Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Should Burke Be Accountable For This?

After losing to Carolina on Tuesday the Leafs actually look worse than their 29th place record indicates. The power play stinks and the penalty kill is worse.

Our goalies can't save anything and our forwards can't score.

Brian Burke built this team and it's about time he be held accoutable: this team is worse than last year's team. Something needs to be done about it.

Star-divide

Wait hold on, I thought we could handle a rebuild? We're the fans that have spent time saying "rebuild the Leafs, we'll suffer if it means we'll be better in the future". So why is everyone losing their mind right now? Did anyone really think we'd do anything more than maybe squeak into the playoffs if we played our cards right?

I know people are upset about the Kessel deal, I think the timing might be wrong personally, but Burke understands what he gave up. If Burke thinks Kessel is a better player than Taylor Hall and whoever we could draft next year then the deal makes sense period.

You can't can a GM for one bad season. These moves take a long time to develop. Evaluating bringing in Kessel or shipping out Tlusty can't be done objectively for years. If Burke got fired now and another GM came in do you fire him in a year when the Leafs aren't in the playoffs? Do you keep firing GMs every year until one stiff gets lucky and his three or four predecessors made good moves that benefit the new guy? This doesn't make any sense.

Bottom line is this is a rebuilding team. This team is going to be horrible. Next year's team is going to be horrible. Our GM is grabbing the pieces that he wants and waiting to grab the pieces that he needs. Let's have a little patience Leafs Nation, as we've all learned if your team doesn't win the Cup the season was an unmitigated disaster. We weren't going to win the Cup this year under any circumstances and that's true for next year too. This is what cheering for a rebuilding team looks like. Relax.

ps. Toskala still sucks and I hate him personally.

Comment 386 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Wait hold on, I thought we could handle a rebuild? We’re the fans that have spent time saying “rebuild the Leafs, we’ll suffer if it means we’ll be better in the future”. So why is everyone losing their mind right now? Did anyone really think we’d do anything more than maybe squeak into the playoffs if we played our cards right?

I know people are upset about the Kessel deal, I think the timing might be wrong personally, but Burke understands what he gave up. If Burke thinks Kessel is a better player than Taylor Hall and whoever we could draft next year then the deal makes sense period.

THANK YOU!

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 11:20 AM EST reply actions  

perfect analogy

Is that the kid you want?

by kessticle on Jan 14, 2010 11:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Like it.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 11:43 AM EST up reply actions  

HOLD ME CLOSER TONY DANZA!

COUNT THE HEADLIGHTS ON THE HIGHWAAAAAAY

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

so rec’d

Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.

by nhlcheapshot on Jan 14, 2010 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

The problem may be that Burke didn’t seem to foresee this, so when he makes his next decisions to deliver a playoff team, will he do any better?

by Topham on Jan 14, 2010 11:21 AM EST reply actions  

If Burke had said “Team blows wait three years” that’s a PR disaster.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Jan 14, 2010 11:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Didn’t forsee that Gustavsson was going to have heart problems? Yeah, what a dummy.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 11:24 AM EST up reply actions  

He needs a magic 8 ball, a bag of coke and a delorean!

Brain: The irony of it all, Pinky. Years of trying to take over the world, and all I had to do was say "truculence".
Follow me I'm Boring!

by blindfolded tank driver on Jan 14, 2010 11:26 AM EST up reply actions  

and 1-point-21-gigawatts of scoring prowess.

"I will take the subway - we were on the subway last night...I'm not above riding the subway or riding on a bus, I don't care. As long as people don't hit me." --Ron Wilson

by Jo4nny on Jan 14, 2010 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Didn’t foresee Toskala having an even worse season than last year?

Didn’t foresee our defense not gelling at all and then Komisarek getting hurt?

Didn’t foresee players like Grabovski and Mitchell being hurt and not progressing?

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Jan 14, 2010 11:26 AM EST up reply actions  

It’s hilarious that every fan of other teams think that it was all so clear before the season started.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 11:27 AM EST up reply actions  

To be fair if this Leafs team was stomping everything in sight we’d be pretty smug about knowing it all along.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Jan 14, 2010 11:28 AM EST up reply actions  

i seem to recall during the preseason, lots of folks were a little worried (as in, we don’t want to play those guys…) about how nasty the Leafs appeared to be.

I have nothing interesting to say.

by blurr1974 on Jan 14, 2010 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah, but at one point we did “know”

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

i can’t stop watching the awesomeness that is Ricky Gervais in that gif

Is that the kid you want?

by kessticle on Jan 14, 2010 11:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for posting what most Leaf fans need to hear.

Patience is something the majority of Leaf fans have never experienced. Everyone wants quick fixes and instant gratification. Sometimes people just need to step back and look at things logically, but sadly when the mob screams and whines, we are forced to listen.

Brain: The irony of it all, Pinky. Years of trying to take over the world, and all I had to do was say "truculence".
Follow me I'm Boring!

by blindfolded tank driver on Jan 14, 2010 11:24 AM EST reply actions  

If it's one thing that Leafs fans need to learn

it’s to be patient with these things. I see Leaf fans all over the net calling for Wilson to be canned, Burke to be canned, Kessel a failure, Schenn to be traded, etc. It’s all just a “ZOMG TEH SKIES IZ FALLIN!!!1” mentality with these Leaf fans.

by Marc Pilgrim on Jan 14, 2010 11:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Knee jerk reactions and demanding to get to the playoffs is what got us in to this mess.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Jan 14, 2010 11:28 AM EST up reply actions  

From the board forcing JFJ to acquire pieces to win NOW. I don’t think he wanted to trade for Raycroft he got railroaded by Peddie et al.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Jan 14, 2010 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

The JFJ era. Whether you want to blame him for being a puppet/dunce or Peddie/the board for wanting a GM who would be a puppet instead of a competent hockey mind is up for debate. My answer is “yes.”

Leafs Rumination: hockey and sesquipedalianism.

by puckurgently on Jan 14, 2010 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah he really fucked things up but I don’t think he was a drooling retard. He was inexperienced and the board forced his hand which is still his fault.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Jan 14, 2010 11:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Exactly.

Leafs Rumination: hockey and sesquipedalianism.

by puckurgently on Jan 14, 2010 11:33 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah, if my boss asked me to do something catastrophically stupid I’d probably say something like “sorry, I want to work after this job is over and not be labeled a walking joke”

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 11:36 AM EST up reply actions  

I think the lock out really screwed the Leafs, because I seem to recall reading from more than a few MLSE employees about how confident they were in not having a hard salary cap or revenue sharing.

It’s almost as if the lockout was a blessing in disguise, as it exposed the weaknesses in the team previously covered up with deep pockets.

I have nothing interesting to say.

by blurr1974 on Jan 14, 2010 11:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

They misread the coming lockout which is why they signed Belfour.

Hell, the Leetch trade (still had one year on his deal) was predicated on there not being ANY lockout.

That miscalculation was huge.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 11:41 AM EST up reply actions  

It wasn’t unreasonable, though. The owners had caved every other time there had been anything. They had a strong team and – had the season started in January – weren’t in bad shape at all.

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Jan 14, 2010 12:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree

They didn’t take the players seriously or their fellow owners and they paid for it.

Hell, in a shortened season a veteran-laden team like the Leafs at that date would have had an advantage I think.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 12:13 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought so, too. They would have really been hitting their stride come playoff time and might not have been tired to the point of injuries.

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Jan 14, 2010 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

The cup WAS in Toronto all year that year…

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."

Albert Einstein

by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Jan 14, 2010 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Obviously Burke wants to make the playoffs and especially compete for them, but only foolish fans take that as the only result that matters. Progress includes learning who doesn’t fit and who needs to go.

Brain: The irony of it all, Pinky. Years of trying to take over the world, and all I had to do was say "truculence".
Follow me I'm Boring!

by blindfolded tank driver on Jan 14, 2010 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

If Burke had said “This team won’t make the playoffs for three years” we’d still be reading about how that’s the reason the suites are empty.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Jan 14, 2010 11:33 AM EST up reply actions  

very true. “The smell of rotting sushi fills the ACC”

Brain: The irony of it all, Pinky. Years of trying to take over the world, and all I had to do was say "truculence".
Follow me I'm Boring!

by blindfolded tank driver on Jan 14, 2010 11:35 AM EST up reply actions  

no finger pointing

we are those types of fans.

Every loss results in more than a few “this team sucks!” and “stajan stinks!” and “what happened to truculence!?!?” with a healthy dose of “wharrgarbl” from everyone.

I’m bookmarking this so after the next Leafs loss (and believe me, there will be one…) I can post the link for a quick reminder.

I have nothing interesting to say.

by blurr1974 on Jan 14, 2010 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Good

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 11:36 AM EST up reply actions  

smart idea, because in the heat of the moment, anyone of us could go crazy

Brain: The irony of it all, Pinky. Years of trying to take over the world, and all I had to do was say "truculence".
Follow me I'm Boring!

by blindfolded tank driver on Jan 14, 2010 11:36 AM EST up reply actions  

WHARRGARBL!

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 11:36 AM EST up reply actions  

The GDT's

a different beast than the FTB and these types of post, ‘cause everyone’s emotionally vested in the game at hand, and there’ll be obviously a lot of those comments you mentioned.

by Marc Pilgrim on Jan 14, 2010 11:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Not to mention half of the people on GDT’s are either drunk or in the process of getting drunk.

"I will take the subway - we were on the subway last night...I'm not above riding the subway or riding on a bus, I don't care. As long as people don't hit me." --Ron Wilson

by Jo4nny on Jan 14, 2010 11:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Drunk.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Jan 14, 2010 11:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Sorry, I should have clarified:

either drunk or in the process of getting more drunker

"I will take the subway - we were on the subway last night...I'm not above riding the subway or riding on a bus, I don't care. As long as people don't hit me." --Ron Wilson

by Jo4nny on Jan 14, 2010 11:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Bingo

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 11:41 AM EST up reply actions  

no

the GDTs and their over-reactionary comments are precisely why a post like this needed to be written, because it’s rarely said outside of that forum.

I have nothing interesting to say.

by blurr1974 on Jan 14, 2010 11:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

That’s what I am saying too.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 11:44 AM EST up reply actions  

but

what are you trying to say?

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 11:47 AM EST up reply actions  

I just think it should be expected that some fans will overreact and say things they really don’t mean. Sometimes I get frustrated after a loss and need 15 minutes to cool down. Now, I’m not a “fuck this team” kind of guy, but I don’t think people are saying it to be dicks or be a troll. They’re just not as good at dealing with losing as some of us “veterans of losing” are.

by birky on Jan 14, 2010 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I dont think people are saying it to be assholes either, but the fact is they are saying it and it pisses off other people and makes this place a lot less friendly and fun to be around

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I said it before and I’ll say it again.

When people say “Fuck this team”, read it as “Fuck, this team…”

Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - only $1,,882,353 to go!

by clrkaitken on Jan 14, 2010 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

nope, I read things as people put them
the fact remains that the negativity around here has spooked a lot of the regs who used to hang out and contribute to the wonderful atmosphere that made PPP the place to be during a Leaf game.
That pisses me off more than anything

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess it’s hard to just pretend everything’s peachy.

by Robot Godzilla on Jan 14, 2010 12:13 PM EST up reply actions  

nobody is saying you have to shove a rainbow up your ass you just have to try and be a little more constructive and less 13 year old kid who just got owned in halo about the whole thing

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:17 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Amen

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

One thing I’d note though is that you are always able to ignore someone that is bothering you.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 2:39 PM EST up reply actions  

i am physically incapable of ignoring someone who bothers me

I have nothing interesting to say.

by blurr1974 on Jan 14, 2010 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

hi blurr!!!!!

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

What would your mom say?

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 3:16 PM EST up reply actions  

if you cant hit first, hit last

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

for example…

I had this old mid 90’s blue Leafs jersey. When the Leafs got knocked out of the playoffs in 2001 by NJ, I literally tore the thing apart. I was only 15 years old. I didn’t know how to deal with my frustration. I would certainly never do something like that now.

All I’m saying is that this is an anonymous internet community. You are going to get immature teens and other people on here that can’t deal with losing. It’s inevitable. If the mods want to ask that person to leave or kick them out, I’ve got no problem with that. But we shouldn’t be surprised that it happens.

by birky on Jan 14, 2010 12:11 PM EST up reply actions  

no one is surprised when it happens, but when people dont get the message that we are trying to keep this place user friendly and prevent it from falling into the Hfboards abyss people get irritated

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Meh

I do it too. It happens. We just need to try to control it outside of the realm of GDTs when it’s really hard to do so.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 12:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I feel split-personality when it comes to GDT and non-GDT. In the GDT it’s easy to let a “Fuck this team” slip because it’s happening then and there. In a thread like this it’s easy to relax because we kinda expected the team to be bad this year.

Columbus: It's amazing how fast the world can go from bad to total shit storm.
Or the Leafs season: either one works

by Clawson on Jan 14, 2010 12:52 PM EST up reply actions  

i’m the same way.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I used to punch things

I don’t do that anymore because

a) I have a wife now and she frowns at punching random inanimate objects

2) I usually end up breaking something and I get even more pissed off

d) It hurts like hell most of the time.

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."

Albert Einstein

by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Jan 14, 2010 4:35 PM EST up reply actions  

after the next Leafs loss (and believe me, there will be one…)

NO! I refuse to believe this! The Leafs will win every game from now on! WHARRGARBL!

leaf fan stuck in ottawa, a localized black hole that will suck everything in that area to oblivion.

by stucky on Jan 14, 2010 11:40 AM EST up reply actions  

i never demanded playoffs

i just had a simple request that I don’t have to hear Tom Kurvers/Niedermayer analogies for the NEXT twenty years of my life.

I get what you’re saying, and I see little pockets of hope and progress in this team. But rebuilding teams keep their draft picks, man. It’s the elephant in the room.

The trade deadline is going to be huge. just as it was last year, when it ended up being pretty uneventful.

Normally when a pick gets traded, people say “well you’ve got to wait 2-3 years to fairly judge this trade.” Now it’s “well you’ve got to wait 2-3 year past next year, to see how all the chips fall before judging”

So we’re up to 2014 now?

Nonetheless, go Leafs go.

by pevans on Jan 14, 2010 12:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Kurvers?

Phil Kessel is not Tom Kurvers. Even if Taylor Hall ends up being Niedermayer, there is no comparison. It is not even close to being the same trade. You can tell this to the folks who are making those analogies and hopefully it will shut them up. I kinda doubt it, but whatever.

by Leaf in Habland on Jan 14, 2010 12:56 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

i know he's not

but taht doesn’t mean we’re not going to hear his name evoked for as long as “the picks taht turned into Niedermayer” are still skating

by pevans on Jan 14, 2010 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

The trade deadline is going to be huge. just as it was last year, when it ended up being pretty uneventful.

Unrealistic expectations met a market full of GMs that found enlightenment at the same time unfortunately.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 2:02 PM EST up reply actions  

You can’t can a GM for one bad season. These moves take a long time to develop. Evaluating bringing in Kessel or shipping out Tlusty can’t be done objectively for years. If Burke got fired now and another GM came in do you fire him in a year when the Leafs aren’t in the playoffs? Do you keep firing GMs every year until one stiff gets lucky and his three or four predecessors made good moves that benefit the new guy? This doesn’t make any sense.

Bottom line is this is a rebuilding team. This team is going to be horrible. Next year’s team is going to be horrible. Our GM is grabbing the pieces that he wants and waiting to grab the pieces that he needs. Let’s have a little patience Leafs Nation, as we’ve all learned if your team doesn’t win the Cup the season was an unmitigated disaster. We weren’t going to win the Cup this year under any circumstances and that’s true for next year too. This is what cheering for a rebuilding team looks like. Relax.

Hooray for rational opinions!

/cheers

by Marc Pilgrim on Jan 14, 2010 11:26 AM EST reply actions  

Eh

Yeah the timing for the Kessel was atrocious, it came right after Leafs management started preaching “rebuild” and “we’re done trading draft picks” after having done so for so many years, and then BAMO they turned around and did it again.

Of course, only time will tell whether this deal was good or not, but until then, some of us fans will still bitch about it because its still the opposite of what they said they’ll do and it just gives more ammo for the “Maple Laff”-haters out there to mock us.

by PLAYOFFS!!!1 on Jan 14, 2010 11:33 AM EST reply actions  

He should absolutely be held accountable.

That doesn’t mean “fired”, of course. I hope nobody’s seriously arguing for that.

But this is his team. Not 100% his team, but he’s had more than enough time to put a big stamp on it. And they suck. They’re worse than they were under JFJ right now. That falls at Burke’s feet.

The whole “be patient for the rebuild” argument is nice, but it got turned on its head the day Burke decided to start trading away first rounders. Having your own first rounder is a pretty crucial part of the whole “be patient” thing, and we don’t.

Burke still has time to fix this, and there’s still time for some of questionable moves to work out. Even in some sort of crazy worst-case scenario he still has a few years.

But is he accountable? Of course. He’s the highest paid GM in the league. The buck stops with him.

Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.

by Down Goes Brown on Jan 14, 2010 11:35 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

Kessel was a top 5 pick who is a legitimate offensive threat. The difference between his production and Kovalchuk’s is entirely on the power play.

If we could guarantee even one of those first rounders would be a player like Kessel I’d pull the trigger on this deal.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Jan 14, 2010 11:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Sure. And it’s way, way too early to call a winner in the Kessel deal. We all knew at the time that we couldn’t declare a winner for years.

But Burke made the deal under the belief that the pick wouldn’t be a high one. He was wrong. That counts for something.

Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.

by Down Goes Brown on Jan 14, 2010 11:44 AM EST up reply actions  

THANK YOU DGB.

We can’t pretend that the man doesn’t make ANY mistakes and ripping someone for pointing that out is just as bad as the idiots who overreact.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 12:31 PM EST up reply actions  

no one is pretending he didnt make any mistakes, but some people are acting like he just traded Luongo for Bertuzzi. Time will tell how badly a mistake Burke made, and if in three years time it looks as bad as some people are making it out to be then I will gladly eat crow and admit it.

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I just think that we can’t be sunshines and roses all the time and it’s okay to express frustration with a team that is not so good.

I’m patient and not a deserter, and I know that once we finally win the whole thing it’ll be that much sweeter, but I honestly can’t remember the last time trading a top 5 pick worked out for the team who traded it, i’m also not trying that hard to remember, so please if you have examples let me know.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:01 PM EST up reply actions  

when was the last time a team traded a top 5 pick?

doesnt happen very often

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Yashin?

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

sounds about right

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:18 PM EST up reply actions  

and that scares me a little.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:18 PM EST up reply actions  

but i know that yes yashin was like 30 years old.

I’m patient don’t yell at me.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:18 PM EST up reply actions  

also no 800 year billion dollar contract

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Last month.

Pouliot from the Wild to the Habs.

by Boob Gainey on Jan 14, 2010 2:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Yup

A top-5 pick that was given up on. Hard to believe he was drafted that high.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 2:32 PM EST up reply actions  

DOUG RISEBOROUGH

Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Jan 14, 2010 2:34 PM EST up reply actions  

What difference does it make? Boston got Ray Bourque at 8 with LA’s pick. They’ll draft who they draft.

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Jan 14, 2010 1:13 PM EST up reply actions  

you can’t bank on getting a hall of famer.

but generally speaking talent level USUALLY drops off after the first five picks.

with a few gems later in the round.

that being said I think that all the money Burke poured into scouting will help us overcome not having those two firsts.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Boston has our first, and it’s going to come somewhere between first and eighth overall. They will draft someone that at some point, we will wish we had drafted instead.

This is a given.

It’s done. Move on.

The only question now is how to fix this mess, given the tools which remain available.

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Jan 14, 2010 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

so we should blindly look to the future?

I agree that there’s reason to look forward, but it should still be tempered with a look in the rearview mirror.

“It’s Done. Move On” – is dismissive and in poor tone, and frankly i expected better from you.

I thought this was all about generating a thoughtful discussion not limiting discourse.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it’s more a case of, it does no one any good to bitch about a deal that’s already happened, because there’s no possibility it can ever be changed. Better to have that thoughtful discussion on where the team goes from here.

We can argue about the Kessel deal until we’re blue in the face, but he’s here and he’s not going anywhere for a while. That’s the way it is. Why argue over something like that when it’s been done to death? Better to argue over what could happen in the future.

leaf fan stuck in ottawa, a localized black hole that will suck everything in that area to oblivion.

by stucky on Jan 14, 2010 1:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Well done, good sir.

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Jan 14, 2010 1:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Why?

It’s not like we can actively affect either outcome?

Why is one better than the other? Or more productive than the other.

Neither one is productive. We can argue about ANYTHING until we’re blue in the face it doesn’t matter.

It doesn’t do any good to bitch about anything in the future either because it’s not like we can do anything about that.

If people want to revisit the Kessel deal, LET THEM. Why should it bother you?

I don’t think I was discussing it like a troll, and as long as people are civilized about the discussion I don’t think it’s fair to tell them to stop talking about it because you’re sick of hearing it.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think you’re discussing this like a troll either, I think you’ve shown that while you like to have interesting and sometimes contentious debate you are not troll-like.

Also, yes it theoretically doesn’t do any good to discuss the future of the team since none of us are in any position to make those decisions.

While I can’t stop anyone from discussing the Kessel deal, I can certainly ask them to stop because the debate is old, tired and pointless. Having different discussions and debates over the unknown is more interesting than having the same debate over the known over and over and over again.

It doesn’t bother me if people want to rehash the Kessel thing, I just would really prefer we not do so.

leaf fan stuck in ottawa, a localized black hole that will suck everything in that area to oblivion.

by stucky on Jan 14, 2010 2:34 PM EST up reply actions  

fair enough.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

let's argue over something productive

like jason blake.

or tuukka rask.

or owen nolan.

by pevans on Jan 14, 2010 3:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I just think that we can’t be sunshines and roses all the time and it’s okay to express frustration with a team that is not so good.

Can we let this meme die? Do I have to go through comment by comment and explain the difference between:

FUCK DIS TEAM BURKE’S WURST EVAR DEVASTATION DEVASTATION!

and

This team is in a lot of trouble. Burke clearly miscalculated when he examined the Leafs’ roster this summer. While he says that he would still make the same deal he better have a plan to make sure that it’s not Taylor Hall/Tyler Seguin AND another top 3 pick.

Basically, read DGB’s comments. Negative as all hell, accurate, and not insane.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

How are my comments insane or inaccurate?

You keep taking this stance that alot of people actually post like this:

“FUCK DIS TEAM BURKE’S WURST EVAR DEVASTATION DEVASTATION!”

you can’t take the one extreme, and use it as an example.

Not everyone is as eloquent as DGB and not everyone is as idiot as a troll.

I didn’t agree with ‘my son has a choice’ but there was definietly a sense of the rest of the site ganging up on him yesterday and I didn’t appreciate it.

He wasn’t being a troll but was still being villified for presenting an opposing viewpoint that fell somewhere in between being a troll and being the most well though out blogger on the barilkosphere.

You have to give more leeway instead of saying ‘be one or the other’.

I understand that you want to keep the trolls out, but you also have to give the dissenting fan who is angry with this team a voice too, otherwise you’ll just as bad as hockeybuzz just in the opposite direction.

That all being said…please don’t ban me.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t mean your comments were insane or inaccurate and I’m not going to ban you for no reason.

I didn’t agree with ‘my son has a choice’ but there was definietly a sense of the rest of the site ganging up on him yesterday and I didn’t appreciate it.

He made his point, it was addressed, he made it again, and again, and again, he talked in circles, other points were refuted. If you read it again it’s not surprising that people got frustrated.

Again, and I’ll make it perfectly clear: You can criticise the team all that you want. I would think it’s pretty clear from the posts from Chemmy and I but if not, there it is.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 2:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Not to mention he did the exact same thing a week before.

by PassivelyTruculent on Jan 14, 2010 2:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

that i did not know.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

You don’t live here :)….yet!

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 2:39 PM EST up reply actions  

How much is the rent?

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

$3.50… beer’s in the fridge.

by PassivelyTruculent on Jan 14, 2010 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

that’s fair.

I just don’t like that people get lumped in with the “FUCK DIS TEAM…” people because they’re not DGB.

That’d be like me saying that you either have to be PPP or Chemmy.

But which one is which?

CHOOSE YOUR OWN ADVENTURE

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 2:42 PM EST up reply actions  

No I agree with you. I don’t think “my son has a choice” was out of line at all and he definitely got ganged up on here.

This is a forum for fans, not a forum for people who feel one way about the Leafs. If someone’s upset about the team this is the place for them to vent.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Jan 14, 2010 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Disagree.

He got ganged up on when he stopped responding to anything anyone brought up against the point he was making.

He suffers because people get frustrated that it’s the same convo again and again but we need to remember that someone new could waltz in with no prior knowledge of that.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 3:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Particularly when he can’t come up with any rebuttal other than

bad trade, period

Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - only $1,860,966 to go!

by clrkaitken on Jan 14, 2010 8:42 PM EST up reply actions  

wait, what?

If you could guarantee that one of the picks the Leafs traded away would turn into a Kessel-equivalent, you’d do the deal again? Wouldn’t that be a wash, at best?

I must be misunderstanding.

I get so easily goaded into Kessel debates. I like him as a player. Especially since he’s still only 22. But I’ve never heard a satisfying justification for why we couldn’t have presented an offer sheet for the same money, and punted away a 1,2 and 3. Then we wouldn’t be facing the awful truth of rebuilding without having a 1st NEXT year too

by pevans on Jan 14, 2010 12:56 PM EST up reply actions  

offer sheet would’ve included the second first.

we saved a third rounder.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 12:57 PM EST up reply actions  

No, an offer sheet would have been just one first.

The Bruins would have matched, but we didn’t save a pick.

Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.

by Down Goes Brown on Jan 14, 2010 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think this is true if we calculate the salary that Kessel was offered by the Leafs.

If it was like a $4.something million/year cap hit it would have only been a 1st, 2nd, 3rd in 2010, but anything over that would have included another 1st rounder in 2011.

Please correct me if i’m wrong (with link if possible)

Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.

by nhlcheapshot on Jan 14, 2010 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Eh I worded it poorly but I have a meeting so I have to type quick: a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush is what I’m getting at.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Jan 14, 2010 12:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Kessel now is worth 2 Kessels maybe sometime in 4 years from now

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:59 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

rec'd

for grammatical awesomness and lunacy

by pevans on Jan 14, 2010 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I like this very much – my kinda crazy

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."

Albert Einstein

by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Jan 14, 2010 4:44 PM EST up reply actions  

That doesn’t mean "fired", of course. I hope nobody’s seriously arguing for that.

There are lots of people arguing for that.

The buck stops with him.

Yup. It’s not a good start.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 11:40 AM EST up reply actions  

100% in agreement. I feel more frustrated as a fan right now then the weeks before JFJ got “relieved” of his responsibilities as GM.

"Is there an ih-sue Papa?"

by Another Good Kingston Boy on Jan 14, 2010 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah. This is probably the most frustrating season I’ve ever had as a Leafs fan. At least under JFJ you could hate the team and it’s management, and know that every loss took them one step closer to firings and housecleanings and getting Peddie’s hands off everything. Oh, and a high draft pick.

Well, we got what we wanted. We have a good hockey man in charge. We have a respected coach. Peddie’s locked in a storage closet somewhere. You apparently can’t make trades in this league anymore. And we have no picks.

There’s absolutely no good that comes from a loss. But they keep losing. And losing. And losing…

Ugh.

Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.

by Down Goes Brown on Jan 14, 2010 11:52 AM EST up reply actions  

agreed.

Also, low expectations made last year a little easier to stomach. They pretty much came out and said the team was going to be brutal.

This year was just a completely cocked evaluation of talent on the part of management. That’s what hurts the most.

by Robot Godzilla on Jan 14, 2010 12:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I did have some expectation the Leafs would be better than they have been.

But I expected the team to be just at a garden variety level of suck, instead of the epic fail suck they are at now. At the end of the day I guess there’s not much difference. Even if every break went the Leafs’ way and the whole group was wildly successful, the ceiling for this team is sneak in the playoffs and get roasted by a really good team. That’s still a bad season by any stretch.

It doesn’t feel good, but you have to take your medicine in cases like this. Let’s hope the payoff comes in a couple years as we think it will.

leaf fan stuck in ottawa, a localized black hole that will suck everything in that area to oblivion.

by stucky on Jan 14, 2010 11:37 AM EST reply actions  

So if we* draft 6th instead of 1st what’s the difference? The pick is gone and Boston will continue to sign energy guys to big deals and not leave room for guys who can score.

* The Bruins

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Jan 14, 2010 11:39 AM EST up reply actions  

haha

true enough.

That Martin Lapointe deal still looks ridiculous, even after like 8 years of salary inflation!

by pevans on Jan 14, 2010 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s still a bad season by any stretch.

In that the team does not win the Stanley Cup – yes.

Too much binary thinking.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 11:41 AM EST up reply actions  

That’s a good analogy, actually. The Leafs are simply in the process of switching over from analog to digital, and it’s going to take some growing pains before the conversion is complete.

"I will take the subway - we were on the subway last night...I'm not above riding the subway or riding on a bus, I don't care. As long as people don't hit me." --Ron Wilson

by Jo4nny on Jan 14, 2010 11:44 AM EST up reply actions  

converting to digital...

…which explains all of the 1’s and 0’s on the scoreboard! :-)

"Windows 7 was my idea--and I am suing"

by pbkunkel on Jan 14, 2010 12:50 PM EST up reply actions  

What building blocks?

Obviously you don’t can a GM for one bad season.

But if you hired a guy to build you a house, and went around to the construction site after one month and saw that he was building the foundations out of old newspapers, what would you say?

Would you say, well I knew he wouldn’t have a finished house after only a month, so I’ll give him a chance? Or would you say, hey that’s never gonna work. You can’t build a house out of rolled up newspapers.

All the additions this year are questionable. The Monster isn’t adjusting to the NHL, and we now know why Bozak and Hanson weren’t drafted, Beachemin and Komisarek can only play next to a good defenceman (Niedermayer or Markov), which you don’t have.

The Bruins didn’t want Kessel, even though they could have had him without giving up any draft picks, and Wilson now understands why.

Truculence isn’t a desirable quality in life. Burke has built a team only Mike Milbury could love.

by Boob Gainey on Jan 14, 2010 11:47 AM EST reply actions  

interesting
The Bruins didn’t want Kessel, even though they could have had him without giving up any draft picks, and Wilson now understands why.

can you explain that, or provide a link corroborating such statements?

I have nothing interesting to say.

by blurr1974 on Jan 14, 2010 11:49 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah i was very confused by that too

Is that the kid you want?

by kessticle on Jan 14, 2010 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

What I mean is that the Bruins could have kept Phil Kessel if they had offered him roughly what they gave David Krejci (i.e. $4M).

So the Bruins looked at Phil Kessel at $4M and said: not interested.

The Leafs looked at Phil Kessel at $5.25M PLUS three draft picks and said: interested.

by Boob Gainey on Jan 14, 2010 11:58 AM EST up reply actions  

really? where did it every say Kessel would take 4 mill?
You also ever think that it may have been boston who made the mistake? I mean they are kind of struggling offensively and if it weren’t for their exceptional goaltending (fuck you JFJ) they would probably be doing as well as the leafs right now

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:00 PM EST up reply actions  

No

They were never going to be able to sign Kessel at $4M. They wanted to keep him and they couldn’t because Milan Lucic needed to be paid double what he is worth.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

The last offer they gave him was 4 million, from what I heard.

Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Jan 14, 2010 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah and that’s why he didn’t sign in Boston. You offered a 36 goal scorer less money than Milan Lucic.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Jan 14, 2010 12:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I never said the Lucic deal made sense for anyone other than the pro shop.

Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Jan 14, 2010 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Building Blocks?

Stalberg? Schenn? Kadri? Kessel? Gustavsson?

Any of them sound familiar to you?

by Marc Pilgrim on Jan 14, 2010 11:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Stalberg – sent back down after scoring like 2 goals in 19 games.

Schenn – nightmare season.

Kadri – terrible in the WJC.

Kessel – one dimensional.

Gustavvson – no proof that he is an NHL number one as of yet.

by Boob Gainey on Jan 14, 2010 12:02 PM EST up reply actions  

You’re right. Every single high level NHL contributor ever has been amazing right of the gate. Blast! We’ve been foiled!

Leafs Rumination: hockey and sesquipedalianism.

by puckurgently on Jan 14, 2010 12:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Stalberg – got a concussion, shows promise needs polishing
Schenn – medeocre season and getting better as of late
Kadri – played top line minuites and first line PP all tournament.
Kessel – back checks harder than anyone gives him credit for
Gustavsson – no argument,

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Stalberg – still adjusting to the pro game, learning and developing in the AHL as well as getting a taste of NHL play, will improve.

Schenn – yes granted he’s been bad overall this year but he’s been getting better lately, and most good defencemen struggle at first before playing to their potential, Schenn’s no different

Kadri – good to very good in the WJC (were you watching a different tournament than most everyone else?)

Kessel – not one dimensional, besides the goal scoring prowess has proven to be a better playmaker and more effective backchecker and worker than given credit for, may not be physical but when you score like him who cares?

Gustavsson – maybe no proof he is an NHL number one yet but nothing to suggest he isn’t, plus two heart ablations would set the elite of the elite back, you don’t seem to want to factor that in to the equation.

leaf fan stuck in ottawa, a localized black hole that will suck everything in that area to oblivion.

by stucky on Jan 14, 2010 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

again with Komisarek
He has been perfectly fine and well worth his money since coming back from a quad injury in November.
As for building blocks the Leafs have a few in Kulemin, Schenn, Kadri and Kaberle.
Hanson and Bozak havn’t been terrible either.
You are talking about a lot of things you seem to have no idea about

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 11:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Have you looked at his profile?

Much will become clear.

"We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into Iraq"
- Major Mike Shearer

by article1 on Jan 14, 2010 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

ummm part of the issue with Komisarek is that he’s often hurt.

Yeah you can’t predict that when you sign a guy, but we have to admit that while he’s good when he’s playing, it’s only when he’s playing. He’s missed 13 games plus at least another week.

So I wouldn’t say that he’s worth the money, because you have to play to be worth it.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

playing like he is worth it is different than being worth it
i call it Gaborik syndrom

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:39 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok

Thank you for dropping by. It certainly makes it easier to pigeonhole fanbases when folks like you drop by and confirm the stereotype of the anti-Leafs fan.

But if you hired a guy to build you a house, and went around to the construction site after one month and saw that he was building the foundations out of old newspapers, what would you say?

I’d be curious, I’d be worried, but I’d think that it takes longer than one month to build a house and the last one he built was named the best house the year he built it I might think that it’s worthwhile firing him.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 12:18 PM EST up reply actions  

The leafs now have the third or fourth largest scouting corps behind the Devils and the Red Wings. Burke did that. The leafs are using their big money to pay the best goalie coach in the business. Burke did that. These things might take a couple of years to pay off (no high draft picks till 2012, Toskala is a lost cause) but there was NO circumstance under which the Leafs were going to win a Cup in that span anyway. Of we want to be in a position to compete EVERY YEAR we need to suffer through a scorched earth policy in the short term.

by Leaf in Habland on Jan 14, 2010 1:07 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Totally agree.

I kind of said this up earlier, but the money in scouting is a HUGE plus for us.

I think people just want to see more scorching because the team is awful.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Not having any first round picks until 2012 is a hell of a scorched earth policy.

Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.

by Down Goes Brown on Jan 14, 2010 1:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Bottom line

The two biggest long-term decisions Brian Burke made since he’s been in Toronto were:
- trading first round picks for Phil Kessel
- not trading Tomas Kaberle

You could argue either of these decisions. Both could certainly turn out to be the right ones in the long run.

But they both have something in common: they were based largely on Burke’s evaluation that this team could be a playoff contender. That’s what made parting with the picks a reasonable price, and that’s what made keeping Kaberle for now instead of dealing him for the future a smart move.

If the Leafs are going to be a last place team, trading two first rounders is probably a disaster. And if they’re going to be a last place team, keeping Kaberle instead of moving him when his value is high is absolutely a disaster.

Playoff contender? Or last place team? That was Burke’s call, and he made it. It looks like he was wrong. It looks like he wasn’t even close.

And that’s on him, and nobody else.

Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.

by Down Goes Brown on Jan 14, 2010 12:00 PM EST reply actions  

Burke should be able to get more for Kaberle this off season anyway as Kaberle is coming off of a better season, last year he was hurt and had one of his worst seasons ever, thus no one wanted to pay the price
Kabby gets 60ish points this year, the value has only gone up

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Disagree. As good as Kaberle is, his trade value is tied directly to his contract. That’s just the way it is in today’s NHL. He’s a $6M defenceman with a $4M deal and that makes him golden.

Except that his deal expires after next year. So at some point, he goes from “total bargain” to “pending UFA who is going to want to get paid”. What team is going to give up a ton to get a guy for one year, followed by… who knows?

I’d argue that his trade value is actually lower right now than it was last year, even though he’s having a much better season. And it’s dropping.

Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.

by Down Goes Brown on Jan 14, 2010 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I Agree

Burke’s principles have cost the team once (bringing in Gerber) and it’s likely going to cost them again (not tell Kaberle he has no future with the team).

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 12:22 PM EST up reply actions  

But it’s going to go back up in the off-season, because teams don’t have to worry about the cap implications immediately.

To acquire Kaberle today, teams need to ensure that adding him (or any player) doesn’t move them above the cap right away.

To acquire him at the draft, they then have 2 months to find the right move to alleviate their cap issues.

COming off of this stellar season, with one full year remaining on his undervalued contract, Kaberle’s value will be its highest since Carter and a 1st.

Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - only $1,860,966 to go!

by clrkaitken on Jan 14, 2010 12:24 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah, but that deal was for a pre-40 goal scoring Jeff Carter.

That deal today would be for a late first round pick and James Sheppard

by birky on Jan 14, 2010 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Didn’t he say last Saturday on HNIC that it’s still their goal to make the playoffs and that they’ll make the necessary trades to get a player on the team to make it happen? What the hell is left to trade to get someone good enough to help them make the playoffs? He just said today that they won’t ask Kaberle to waive his NTC.

"Is there an ih-sue Papa?"

by Another Good Kingston Boy on Jan 14, 2010 12:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Of course he said the playoffs were still the goal, like Chemmy said if Burke were to say to hell with this season it’s a PR disaster.

And he also said IF he could make a trade to get them in he would. That little word makes a huge difference.

leaf fan stuck in ottawa, a localized black hole that will suck everything in that area to oblivion.

by stucky on Jan 14, 2010 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Plain and simple, we overachieved last year.

That team was gawd-awful, only so many forwards had career years offensively, and then Gerber played his best hockey of his last 3 years that we ended up better than we should be. If the team had have been Colorado terrible last season, the Kessel trade never happens because Burke realizes we’re guaranteed to be giving up two lottery picks.

The offseason signings, the development of young players like Stajan, White, Mitchell and GRabovski last season and the cap flexibility this season made Burke believe the Kessel trade was worth the risk. (And I still prefer two 1sts and a 2nd to Kaberle and a 1st for Kessel).

DGB’s correct that Burke deserves blame for misreading the team’s position, but doesn’t deserve to be fired. He does need to clearly identify what his next step is before the trade deadline.
WIlson deserves blame because his players can’t seem to do things they should have learned in PeeWee, like kill a penalty or move to open space on a powerplay.
The players deserve blame for the aforementioned inability to do things PeeWee players know how to do.

Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - only $1,,882,353 to go!

by clrkaitken on Jan 14, 2010 12:00 PM EST reply actions  

He does need to clearly identify what his next step is before the trade deadline.

And having him reiterate, as he apparently did again today, that he’s not trading Kaberle is not a good sign.

Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.

by Down Goes Brown on Jan 14, 2010 12:01 PM EST up reply actions  

That may just mean he’s not asking him to waive his NTC at the deadline.

If he’s intent on keeping White, Kabby will probably go at the draft.

Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - only $1,,882,353 to go!

by clrkaitken on Jan 14, 2010 12:03 PM EST up reply actions  

He said he won’t ask him to waive at any point. Does his NTC take a pause for not making the playoffs again? I could handle an offseason move, but I’d still rather he cash in at the deadline.

Leafs Rumination: hockey and sesquipedalianism.

by puckurgently on Jan 14, 2010 12:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, it does. Any season in which the Leafs don’t make the playoffs, IIRC.

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Jan 14, 2010 12:13 PM EST up reply actions  

We heard this exact same song last year. Remember Burke’s brilliant gambit to hold onto Kaberle so that everyone would knock down his door once Bouwmeester was moved?

Veteran players are at their highest value at the trade deadline. That’s especially true for Kaberle, since you’d get him two playoff runs instead of one. Holding onto him at the deadline so you can move him in the off-season (when their are similar UFAs available for free) is just madness.

Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.

by Down Goes Brown on Jan 14, 2010 12:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree. Kaberle’s trade value will be much lower this summer. Considering that making the playoffs can be the difference between being in the red or being in the black, teams get desperate.

by birky on Jan 14, 2010 12:25 PM EST up reply actions  

i agree on Kaberle

but don’t forget, Burke did ask for a list of teams from Kabby last year.

he may never need to “ask” Kaberle to waive anything…

I have nothing interesting to say.

by blurr1974 on Jan 14, 2010 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

indeed

if Kabby says “these are the teams i would go to” he has (at least in principal) agreed to waive.
so if Burke came to him and said “hey Kabby, nashville wants you, and they are on your list”
its not really asking to waive the NTC

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

But that’s bush league on Burke’s part. He’s basically setting it up so that if Kaberle is dealt, it looks like he wanted out. There’s no reason to keep being so public about this, other than making Burke look good.

There’s nothing wrong with asking a player to waive his NTC. Happens all the time. I have no idea why Burke inisists on thumping his chest on this issue.

Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.

by Down Goes Brown on Jan 14, 2010 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

well I was half joking, but I still think there is a (small) chance that Kabby is gone at the deadline

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

If it wasn’t for the mix-up at the draft, Kabby’d be a Bruin right now.

I gotta think a team in need of a puck-mover and PP quarterback will ante up at the draft to get that player for one year and 4.25M

Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - only $1,860,966 to go!

by clrkaitken on Jan 14, 2010 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

What, the mix-up where Burke somehow thought he was getting Kessel and a first for him?

Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.

by Down Goes Brown on Jan 14, 2010 12:26 PM EST up reply actions  

The deal for Carter 2 years ago was Carter and a first… why the surprise?

Also, trading for Kessel was not done in a vacuum…

Burke and his staff probably looked ahead and decided

 "Um, it is highly unlikely that we are going to get a shot at a top offensive player in two years time when we will be competitive, but we have a chance at this 22 year old this year. Sure this deal won’t look good over the next 2 years or so… but when the team starts coming together in 2012 we will have a 24 year old scorer.’

Also, what percentage of us before the season thought ‘we aren’t a very good team, but if things go right we can be fighting for a playoff spot and… wait, we got Kessel? that might just be enough of a push to get that 8th playoff spot?’

I am in that percentage.

To be fair, I don’t know if the Kessel trade will turn out to be a good move or not but let’s consider that Burke had the balls to make that deal.

Sure it looks pretty bad right now, but all the people who are now criticizing him for making that deal would have been tearing him up for doing nothing if he hadn’t made a move.

You can’t have it both ways, people. Burke is shit or get off the pot – he may have shat a poor decision but who could have predicted this season would be as bad as it is?

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."

Albert Einstein

by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Jan 14, 2010 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Kadri

I’m going to watch him and the Knights play Friday night here against the Front’s.

What are the rules about him playing those 9 games in the NHL? Once the Leafs are inevitably eliminated from the playoffs, I say bring him up and let him get some experience.

"Is there an ih-sue Papa?"

by Another Good Kingston Boy on Jan 14, 2010 12:01 PM EST reply actions  

he cant play in the NHL until the OHL season is done and the knights are eliminated from the playoffs

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:03 PM EST up reply actions  

well seeing as how they’re tied for 4th overall, that might not happen.

"Is there an ih-sue Papa?"

by Another Good Kingston Boy on Jan 14, 2010 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I would argue that this isn’t yet Brian Burke’s team. I took a quick look at the current roster and I counted only 9 players that he signed (maybe 10); which is easily less than half of the team. JFJ and Fletcher have built most of this team (Finger, Blake, Toskala, etc…).

We require, as a team, proper levels of pugnacity, testosterone, truculence and belligerence.

by Belligerent Burkie on Jan 14, 2010 12:04 PM EST reply actions  

Sure. But that number would be a lot lower if Burke ever actually made a trade.

Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.

by Down Goes Brown on Jan 14, 2010 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

That is never off topic.

Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.

by Down Goes Brown on Jan 14, 2010 1:03 PM EST up reply actions  

You mean if he was able to make a trade right? Most of the players we have that other teams want are the ones we want to keep (Kaberle aside). Nobody is calling Burke at 4 am looking to aquire Jason Blake.

We require, as a team, proper levels of pugnacity, testosterone, truculence and belligerence.

by Belligerent Burkie on Jan 14, 2010 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Trades are impossible during the season. But not at the deadline, and not in the off-season.

Burke just chose not to deal because for the most part he liked his roster. Oops.

Down Goes Brown - Unapologetically nostalgic for the past. Brutally realistic about the present. Grudgingly optimistic about the future.

by Down Goes Brown on Jan 14, 2010 1:04 PM EST up reply actions  

how do you know this? He may have liked some of his top end guys, but than again so did everyone else.

I’m pretty sure he wasn’t sitting in his office going ‘Hmm, someone offered me a prospect for Jamal Mayers – nah, think I’ll keep him cause I like him.’

DGB you are an amazing blogger and I hold you in the highest respect, but I’m going to have to call bullshit on you for that statement

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."

Albert Einstein

by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Jan 14, 2010 5:01 PM EST up reply actions  

you need two to tango – do you advocate making a poor trade just for the sake of making a trade?

If you are, then there is this guy who has a resume here… JFJ?

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."

Albert Einstein

by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Jan 14, 2010 4:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Burke came in with the promise that things would change. That is, after all, the impetus for firing the old GM.

And then he went and signed a couple of expensive, underwhelming UFAs and traded away two first rounders. The Leafs are once again a mediocre team playing the blame game with various pieces, and the fans are looking at the exact same thing they’ve been looking at for 4 years.

Burke saw an average team and thought he could take gambles in order to propel it into success. He’s failed, and he was wrong. Those two facts are pretty inescapable, no matter how they might be cushioned with intentions and hindsight.

He’s done a terrible job thus far if you want to evaluate where the team was when he came on and where it is now. He looked at a team that had been mismanaged with win-now solutions, and then he repeated those mistakes. That decision making process rests entirely on him.

We can talk about how “it all might work out anyway” but we were saying it in the JFJ era too.

by koopa kid on Jan 14, 2010 12:07 PM EST reply actions  

I have more belief that a 22, 24, 28 and 29 year old can furn things around than a bunch of 30 somethings.

Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - only $1,,882,353 to go!

by clrkaitken on Jan 14, 2010 12:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Are you telling me that your hope for this season was that we’d all be saying “Well hopefully these guys can pull something out later…” again?

Yes, it could all work out. The issue is that once again the Leafs are going to lose and have nothing to show for it, and if any of the new “core” mess up then we’re up a creek. Again.

by koopa kid on Jan 14, 2010 12:15 PM EST up reply actions  

what can you say about a draft pick?
I hope the guy we draft turns out to be good!

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually we’re saying that we hope the next two guys we draft turn out to be good. And it’s looking very, very likely that they will be, considering where the leafs end up.

Look, you can hope that the Leafs do well, that Boston will bungle a very high pick, but the fact is that the Leafs are terrible and someone else is reaping that reward.

by koopa kid on Jan 14, 2010 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh no, don’t get me wrong. I wrote this season off a while ago.

But my point was that JFJ tried to win now with 30 somethings who were cashing in on contract years. Burke has acquired young pieces with potential that would hopefully develop into building blocks, and/or young veterans who can provide capable stopgaps for the short and medium term until the prospect pipeline hopefully gets rolling.

I’m more inclined to believe that 23 year old Phil Kessel and 25 year old Jonas Gustavsson are going to mean more to the team next year, and deliver results superior to this year, than 36 year old JAson Blake and 31 year old Jeff FInger. You know what I mean?

Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - only $1,860,966 to go!

by clrkaitken on Jan 14, 2010 12:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I understand that reasoning, but the mentality behind the Kessel move is the same, and the team’s situation with regards to it’s place in the standings and it’s draft picks is also the same. You can’t tell me that’s not unsettling.

by koopa kid on Jan 14, 2010 12:22 PM EST up reply actions  

“here is a player who is young, can score goals and will be a big part of this team going forward”
is much different than
“here is this past his prime vet who might bring some jam to putting the team over the edge this season!”

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:24 PM EST up reply actions  

that goes for any team experiencing a fair bit of an overhaul.

Every d pairing is two guys who have never played together until this season. And on each pairing is only one guy who has played under Wilson before, with all of 1 season to his credit. behind them is a goalie who has never played with any of them before, or with Wilson, or in the NHL.

Up front are a huge amount of guys left over from Fletcher, JFJ and even the Quinn eras. Burke looked at what they did last year and hoped that with an upgrade behind them, they could be better, and that is the truth.

What is the Leafs biggest problem right now? – Scoring goals. No one can. So the opposition needs only worry about Kessel because a perfect storm of suck has enveloped the entire forward corps.

I don’t recall ANYONE thinking that the forwards would regress this badly over one season over the summer. Hindsight makes us all geniuses though…

I have nothing interesting to say.

by blurr1974 on Jan 14, 2010 12:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Just because we didn’t think they’d regress doesn’t mean we have to ignore it and we can’t say they’re playing like shit and it sucks to watch.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

who is ignoring it? who is saying this team is amazing and the games are a joy to our eyes?
how is that relevant to anything he said?

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:44 PM EST up reply actions  

i was responding to this:
Are you telling me that your hope for this season was that we’d all be saying "Well hopefully these guys can pull something out later…" again?

Yes, it could all work out. The issue is that once again the Leafs are going to lose and have nothing to show for it, and if any of the new "core" mess up then we’re up a creek. Again.

I’ve never said to ignore it or tell anyone what to say. Personally, I just avoid most GDTs now, so I have no idea what anyone says about the team anymore.

My only point is that the Leafs forwards are a bigger problem than their D or goalies. Burke put his focus in the off-season “from the net out” and I think the results are half decent. His only additions to the forward corps were with Orr and Kessel. I like those as well. This coming off season, Burke will have even more cap space and roster slots to fill at forward.

In other words, as puckurgently put it: It’s not finished

I have nothing interesting to say.

by blurr1974 on Jan 14, 2010 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

also Primeau

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

forgot about him.

so three bodies, one of which can score.

I have nothing interesting to say.

by blurr1974 on Jan 14, 2010 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

fair comment

“Burke put his focus in the off-season "from the net out" and I think the results are half decent”

i hadn’t considered that. I mean, the GA has been abysmal, but i’m still willing to pin most of that on Toskala. Save for Exelby, there’s no bodies on D that make me consistently nervois every time i see their jersey number. They’re just a tad overpaid, collectively

by pevans on Jan 14, 2010 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah i agree with the overpaid part.

Also the part where we don’t have an ‘elite’ guy if kaberle leaves.

But hopefully we can find/develop someone.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

ok makes more sense in response to that. apologies blurr.

I just get annoyed when people get called out for being frustrated watching shitty hockey.

The leafs aren’t good, it should be okay to say they aren’t good RIGHT NOW,
People should just stay away from the future argument, because who knows, Dastyuk Zetterberg and Franzen didn’t look like superstars until age 26.

And if anyone responds “do i really think Bozak Hanson or Stalberg could be a superstar?”

Honestly, they could! No one knew about Pavel, Henrik or Johan when they were 24.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:07 PM EST up reply actions  

The leafs aren’t good, it should be okay to say they aren’t good RIGHT NOW,

I don’t have a problem with the f actuality of that statement at all. It’s just blatantly obvious. I think what P3 and Chemmy are trying to do is push that typical response into more meaningful dialogue. Otherwise, we might as well read the comments on a TSN article….

Agreed on Bozak et all re: superstardom. You just never know…

I have nothing interesting to say.

by blurr1974 on Jan 14, 2010 1:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m fine with the dialogue, I just lose my temper in the GDT, saying stupid fucking shot into the chest jason blake shouldn’t be grounds for getting filleted by people for being angry.

And as much as it’s often said that this is an open community I don’t feel like being annoyed while watching a shitty product is allowed.

Like Clawson said earlier, on game nights it should be okay to be annoyed with the one ice product.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:25 PM EST up reply actions  

saying “jason blake i hate you for sucking and doing the same thing every fucking shift you stupid smashed hamster” is fine because it is a realistic deduction based on what is happening
saying “this team is the worst thing since ebola and brian burke is the worst GM in the history of forever and we are fucked for the rest of human history as a franchise” are not

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

as long as i can yell at current players for sucking when they suck, i’m okay.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:34 PM EST up reply actions  

aces

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

And former players. I want to yell at them for sucking when they were here too.

"We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into Iraq"
- Major Mike Shearer

by article1 on Jan 14, 2010 1:39 PM EST up reply actions  

YOU SUCK MURPHY!

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:40 PM EST up reply actions  

JONAS F-ING HOGLUND!!!1

"We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into Iraq"
- Major Mike Shearer

by article1 on Jan 14, 2010 1:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m okay with that.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:40 PM EST up reply actions  

seriously

because those guys SUCK

by pevans on Jan 14, 2010 3:08 PM EST up reply actions  

well really, what were Burkes options?
I would love to hear some viable other ways that Burke could have built this team any better than it is now without the gift of foresight

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I question why Burke should have been building this team for the now. Period. What I’d wanted to see was the team holding on to it’s picks, trading it’s veterans at value near the end of their contracts, and working with their young guys while taking the losses that would result. Burke’s done none of those things in an effort to bail out a sinking ship.

by koopa kid on Jan 14, 2010 12:13 PM EST up reply actions  

how is this team being built for the now? Looks to me like he is building for a few years down the road. a 22 year old on a 5 year contract, Komi to the same, two players that will be a part of this team going forward.
A few older players to 3 year deals as stop gaps, mentors and fillers while the kids develop and actually making the team much younger than it has been in a while.

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Because Burke said in a press conference that he was looking to win now, and in the future. Because trading for a top 5 pick was made under the assumption the Leafs would be better than a top 5 pick.

by koopa kid on Jan 14, 2010 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

every GM wants to win now (offer not valid in TanksBurgh) I don’t think Burke had fooled himself into thinking this was a legit playoff threat of a team, and no one picked so much to go wrong for the Leafs

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:31 PM EST up reply actions  

How can he sayanything else? He’s no fool. He knows where it stands. Once he starts saying this season is done, how does that make the players feel? Then they would tank and the pick would be even lower.

by Leaf in Habland on Jan 14, 2010 1:14 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Agreed, but we also have to take him at his word.

You say you want to win now and in the future, okay I believe you.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Could have waited to see how the team actually performed before wagering major assets?

by Robot Godzilla on Jan 14, 2010 12:15 PM EST up reply actions  

so then Kessel goes on LTIR or Nashville trades for him and Burke is SOL on getting the team a pure goal scorer and the Leafs maybe get a crack at a draft pick who might be good maybe some day

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Yep, and have the money to pick up the next FA.

by Robot Godzilla on Jan 14, 2010 12:18 PM EST up reply actions  

who may sign anywhere in the NHL, or turn out to be shit and at a guarenteed over payment

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:18 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah, but at least you’ve still got those picks. We lost the money and the picks because Burke was under the impression we were a piece away from being a playoff team.

The Kessel deal is a good move for a talented team to make. The Leafs, as we have learned, were not that. Frankly, that’s something Burke should have known, or at least waited to find out.

by Robot Godzilla on Jan 14, 2010 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Burke was under the impression they were one peice away from a playoff team?
what?
where do people keep getting this from?

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry, not verbatim, but he clearly thought we were in the hunt.

“a price we felt we could pay, considering the recent transactions”

“it’s a statement to our players that we intend to be competitive right away.”

by Robot Godzilla on Jan 14, 2010 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

i read that as he thought the free agent pickups of Hanson, Bozak and Gustavsson were comparable to draft picks
players with promise but no identified NHL ability

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Stocking the cupboard, as he put it. Obviously feeling he was in a position to buy.

by Robot Godzilla on Jan 14, 2010 12:47 PM EST up reply actions  

he had just signed 3 highly sought after free agents. It isn’t a far stretch to think he had more wiggle room with future assets than he did before.
Had Burke not signed those players it is very doubtful he would have pulled the trigger on the Kessel trade

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:48 PM EST up reply actions  

There’s is one big problem with undrafted free agents. For the most part, the ceiling is limited. I know the Leafs have to play the hand dealt to them, but still. Signing kids out of college or europe is far more hit or miss than a first round draft pick.

by birky on Jan 14, 2010 12:51 PM EST up reply actions  

really? is it? I’m not trying to be a dick here, but I haven’t seen any numbers anywhere that say Bozak has less chance at becoming an impact NHL player than a first round draft pick

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Bozak has the highest Point Per Game ratio in the NHL right now.

I have nothing interesting to say.

by blurr1974 on Jan 14, 2010 12:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Bozak can. Let’s not forget that Bozak is still a work in progress. Nobody truly knows what his ceiling is, but the odds of finding a guy who can contribute at a high level are slim. You may get one or two guys per season that can stick in the NHL out of the NCAA (undrafted guys). For most of those undrafted kids, there is a reason they weren’t taken. Not saying you can’t find a guy here or there, but it’s not as viable for the future as the draft. You will always have late bloomers, your Dan Boyles and Marty St. Louis, but they’re few and far between.

by birky on Jan 14, 2010 12:59 PM EST up reply actions  

yah, but all Hanson, Bozak and Gustavsson have shown a million more times more at the NHL level than any player yet to be drafted

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:01 PM EST up reply actions  

i agree on that issue, however

My point: if the team’s philosophy’s is “well, we’ll trade away picks because we can always just sign undrafted kids or europeans”, you’re playing with fire.

by birky on Jan 14, 2010 1:03 PM EST up reply actions  

yah, but he didnt trade the picks because he was going to sign players maybe, he traded them because he had known assets that he was pretty sure could be NHL players

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Only one of which had played any games in the AHL or NHL

by birky on Jan 14, 2010 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah, and most draft picks have never played at a level higher than the SEL or CHL

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:09 PM EST up reply actions  

but it all goes back to the ceiling. the likelihood that those three draft picks could be better than Bozak and Hanson is pretty good.

by birky on Jan 14, 2010 1:13 PM EST up reply actions  

maybe one of them (this years first) but second rounders are pretty damned iffy and who knows how well the leafs will finish next year

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t blame him for over estimating our skaters. I’m as guilty for that as anyone.

But we had two huge question marks in net. I don’t think he factored that into his wiggle room very well.

by Robot Godzilla on Jan 14, 2010 12:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Gustavsson and Toskala may have been question marks, but Toskala playing EVEN WORSE than he did last year and Gustavsson having two heart opperations were a little hard to predict
no one was expecting a viezna out of these two, but that?

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Well I mean Toskala was coming off of hip surgery. He’s getting older. He’s been given more chances to turn it around than Jose Theodore.

Monster’s surgery obviously wasn’t predictable, but it wasn’t supposed to have any lingering effects, right? He’s been pretty weak all around.

by Robot Godzilla on Jan 14, 2010 1:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Gustavsson looked pretty damned good up until this last little stretch where he has looked very beatable.
I’m not saying Burke shouldnt have gone for something a little more proven between the pipes, but an 80 year old Roloson or psycopath Emery didnt look like safe bets either

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Fair enough. I wonder if we can call GRBRZRKR in for another relief job.

by Robot Godzilla on Jan 14, 2010 1:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Roloson has been awesome.

A two year deal for him would’ve been okay by me even in july.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:09 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah, again hind site. No one knew he would be this good, thats why the islanders got Biron too, and Edmonton allowed him to walk for Khabbybulin (HA)

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

No hindsight for me!

I loved Rollie the goalie ever since he was in Minnesota.

But yes you’re right.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:27 PM EST up reply actions  

FYI: Gustavsson is 38th in the league in save percentage and 35th in GAA.

There are 30 teams in the league.

by Boob Gainey on Jan 14, 2010 1:15 PM EST up reply actions  

more to do with the team in front of him than him

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:16 PM EST up reply actions  

two goalies a team

so minimum 60 players.

middle of the pack on a team in 29th. That’s pretty good for a rookie…

I have nothing interesting to say.

by blurr1974 on Jan 14, 2010 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Which means more than 60 goaltenders. Toronto is either last or near-last in GAA, so Gustavsson is lower/mid-pack on a team that’s dead last otherwise.

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Jan 14, 2010 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Don’t let him off the hook for making the same mistake you (and I) did.

He’s paid a lot of money to be a full-time expert, surround himself with other experts, and get the job done. Nobody’s perfect, but the closer, the better.

by Akihockey on Jan 14, 2010 12:57 PM EST up reply actions  

if burke signed Kessel

even in part because he just signed Christian Hanson then i don’t know what to say

by pevans on Jan 14, 2010 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Bozak + Gustavsson = First rounders
Hanson = Second rounder

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

thats pure speculation.

by birky on Jan 14, 2010 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

so is saying that the draft picks will be better than those three players

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah, but the likelihood of finding a top level player is higher int he draft.

by birky on Jan 14, 2010 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

really? is it? again, I have never seen numbers proving this

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:18 PM EST up reply actions  

go look at the number of elite players drafted vs. the number of elite players not drafted

by birky on Jan 14, 2010 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

look at the number of players drafted VS the players not drafted

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:21 PM EST up reply actions  

fine. go look at the the number of elite players who were drafted in the first 2 rounds vs. the # who were undrafted.

by birky on Jan 14, 2010 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

of course more elite players came from the draft, its a simple numbers thing, more players who play in the NHL are drafted than not so it makes sense that a higher number of the elite players in teh NHL would be drafted

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Bozak wasn’t drafted because he stood 5’9" in his draft year.

He no longer stands 5’9".

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Jan 14, 2010 1:30 PM EST up reply actions  

he had some pretty damned good Jr numbers too

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:32 PM EST up reply actions  

haha

golf clap.

But come on, that’s just as narrow-minded as the people you’re railing against.

by pevans on Jan 14, 2010 1:19 PM EST up reply actions  

how so?

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:21 PM EST up reply actions  

unless i'm misreading

you’re implying that what we gave up for Kessel (two 1s and a 2) is equivalent to what we picked up as FA’s, ergo it’s a wash or something, since we’ve already replaced the assets we gave up.

Which is completely misleading. the assets we gave up for Kessel are completely distinct from those 3. They may be better. They may be worse.

At any rate, after having read this thread for the last hour, I’m convinced for now.

Kessel is here. The deal is done. Move on.

by pevans on Jan 14, 2010 3:12 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

"a price we felt we could pay, considering the recent transactions"
"it’s a statement to our players that we intend to be competitive right away."

neither of those scream “playoff team” to me.

I have nothing interesting to say.

by blurr1974 on Jan 14, 2010 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t have a problem with Burke trading a pick for Kessel. I am starting to question the need to give up 3 high draft picks for Kessel.

As Wysh said yesterday in their rumor’s chat, Kessel is a very, very good player. But he’s not a star player (at least not yet).

by birky on Jan 14, 2010 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

two firsts and a second is probably market value for a player like kessel
try and find a comparable trade where less was given.
and heatly doesnt count because they were essentially forced to trade him

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:20 PM EST up reply actions  

the problem with that argument is that you simply don’t see enough trades like that to set any kind of a market value.

by birky on Jan 14, 2010 12:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Boston was forced to trade him. There’s no way that they could afford to pay Kessel that money, and they were shocked at what we signed him for. The fact that Burke ended up giving market value for essentially a holdout is bad.

by koopa kid on Jan 14, 2010 12:23 PM EST up reply actions  

how were they forced?
If Boston didn’t get what they wanted for him they could have just slapped him on LTIR and easily had 4 months to sort out their cap situation, to which I have no doubt they could have done

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Even after trading we still had to do salary dumpings.

Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Jan 14, 2010 2:42 PM EST up reply actions  

The Bruins chose to trade a player with which they had all of the leverage.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

two firsts and a second is probably market value for a player like kessel. try and find a comparable trade where less was given.

Pederson for Neely
Savard for Zainullin
Bertuzzi for Luongo
Primeau, Sturm, lint for Thornton
Christensen, Esposito and Armstrong for Hossa
Coburn for Zhitnik
Sharp for Ellison

Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...

by mf37 on Jan 14, 2010 5:18 PM EST up reply actions  

sharp was a borderline nhler when he was traded to chicago. coburn was about as good as luke schenn has been this year when he was traded.

by birky on Jan 14, 2010 6:32 PM EST up reply actions  

note…i don’t necessarily disagree with you mf, just wanted to point out that Kessel was a much higher profile player than those two were when he was traded.

by birky on Jan 14, 2010 6:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t even agree with me. Just throwing out an half-assed answer to Jared’s question.

Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...

by mf37 on Jan 14, 2010 8:27 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Yeah

I was going to say “Ummm ‘comparable’”

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 11:35 PM EST up reply actions  

how about

not trading away two 1sts and a 2nd….letting Kessel hold out in Boston and seeing if and when the price comes down to land him? If this team is 15-25 and 10 points out of the playoffs (or hell, even worse, since we wouldn’t have Kessel) bt we’re all sitting here salivating over getting Taylor Hall, I can honestly say I’m a lot less bleak about this “rebuild”.

The Kessel deal is the 800 pound gorilla of this season.

by pevans on Jan 14, 2010 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Kessel price wouldn’t have gone down.

Kessel would’ve gone to Nashville.

Bruins all but said they also had a deal but Kessel would rather have signed in Toronto.

not that he WOULDN’T have signed in Nashville.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

or they could have just kept him, made a move or two and signed him themselves

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

could be (probably, usually am) wrong, but...

I thought both deals (NSH and TO) were contingent on Kessel signing with the team

I have nothing interesting to say.

by blurr1974 on Jan 14, 2010 1:13 PM EST up reply actions  

i know the TO one was, but never heard anything on the Nashville side, it wouldnt be a stretch to think that was part and parcel though

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:15 PM EST up reply actions  

they were.

but kessel never said he wouldn’t sign in nashville, just he would rather sign in toronto.

If toronto refuses to make a deal with boston, you think kessel doesn’t sign in nashville?

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

yes, given the option of staying where he isnt wanted and the GM tried to pay him below market value because he payed lesser players too much money or go to a place with a great hockey team quietly developing I’d pick Nashville

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

is his buddy’s name Blake Wheeler?

Lots of players don’t sign. He wouldn’t have been the first.

I have nothing interesting to say.

by blurr1974 on Jan 14, 2010 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

different situation.

Wheeler could sign with anyone, it wasn’t an offer sheet. The Coyotes just got the 35th pick in the draft as compensation.

i think.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:37 PM EST up reply actions  

my point being

lots of players don’t sign.

Kessel could have said no thanks, call me when I’m back from Russia, and cashed in over there.

I have nothing interesting to say.

by blurr1974 on Jan 14, 2010 1:38 PM EST up reply actions  

true,

but the Nashville contract wasn’t atrocious, just slightly less than Toronto’s.

I think he signs there instead of going KHL or europe.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 1:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I would have been really surprised if he disappeared to Russia or Europe. I think he enjoys playing at a high level, and you don’t get higher than the NHL.

Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Jan 14, 2010 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I also think he enjoys North America and working defibrillators.

But I might be wrong.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Is it wrong if I laughed at this? Oh well, if it is I don’t want to be right.

leaf fan stuck in ottawa, a localized black hole that will suck everything in that area to oblivion.

by stucky on Jan 14, 2010 3:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I think that the issue there is that Nashville was ready to make a deal as well and Burke identified Kessel as a player that was needed.

But yeah, if he doesn’t make that trade we’re laughing.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

One why I would put it is,

The Kessel trade was a gamble; we don’t know if it’ll work out yet, compared to who we could have drafted this summer and next.

The question, then, is: with the state of the Leafs at the time, should Brian Burke have gambled, or played it safe?

by Akihockey on Jan 14, 2010 12:31 PM EST reply actions  

yes

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m leaning toward no. I’d rather have drafted, then traded picks for a star player when the team was closer to competing. My fear with Kessel is that if the team is as bad as it looks, maybe they’re not going to be a cup contender during his time here.

by Akihockey on Jan 14, 2010 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

yah, but then you run the risk of never finding a player like kessel when you need him
what if 3 years down the road the Leafs need a pure goal scorer and none is to be found? they trade away a kings ransom for one or gamble on a vet
nothing is for sure

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

True. But assuming it takes 3 more years to rebuild this team before it’s ready to go on a deep playoff run, then we’ve got a pure goal scorer for just one year anyway.

by Akihockey on Jan 14, 2010 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

so? we still have him, at or around his physical peak

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I should have read a little further when I made a similar point

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."

Albert Einstein

by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Jan 14, 2010 5:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m curious how many people would have been saying, “Man I wish Burke would have pulled the trigger on the Kessel deal” if Nashville got him or Boston kept him instead, assuming all else is the same.

leaf fan stuck in ottawa, a localized black hole that will suck everything in that area to oblivion.

by stucky on Jan 14, 2010 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Minus Kessel this season, I think we’d all be cheering for the draft pick. And seeing how bad the Leafs are, I don’t think many of us would have expected Kessel to make a big difference.

Without disparaging Kessel, his addition to the team has not helped move it out of a lottery pick position, and we’re over halfway through the season. That’s how bad the team around him is.

by Akihockey on Jan 14, 2010 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

and how irritating was all that tank nation talk?
probably more irritating than the “hang burke from the rafters talk”

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

This, is a great point.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 14, 2010 12:45 PM EST up reply actions  

I take solace that we have a GM who hasnt panicked despite a terrible season and is sticking to his plan after years of watching another GM run the organization with all the ability of a monkey throwing shit at a mirror to sully his reflection

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:34 PM EST up reply actions  

take that back

he’s the silver fox!

oh wait. you mean that other guy

by pevans on Jan 14, 2010 3:15 PM EST up reply actions  

people would be crying out against Burke. just like they are now.

as long as the team is losing, Leaf fans will be up in arms.

by birky on Jan 14, 2010 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Not me. Who would look at an even worse team (minus Kessel), and think one player would make a difference. Hell, we HAVE Kessel, and I can’t imagine ANOTHER star player making this team a playoff contender. We’re bad.

by Akihockey on Jan 14, 2010 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

FWIW the Leafs are 5-5-1 when Kessel scores.

The Leafs are 3-8-2 in his current cold streak.

by birky on Jan 14, 2010 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

To be absolutely fair

A lot of people suggested the Leafs would have trouble scoring this year, which was typically brushed aside by pointing to offensive success from last season. As clrkaitkin pointed out, the Leafs overachieved offensively last season – it was very surprising to me that they were able to do just as well without Sundin, and I think it was a fluke. I don’t know why (luck? new coach effect? lack of pressure to succeed?)

That said, I think they’re clearly underachieving this year. Burke improved the defence (although not the goaltending – clearly should have kept Grbrsrkr) and improved the youth, but the pucks aren’t going in at all, and I think in that regard they’ve been unlucky. I also wonder if the Kessel trade (sorry PPP) made the players themselves feel pressured to win, and they’re not responding well.

I don’t blame Burke – I think we all just underestimated how far this team has to go. The core of the team this year was always going to be JFJ/Fletcher players – those are the veterans – and they still just aren’t that good.

I've been looking at the sky

by Back In Black on Jan 14, 2010 12:47 PM EST reply actions  

i dont have the numbers in front of me, but i still think the leafs are around mid point in the NHL for goals scored. It isn’t their main problem (except for the last few games).
The main issue is goals against, mainly on the PK

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 12:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Goaltending is their main problem

But they were last in GAA last year, too. In fact, they were just as bad or slightly worse. A big reason they are worse overall this year is that they’ve fallen from 10th to 18th in GFA.

I've been looking at the sky

by Back In Black on Jan 14, 2010 12:57 PM EST up reply actions  

it is all Toskalas fault
of that I am sure

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s only true since the slump, though. They were sitting right where they were last year until this recent stretch of games.

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Jan 14, 2010 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

In their last 13 games, they’re 2-0 when they score at least 3 goals. Not to distract from PK and goaltending woes, but offense is killing them too.

I've been looking at the sky

by Back In Black on Jan 14, 2010 1:32 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s the slide from 11th (where they were) to 18th (where they are).

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Jan 14, 2010 1:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Ah, I see

You meant slump in scoring, not just slump in winning. Point taken. However, without this recent stretch of games – and without the opening eight games, when they also averaged less than 2 GF/game – they would be in contention for a playoff spot. Or at least as close as they were last year.

I've been looking at the sky

by Back In Black on Jan 14, 2010 1:56 PM EST up reply actions  

This team seems to be feast or famine. I think this current streak is close to over, though I wouldn’t bet a cent on it ending tonight.

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Jan 14, 2010 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s the start of the year all over again. This team is a on a freaking teetertotter in terms of regression to and from the mean.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I also wonder if the Kessel trade (sorry PPP) made the players themselves feel pressured to win, and they’re not responding well.

I think that’s just it. This team has a lot of losers that have made their miracle runs only once the playoffs have been deemed dead. After the Olympics the players that are left will probably rally which sickens me.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Why? That late-season rally does nothing but damage Boston’s chances….

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Jan 14, 2010 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

In that sense it would be great but in the sense that it just shows how gutless these guys seem to be.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 2:20 PM EST up reply actions  

It would, but you take your victories where you can….

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Jan 14, 2010 2:21 PM EST up reply actions  

gutless?

HOW DARE YOU BE NEGATIVE!

by pevans on Jan 14, 2010 3:18 PM EST up reply actions  

LOL

But I said ‘seem to be’ so I give myself a pass.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 3:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Because then everyone will want them all to be resigned.

by PassivelyTruculent on Jan 14, 2010 2:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Fool me once, shame on you.

Fool me several dozen times?

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Jan 14, 2010 2:22 PM EST up reply actions  

How forgetful we can be….

by PassivelyTruculent on Jan 14, 2010 2:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I am sick of those ’it’s nearly hopeless now, lets go on a tear’

I thought that attitude left with the Muskoka gang

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."

Albert Einstein

by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Jan 14, 2010 5:12 PM EST up reply actions  

haha

13-3 to end the season fo sho

by pevans on Jan 14, 2010 3:18 PM EST up reply actions  

One thing I don’t think has been mentioned in this thread is, should Burke be held accountable for not firing the coach? 3 new defencemen signed, and we have one of the worst PK’s in history?

by Akihockey on Jan 14, 2010 12:49 PM EST reply actions  

It’s going to be a touchy thing to get into here. But I have to agree. The team is playing poorly as a whole. They’re unmotivated, inconsistent. How much worse does it get before we look at Wilson?

by Robot Godzilla on Jan 14, 2010 1:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Thought exercise:

Compare likelihood of finding a coach who can win with this group to finding players who can respond to Wilson’s system.

Leafs Rumination: hockey and sesquipedalianism.

by puckurgently on Jan 14, 2010 1:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Hard to imagine somebody doing worse then Wilson is. Easy to imagine somebody else, who doesn’t have such a cozy relationship with the GM, getting more respect from ther players, better performances out of them, and better results in the standings. It’s not hard to imagine somebody else getting better results out of this group. Not hard at all.

Second excercise: Name one good thing Wilson does for the Leafs. Just one.

by general borschevsky on Jan 14, 2010 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

he makes Howard Berger cry himself to sleep

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

He benches players who aren’t working hard.

I've been looking at the sky

by Back In Black on Jan 14, 2010 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

well some of them, cant bench 80 percent of the team every night

Puns, Innuendo and Bad Spelling, Yes We Got That

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2010 1:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Granted

on all four points. Well done.

I’m not ready to throw in the towl on Wilson yet, but I am very concerned. Good to hear some counter-points cause I am honestly struggling to appreciate Wilson right now.

by general borschevsky on Jan 14, 2010 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Rec'd

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 2:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Also, lets face it, we will probably be seeing a lot of new players in a Leafs uniform next year, whether it be callups becoming regulars or FA signings or trades.

I say Wilson has until the end of next season.. then if the results still aren’t there it is time to look around at our options

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."

Albert Einstein

by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Jan 14, 2010 5:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ve been slowly coming round to this way of thinking for a while.

the PK has been too bad, for too long to solely be a question of personnel. Whoever we put out flails around hopelessly like a hamstrung giraffe. At some point, it has to be considered a systemic issue. And that’s on the coaches.

"We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into Iraq"
- Major Mike Shearer

by article1 on Jan 14, 2010 1:38 PM EST up reply actions  

he's an excellent WWE-style heel

with all of his “GO USA HOCKEY” stuff.

Personally, I love it.

But yeah, with regards to the Leafs? I dunno.

by pevans on Jan 14, 2010 3:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Gustavsson’s PK SV% replacing Toskala’s PK SV% eliminates about 13-16 goals against. That’s a HUGE change.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Is it possible to be patient while not accepting all-out mediocrity?

The Leafs have scored the first goal only 13 times in 47 games.

They’ve been outscored in the 1st period this year 48-29.

Their OT record is 1 win 9 losses.

They’ve been outscored 7-0 in 4-on-4 situations.

Their penalty kill rate is 68.1%, the worst the league has seen in TWO DECADES and very close to being the worst penalty kill in recorded history (1979-80 L.A. Kings were 67.7%)

You can’t play “truculent” hockey if you can’t kill penalties. There isn’t just one problem. It’s a total break-down of the entire design and system.

A bad team that tries hard is still fun to watch. That would be tolerable.This team fails in nearly every category. One win in 6 games and then they play soft at home in the third period against the league’s worst team and lose. That’s unnacceptable.

The flip side of patience is toleration. The way this team plays is unnacceptable. It’s embarrassing. I don’t mind having patience for somebody who’s legitimately struggling, but I don’t tolerate being embarrassed. There needs to be an honest struggle. There needs to be an HONOURABLE and NOBLE effort.

Patience and progress work hand in hand.

by general borschevsky on Jan 14, 2010 12:50 PM EST reply actions  

Andy Murray is available

and he took a team like that and made em good.

by Icion on Jan 14, 2010 12:56 PM EST up reply actions  

At this point “mediocrity” is pretty damn flattering.

by Robot Godzilla on Jan 14, 2010 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

the OT point

is an excellent one.

Much like the Habs, if the Leafs could even average say .500 after three periods, this season’s looking a lot better.

1-9 is just unfairly bad.

by pevans on Jan 14, 2010 3:21 PM EST up reply actions  

and how many games have we outshot our opponents and lost?

how quickly we forget the games we spend most of the time dominating and then end up losing.

We look back and see the ‘L’ and go ‘that was another stinker.’

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."

Albert Einstein

by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Jan 14, 2010 5:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Last I checked, a hockey game was 60 minutes long. The Leafs have been outscored in the 1st period this year 48-29. It’s easy to pepper a team with a ton of shots when you’re already down by 2 goals. Let’s see them do that in the 1st when the game is tied 0-0.

The Leafs don’t quit, I’ll give them that, and they must have the league’s best record when trailing by 2 goals. But they also don’t show up on time, and they don’t give a serious effort until it’s already too late. There’s been very few games this year, maybe none, where the Leafs have dominated their opponents from the beginning of the game until the end.

by general borschevsky on Jan 14, 2010 6:03 PM EST up reply actions  

not arguing any of your points, just trying to show that a fair chunk of those losses occurred when the Leafs were carrying the play for a good part of the game.

The results have been more horrible than the play(although I’ll admit the play has been pretty bad.)

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."

Albert Einstein

by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Jan 14, 2010 6:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Outshooting opponents is not necessarily indicative of strong play.

Someone needs to pull out the statistical analysis that showed losing teams usually post favourable shot differentials in the late stages of a game.

Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...

by mf37 on Jan 14, 2010 8:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Transcript of Burke’s press conference on the front page.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Jan 14, 2010 1:45 PM EST reply actions  

My 2 Cents on the whole matter is, yes Burke should be held accountable (not fired – don’t get me wrong), but what is done is done, there’s no point harping on it after the fact. For me at least, the true test of Burke’s character is what he does NOW, at the deadline, draft day and free agency. Personally I’d rather he commit to the rebuilding process and re-sign only a couple players (White, Gusto, maybe 1-2 others) and either trade the rest for w.e he can get or let them walk come free agency; as opposed to retooling.

by PassivelyTruculent on Jan 14, 2010 1:52 PM EST reply actions  

Second time posting here

Hi Guys I’m usually a lurker in what I think is one of the best user communities on the net. I’ve only commented once before and that was in my total disagreement of the Kessel trade. I’m not here to tell you na, na, na, na I was right you guys were wrong. That’s defeatist and stupid. What I do want to say that although not finished in judgment that trade compounded by the lackluster additions on defense and the utter horrendous play of the team makes that move an epic fail. Yes it can get better but there is no way Burke makes that trade if he thought his moves coupled with trading for Kessel doesn’t make both those picks in the teens. First from a cap standpoint he left no room for in year additions to tweak this team. Next, If he was not to have made the trade and lets just hypothetically say the leafs finish bottom 3 (Hall, Fowler, Seguin) which all pundits agree are impact players of the future; would Burke make that trade on the draft floor??? Hey Burke I want (insert any of the above 3) plus you have to give me your #2 this yr and your #1 next yr. You get Kessel and you have to pay him as a franchise player. No way that you do this. Please don’t tell me they could be the next Daigle, Ill tell you Kessel could be the next Rick Dipietro. And yes I agree its gloom and doom all the time and it’s hard to keep on hearing this but I think most fans are basically saying this with every loss. " This motherf%^## is going to cost us a top pick franchise player for F^%^*^ Phil Kessel who hasn’t scored in (insert current number) ….." Short sighted? Maybe. But correct in one way. Burke obviously gambled on that trade and right now it’s not looking good. In the highest profile team in the league making as much money as he is, you bet your ass he deserves the criticism right now. Especially with how much he likes to talk. And for all who are going to tell me judge this in 3 or 4 years let me tell you this. In all of our current jobs in any similarly situation we would be catching hell too. And yes I know that sports and real jobs are not totally equal (please don’t tell me that invalidates the point). Yes in 3 years if Kessel is part of a # line taking them to the playoffs this will be forgotten but that in no way will validate the trade as it will be bad asset management. With that I want to say how much I enjoy this site and its many members. Thank you for an outstanding job. Note none of my comments are personal to anybody.

by lostsin44 on Jan 14, 2010 2:05 PM EST reply actions  

Cheers

But you gotta use paragraphs on that comment!

First from a cap standpoint he left no room for in year additions to tweak this team

There aren’t many in-year additions as it stands to begin with.

Yes in 3 years if Kessel is part of a # line taking them to the playoffs this will be forgotten but that in no way will validate the trade as it will be bad asset management.

If Kessel is doing that and the kids drafted aren’t doing close to what he is doing then that definitely validates the trade.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 2:25 PM EST up reply actions  

since Grabovski's injury

the Leafs have gone 1-4.

Maybe we’re not giving enough credit to the crazy Belorussian?

I have nothing interesting to say.

by blurr1974 on Jan 14, 2010 2:53 PM EST reply actions  

Hoping Wallin could step into his shoes was a bit of a miscalculation….

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Jan 14, 2010 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Hoping Wallin could step into tie his shoes was a bit of a miscalculation….

Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - only $1,860,966 to go!

by clrkaitken on Jan 14, 2010 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s just mean, he’s really well spoken.

by PassivelyTruculent on Jan 14, 2010 3:10 PM EST up reply actions  

allegedly not a good shoe-tie-er though

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."

Albert Einstein

by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Jan 14, 2010 5:17 PM EST up reply actions  

What it does prove is that Grabvoski can’t just be replaced by the first guy in the ticket line who happens to be wearing a Leaf sweater, or Wallin, whichever represents less ability.

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Jan 14, 2010 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Grabbo has clearly regressed this year

I didn’t like his contract terms when he re-upped, but even I’d have to agree he’s better than the average asset you get with a 2nd round pick.

by pevans on Jan 14, 2010 3:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I was shocked that he only has four penalty minutes. Where is the crazed pinapple-killer of old?

Leaf, the universe and everything.

by 1967ers on Jan 14, 2010 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

He made up with the baby Kostityn over the summer, thus no more vendetta.

by PassivelyTruculent on Jan 14, 2010 3:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m willing to take the challenge. I think I’m a better player than Rickard Wallin.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Jan 14, 2010 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

not for nothing, but

I have not worn a pair of skates on the ice in over 15 years, and I’m pretty sure I’m a better player than Wallin

I have nothing interesting to say.

by blurr1974 on Jan 14, 2010 3:37 PM EST up reply actions  

This actually reminds me of a joke an Irish-Catholic comedian was making about the Passion of Christ (remember, it’s a joke):

Jewish people are always complaining that they get blamed for killing Jesus Christ…well it sure as hell wasn’t the Mexicans!

Basically, the problems with this team are becoming Burke’s to own more and more.

The fact that he didn’t have more kids in the pipeline and more good players ready to step in when Fletcher took over was on JFJ but now…

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.

by PPP on Jan 14, 2010 4:19 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your best source for quality Toronto Maple Leafs news, rumours, analysis, stats and scores from the fan perspective.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Frank_serpico_by_drawmanou_small
How to Value Mikhail Grabovski

Recent FanPosts

N907005365_1934770_7971_small
Leafs vs. Habs and the red hot $cott Gomez!!
Black_sox_small
First-time jersey purchase
Blawrie_small
Irresponsible Speculation Time
Syrupglleaf17lg_small
The Stretch Drive Schedule: DIY Analysis (AKA I have way too much time on my hands)
Leafs_small
Heartbreaking S-O Loss to Penguins
N907005365_1934770_7971_small
Complaining like an All-Star
Small
Mental Health and Kevin Bieksa
Leafs_small
AllStar Fantasy Draft........P'neuf Already
Frank_serpico_by_drawmanou_small
Team Defense Cap Hit vs. Performance

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

StatCounter

wordpress visitor


Chief Blogging Officers

Calvin_small PPP

Aen1_small Chemmy

PPP's Girlfriends

Don_t_panic_small SkinnyFish

Picture_1_small JP Nikota

Fg_small birky

Christian-hanson-wrecks-brian-o_1__small Bower Power