle?

"Life is just a place where we spend time between games. Hockey is where we live, where we can best meet and overcome pain and wrong and death." - Fred Shero

by Karina on Sep 29, 2009 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

oh wait

you mean the PP.

I am dumb today.

"Life is just a place where we spend time between games. Hockey is where we live, where we can best meet and overcome pain and wrong and death." - Fred Shero

by Karina on Sep 29, 2009 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I thought it was humming at certain points. A lot of forwards that’ll never see the PP saw PP time though and Beauchemin and Kaberle didn’t play all of the games.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Sep 29, 2009 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah it’s hard to gauge Beauchemin’s PP numbers because he wasn’t on the first PP unit in Anaheim because of Pronger.

Kabby’s assists might be low, but I think his goals are pretty much what they will be. This isn’t an assist making competition. :P

Wings fan by birth. Leafs fan by truculent osmosis.

by SkinnyFish on Sep 29, 2009 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you were spot on with Beauchemin, skinnyfish. Besides, if Beachemin does struggle to match the point totals you predicted above, I think Kulemin makes up the difference, since his point totals seem to be on the low side of the ledger.

Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell

by bkblades on Sep 29, 2009 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is it fair to say that what the mittenstringers really mean but are too stupid to say is that the Leafs don’t have a superstar scorer and/or offensive line that when the chips are down can often score the crucial goals?

Then again, very few teams have that so that isn’t even a fair criticism. A little more understandable from a fan’s perspective perhaps, but not from reporters who should, in theory, know what they are talking about.

Some of these projections will obviously be a bit off in real life but I wouldn’t be surprised to see them score at about the same pace they did last year. The key scoring-wise (leaving aside the defensive and goaltending aspects for now) is will the team deliver consistent and timely scoring. I think someone pointed this out recently in another post, but that’s the real issue… I think everyone remembers last year some times when the Leafs were rolling offensively and then the next game they couldn’t get that tying goal to save their lives.

Anyway, count on the so-called “experts” to only deliver superficial analysis and be too lazy to dig a little to get the real story.

Being a Leaf fan here requires one to be sufficiently lubricated... and truculent!

by stucky on Sep 29, 2009 2:44 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

the Leafs

do have a superstar scorer, or at least one in the making… Phil Kessel.

"Life is just a place where we spend time between games. Hockey is where we live, where we can best meet and overcome pain and wrong and death." - Fred Shero

by Karina on Sep 29, 2009 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

But I think these “experts” are focusing on the “in the making” part… or at least are trotting out the line “he won’t be as good without Savard setting him up”.

Being a Leaf fan here requires one to be sufficiently lubricated... and truculent!

by stucky on Sep 29, 2009 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And Savard won’t be as good without Kessel on his line.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Sep 29, 2009 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Funny

You don’t hear anyone else saying that do you?

Being a Leaf fan here requires one to be sufficiently lubricated... and truculent!

by stucky on Sep 29, 2009 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That argument doesn’t disparage the Leafs, so…

Resident Capologist

by clrkaitken on Sep 29, 2009 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

SO TRUE

honestly, when Savard has has his best seasons, he’s been playing with a superstar winger- Kovalchuk, Kessel…. Sturm will replace some of Kessel’s scoring, but I honestly don’t think Savard can top 90 points again.

"Life is just a place where we spend time between games. Hockey is where we live, where we can best meet and overcome pain and wrong and death." - Fred Shero

by Karina on Sep 29, 2009 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Savard will have a good season, if Lucic can continue to improve his offensive game, but without a sniper like Kessel, yeah, he isnt going reach those heights again

Refusing To Bow To Your Standards Since 2006

by JaredFromLondon on Sep 29, 2009 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Savard had two good seasons with Murray and Sturm I think.

Always liked Glen Murray btw.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Sep 29, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, he played with those two and Axelsson for the two seasons before Kessel.

Wings fan by birth. Leafs fan by truculent osmosis.

by SkinnyFish on Sep 29, 2009 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Savard was even decent in Calgary, the knock on him was never about skill, it was about defensive responsibility. That’s why Sutter personally drove him to the airport out of Calgary.

"Sanity is not statistical." - George Orwell, a Leafs fan...
Stalk me here...

by blurr1974 on Sep 29, 2009 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm

forgot about him.

"Life is just a place where we spend time between games. Hockey is where we live, where we can best meet and overcome pain and wrong and death." - Fred Shero

by Karina on Sep 29, 2009 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Too bad about Murray, he seemed to have gotten jerked around, with the ankle kerfuffle.

He had a couple years left in him.

by Ando Rich on Sep 29, 2009 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, Muzz ruled.

Where’s CH? If anyone sees him let me know so we can all delete our pro-Bruins comments.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Sep 29, 2009 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

BRUINS SUCK!

Refusing To Bow To Your Standards Since 2006

by JaredFromLondon on Sep 29, 2009 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bruins do suck.

They basically cut then bought out an injured player which violates the PA big time. Muzz got the Beantown bump.

Murray, pro
Bruins, CON.

by Ando Rich on Sep 29, 2009 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh sorry I had work. And now I’ve read them.

Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Sep 30, 2009 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Savard wont be nearly as good without a kessel or kovalchuk on his line.

There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"

by Matt_Roberts on Sep 29, 2009 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Depends on if Blake Wheeler steps up or not.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Sep 29, 2009 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And if he does, watch out.

Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Sep 30, 2009 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Totally. How many times has a double-edged sword comment been made by the MSr’s only for the blade to land squarely under the Leafs knees.

Because Matt Stajan could only benefit from playing with Nik n’ Poni and not the other way around. Right?

by Ando Rich on Sep 29, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

That is exactly what they are trying to say. The Leafs do not have problems with scoring. They have problems with consistent scoring. They can go 3 games in a row with 1 goal and then score 24 over 4 games. But that’s nuance, that’s subtlety, and that’s lacking.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Sep 29, 2009 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Consistency is stupid. I mean of course if your team averages 4 goals a game and only gives up 3.85 a game and every game you did exactly that you’d go 98-0 on your way to winning the Cup but even teams with elite scorers don’t score sometimes. Pittsburgh sometimes only scores one goal. Gasp! Shock! Horror!

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Sep 29, 2009 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Max Talbot : HERO FOR LIFE

by Ando Rich on Sep 29, 2009 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is exactly right. I’m not sure the evidence would bear out any unusual “inconsistency” with the Leafs scoring compared to other teams.

And as to the “lack of a superstar to score when the chips are down”, aren’t one-dimensional teams reliant on one or two top stars the easiest to shut down with a good checking line come playoffs? Isn’t that what Ottawa always fell prey to (going back to the job Corson did on Yashin) and why they’re constantly bemoaning a lack of secondary scoring?

Look, it’s great to be able to roll out two lines with superstar players (Zetterberg & Datsyuk, Malkin & Crosby) plus a good supporting cast, but for the rest of the league I’ll take the Leafs’ balanced scoring over top-heavy, star-driven teams favoured by the media any day. I mean, have you looked at the third lines of some of the teams universally expected to trounce the Leafs in the standings? Pretty grim.

by The '67 Sound on Sep 29, 2009 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Number of 20 goal scorers for 10 top teams 08-09:

Detroit – 5
Boston – 6 (5 with Kessel)
Washington – 5
Chicago – 5
Philadelphia – 6
Pittsburgh – 4
San Jose – 6
Calgary – 5
Atlanta – 5
Toronto – 5

Add in Kessel and potentially Stalberg and you have 7 for Toronto.

Wings fan by birth. Leafs fan by truculent osmosis.

by SkinnyFish on Sep 29, 2009 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The first year after the lockout the Leafs had something like 10 players score 10 goals, the next closest team had like 7.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Sep 29, 2009 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That’s something I remembered and am pulling out of my ass for the record.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Sep 29, 2009 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

12

Sundin, Tucker, Ponikarovsky, O’Neill, McCabe, Steen, Kilger, Allison, Stajan, Antropov, Wellwood, Lindros

Resident Capologist

by clrkaitken on Sep 29, 2009 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

id say every player on the leafs forward roster except Premeau , rosehill and orr have the capability to score at least 10.
Including bozak, kulemin and tlusty

Refusing To Bow To Your Standards Since 2006

by JaredFromLondon on Sep 29, 2009 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

10 goal scorers

Last year the Leafs had 12.

Wings – 11
Bruins – 10
Caps – 9
Hawks – 10
Flyers – 7
Pens – 11
Sharks – 10
Flames – 11
Thrashers – 7

Wings fan by birth. Leafs fan by truculent osmosis.

by SkinnyFish on Sep 29, 2009 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think that would be six

Unless you wanted to trade back for Antropov.

by Pat Verbeek on Sep 29, 2009 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

touche

Wings fan by birth. Leafs fan by truculent osmosis.

by SkinnyFish on Sep 29, 2009 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

 Fuck ESPN. Tampa is 10th. What does that say about their credability?

by 6rick6 on Sep 29, 2009 4:21 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Generally I agree with this sentiment

But I think there’s a bit of a problem with assuming White replicates his 10 goal season from last year since most of his goals were scored as a forward last season.

Also, if you take it as a given that Blake, Stajan, Hagman, Grabovski, Kessel, and Ponikarovsky are locks for the top 6, and that their production is unlikely to waver, I’m not sure how you can argue that Stempniak, Bozak, Stalberg, Tlusty, Kulemin, Mitchell, Wallin, Primeau, Orr, and Mayers combine for a total of 79 goals.

Minutes were provided to players last season based on those injuries that dropped production… which is why Mitchell got the opportunity to score 17, and why Kulemin managed to score 15… I just don’t think those guys will all step up with more production unless someone goes down with injury, and thus loses some of their goals in the process.

You’re also over-estimating the contribution of Wayne Primeau by a wide margin, probably over estimating the contribution of Bozak if he’s starting the year with the Marlies, and I think under-estimating Kulemin and Grabovski.

In the end the total likely won’t be far from your number, so yes I think ESPN is idiotic.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve@Leafs.HockeyAnalysis.com on Sep 29, 2009 4:29 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

sorry I mean 12

for Mitchell

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve@Leafs.HockeyAnalysis.com on Sep 29, 2009 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Players on the 3rd and 4th line don’t score goals?

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Sep 29, 2009 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

At least not a full 1/3 of a teams total goals…..wait……yeah they do. Especially on a team with a more even distribution of goals like the Leafs. See above; 12 players with 10 or more goals last year. Losses of Antro and Moore replaced with Kessel and Stalberg.

Wings fan by birth. Leafs fan by truculent osmosis.

by SkinnyFish on Sep 29, 2009 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You can't

drop Antropov and replace him with Kessel and then say you have 12 players with 10 or more goals. Kessel basically replaces Antropov… which means it’s down to 11… plus one of those players was a Defender who is pretty unlikely to suit up as a forward this eason… so that’s back down to 10. Then you’ve got to wonder if Kulemin drops off because of his falling out of the top 6 if he hit’s 10 this season… that’s 9 players. If StÃ¥lberg replaces Moore that’s fine, but then I’m not sure how we explain Tlusty and Bozak combining for 17 goals without getting minutes?

As I said before, I’m not sure I disagree with your final total… by much… I just don’t think all of it makes sense to me.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve@Leafs.HockeyAnalysis.com on Sep 29, 2009 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pancake

Wings fan by birth. Leafs fan by truculent osmosis.

by SkinnyFish on Sep 29, 2009 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes teams on line 3 and 4 score goals

Yanno the burr under your saddles over the Toskala thing is a bit obvious, but I digress.

My point is that I don’t see Stempniak, Bozak, StÃ¥lberg, Tlusty and Kulemin all playing on those 3rd and 4th lines as mentioned. Since the only way they’re likely to see many minutes and thus produce at all would be a result of injuries to the top 6 we already settled upon, then that kind of produces a problematic result in the total for either one set or the other.

As for Wayne Primeau, Jamal Mayers, Colton Orr, or Jay Rosehill scoring goals… I wouldn’t expect them to produce a combination of 17, after last year combining for 8… when 7 of those came from Mayers… who was getting minutes on a less deep Leafs forward unit.

I didn’t say the 79 goals should be ZERO goals, I just said I thought 79 was high.

If you think that Bozak, Kulemin, StÃ¥lberg, Tlusty and Stempniak are combining for 50 goals, but they’re all slated to be on the top 2 lines other than Stempniak… yeah it doesn’t make much sense.

Last year the fill in’s for injured Leafs were coming from within also, and you’re ignoring the fact that Tim Stapleton, Boyd Devereaux, Jeremy Williams, Jiri Tlusty, Jeff Hamilton, and Christian Hanson, combined to score a measly 16 goals last season in their limited opportunity.

You’re basically saying this years fill ins will outperform last year’s by 312.5%. That’s a bit of a drastic increase wouldn’t you say? Especially when one could reasonably argue that Tlusty and Hanson are still likely to be two of those fill ins? You’ve replaced Deveraux, Williams, Hamilton, and Stapleton with Bozak, StÃ¥lberg, Kulemin as Kessel has dropped Kulemin out of the top 6. I just don’t think a tripling in that production is likely.

A doubling is more realistic to me.. but that’s just like my opinion… man.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve@Leafs.HockeyAnalysis.com on Sep 29, 2009 5:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Just to be fair

When I looked at this same topic back in mid August, I ended up with a total that was 15 higher, not 13 higher… so I’m not in disagreement with the final total (as I originally stated).

But my projection for Wallin, Tlusty, and Bozak was 10 EACH. That was in August when I figured Tlusty and Bozak would make the team… now they’ve added Kessel, and Tlusty didn’t look so great in training camp. I’d rachet that back a bit, and hope the 3 of them could combine for 25.

I suggested StÃ¥lberg would hit 5 to 10… I think he might hit 10 to 15 after the camp he had and how good he looked, but to be reasonable I’ll say 10. Then I suggested Hanson, Stefanovich, and Slaney might add 5 to 10 more as a group, but given the depth, I’d say those are likely to drop down to 5 or less. So where before I had between 40 and 45, I’m coming in closer to 40.

Kessel also displaces Kulemin, whom I was projecting to score 20. Stempniak was supposed to put in 19, but now he’s on the 3rd line. So I think I have to go back to 15 for both… which drops 10 off my total. So since I was at an increase of 15, but I just lost 15 from my projection… I’m back down to last season’s numbers. I also think Kessel’s PP time will dig into the production of a few players (i.e. Blake and/or Hagman)… so we’ll see if they can actually keep the totals up.

Either way… like I said… they should at least score to a similar level, I just don’t know if I’m on board with the dissection as it was made.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve@Leafs.HockeyAnalysis.com on Sep 29, 2009 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

John McCain

Wings fan by birth. Leafs fan by truculent osmosis.

by SkinnyFish on Sep 29, 2009 9:18 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

you sir, are a treasure

Refusing To Bow To Your Standards Since 2006

by JaredFromLondon on Sep 29, 2009 9:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL
Yanno the burr under your saddles over the Toskala thing is a bit obvious, but I digress.

At least these arguments are consistent with your previously held beliefs and not written for the sake of playing Devil’s Advocate.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Sep 29, 2009 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ast year the fill in’s for injured Leafs were coming from within also, and you’re ignoring the fact that Tim Stapleton, Boyd Devereaux, Jeremy Williams, Jiri Tlusty, Jeff Hamilton, and Christian Hanson, combined to score a measly 16 goals last season in their limited opportunity.

Hanson played 5 games so including him is pretty funny.

One thing I’d point out is that the players stepping in (Kulemin, Bozak, Stalberg) are much better than the ones that those you’ve listed.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Sep 29, 2009 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure

how one can say they’re better without seeing them in much NHL action.

Kulemin and Tlusty have both played in the NHL for a season and neither one has lit it up a tonne yet. As for Hanson getting 5 games, that’s more than Stapleton’s 4. Devereaux, Williams, and Hamilton played 23, 11, and 14 games respectively.

If Bozak scores 9 goals in 23 games, then he shouldn’t only be playing 23 games. Similarly Williams had 5 goals in 11 games which is pretty damn good… so if we assume Tlusty can match that pace, then that’s ok. Kulemin and Hanson should be better than 3 goals in 15 games like Hamilton… so I guess there’d be an improvement on that front… but overall I don’t think it would be more than 5 to 10 goals.

I don’t know why we’d include

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve@Leafs.HockeyAnalysis.com on Sep 29, 2009 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bunny

Wings fan by birth. Leafs fan by truculent osmosis.

by SkinnyFish on Sep 29, 2009 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm confused

Maybe this was explained somewhere and I missed it, but you have 24 players listed there. I know you have more than 18 skaters listed in last years list too, but is the final predication based on 1476 (18 × 82) total games from players (not goalies)? It looks like it’s 24 players all playing 82 games, which is impossible. I’m kind of tired, so sorry if I missed something.

I still voted for same or more goals than last year.

by Screaming Will on Sep 29, 2009 7:51 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

No, some of the guys with low totals; Bozak, Tlusty, Kulemin, and a couple of the defense I figured would split time between the Leafs and Marlies. Either due to poor play by those above them, or injuries.

Wings fan by birth. Leafs fan by truculent osmosis.

by SkinnyFish on Sep 29, 2009 9:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks,
I figured you’d accounted for that somewhere.

by Screaming Will on Sep 30, 2009 5:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Trouble with Scoring

Is that it’s full of Scores

I'm not even supposed to be here today..!

by Shield on Sep 29, 2009 8:10 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Now I’m humming Bruce Cockburn songs. Thanks, Shield!
(he was great live here in Peterborough in April)

"We've had an ongoing problem with Grabovski this year." Bob Gainey, 4/04/09

by kidkawartha on Sep 29, 2009 8:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Braveheart reference fail.

I'm not even supposed to be here today..!

by Shield on Sep 29, 2009 10:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, I caught it Shield. It just ear-wormed me with this-
http://www.cockburnproject.net/songs&music/ttwn.html

"We've had an ongoing problem with Grabovski this year." Bob Gainey, 4/04/09

by kidkawartha on Sep 29, 2009 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The trouble with Scotland…is that it’s full of Scotts.

Awesome movie, douchebag character.

Boo hoo!

by sparrow13 on Sep 29, 2009 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m not really concerned about our scoring. I worry about the ability of the team to defend, support each other in each zone, eliminate the constant barrage of odd man rushes, and maybe just maybe finally get decent goaltending for the firs time in too long. I figure the goals will be around 250 or so. If they keep the GA to that level, at least, it will be great progress!

Brain: The irony of it all, Pinky. Years of trying to take over the world, and all I had to do was say "truculence".
Follow me I'm Boring!

by blindfolded tank driver on Sep 29, 2009 8:16 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Don’t forget about a healthy Van Ryn. He’s had two 37-point seasons when he’s around for 80 games.

by Koitiz on Sep 29, 2009 8:52 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Welcome

Thanks for joining.

I wouldn’t count on Van Ryn for anything more than 10 games though.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Sep 29, 2009 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hell-thee Van Rye-an? What is this thing you speak of?

I'm not even supposed to be here today..!

by Shield on Sep 29, 2009 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ree-sy-kull?

"We've had an ongoing problem with Grabovski this year." Bob Gainey, 4/04/09

by kidkawartha on Sep 29, 2009 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You heard it here first!

The Leafs will score 1000 goals. That’s not a typo. Unfortunately, 900 of them will be scored by Viktor Stalberg on opening night, who will then explode in a fiery ball of stupendousness, depriving the team of his contributions for the rest of the year.

Leafs Rumination: hockey and sesquipedalianism.

by puckurgently on Sep 29, 2009 11:57 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Wait…who’s gonna score the other 100? I assumed Stalberg would score all 1000…

by Koitiz on Sep 30, 2009 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Im going to say that StÃ¥lberg gets over 20 goals this year…

book it.

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

Albert Einstein

by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Sep 30, 2009 6:36 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog for the Toronto Maple Leafs.
Start posting about the Maple Leafs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

800px-flag_of_new_brunswick
The Book of Rebuild, Chapter 35

Recent FanPosts

Ob_ax_190_1_small
Kessel vs. Malkin: A Graphical Comparison
Fml_copy_small
The top 5 reasons I'm glad I didn't trade those tickets for a used blender.
Buffalo_sabres_v_toronto_maple_leafs_3kqnv0wzt7fl_small
Leafs vs Devils February 5 (Photos)
Clipboard01_small
Can the Leafs still qualify for the Playoffs? Do I even want to know? I know you do!
Small
The Leafs need new jerseys...
Leafs_man_small
PPP Dictionary: "You're a Dick"
Axl_rose_01_small
Who had 'four days' in the pool?
Leafs_man_small
More submissions for the PPP dictionary!
Small
Giguere to start tuesday and rest of the season

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

StatCounter

wordpress visitor


Chief Blogging Officers

Calvin_small PPP

59_small Chemmy

PPP's Princesses

Alfie2_small Mattblack

Dscn1755_small wrap around curl

Mr_hanky_small Karina

Don_t_panic_small SkinnyFish

Contributing Bloggers

Clockwork_orr_cropped_small mf37

Tester_small Greener

Hitchhiker_42_small 1967ers