How Streaky Is Phil Kessel?
Editor's Note: Phil Kessel is streaky. That's taken as gospel and is used as a knock against him. But is he anymore streaky than any other sniper? Bower Power took the time to find out.

Versteeg doesn't seem to understand what just happened.- REUTERS/Mike Cassese
The question has come up countless times already – Is Kessel too streaky of a goal scorer? Do his droughts drag down his status as an elite goal scorer? Looking at his last 83 games and comparing them to peers, it looks like he doesn't suffer much more than most.
A brief paragraph on methodology. First of all, what’s a streak? For the purposes of this post, a cold streak is any two games where a player goes back to back without goals. Games of 1, 0, 1 is not counted as a cold streak. Games of 1, 0, 0, 1 is counted as a 2 game drought. For the section on hot streaks, a single goalless game does not interrupt what would be a hot streak. So in that section, games of 1, 1, 0, 1 is actually counted as a 4 game hot streak. 1, 1 is counted as a two game hotstreak, and 0, 0, 5, 0, 0 is not a hot streak. Kessel had been a Leaf for 83 games when I started working on this post, so I’ve grabbed the scoring data for Jeff Carter, Bobby Ryan, Rick Nash, Danny Heatley, and Alex Semin over their last 83 games.
The stats are available in full here (File, Download As). A player’s hot streak is to the left of his game stats, the same player’s cold streak is to the right of his game stats. I’ve pulled out just the cold streak summary stats below. I’ll have them in graphs, then I’ll put the numbers in sentences below, and then I’ll talk about what (I think) it all means.
Cold Streaks
|
Kessel |
Carter |
Ryan |
Nash |
Heatley |
Semin |
|
|
Drought Count |
11 |
14 |
13 |
12 |
12 |
15 |
|
"Cold" Games |
45 |
55 |
43 |
47 |
39 |
43 |
|
Max Drought |
8 |
6 |
8 |
11 |
7 |
6 |
|
Average Drought |
4.09 |
3.93 |
3.31 |
3.92 |
3.25 |
2.87 |
So the biggest thing is Kessel’s average drought; Kessel does take longer to "get hot" than the comparables we’ve pulled. His drought averages 4.09 games, compared to Semin’s low 2.87, and compared to the 3.56 average of all skaters (that average raises to 3.64 without Semin and to 3.6 without Semin and Kessel).
Though Kessel has had the longest droughts on average, his 11 droughts are the fewest of all our skaters in the last 83 games. He’s been cold for 6+ consecutive games three times, with a max of 8 games without a goal (Note: Now that he hasn’t scored against TBL and FLA, this number has become four times). And though Kessel's streaks have been fairly unbearalbe, he has yet to top Rick Nash’s 11 game goalless streak! But how is Phil once he turns on?
Scoring Streaks
|
Kessel |
Carter |
Ryan |
Nash |
Heatley |
Semin |
|
|
Hot Streak Count |
6 |
4 |
8 |
7 |
7 |
8 |
|
"Hot" Games |
34 |
20 |
29 |
29 |
36 |
29 |
|
Goals in one gm |
10 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
14 |
5 |
|
Average Streak |
5.67 |
5.00 |
3.63 |
4.14 |
5.14 |
3.63 |
|
Multi goal gms |
7 |
9 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
10 |
Kessel’s 6 scoring streaks are slightly below the average 6.67, and his streaks tend to last longer than others’, averaging 5.67 games of goal scoring (In this case, lower is better, since it means more evenly distributed scoring through the season).
But the good part about Phil’s hot streaks? He has just 7 multi goal games, and has yet to score a hat-trick. This isn’t 10 games of nothing, show up for 4 or 5 goals in one game, and then head out for another month. His hot streaks are long and sustained, consistently contributing to games for a long period of time.
Also of interest:
|
Kessel |
Carter |
Ryan |
Nash |
Heatley |
Semin |
|
|
Age |
23 |
26 |
23 |
26 |
30 |
26 |
|
Shared production |
Bozak Kulemin |
Hartnell Brier |
Getzlaf Perry |
Vermette Huselius |
Thornton Marleau |
Laich Backstrom |
So what does all this say about Phil?
First of all, yes. Phil is a streaky player. But when compared to the average "streakiness" of players, it’s probably not as bad as you thought. We’re wading through one of them right now – one more goalless game will tie his Leaf high. But it should end shortly, and it should trigger a five to seven game streak of goals. Which should spark a turn in the Leafs’ record; the Leafs are 15-38 in their last 83 when Kessel hasn’t scored and 19-11 when he has (OTLs counted as Ls).
But as far as development goes, it’s important to remember he still has a ton of "upside." This post has compared Phil to dominant shooters in what is expected to be their physical peaks with strong line mates. If a good, complementary centerman is one who helps a goal scorer shrink cold streaks and extend hot streaks, and if experience and size contribute to goal scoring, it's clear that Kessel is at a disadvantage in both categories against all opponents. There is no doubt in my mind that with teammates and time, Kessel will routinely be able to hit a 40 goal pace in his mid-to-late 20s.
PensionPlanPuppets.com is a fan community that allows members to post their own thoughts and opinions on the Toronto Maple Leafs and hockey in general. These views and thoughts may not be shared by the editor of PensionPlanPuppets.com.
43 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Solid post.
Kessel is going to be a STUD! MAYBE, we overpaid slightly but im still fine with the deal because Kessel in his prime, with linemates, is going to be a top player in the leauge. All these leaffans bitching and complaining…theres a thousand things screwed up with our team you can still whine about, get over the trade though.
Welcome
Thanks for joining.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
Since, we’re talking about Kessel – Question:
Why not try Kessel at Center?
I know he’s played wing for most of his NHL career, but I seem to recall him being a Center growing up.
He’s the Leafs most talented forward and they desperately need help down the middle.
BS
he’s way too soft and defensively unreliable to be a center in the NHL. It’ll never happen.
Loving the Leafs is like being in love with a drug-addled, gambling addicted prostitute with a heart of gold and a bunch of humanitarian awards from her youth. It’s hard. It hurts. But dammit! I just love them!
by Van Ryn's Neurologist on Nov 12, 2010 11:24 AM EST up reply actions
I hear that. But I just wonder if playing at center would make him more defensively responsible. He has the speed to be all over the rink. Maybe not the strength to play Center, but neither does Bozak. Would expect his goal scoring to take a hit.
BS
by MapleLeafMole on Nov 12, 2010 11:42 AM EST up reply actions
The problems facing kessel are a result of the fact he plays with no one on his line. Even a move to center would simply mean that instead of putting 3 guys on him along the boards, the opposing team simply overloads the middle…either way, he’s covered. Kessel needs space to really earn his money (think stamkos…finds the empty ice, Heavy shot, etc…difference is stamkos plays on a loaded line…they cant cover him with as many guys as they need to… therefore hes wide open and TB gets full benifit of his deadly shot) and so long as hes the only threat on the ice the defense can leave guys like Bozak open until the puck is on their stick. When they give Kessel some line mates its going to free up more ice and your really going to see what a proper NHL sniper can do. right now, he’s on his own..if he cant make his own space, he doesn’t have the ice needed to be as effective as he can be.
For sure. I agree with that. I guess what you’re saying is a move to Center wouldn’t help the team or Kessel, any. I think it might help the team a bit.
BS
by MapleLeafMole on Nov 12, 2010 12:15 PM EST up reply actions
It may help the team a bit (fuck, we can only really go up from where we are) but, i think hes too undersized to be effective at center at the NHL level. Any “help” to the team i fear would be miniscule at best….at least bozak (6’ 1" – 195lbs) can semi lean on people…whats Kessel going to do against a guy built like Carter, Thornton, Lecavalier, Getzlaf, etc…even Crosby (while vertically not a monster) is notoriously strong on his skates and tough to move off the puck. I just dont think theres a real benefit to moving him…we’d still need 5 more “top 6” forwards…and if we acquired them people would just end up saying “Surely we can do better (bigger, stronger) than Kessel up the middle?”
"soft" i'd agree with
but i think “defensively unreliable” is debatable
˙˙˙buoןɐ sǝɯoɔ ɹǝʇʇǝq buıɥʇǝɯos ןıʇun 'op oʇ ǝʌɐɥ ןןıʍ sıɥʇ
by blurr1974 on Nov 12, 2010 12:44 PM EST up reply actions
I agree. I think he plays the wing and is asked to score goals, so he might sacrifice a little “Defensive responsibility”. I think he has the hockey IQ for Center and we’d see a whole different Kessel.
BS
by MapleLeafMole on Nov 12, 2010 12:54 PM EST up reply actions
I think this piece highlights that the last thing we want is “a whole different Kessel.” The answers to our problems down the middle are not in this organization right now.
The experiment failed: Get rid of the trapezoid.
by Bower Power on Nov 12, 2010 12:59 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
We could swing him back to the wing, whenever that center comes around maybe? I’m grasping at straws, anything to help this team win a couple games
BS
by MapleLeafMole on Nov 12, 2010 1:57 PM EST up reply actions
I’m right there with you, but the last thing we want to do is screw with Kessel. His goal scoring drought is more of a regression to he mean than it is him needing us to shake things up. All goal scorers go these droughts, but because there’s less talent around Kessel, his are slightly more pronounced, and the team is much more impacted.
The experiment failed: Get rid of the trapezoid.
All goal scorers go these droughts, but because there’s less talent around Kessel, his are slightly more pronounced, and the team is much more impacted.
Couldn’t be more true.
Le sigh
BS
by MapleLeafMole on Nov 12, 2010 2:12 PM EST up reply actions
We use the term
“regress to his mean” way too loosely around here.
He isn’t “regressing to his mean” when he stops scoring.
“Regression to the mean” means for an INDIVIDUAL EVENT, if the first measurement or occurrence deviates heavily from the expected mean, the NEXT measurement TENDS to be closer.
The problem in this instance is, your individual occurrences are goals in a game. He either SCORES or he DOESN’T SCORE. What exactly would the mean be in this instance for a natural scorer like Kessel? His goals per game number for his career is a decimal… and that’s the closest thing you have to a “mean” for scoring or not scoring in an individual game.
Going on a hot streak or going on a cold streak has nothing to do with that concept. Scoring and Not Scoring are not any more or less extreme an occurrence than the previous instance. If he scores in one game, then scores in the next, he hasn’t actually gone further from his mean for the single measurement in a given game.
If you want to discuss number of goals per game, that’s a completely distinct measurement from what you’re examining in this idea of hot and cold streaks.
Either way, let’s stop using that term if we’re not going to use it correctly.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Nov 12, 2010 6:26 PM EST up reply actions
Also
the idea of an individual mean is a bit flawed in this instance because arguing that Phil Kessel has some sort of innate “mean” value of goal scoring is like arguing that he isn’t going to develop at all as a player ever.
Most people on here agree he’s capable of scoring 40 goals in a season… but he has yet to actually do that.
He might score 50 at some point, but he hasn’t done that yet either.
For all we know, he’s going to score 25 this year, and that would throw the whole “mean” thing for a loop.
Why aren’t we looking at the mean of the length of his hot and cold streaks? This one may be longer or shorter than past ones… if it’s longer… then we can hope his next one is shorter.
If his last hot streak was long though, the next one will most likely be shorter, so again, that might not be something we want to think about.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Nov 12, 2010 6:31 PM EST up reply actions
It also
implies we’re ignoring all external factors, like who he’s playing against, who he’s playing with, how both teams are playing, the goalie he’s facing, etc. All of which come into play.
We aren’t running identical measurements of identical situations over and over again… so the idea of regressing to the mean is a bit stretched any way we look at this.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Nov 12, 2010 6:33 PM EST up reply actions
You start off nice but always regress to the mean.
(jokes)
by Death_By_Leafs on Nov 12, 2010 7:08 PM EST up reply actions
If his shooting percentage is 40% there’s a good chance as the season goes on it’ll regress to the mean.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
A little confused
Not to be nitpicky, but:
He has scored in 34 games, and not scored in 45 of 83. That is only 79 games.
Additionally, you say the leafs are 15-38 when he doesnt score (or 53 games) and 19-11 when he does (or 30 games). Just a little confused as to why there are differences.
I figured out the problem – it should read that he has had 34 games which fall under a hot streak and 45 games which fall under a cold streak. A series along the lines of 0, 0, 1, 0, 0 would leave that 1 game as neither a hot streak nor a cold streak – that gap happened four times, giving us the difference between 79 and 83.
Still looking into the issues about the record, but it’s likely because I screwed up counting. It probably happened when I had to transition from counting on fingers to counting on toes.
The experiment failed: Get rid of the trapezoid.
by Bower Power on Nov 12, 2010 12:18 PM EST up reply actions
i use the gaps between my knuckles to complement my fingers when i’m counting
by Death_By_Leafs on Nov 12, 2010 2:22 PM EST up reply actions
It’s not just goals, it’s backchecking. Even if you’re not scoring, make your play a + when you’re out there.
He backchecks.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
He sure does backcheck
I’ve seen him go right down to his goal line if the centre isn’t there to support the puck when a DMan has it with a forechecker in his face. He’s one of the best Leafs at reading when a DMan pinches, and at dropping back to cover.
The guy may look like he belongs in Wayne’s World, but he has a high hockey I Q.
by Infield Pete on Nov 12, 2010 6:04 PM EST up reply actions
I see him more as a Forest Gump idiot savant type than as an extra in Wayne’s World.
©1979-2010 article1 All rights reserved. Terms and conditions available on request. May be freely reproduced by anyone except those answering to the description 'Thieving Mittenstringer'.
by article1 on Nov 12, 2010 8:22 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Concerning Kesticle
All shooters have dry spells. This guy lives to score, He grows a woodie every time he does. I think he takes a stick to bed because all he dreams about is putting the biscuit in the basket.
And don’t worry about poor Phil having to score on a dazzling rush. He would prefer them that way. More fun. He gets a bigger boner when he skates through the whole team.
Kesticle will always get his.
Fletcher On the Road
He’s on the road trip, in Hershey tonight. Looks to me another shoe is about to drop. They don’t ship out the ancient “Draft Schmafter” for no reason.
Oh yeah, it’s 1 zip for the Marlies after 1. One of Kadri’s Marlie linemates, D’Amigo, has the goal, by going to the net.
I still say Burke should have brought that whole line up and played them as the 3rd line. Quickest way I could see to find out how ready all 3 of them are.
Rynnas is standing on his head, 15 shots, a lot of them great chances. (I’m streaming in the audio)
Fletcher is being interviewed, he is raving about Kadri. The kid is gonna have to key Burke’s car to get sent back down, the way it sounds.
Think back to when Kessel was first acquired.
Many Boston fans thought that he’d never score without Savard, and we spent an entire season ridiculing this notion.
Now, Kessel is in the midst of a drought and we say “yeah, but who could put up any points beside Bozak, and Versteeg (or Kulemin, and any one of our defensemen)?”. It’s an interesting shift in perspective, because a top-line playmaking centre seems to be the consensus #1 need right now for the Leafs.
Incidentally, we always talk about Kessel’s goal total. That’s good. Fine. But I suspect that his slumps would look a whole lot worse if we considered his point totals next to some of these other players.
Of course I realize that Kessel is young, and that he may still put up better numbers than he has over the past couple years, but I’m starting to wonder how much better. Some young players just hit their ceilings early.
In any event, I’m very interested to see how this MacArthur-Grabbo-Kessel line performs. In my eyes, these three have been our best forwards so far, so it only makes sense that they all wind up on the top line.
Defense! Defense! Common! Do you call that blowing!?
Most elite goal scorers hit their prime between ages 24-26.
Another reason why trading big or spending big on guys like Heatley, Kovalchuk, (and maybe) Semin isn’t always the best idea for a 27 or 28 year old.
Although Semin has some of the slickest hands in the biz, so even if his shot speeds suffers a little bit, he will still be an offensive threat. Whereas when Heatley or Ilya start to lose their shot, it’s not coming back…
by Death_By_Leafs on Nov 14, 2010 3:27 AM EST up reply actions
It wasn’t two weeks ago that people were writing stuff like this about Kessel.
One win and we’re back in action. Two wins and we’re in the mix for a playoff spot. Welcome to our year – fighting for a playoff spot.
that was just brophy being fucking stupid anyway.
Pretty sure it didn’t gain any tread here except for a brief mention.
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Nov 13, 2010 9:52 AM EST up reply actions
No idea what happened to the link but you’re right. Things will change pretty quickly with a couple of wins.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
Here’s hoping?
Loving the Leafs is like being in love with a drug-addled, gambling addicted prostitute with a heart of gold and a bunch of humanitarian awards from her youth. It’s hard. It hurts. But dammit! I just love them!
by Van Ryn's Neurologist on Nov 13, 2010 12:05 PM EST up reply actions

by 

































