Book Excerpt: Leafs AbomiNation Part Five
When news of this book first came out the response was...ummm...visceral to say the least and understandably so. I received a copy to review (I'll post it next week) but over the weekend I'll provide you the excerpt of the first chapter. Read it at your own risk. Full disclosure: The hour and a half I spoke with Michael Grange turned into about 5 pages worth of me defending our honour. Also, I HAVE to put up the book cover every time but each time will have a new joke.
Chapter One: Blame History
Could any team survive a meddling owner who goes out of his way to squander the likes of Lanny McDonald, Darryl Sittler and Dave Keon in exchange for little more than a pair of Cooperalls? Ballard's own history shows the kind of effect the guy could have on a hockey team. Before he began systematically stripping the Leafs of their intimidating reputation and their best players, Ballard coached an amateur team, the Toronto Sea Fleas, taking over behind the bench after Harry Watson stepped down in 1932. Ballard acknowledged he "didn't know any more about coaching a hockey team than Saint Peter knows about African golf."
"Dress up the Keystone Kops in hockey uniforms, throw in several scenes from the movie Slap Shot and you get an idea of what Ballard's attempt at coaching a hockey team was like," wrote William Houston. Sounds a lot like his work as a behind-the-scenes general manager too.
The Sea Fleas might not have done much worse in the NHL than the Leafs if Ballard had sent them over the boards. Toronto fans are disappointed that their team missed the playoffs yet again in the spring of 2009, but at least they won some games over the course of the season. The 1987-88 version of the team actually went fifteen straight games without a victory and ended the campaign going 1-8 to wind up with a .325 winning percentage (though, since the Norris Division was so weak that year, they actually ended up making the playoffs, bowing to the Detroit Red Wings in six games). And that dismal season was typical of the Ballard years. Between 1980-81 and 1989-90, the Leafs finished last in their division an incredible eight times.
There was a joke at the time that Leafs goalie Ken Wregget was once so depressed after a bad loss that he tried to put an end to it all by jumping in front of the team bus-only to watch in horror as the bus squeaked between his legs. But everyone knew the problem wasn't Wregget, it was Ballard. When he fell ill, Gardens stock rose. When he recovered, it fell. When he went into the hospital for a quintuple bypass a few months later, it rose again. "We know he has diabetes," a Toronto investor told a reporter as Ballard neared his end. "We know he doesn't follow his diet. We know he's eighty-three. That's why I started buying stock."
Of course, nothing is that easy. Ballard's will had hardly been read before a byzantine, four-year boardroom tumult for control of the Gardens broke out, as friends, enemies, investors and corporations as big as Molson got their elbows up to lay claim to what was still one of the sporting world's great properties, even at the end of the Ballard years. Lawsuits were launched, favours and loyalties were invoked, millions of dollars changed hands, and when the dust settled grocery baron Steve Stavro, a longtime friend of Ballard's, was at the helm. For a while.
Attending a Leafs game these days, of course, you would be forgiven if you came away believing that the club was never associated with a Smythe, let alone a Ballard-a looming personality that could impose his vision on a team and a city for better or worse. The idea of an owner like that-particularly in an era when there is no identifiable owner at all-seems as quaint as tube skates and fans dressed in jackets and ties.
But those are the guys who got the Leafs here, and it seems strange that they are so close to being totally forgotten. Perhaps that is because MLSE sells naming rights to everything in its purview, and doesn't have anything left to name after the owners who stamped the team so completely with their personalities. The arena cannot be named after Conn Smythe (because it's named after an oft-teetering airline), the dressing room cannot be named after Conn Smythe (because the folks at UnderArmor, the sports-gotchies giant, have paid dearly for their share of that real estate, and can hardly be expected to share it), and the media room cannot be named after Harold Ballard, even if it would be an ironic nod (because a telecommunications company, Rogers, holds sway on the nameplate). Perhaps there is a water fountain somewhere in the ACC as yet unnamed, waiting for a plaque. Or a urinal.
It's been suggested a statue be erected to honour Smythe, if not Ballard. But anyone who knows anything about the folks who run the Maple Leafs know they're saving their bronze for a monument to Richard Peddie, the CEO who, in more recent Leafs history, commiserated after a defeat with then-Leafs coach Paul Maurice about a "tough third quarter." One supposes when you operate quarter to quarter, in the fiscal sense of the word, history begins and ends every three months.
THE LEAFS DO IT AGAIN
AUGUST 25, 1977: Harold Ballard is inducted into the Hockey Hall of Fame.
JUNE 9, 1965: With their NHL goalies Terry Sawchuk and Johnny Bower at age 35 and 40, respectively, the Leafs allow the Bruins to pluck Gerry Cheevers, 24, from their minor-league system in the intra league draft. He'd go on to backstop two Stanley Cup teams and reside in the Hall of Fame.
MARCH 3, 1968 : Leafs trade Frank Mahovlich, Pete Stemkowski, Garry Unger and the rights to Carl Brewer to Detroit for Norm Ullman, Paul Henderson, Floyd Smith and Doug Barrie. The outgoing players go on to tally 1,850 points; what comes back yields 848 points. Oh, and Mahovlich goes on to win two Stanley Cups as a member of the Montreal Canadiens.
JUNE 1969: Leafs select Ernie Moser with the ninth-overall pick in the amateur draft. Moser never plays in the NHL, while no fewer than twelve players selected after him, among them Bobby Clarke and Butch Goring, play at least 400 NHL games.
Excerpted from Leafs AbomiNation by Dave Feschuk Michael Grange Copyright © 2009 by Dave Feschuk Michael Grange. Excerpted by permission of Random House Canada, a division of Random House of Canada Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
50 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hey remember that one time a team drafted someone crummy? That team is always the Maple Leafs.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
remember that terrible one sided trade that was all cup champions for scrubs? Leafs again
Refusing To Bow To Your Standards Since 2006
by JaredFromLondon on Sep 8, 2009 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions
In the 2003 draft Montreal took Andrei Kostitsyn at #10 ahead of the following first rounders:
Jeff Carter, Dustin Brown, Brent Seabrook, Zach Parise, Ryan Getzlaf, Brent Burns, Mike Richards, Corey Perry.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
are you sure that wasnt the Leafs?
Refusing To Bow To Your Standards Since 2006
by JaredFromLondon on Sep 8, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions
No, we outsmarted Feschuk and traded our first rounder that year. 
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
thank god for Leetch /Francis/ Nolan, god knows where the Leafs would be without them
Refusing To Bow To Your Standards Since 2006
by JaredFromLondon on Sep 8, 2009 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Ron Francis is, was, and always will be a turd.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
?
Dude seemed like a character/family guy. Why the hate from a former Man of the Whale?
jrwendelman
The Artist Formerly Known as "Junior", who blogs at heroesinrehab.ca/blog
"But if someone so eager to engage into fist talk, we can always meet after season end in Minsk." (Mikhail Grabovski and a well-meaning but not particularly skillful translator)
Because he got traded to Pittsburgh. >:(
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Hate fills the void better than sorrow…
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."
Albert Einstein
by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Sep 8, 2009 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Hate keeps you warm at night
Refusing To Bow To Your Standards Since 2006
by JaredFromLondon on Sep 8, 2009 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions
The entire disparity in that trade comes down to the two prospects – Garry Unger for Doug Barrie. The NHLers were pretty much a wash.
The interesting comparison comes when you look at what they each did for their respective teams. Mahovlich, Stemkowski, Brewer and Unger were all gone from Detroit within three seasons. Detroit didn’t win a thing with any of them.
Ullman and Henderson were mainstays until the mid-70s.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
Some numbers
Total NHL points post trade:
- ex-Leafs – 1843 (includes 5 Leafs points from Brewer 1979-80)
- new Leafs – 931
Total points (NHL + WHA)
- ex-Leafs – 2095
- new Leafs – 1503
Total points with new teams (Detroit, Toronto)
- ex-Leafs – 501
- new Leafs – 848
Total NHL points from established players
- ex-Leafs – 1036
- new Leafs – 879
Total NHL points from prospects in deal
- ex-Leaf (Garry Unger) – 802
- new Leaf (Doug Barrie) – 52 (plus 159 WHA)
Note that Doug Barrie was a defenseman.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
Should note too
In 1965, the Leafs had the choice of exposing Gerry Cheevers or one of Bower/Sawchuk, who had just combined to win the 1964-65 Vezina Trophy. They exposed Cheevers, who had been an AHL All-Star and led the league in GAA.
He wasn’t NHL ready, though. Even for Boston, who also debuted a young Bernie Parent in 1965-66, he only played 7 games and didn’t win any of them.
Meanwhile, the Leafs won the 1967 Stanley Cup on the back of Terry Sawchuk.
By 1968, yes, they missed Cheevers. But without Sawchuk, the drought could have started in 1964.
By 1971, they had Parent. Did they really miss Cheevers at that point?
Also – in 1964, Boston let some kid go by the name of Ken Dryden. Welcome to the world of drafting in the 6-team league….
Leaf, the universe and everything.
theres that logic thing again
Refusing To Bow To Your Standards Since 2006
by JaredFromLondon on Sep 8, 2009 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions
The 1969 draft sucked large for the Leafs, no doubt. Their one real NHL player was Spinner Spencer, drafted in the fifth round.
Ernie Moser, taken 9th overall, never played a game. Terrible pick.
Taking Moser at 9 is almost as bad as Philly taking Bob Currier (0 games played) at number 6. Boston, with picks 3 and 4, got Don Tannahill and Frank Spring, legends both. Their best pick, Ivan Boldirev, got all kinds of points playing for other teams.
Draft hindsight. There’s something to base a book on….
Leaf, the universe and everything.
Why the focus on 1969, though. Was it the anomaly or the trend?
In 1968, the draft was only three rounds and the Leafs had one pick. They used it on Brad Selwood. Tolerable.
In 1970, the Leafs didn’t do too much other than drafting Darryl Sittler in the first round and Errol Thompson in the second. Ron Low was a late rounder and there were others who got some NHL time, too.
1973? Lanny, Neely, Turnbull from three first rounders?
Doesn’t make up for Ernie Moser, though. Nothing could….
Leaf, the universe and everything.
Lets face it tho – drafting was in its infancy and I doubt any of these guys had the scrutiny that we now expose to future professional athletes.
I seriously doubt that our ‘scouting’ department were anything more than an old boys club of guys getting jobs because of patronage – I guess there is still some of that going on so forget about this statement…
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."
Albert Einstein
by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Sep 8, 2009 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions
heh.
Bruins passed on Clarke three times in the first round. Flyers drafted somebody who never played a game at number six.
Who gets lambasted? The Leafs at 9.
This stuff is nonsense.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
i bet later in the book it rips on the leafs for not taking Zetterberg or Datsyuk
Refusing To Bow To Your Standards Since 2006
by JaredFromLondon on Sep 9, 2009 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions
Between 1980-81 and 1989-90, the Leafs finished last in their division an incredible eight times.
Erm – no.
Between 1980-81 and 1989-90, the Leafs made the playoffs five times, winning their first-round matchup twice. Of the five times they missed, they were last in a five-team division four times, fifth in a six-team division once.
These are credibility busters, guys….
Leaf, the universe and everything.
The 80s were rough, but there were really two very distinct periods there. From ’80-81 through ’84-85, the Leafs missed the playoffs four years out of five, were last in the division three times and last overall once.
In the back half of the 80s, the kids started to round into form, we had Wendel, and the team made the playoffs four years out of five and even won a couple of rounds. It was a lot more fun.
Of all the stupid stuff in this excerpt, this “eight last-place finishes” thing irks me the most. It’s wrong to the point of utter carelessness.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
it makes me want to smash my computer to bits and go around town burning every Star and Sun paper box I see
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
Isn’t the new journalism mantra “Why let the facts get in the way of a good story”? It sure seems like it is anyway.
Being a Leaf fan here requires one to be sufficiently lubricated... and truculent!
too bad there is no good story here
Refusing To Bow To Your Standards Since 2006
by JaredFromLondon on Sep 8, 2009 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions
ive been listening to the fan all day as well, there are still “fans” calling in and telling everyone who is listening that its “the fans” fault for the leafs trouble over the last 42 years and the guys on the gameplan were backing them up with the same old and tired cliches. They practically filled out DGB’s MSM cliche bingo card in a 3 minute segment. I had to send them an email with a link to DGBS “Why blame the fan doesnt make sense” post.
One of them even brought up the ol’ “Habs fans stayed away in the late 90’s and it worked” arguement. I’ve been trying to find an old post from somewhere around the barilkosphere that disproved this old wives tale but cant seem to find it.
The MSM is infected everywhere around here and its no wonder why some other fans think we are total idiots. The reportingwe receive is just plain wrong most of the time…
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
Ask and Ye Shall Receive
Here are two posts with links to others that help with the “Habs stayed away in the late 90s” which was and always will be a giant pile of crap.
Considering the Habs are having financial problems again despite a successful team and even more ticket sales (100% v. 96%) I’d wager that the losses come from falling corporate support (ie fans has sweet fuck all to do with it).
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
by PPP on Sep 8, 2009 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions
great article by the way, i love reading through the archives, i missed some good stuff
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Sep 9, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions
As 1967ers above points out with the lovely lack of context the authors have placed in the Leafs failure to do well in trades and drafts, I love how Frank Mahovlich is seen as the automatic catalyst for the Montreal Canadiens and their two Stanley Cups they won with him on the roster. I sort of remember the 1970s Canadiens as being one of the most successful dynasties in all of sports, but you know, I don’t really like fact-checking or providing background information either.
Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell
Someone needs to tell these guys that running spell-checker isn’t the same as proofreading….
Leaf, the universe and everything.
by 1967ers on Sep 8, 2009 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Somehow, I’m thinking that this book isn’t too high on my purchase or read list.
Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell
I’ve acquired a copy. I plan to burn it and put it out with my own urine.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
I wouldnt piss on that book if its synopsis was on fire
Refusing To Bow To Your Standards Since 2006
by JaredFromLondon on Sep 8, 2009 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions
There was a joke at the time that Leafs goalie Ken Wregget was once so depressed after a bad loss that he tried to put an end to it all by jumping in front of the team bus-only to watch in horror as the bus squeaked between his legs.
Darryl Sittler told that joke about Dave Reese after the 10-point game in 1976. It has been told of umpteen netminders.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
Reusing jokes to pass off as evidence and fact of the Leafs being a horrendous franchise? Get out of here!
Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell
I thought he saw more rubber than a dead skunk on the 401
Refusing To Bow To Your Standards Since 2006
by JaredFromLondon on Sep 8, 2009 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions
That too.
Bester averaged over 37 shots per game as a rookie in ’83-84.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
thats insane
Refusing To Bow To Your Standards Since 2006
by JaredFromLondon on Sep 8, 2009 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions
FWIW, I remember it being said of Allan Bester.
Me too – after the Sergio Momesso overtime winner in 1990.
jrwendelman
The Artist Formerly Known as "Junior", who blogs at heroesinrehab.ca/blog
"But if someone so eager to engage into fist talk, we can always meet after season end in Minsk." (Mikhail Grabovski and a well-meaning but not particularly skillful translator)
Way to go 1967ers
Thanks for articulating what we were all suspecting: that this book is a complete fraud. The best thing that you could say about it is that it’s pointless and will be forgotten. The worst is that it will be forever held up as an example of how full of shit sports media can be. Everything mentioned in any of the excerpts that have been released is either a) well-known by anyone who would care to know it; b) only interesting and relevant in the way tabloids are interesting and relevant; and c) as demonstrated above, an exaggeration, a story/fact taken out of context to make the Leafs look bad (are the Leafs the only team to sell naming rights?), or downright inaccurate. I sincerely hope nobody spends any money on this thing.
There’s no shortage of stupid things the Leafs have done. You can fill a book without making stuff up or spinning like a top.
1967 by Cox and Stellick is a lot more even handed even as it roasts the Leafs for the things they’ve done over the years. That book is actually worth buying.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
When thinking about this era, this always makes me happy

"I'd walk into the Leafs dressing room to get ready for the day and Harold would be there in his boxer shorts shaving. King Clancy would drop by a little later, play the fool, and then head off to the racetrack." John Brophy
by Mike Pelyk's Hairdo on Sep 9, 2009 11:23 AM EDT reply actions

by 































