Last night's game; 10 times better than a shrimp taco
That's right; a shrimp taco. Not just any shrimp taco, a Taco Bell shrimp taco. I don't know when it began, but apparently in America you can now buy of of these at your local Taco Bell. Who in the Taco Bell hierarchy thought this was a good idea? Someone moron who has never eaten at Taco Bell, that's who.
While I love Taco Bell's food, it does not love me back if you catch my drift. Now they decide to throw seafood into the mix. Bad idea. I've had bad shellfish before. Believe me, it's not something you want to go through in life. Nothing but 3 of the worst days of my life. That is why I'll be avoiding Taco Bell's new shrimp taco like a cute blond avoids a 300 pound basement dwelling vlogger. Nothing good can come from the shrimp taco.
However lots of good came from last night's game. Luca Caputi scored his first of what I hope is many goals for the Leafs. And in front of 40 family and friends no less. Not a bad way to do it at all. Nikolai Kulemin showed why he's all but guaranteed a spot on the team for the next 3 to 4 with great hustle and poise on the game winner. And Mickey Grabs seems to have returned from his wrist injury without missing a beat as he played some good hockey.
All in all, a great game for the baby buds.
More links about this after the jump.
Holy shit! blurr has a blog! And he wrote something on it! [Left Coast Lock]
Why hockey fans shouldn't watch ESPN [Barry Melrose Rocks]
People in Edmonton like hockey and have big bladders [Behind the Net]
A recap of last night's game courtesy of the [Globe and Mail] [Hockey News]
The A to Z of last night's game [Maple Leaf Hot Stove]
The opposition's take on last night's game [Stanley Cup of Chowder]
A rundown of all the topics up for discussion at the GM meetings [NHL.com]
With a lack of a 1st or 2nd round pick this year, the Leafs may look to picking up college free agents [The Hockey News]
There's a new blog on the block and their first post has an interesting look at the Kessel trade. Unique even! [Hockey Broads Redemption]
A take on what an all-time Leafs' team from 1957 to the present would look like [Vintage Leaf Memories]
Chemmy Update:
Dobber Hockey's take on Nikolai Kulemin. Timely considering his excellent performance last night. [Dobber Hockey]
mf37 doesn't think the Olympics helped the NHL out in America. No kidding. [Bitter Leaf Fan]
0 recs |
613 comments
|
Comments
At Bitter Leaf: NHL ratings/ticket prices get dead raccoon bounce from Olympics.
And thanks/apologies to whomever I stole that line from…
Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...
couple quick thoughts from the game last night;
im sure its been said enough but Kulemin is a freaking monster out there, he is quickly becoming my favorite leaf.
John Mitchell….. what the hell is wrong with this guy? Is he super nervous all the time or does he just suck at everything except skating….
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
John Mitchell….. what the hell is wrong with this guy?
he sucks. Please some team with no brain offer sheet him. Or Leafs bury him in the minors with perennial AHL all-stars Andre Deveaux and Ben Ondrus.
The only reason he’s skating with the big club is either because we need a warm body to fill the line out or BB and RW are giving him one last shot to prove himself before the roster gets filled out with college free agents, rising AHL players in the organization or UFA signings.
Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.
by nhlcheapshot on Mar 10, 2010 9:41 AM EST up reply actions
Mitchell reminds me a lot of Pogge. I had a lot of faith in him developing into a great Leaf but he just sucks more and more each game. If Sutter picks up Mitchell in Calgary I will laugh my ass off — and then cry because the Flames are my team 1b.
Exactly. Mitchell came in with too much hope for his talent skill.
I've always wanted to be a PPP Princess. You see kids, you can be anything you want to be; so long as Jay Leno doesn't also want to be that.
the worst part is him teasing us with promise last year, sure he never looked like the next gary roberts or anything, but he appeared to be developing into a tweener 2-3 line player.
Now he barley qualifies as a 4th liner
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 9:53 AM EST up reply actions
Exactly, I think Burke should hold off on giving him a qualifying offer of 105% until near the end of free agency in the hopes that somebody bites. They won’t, but it’ll send a clear signal to Mitchell. Hell, if I were Burke I’d offer him a two-way contract.
I've always wanted to be a PPP Princess. You see kids, you can be anything you want to be; so long as Jay Leno doesn't also want to be that.
ive never seen someone miss the net as often as he does, he is also one of the worst ive seen when it comes to turnovers…. offensive blueline, neutral zone, in the corner, it doesnt matter. If Johnny has the puck, he will lose it in a nano second
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 9:57 AM EST up reply actions
yah, I wouldn’t mind having him as an AHL vet/ NHL emergency call up, but unless Burke cant fill the holes with cheap UFAs or kids MItchell is all but done as a Leaf regular.
Even if Ronnie Dub loves him
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 9:57 AM EST up reply actions
I’m happy to have Mitchell play > 10 min/gm for ~ $500K on the 4th line. Most good teams have one or two relatively useless 4th liners. The key is to be cheap.
It will be an interesting test for Burke to see if he tries to “upgrade” our 3rd and 4th lines with UFAs (I think the kids will get the best shots at the top 6). My own personal view is that it would be a massive mistake to spend more than $1MM on a UFA for our bottom 6. Maybe pick up one cheap PK specialist to go with Sjostrom. I’m already planning in my head a fanpost for late June tentatively titled “Dear Brian Burke: Just Say No (to UFAs)”.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 10:32 AM EST up reply actions
I wouldnt mind a cheap UFA along the premeau line to come in, some vet stability and experience to mentor some of the kids as long as he is defensibly responsible and cheap, its gravy
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 10:36 AM EST up reply actions
Malholtra…?
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 10:37 AM EST up reply actions
potentially, yes
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 10:37 AM EST up reply actions
No way you’ll get him for $700K again. Ttwice that probably. Which is too much for me.
But I wouldn’t mind a pickup like Malhotra 2009.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 10:41 AM EST up reply actions
yeah, not him specifically, but he is a good example
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 10:53 AM EST up reply actions
Veteran + Under 35 + PK Specialist + Cheap = Toronto Maple Leaf
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
Taylor Pyatt would also be a decent option
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 10:58 AM EST up reply actions
hell, Rob Neidermyer is only making 1 mill this year
we could complete our lesser brothers collection
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 11:00 AM EST up reply actions
I HOPE you’re not referring to Schenn as a lesser brother!!!
Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.
by nhlcheapshot on Mar 10, 2010 11:18 AM EST up reply actions
….maybe he means wayne primeau
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 11:20 AM EST up reply actions
nah, until Braden sticks in the bigs and proves he is a superior player, Luke will be the better. I mean Premeau
I thought we had another one at some point recently too
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 11:21 AM EST up reply actions
Better Brothers
We actually have the better brothers collection, excuse you.
-Tomas Kaberle vs Frantisek Kaberle (ex-CAR)
-Viktor Stalberg vs Sebastian Stalberg (undrafted, college)
-Phil Kessel vs Blake Kessel (NYR 2007, college)
-Dion Phaneuf vs Dane Phaneuf…
oh wait Dane was the one who picked a fight with Wickenheiser in an exhibition match… scratch that I prefer Dane!
Roger, of course.
Can it before I drive this truculence through your faceulence and put you in an ambulance.
by Brunswick Bruiser on Mar 10, 2010 3:41 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Neidermeyer actually makes a tonne of sense. He’ll be over 35, but cheap, defensive (despite his career +/-) and Burke has experience with him. He signed a one year term this season, and wouldn’t be suprised if Burke signs him to a similar contract this summer.
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 11:38 AM EST up reply actions
The question is...
Why would a veteran stalwart defensive forward want to sign cheap with us? Why wouldn’t they sign with a contender (e.g. Malhotra with SJ, Nieds with NJ)? I think we’d have to pay a premium either in $ or term to get a guy like that, which I think would be a mistake
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 11:39 AM EST up reply actions
Excellent point
Unless those contenders aren’t interested in them and they want a chance to audition.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
yeah, there are many factors, and contenders probably want “more useful” vets like guerin who can contribute in all three zones.
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 11:43 AM EST up reply actions
Yeah, I just don’t think there are any sure things in the UFA pool. And given the price premium I don’t want to spend on someone who’s not a sure thing.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 11:51 AM EST up reply actions
I agree with this… 4th line, limited minutes, at a very cheap price I can stomach. He is a devout Leaf
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 10:45 AM EST up reply actions
Mitchell….man he doesn’t even skate well, just really fast. He’s stride isn’t smooth at all and he has poor balance. I ‘member the hype was he would replace Dom Moore…so much for that. I’d rather have C Hanson take Mitchell’s job.
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 10:12 AM EST up reply actions
I am going to start the John Mitchell Defence Society.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
John Mitchell Sucks
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
Albert Einstein
by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Mar 10, 2010 4:02 PM EST up reply actions
.* sigh *
jrwendelman
The Artist Formerly Known as "Junior", who blogs at heroesinrehab.ca/blog
"But if someone so eager to engage into fist talk, we can always meet after season end in Minsk." (Mikhail Grabovski and a well-meaning but not particularly skillful translator)
read further down
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
Albert Einstein
by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Mar 10, 2010 4:47 PM EST up reply actions
Are you implying John Mitchell should play defence? Because I don’t think he can skate backwards.
:P
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 10:49 AM EST up reply actions
Probably still better than XLB
Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.
by nhlcheapshot on Mar 10, 2010 10:53 AM EST up reply actions
I was with you on the Hal Gill motion, but I cannot join you in the John Fucking Mitchell battle
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 10:54 AM EST up reply actions
Hal Gill highlight from last night’s game. Sick pass.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 10:59 AM EST up reply actions
hahahahhahhahahhhaahahaahhahaa
breathe
hahahhahhhahhhahahhaahhaa
I've always wanted to be a PPP Princess. You see kids, you can be anything you want to be; so long as Jay Leno doesn't also want to be that.
good ol Hall Gill, still fighting the good fight as a double agent
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 11:02 AM EST up reply actions
If they traded him to phoenix, he really would be paid by every other team in the league.
But then he wouldn’t keep up his streak of playing for northeast teams. I wonder if he’ll go Ottawa or Buffalo next. And if they’ll give him an “A” like Montreal did.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 11:04 AM EST up reply actions
I can’t believe they gave him a letter
that is comedy on so many levels
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 11:05 AM EST up reply actions
Montreal
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 11:06 AM EST up reply actions
Leagure rules don’t allow teams to put a lowercase ‘a’ on players’ sweaters.
Since that’s all that will fit for most of Montreal’s players, they had no other choice.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
by clrkaitken on Mar 10, 2010 11:08 AM EST up reply actions 7 recs
Bazinga!
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 11:09 AM EST up reply actions
Welcome to Rec’dom, population you.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 11:10 AM EST up reply actions
Mission Accomplished Agent Gill
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
He was an alternate for Pittsburgh while Gonchar was injured. Then again, it was rotated monthly until Gonchar was healthy and him and Malkin were permanent Alternates
Cheers, Complaints, homerism and bashing of mediocre pop musicians in 140 Characters
"DO NOT get stuck behind Kyle Wellwood in the buffet line. This isn't really etiquette, but it will prevent you from starving to death"- Down Goes Brown on Etiquette for Jason Spezza's wedding
by Kevin Sellathamby on Mar 10, 2010 11:59 AM EST up reply actions
I am going to start the John Mitchell Defence Society
Everybody harshing on John Mitchell right now ought to remember that he had a significant knee injury earlier this year. Those things take time to fully rehab. Even though a player might be able to play, he won’t return immediately to his pre-injury level of performance. Hell, he might not ever return there.
All I’m saying is that before we toss Mitchell on the trash heap for an admittedly disappointing year, let’s be certain that his development wasn’t just stalled by an injury. Only time will tell if he had an injury-related setback, or if his career has permanently stalled (either because of injury, or he just failed to take the next step, whatever). Anybody calling for Mitchell’s release better not follow that up with the argument that “the Leafs give up on prospects too soon”, or I’ma call bullshit.
jrwendelman
The Artist Formerly Known as "Junior", who blogs at heroesinrehab.ca/blog
"But if someone so eager to engage into fist talk, we can always meet after season end in Minsk." (Mikhail Grabovski and a well-meaning but not particularly skillful translator)
by jrwendelman on Mar 10, 2010 11:29 AM EST up reply actions
You’re right about the knee injury. And I had forgot that. Don’t necessarily want him released, just prefer he fill a lesser role on the team. Good 4th line player, at best 3rd line. They guy grew up Blue and White, you can’t replace that. Was never big on John Mitchelll, i dunno, I like him as a plugger.
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 11:44 AM EST up reply actions
i still hate him
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 11:46 AM EST up reply actions
me too.
At least I was only “meh” on him last year, too.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
I was an intrigued meh last year
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 11:49 AM EST up reply actions
Nope
The issue isn’t to compare him based on what he does but what he does in relation to his salary.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
ding ding ding
This is true for every player in fact.
I think people were hoping he’d turn into a top 6 guy. To me he’s 4th line pure and simple, he’s paid appropriately, and he’s perfectly serviceable in his role.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 11:53 AM EST up reply actions
Will Leitch made that point in his preview of the San Francisco Giants.
Skill and Talent isn’t the barometer anymore in baseball and that’s doubly true in hockey.
Skill + Talent + Cap Hit together are the measuring sticks. 35 Goals at $1.5M is very different than 35 goals at $9.8M.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
Exactly
I’d say it’s 10x true in hockey because of the cap.
Which is why I’m still upset we’re paying Komi + Beauch $8.3MM for the next 3/4 yrs rather than Kubina and Stralman $5.8MM this year (with Kubina gone after this year and Stralman still under RFA control), and Stralman and Aulie/Mikus/whoever under $2MM the next two. This to me was Burke’s only clear mistake thus far but it was a whopper.
/ducking
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 12:10 PM EST up reply actions
Burke also wanted to change the culture of the team, sometimes you need to pay up to do that. He really wanted beauch and komi’s presence in the room
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 1:33 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, I just think he miscalculated. The culture of the team still sucked for most of this year. Beauch has been “meh” and Komi generally a disaster with the exception of some bright signs before he went down for the year.
I’d rather have an extra $6MM in cap space the next 3 years. Then we could actually think about a guy like Kovie or Marleau (not saying I’d do it, but we’d have the cap space).
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 1:36 PM EST up reply actions
Komi seemed to be key to our defensive ability before he went out with injury.
If anything, Beauchemin’s signing might look bad, but it’s been worth it this year given Komi’s injury.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
The key to our league worst defensive ability? He was dreadful much of the year for a $4.5MM player. I acknowledge he looked better at the end.
I don’t think there’s any doubt Kubina + Stralman have outperformed Komi + Beauch this year. And you can’t say “Komi was hurt, that’s not fair”—he was a known injury risk going in.
And Kubina + Stralman would have cost almost $3MM less. I don’t give a damn about MLSE coffers but cap space is king in the NHL.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 1:40 PM EST up reply actions
Chemmy abandoned a pretty good post but before he was injured Komisarek was killing it on the defensive end despite playing in front of Toskala.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
Kubina had to go, he was Muskoka 5 and again goes back to that whole changing of the culture in the dressin room.
Kubina also was not exactly the greatest in his own zone and how many times did you yell at your TV saying “Kubina why the fuck are you behind the net?”
I would take Komi over Kubina in a heartbeat.
Stralman was talented but when he says he would rather play for Sweden in the World’s rather than Marlies in the playoffs, then fuck him. Beauchemin is a leader and his on ice play could be better, but he hasn’t been god awful
Fairweather fans can go to hell
You know what was fun last night? That goal where Kaberle skates right by the puck laying in our crease.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
And what does that have to do with any of the players I just said? We all know Kaberle is atrocious in his own zone
Fairweather fans can go to hell
It’s just another example of why Chemmy wants to see him traded.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
You’re surprised Chemmy took an unprovoked jab at Kaberle…
You must be new here. Thanks for joining!
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
Well first and foremost Kubina has more points than Kaberle.
Secondly Tomas Kaberle plays against negative QCOMP opposition and has a negative +/-ON/60.
Kubina plays against positive QCOMP opposition and has a positive +/-ON/60.
Basically what I’m saying is that Pavel Kubina is an all around better player than Tomas Kaberle on both ends of the ice and people ran him out of town.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Cue up the “but Tomas Kaberle makes a great first pass!!!” argument.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
He doesn’t look smooth to me. He looks like he’s terrified of being hit and he makes stupid plays on the ice.
Last year his stupid play of choice was giving Luke Schenn a pass when two forecheckers were already on top of Schenn.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Kaberle, over rated or very over rated? I have to agree with Chemmy and others who are suspect of Kaberle’s true value or abilities. All I would say is if Kaberle could play just a bit of sensible defense, I would be thrilled to have him on the Leafs, but the reality is I think he is inept in that role.
"There's been four different Cup winners the last four years, and I got one of them (Anaheim) and it was a fighting team. We're playing it that way regardless." - B. Burke, Toronto Maple Leafs GM
I don’t doubt Kaberle’s trade value at all which is why I want him gone before other people catch on.
And yeah, I don’t need our offensive defenseman to be a huge shut down D-guy but Kaberle just sort of ignores his defensive role.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
sshhhhh
We are trying to offload trade this guy. We want to be able to get something good for him. Don’t ruin the illusion that the rest of the teams in the NHL has that he is an amazing defenceman!
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
Albert Einstein
by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Mar 10, 2010 4:06 PM EST up reply actions
I’m pretty sure he is definitely worth more than Pronger, as he is younger and puck movers are harder to find than shut down guys… so yeah, he is worth more than that package.
Phaneuf Phever, an upgrade in skill and alliteration!
But do you think Kaberle will really get that much come draft day?
That same draft Boston was asking for Kaberle & our 1st for Kessel.
WWGRD? (What Would Gary Roberts Do?)
by PassivelyTruculent on Mar 10, 2010 5:53 PM EST up reply actions
I think he is worth that, for the record, and for anyone wondering what Leaf fans think Kaberle is worth.
Phaneuf Phever, an upgrade in skill and alliteration!
I hope so
WWGRD? (What Would Gary Roberts Do?)
by PassivelyTruculent on Mar 10, 2010 6:42 PM EST up reply actions
We all hate certain players, I hate Kubina. I was HAPPY to see him leave.
Also, put Kaberle on the ice with Kovalchuk…
Fairweather fans can go to hell
What was it you hated about Kubina? His “better than Kaberle” defensive game?
Was it his “better than Kaberle” offensive game?
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
You honestly believe Kubina was a better offensive defenceman than Kaberle?
Fairweather fans can go to hell
They produced points at about the same rate last year on the Leafs.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
First of all – Kaberle’s our leading scorer. When you’re leading your team in scoring, that cuts you slack on the defensive end of things. Even if you are a defencman. How many Dmen besides kabby are making $4.25M and leading their team in scoring? I bet you a thousand dollars the answer is zero. How many team’s leading scorers are earning less than $5M for that matter??
And weren’t you going on about how this post-trade deadline Leaf team isn’t going to be able to score? Is it Kaberle’s fault that all of a sudden the guys he’s making the great passes to can’t put the f8cking puck in the net
Yesterday is dead, but not my memory.
Leading a team in scoring with 40some points doesn’t give you free license to be terrible in your own end.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
how many points would he have if we actually had forwards that could score (which you’ve pointed out many many times that we don’t.)?
Yesterday is dead, but not my memory.
Last year we could score and Pavel Kubina scored just as many points per game without being a defensive liability.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
kubina had 40 pts in 82 games. kaberle had 31 pts in 57 games, which would have put him on pace for 45ish points.
that was also kubina’s best ever year offensively, and would have been kabby’s worst one since the lockout.
Yesterday is dead, but not my memory.
Please describe where any of this fits in to “Tomas Kaberle doesn’t need to play defense”.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
it doesn’t. you said above that kubina was as good or better as kaberle offensively. this is false.
Yesterday is dead, but not my memory.
They scored at an equal clip at even strength last year and this year Kubina is way ahead of Kaberle against much tougher opposition.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
so he scored almost as much as kabby in a year where kabby was injured, and he’s ahead this year for the first time in his career. great analysis.
Yesterday is dead, but not my memory.
I posted their QCOMP and scoring rates at even strength.
You told us all that Kaberle would score more if the Leafs scored more.
Last year on the same team Kaberle and Kubina produced at the same rate.
Kaberle’s been on the decline since the Janssen hit. He’s terrified of getting hit and makes bad plays in his own end to get rid of the puck as quickly as possible.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
they produced at the same rate (kabby was actually higher) in a year where kabby was injured.
it’s curious that he’s on the decline while his point total is up versus last year on a team that’s weaker offensively.
i don’t think we’re watching the same team. I see tomas’ misplays (he had at least 3 last night), but i also see his great outlet passes, his little dekes behind the net to shake off a forechecker, etc. when your team is giving you the puck to move out of your zone 95% of the time you’re on the ice, you’re going to have more opportunity to make the wrong choice now and again.
Yesterday is dead, but not my memory.
I think the overall point here is that unless you consistently put up Crosby/Ovechkin type numbers, no one is exempt from being poor defensively.
leaf fan stuck in ottawa, a localized black hole that will suck everything in that area to oblivion.
no one is exempt from being poor defensively
Least of all OUR DEFENSEMEN.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Saying Stralman would have been better is completely false, because he wouldn’t have gotten anywhere near the PP time he’s gotten in Columbus with Kaberle here.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
Stralman is 3rd in TOI, including 3rd in ES TOI (barely behind the top 2). For his $750K he’s been exceptional value.
Kubina is a former Cup winner. He wasn’t perfect but he was a perfectly serviceable defeceman, just an overpaid one. And he’d be off the books next year. Plus what Chemmy said above.
Komi is going to haunt our cap for the next four years. I know I’m alone on this one, but I would LOVE for Burke to trade him this summer. I just don’t think one dimensional D—no matter how good they are in that one dimension—are worth $4.5MM unless it’s Mike Green. We’ve got cheap young D coming through the system but nowhere to put them. We already lost Stralman for virtually nothing this year for that very reason.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 1:56 PM EST up reply actions
Robyn Regehr? Scott Hannan?
Heck, Tomas Kaberle is a one dimensional D, you don’t seem to be too upset about his value.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
also
you’re missing the point that Stralman still wouldn’t have been 3rd in TOI if we had kept him and Kubina – He’d be behind Kubina, Kaberle, Schenn.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
I know, I’m just saying he would definitely have been in our top 6 and he was dirt cheap.
And Regehr & Hannan are both much more effective offensive players—both have topped 20 pts multiple times and Komi never has.
Kaberle was at least a serviceable defensive player when he signed his deal. He’s not anymore. I wouldn’t pay him $4.5MM going forward (he of course makes $4.25MM).
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:01 PM EST up reply actions
Gunnarson is now in our top 6 and is dirty cheap.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
No! Dirt cheap but good players are never redundant. Expensive ones are.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:11 PM EST up reply actions
Dion, Kaberle, Beauch, Komi, Schenn, Gunnar…
No room for Stralman anyways.
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Missing the point
My point is we shouldn’t have signed Komi or Beauch. Certainly not BOTH of them.
Having 6D all making over $3MM is just atrocious cap management, particularly when you’re dead last in GA (Toskala or no Toskala).
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:15 PM EST up reply actions
You’re missing the more important point.
You haven’t given any evidence to convince anyone that Stralman would be putting up the same stats here he is in COlumbus.
Also, he’s an RFA this year, so your $19M price tag is higher than you think.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
I factored in a raise. And as you point out, he’d be getting bottom pair minutes here so it’d be the standard RFA 5% in all likelihood.
My argument doefsn’t depend on saying Stralman would put up the same stats here. he wouldn’t. The point is we have WAY too much money tied up on an underperforming D corp and swapping Stralman for Komi would solve that in an instant.
Given their contracts, if we offered Stralman for Komi straight up, Scott Howson would laugh his ass off.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:20 PM EST up reply actions
Gunnarsson = same price as Stralman, but better.
Stralman is redundant.
He could not supplant any of the higher priced defensemen on the Leafs, skill-wise. You have to look at both price and skill.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
No
You have to look at skill/price. Bang for buck. That’s what matters. And Stralman kills Komi or Beauch on bang for buck.
Think about what that extra $7MM could get you.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:17 PM EST up reply actions
Stralman can’t shut ANYONE down, which is what we pay Komi and Beauch to do.
Having him in our lineup means even more goals against. Where would you allocate the money saved?
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
I could live with one of them, but not both.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:21 PM EST up reply actions
And Stralman kills Komi or Beauch on bang for buck.
I will forever ignore anything you ever say
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Really?
$762,500 vs. $3.8/$4.5? Are they really 5-6 times better than Stralman? You’re joking, right?
NHL is an efficiency contest. I’d allocate the money saved to the salary cap which could be used to pry someone loose from all the cap-strapped teams this summer.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:21 PM EST up reply actions
Are they really 5-6 times better than Stralman?
Yes.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
I just hope Burke disagrees with you
If he holds this worldview that skill matters more than contract we’re doomed.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:23 PM EST up reply actions
I think Burke made his choice clear this summer when he traded away Stralman and signed Beauchemin/Komisarek.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
who would you have moved up to the top 4 to make room for Stralman on the bottom pairing?
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
Phaneuf/Beauch/Kabs/Schenn/Gunnar/Stralman
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:28 PM EST up reply actions
We didn’t have Phaneuf to start the year.
Who would’ve been moved up to top 4?
And if it’s Schenn, what would you have done when he struggled?
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
And then he and Stralman would have needed raises, and oh look you’re spending the same on White & Stralman that you are on Komi & Gunnarsson.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
No, because we traded for Dion
Nothing I’ve suggested would have changed that.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:34 PM EST up reply actions
No. HOld the hell up.
You can’t undo every other trade we made on defence this offseason, and then just state that we would have swapped White for Phaneuf.
If we hadn’t have done the Komi and Beauchemin signings, it would have been prudent to keep White as a top 4 defenceman. With those 2 here, he was expendable, and since he was earning a big raise Burke moved him at his peak.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
If he holds this worldview that skill matters more than contract we’re doomed.
So nobody gets a raise in your world eh? When contracts are up you trade them for cheaper guys?
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Not unless they’re premium guys. That’s why I supported dumping Antro, Poni & Stajan. They’re no longer bargains.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:25 PM EST up reply actions
How many premium guys are there?
Would you give Kulemin a raise this year?
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Yes
Even with a raise he’ll still be a bargain even if he barely improves. I’d lock him down for 5 years.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
Yes
He’s an RFA and will still be a bargain. I was referring to UFAs.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:28 PM EST up reply actions
Yes
Unless their contribution outweighs their cost.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
How do I say this the right way?
GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS!
Anton Stralman would not be getting the same ice time, the same PP time, and thus would not be getting the same value out of his contract if he were in Toronto.
Even if you turn back the clock and take back the Beauchemin, Komisarek and Kubina deals, Stralman isn’t getting the ice time to be as valuable as he is to Columbus. Which means that he’s not the super-efficient defenceman you claim him to be.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
No need to get all outraged.
Even at 16 mpg, he’d be a bargain. Certainly better than the guy with a bum shoulder who hasn’t put together a solid year since 2007/08 and is making $4.5MM for the next 4
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:31 PM EST up reply actions
This argument makes me feel like Doc Brown trying to explain to McFly not to fuck shit up when he goes back in time.
You’re argument is based on a reality that doesn’t exist.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
Sure
But it’s about the broader point of valuing performance or performance per dollar. I think the latter’s more important.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:37 PM EST up reply actions
And Stralman kills Komi or Beauch on bang for buck.
If this is true right now, it may not be for long. As clrkaitken said, Stralman is an RFA. It wouldn’t take that steep a raise to make Stralman’s skill/price ration questionable.
leaf fan stuck in ottawa, a localized black hole that will suck everything in that area to oblivion.
5% raise on offer sheet
Playing on out bottom pair he wouldn’t get more.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:22 PM EST up reply actions
Then there’s no way he’d sign with any team offering him that. If he’s getting real minutes and putting up real numbers (at least in terms of points), he wouldn’t even consider an offer like that for 10 seconds. He’s getting a good raise from somebody, whether it’s Columbus, any GM willing (crazy?) enough to offer sheet him, or the KHL.
leaf fan stuck in ottawa, a localized black hole that will suck everything in that area to oblivion.
The hypothesis here is he’d be on the Leafs playing #6 minutes. So still cheap.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:33 PM EST up reply actions
But then he wouldn’t be nearly the cap bargain, and the Komisarek vs. Stralman argument would be dead in the water.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
I guarantee you playing #6 minutes, Stralman would have played more minutes this year than Mike “not the same post-Lucic” Komisarek.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:36 PM EST up reply actions
Not on a per game basis.
Which is how I’ve understood your argument this whole time; that it made more sense to pay Stralman to be in our top 4 than Komisarek. But if you’ve just admitted that Stralman WOULD NOT be in our top 4, doesn’t that kill your argument?
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
I’ve never been saying Stralman would be in our Top 4. Top 4 is Phaneuf/White, Schenn/Gunnar, Kaberle, Beach
As for whether we’d get Dion, you’re right, it’s all “if a butterfly flaps its wings” shit. I’m just making a point about valuing efficiency over just ability.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:39 PM EST up reply actions
Counter-factuals
while interesting are really tough to argue. When it comes down to it I can say that Stralman would have been eaten by a whale on a visit to the zoo if he had resigned with the Leafs with as much certainty as you can say that he’d be a valuable member of our defensive core. Philosophically speaking of course.
The Guess Who sucked, the Jets were lousy anyway
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Mar 10, 2010 2:43 PM EST up reply actions 6 recs
YAY!!!!!
The Guess Who sucked, the Jets were lousy anyway
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Mar 10, 2010 2:45 PM EST up reply actions
i swore these off
but how do you have Phaneuf without trading White?
In addition, without trading Stralman, you toss out trading for Kessel, as Stralman netted the pick that allowed for the Kessel deal.
So by keeping Stralman (of the -13 despite having the 3rd best QUALTEAM rating amongst all defenders you’ve mentioned) you squeeze out Gunnarsson, lose Kessel and Phaneuf, Sjostrom and Aulie.
Please stop looking at player moves within a silo. they never are…
I have nothing interesting to say.
by blurr1974 on Mar 10, 2010 3:32 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Debate over.
Well said Blurr.
The Guess Who sucked, the Jets were lousy anyway
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Mar 10, 2010 3:34 PM EST up reply actions
I never said you had Phaneuf without trading White. Just the opposite.
Look, I acknowledged the “butterfly flapping its wings” point a while ago. Infinite things would have happened differently. The point is about phiosophy to building a team. And I still think it’s unwise to sign a guy for $4.5MM who’s never played over 21mpg or had more than 19 pts, who had not shown he had recovered from a shoulder injury, especially when you already had a pile of Ds making over $3MM. Especially when you lose a bargain player in the mix.
It will be interesting to see how we view the Komi deal 3 years from now. Hope I’m wrong…
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 3:42 PM EST up reply actions
I’m going to add 2 things to this and then I’m done.
Stop calling Stralman a “bargain player”. it’s logically inaccurate, because at the time he was moved he hadn’t proved he could even take a regular shift in the NHL, much less become the player he’s been in Columbus. We’ve already proven that you can’t project his Columbus stats over to his hypothetical play in Toronto this year.
At the time Komisarek was signed, there were 2 defence in the organization making $3M+, Kaberle and Finger. So if the logic behind signing Komisarek was "we have too much money tied up on D, it’s false and your timing is off.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
by clrkaitken on Mar 10, 2010 3:50 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
pffft….that was the weakest attempt at quiting something I’ve seen since I tried stop smoking pot an hour ago.
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 3:44 PM EST up reply actions
What can I say, I’m irresistably irritating.
But I’ll keep questioning Burke where it seems appropriate, and applauding him where that seems appropriate (which has been quite frequently of late).
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 3:48 PM EST up reply actions
Are you that type of fan
That thinks to himself, “If I was GM this team would win the cup next year”
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Not you quitting, Blurr….but yeah keep questioning him where you deem it appropriate. I do too.
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 3:50 PM EST up reply actions
That’s great for Stralman. But it wasn’t going to happen here.
If Stralman had have stayed, he never would have been 3rd on the team in ES TOI. So while I’m not refuting that Stralman has had a wonderful season down in Columbus, to suggest that you could transport him from there to here and he’d be putting up the same stats is patently false.
We got a 2nd round pick and a dependable 4th line center out of a prospect who was 50/50 to make the club and be lost for nothing on waivers and a throw-in to a curious Kubina trade. calgary turned around and dealt him for a 3rd round pick. We won the Stralman trade no matter how you slice it. Accept the things that cannot be changed and move on.
Gunnarsson is the new hotness.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
Look, this is all just following PPP’s point above.
Next year, would you rather have Phaneuf/Kaberle/Stralman/Schenn/Gunnar/Finger/#7 for ~ $19MM, or Phaneuf/Komi/Beauch/Kaberle/Schenn/Gunnar/Finger for ~$25.5? Especially if you could take that extra $6.5MM, plus what little cap space we have, and sign Marleau or Kovie? I’d take the former, thank you very much. You’re the capologist, right?
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:06 PM EST up reply actions
I think it’s tough to judge when most of the defence only played in front of Toskala, Komi ONLY did really, Gunnarsson missed so much time, and there were so many new players.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
Can I have something in between?
Phaneuf, Komi, Beauch, Gunnar, Schenn, Holzner (someone on an EL deal), #7 for 19-20 million?
Fingers crossed
Though I’d obviously take Komi for a pick too.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:33 PM EST up reply actions
And I’ll bet you right now Stralman’s a better player than that pick will ever be. What’s the washout rate for #2s, 75%?
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:12 PM EST up reply actions
Have you watched the Blue Jackets?
Despite his points, Stralman has NOT been very good this year. He gets his minutes because of their lack of defensive depth. Not because he’s that good.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
I have Stralman for fantasy power play points. He’s terrible at everything else.
He only scores on the PP and is a minus player every night.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
you all need to go look at Beauchemin’s numbers. The only thing that appears to be different from any of his last few years is that his +/- is down (hmm, wonder why). He’s never going to be more than a 25-28 point dman who can log 25 minutes a game.
yeah, Beauchemin hasn’t really been that bad, it’s just that with Phaneuf and Schenn and Komi now, he’s kind’ve redundant.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
There is a lot of redundancy on D. I wonder if Burke will move one. Also, I think Elliot Freidman was saying in his last post something like (to paraphrase)
“at this point it looks like Burke will re-sign Kaberle to an extension this summer”
IIRC
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 2:16 PM EST up reply actions
yeah he was
Burke really values Kaberle’s puck moving ability, so I could see him signing Kaberle to an extension.
We’re not going to be competative next year, so I wouldn’t be surprised if the D stayed as they are, Kaberle gets an extension, and Beauchemin is traded the summer after.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
I said this before, but I still think that is Burke supporting his player by posturing for the media here. He’ll probably explore what it would take to sign him to an extension but unless he gets a great deal I still think there’s a good chance Kaberle is dealt in the off-season.
leaf fan stuck in ottawa, a localized black hole that will suck everything in that area to oblivion.
This right here. Also, let’s see how badly Kaberle wants to sign when Burke says ‘No way’ to a NMC.
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
Albert Einstein
by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Mar 10, 2010 4:16 PM EST up reply actions
Komi
I think Komisarek is going to prove his doubters wrong next season. The Leafs this year were better with him in the line up, outside the first 10 games. He’s been playing injured, thats fixed.
I play pickup hockey, and I’ve got a loose shoulder which dislocated easily. I can only imagine what its like to play in the NHL with a bummed shoulder.
That’s exactly my concern. I’m worried this will be a chronic issue. Two years running now…
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 5:51 PM EST up reply actions
I think the difference will be that Komisarek tried to fix it via physio and rest instead of surgery like Kessel did.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
he sucked before the injury
I’m sure there’s more that could be done with a response to this, but I don’t know how to access the CORSI numbers, etc. and I have a crapload of work to do, so I’m going to just leave my response at this:
Last year, most of us who watch the team night in and night out around here would have been hard pressed to say that Mitchell or Kulemin was a clearly and demonstrably better player than the other (each showed flashes, and Kulemin in particular, near the end of the year, showed some defensive talent that had previously gone more or less unnoticed). Whatever, my point is that neither of them was an obvious all star top 6 ZOMG player; they were both “guys who had potential”. Mitchell had 12 goals and 17 assists for 29 points. Kulemin had 15 goals and 16 assists for 31 points.
It would be inaccurate to say that Mitchell’s 2 fewer points place him in the “sucked” category whereas Kulemin was teh awesome. If Kulemin had sustained the knee injury and was slow to rebound from it….would you be saying that he “sucked” and deserves to be abandoned?
It is true that Mitchell has disappointed this year. I was at the Leafs/Kings game Jan. 26th and I thought Mitchell looked absolutely lost out there. His lack of jump and inability to get himself in position made me angry. So I get the frustration with his play, really, I do. I’m just saying that it’s too early to give up on a young guy that has in the past shown some jump, a reasonable amount of offensive promise, has the size and has shown the passion for the game in the past. I think his ceiling is probably as a 3rd line guy, but assuming that (in the future) the Leafs have other players in position whose job it is to play in the top 6, score goals, collect big cheques and make a lot of tv commercials, Mitchell can succeed in a 3rd line role.
jrwendelman
The Artist Formerly Known as "Junior", who blogs at heroesinrehab.ca/blog
"But if someone so eager to engage into fist talk, we can always meet after season end in Minsk." (Mikhail Grabovski and a well-meaning but not particularly skillful translator)
by jrwendelman on Mar 10, 2010 12:06 PM EST up reply actions
Agree
100%.
Mitchell’s had a bad year but the advantage is that he has another cheap, cheap year coming up.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
Yes
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
I still hate him
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 12:14 PM EST up reply actions
me too
I don’t know what it is about him.
the best way to describe how I feel about him is how earlier this year he was playing on the PP with Blake and Kessel and got a goal because Kessel shot it at him, it him and deflected him.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
I agree with the hate. This year I specifically keyed on watching him and he really did nothing, nothing at all that even remotely impressed me.
Maybe I am not seeing his ‘potential’ but even last year I enjoyed watching Kulie a lot more – points not withstanding.
I can’t really quantify it, but Mitchell doesn’t have jam. Do I want to throw him away? Not really, I hope we can get some asset out of him or give him a two way and play him in the AHL.
I just don’t see it and I don’t want him taking up a roster spot if we found someone even marginally better and similar in age.
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
Albert Einstein
by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Mar 10, 2010 4:21 PM EST up reply actions
Can I agree 150%?
I’ll allow it.
jrwendelman
The Artist Formerly Known as "Junior", who blogs at heroesinrehab.ca/blog
"But if someone so eager to engage into fist talk, we can always meet after season end in Minsk." (Mikhail Grabovski and a well-meaning but not particularly skillful translator)
by jrwendelman on Mar 10, 2010 12:24 PM EST up reply actions
I’ve not liked his play at all this year, but I’ll reserve judgement on Mitchell for now until next season, when he’ll be fully healed from his knee injury (let’s hope) and we can see how he performs in relation to his still cheap contract to see if he’s worth another contract as a Leaf.
leaf fan stuck in ottawa, a localized black hole that will suck everything in that area to oblivion.
This is all I ask! Nicely done.
jrwendelman
The Artist Formerly Known as "Junior", who blogs at heroesinrehab.ca/blog
"But if someone so eager to engage into fist talk, we can always meet after season end in Minsk." (Mikhail Grabovski and a well-meaning but not particularly skillful translator)
by jrwendelman on Mar 10, 2010 12:24 PM EST up reply actions
I forgot about the knee injury, to be honest, otherwise I would have been firmly in the “hate Mitchell” camp.
leaf fan stuck in ottawa, a localized black hole that will suck everything in that area to oblivion.
I forgot about the knee injury, to be honest
Ya I forgot about that too.
Still. His play so far has been frustrating and it makes me a sad panda.
Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.
by nhlcheapshot on Mar 10, 2010 12:30 PM EST up reply actions
His play so far has been frustrating and it makes me a sad panda
I agree with this.
jrwendelman
The Artist Formerly Known as "Junior", who blogs at heroesinrehab.ca/blog
"But if someone so eager to engage into fist talk, we can always meet after season end in Minsk." (Mikhail Grabovski and a well-meaning but not particularly skillful translator)
by jrwendelman on Mar 10, 2010 12:52 PM EST up reply actions
If we can sign John Mitchell cheap we should. Emphasis on cheap.
4th liners in Toronto are under a lot of pressure and scrutiny because we don’t have first liners to steal the spotlight. Mitchell is a perfectly servicable bottom six kind of guy.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
I’m an advocate on keeping the kid around because he’s shown flashes of competence, but I’d dispute him being a serviceable bottom sixer thus far. If he’s not going to generate much offense then he needs to at least make sure he’s not getting scored on. That hasn’t been the case, he had pretty terrible defensive numbers last year and he started this year equally poorly.
Mitchell’s future on this team will depend on him getting smart about his positioning and responsibilities, I wouldn’t call him a serviceable player just yet. But he could be.
I wasn’t aware that a knee injury could have such an unfortunate aspect on John Mitchell’s brain. He’s not playing smart hockey and while that might be part of re-habbing or accommodating a bad knee, it’s been an ugly season for him.
If he’s back next year, I hope it’s in a reduced fourth line role with only the minimum required increase in salary.
Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...
Physical infirmity can absolutely lead to confidence/mental issues.
That said I agree—I’d be much happier with him getting 10-12 MPG rather than the 15 he’s averaged this year.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 1:24 PM EST up reply actions
I hope it’s in a reduced fourth line role with only the minimum required increase in salary
Agree, I think that’s all that can be justified right now. I’m just saying we shouldn’t entirely give up on him because he showed signs of being a better player than that last year.
jrwendelman
The Artist Formerly Known as "Junior", who blogs at heroesinrehab.ca/blog
"But if someone so eager to engage into fist talk, we can always meet after season end in Minsk." (Mikhail Grabovski and a well-meaning but not particularly skillful translator)
I can get on board with this
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
Albert Einstein
by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Mar 10, 2010 4:21 PM EST up reply actions
Kulemin is King
If he keeps playing at this pace the questions will be:
Who center’s Kessel AND Kulemin?
Does he deserve an A on his chest?
Not to go all hyperbole because he had a great game last night, but his effort has been the same all season. If it continues into next year, I’d consider slapping an A on his chest. His work ethic sets a great example for the rest of the forwards. Agree/disagree?
Wendel Killer Joseph
2011-2012
Kulemin-Kadri-Kessel
the grand dragon line
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 10:20 AM EST up reply actions
If Bozak develops chemistry with Kessel I wouldn’t mind keeping them together. Let Kadri be a poor man’s Malkin and give some punch to the second line.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 10:22 AM EST up reply actions
yeah, i know, i just wanted to use that joke
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 10:22 AM EST up reply actions
It would be funny to have a KKK line centred by a guy actual KKK members/lunatics would probably like to hang from a tree.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 10:25 AM EST up reply actions
i think thats what makes calling them that okay.
by ShahofToronto on Mar 10, 2010 1:11 PM EST up reply actions
Wow – yeah totally missed the joke. I mean I knew what Grad Dragon meant, but I didn’t put it together…wow – imagine if that ever stuck as a nickname
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 10:34 AM EST up reply actions
Komisarek and Kaberle on Defence?
hopefully it’s Komisarek and 2011 1st round pick + a prospect instead
Is that the kid you want? Follow me on Twitter
Not sure Kulemin would want that role. He strikes me much more as the quiet, sits in the corner of the locker room, goes-about-his-business kind of guy.
I think next year Phaneuf is C, and some combination of Kessel, Komi and Kabs get the As.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 10:20 AM EST up reply actions
Smile dammit!
i dont think ive ever even heard kulemin speak, hell ive never even seen him change the expression on his face. He always just seems to be staring blankly….
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 10:31 AM EST up reply actions
He’s dead inside…only playing hockey remotely gives him joy.
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 10:36 AM EST up reply actions
he looks like a goldfish on the ice, mouth always open, eyes kinda bugging out
I call him Carp
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 10:37 AM EST up reply actions
yes! Nikky Carp
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 1:36 PM EST up reply actions
Centre for the first line for next year
Olli Jokinen.
Seriously. He can be had for a better deal than Marleau. The attitude thing is old news. He is a good placeholder for the next two years. Think of it this way, he’s the number one guy next year, providing some shelter for Bozak and Grabbo. Two years from now, Grabbo goes, Kadri steps in as a number two and Jokinen holds on to number one, Bozak number three. Three years Kadri goes number one, Jokiene is gone, Bozak number two.
What kind of deal can he get? I’d offer him two years at 4M. Unless he has a big finish to this year, he’s probably going to end up at around 15 goals and 60 points. Getzlaf makes about what he does now, but he’s not worth Getzlaf money. He’s a BIG C who uses his body. We need a BIG C.
Marleau I think will cost too much for what he’s worth. Olli is probably just as good (in the sense that he might help us get to 9th or 10th place—it’s not like Marleau guarentee’s playoffs either) but for cheaper.
Probably some fool GM will offer him 4-5 years at 5M though, but if that’s the case, they can have him.
by Leaf in Habland on Mar 10, 2010 1:10 PM EST up reply actions
So then Kessel will have to play on the 2nd line, since Jokinen isn’t a passer?
Phaneuf Phever, an upgrade in skill and alliteration!
no
Kessel is just as much of a playmaker as he is a scorer.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
He has the potential to be a 2nd tier playmaker or a 1st tier sniper, I’d prefer to have him continue to develop into the latter.
Phaneuf Phever, an upgrade in skill and alliteration!
I was not aware of that bit of scouting. Neither is Marleau though, really, is he? Or maybe compared to Big Joe, he doesn’t look it. I think players can adujst their styles. Actually, I would like to see Grabbo with Kessel and Kulie this year, as long as Grabs is in playmaker mode.
by Leaf in Habland on Mar 10, 2010 1:18 PM EST up reply actions
Marleau shoots and passes. In this case they have Joe as the set-up man, Dany as the scorer, and Marleau who can do both. Its a perfect combination. We don’t have the cap room/there aren’t FAs available to sign enough players to make a line like this. We need a set up man to play with Kessel, and then put someone like Kuli on the other wing to dig, forecheck, and chip in a few goals and helpers.
Phaneuf Phever, an upgrade in skill and alliteration!
I wonder if Marleau would be more of a passer if he was called upon to be the main playmaker. I was watching the San Jose game the other day and he was actually not on the top line anyway. They had him with Pavelski and Clowe I think. I think Marleau would be awesome, it’s just the money. I think Olli would not be that much worse, and would be cheaper. Chemistry is important, I agree, but I don’t think it is a slam dunk that the chemistry would NOT be there between Olli and Phil.
by Leaf in Habland on Mar 10, 2010 1:22 PM EST up reply actions
I also don’t have a problem using Bozak with Phil even if we do sign Jokinen.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
I asked this question a month ago, and I’ll ask it again:
If you’re keeping Bozak with Kessel, who’s left to play with Jokinen to justify the cost of bringing him in?
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
I’m not agreeing that we should get Jokinen (i’m totally against it), but I think he and Kulemin would be a good complement.
Phaneuf Phever, an upgrade in skill and alliteration!
When Jokinen had big years with Florida he didn’t have any top wingers with him; Horton’s a C and I assume they didn’t play together. He’s a puck hog—you just would need a couple garbageman to dig out pucks and hammer in rebounds.
I think Olli could be an ideal #2 centre for some team for this very reason.
Just not with us.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 1:33 PM EST up reply actions
It could be justified to bring in Kessel this early in the rebuild because he’s 22 and the expectation is that as he matures into his prime, the team will develop and grow with him.
Jokinen turns 32 this year.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
That would be my reason #4 not to get him.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 1:37 PM EST up reply actions
move Grabbo to the wing.
I dunno. Do we need that big #1 center that badly? If we need him that badly, the best option is Jokinen. Does Jokinen actually make sense for the team? Probably not. At this point, I can’t really see Burke bringing him in, to be honest.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
Toronto…is…Calgary?
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 1:33 PM EST up reply actions
I agree that Marleau would be awesome. The guy is a good skater, he’s big, and he’s talented. That being said, Jokinen couldn’t play with Iggy in Calgary because he just doesn’t pass enough. If we signed Olli he would end up on the 2nd line, meaning we’d be spending way to much on 2nd and 3rd line centers (Jokinen and Grabbo)
Phaneuf Phever, an upgrade in skill and alliteration!
I never said he couldn’t. But if he’s on the top like with Jokinen, he becomes the one who sets him up, without having anyone to set HIM up. Kessel has an amazing shot with a quick release, and always knows where to be to get the puck on his stick. This also translates into knowing where other people are, but its not his natural instinctive ability. I would be pretty upset if we signed Jokinen, and rather keep Kessel with Bozak and maybe sign a winger for the other side.
Phaneuf Phever, an upgrade in skill and alliteration!
An interesting idea I’ve thought of too, but I’d pass.
1) Don’t want his bad attitude infecting the kids
2) By 2011/12 I want our Cs to be Bozak and Kadri. Neither of them are ideal in the size department but it would be a huge waste of talent and cap space to have either on the 3rd line behind Olli.
3) Actually not sure we’d have $4MM in cap space given the ~$26MM we have committed to the blue line for next year.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 1:18 PM EST up reply actions
Well this assumes we are going to sign a free agent centre for significant money. If we are, I think he’s the best deal. I don’t know if he has such a bad attitude. At the deadline or during the Olympics, the TSN guys (I think) we saying that his attitude was shitty as a rookie, but that he got his head out of his ass.
by Leaf in Habland on Mar 10, 2010 1:20 PM EST up reply actions
If we assume we’re going to toss money at a UFA C, I agree a short-term deal with Olli would be best. But I think the better course is not to throw money at short-term fixes just because you can. Save the cap space and roster spots so you can make a Phaneuf-ian deal down the road (or make a run at Semin in 2011—now that’s a UFA forth paying for, though I assume WAS will lock him up).
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 1:26 PM EST up reply actions
Finger will not be on our cap hit next year, through trade or a waive down to the AHL or unfortunate ‘accident’
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
Albert Einstein
by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Mar 10, 2010 4:25 PM EST up reply actions
I dunno
I’m skeptical on t he bad attitude thing. Sure, it was apparently an issue in Phoenix and Calgary, but Phaneuf was apparently also an issue in Calgary, and he and Jokinen got along fine.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
That seems pretty key to me. I think maybe two guys like that would not get along with Jarome, and he is the real leader in that room. He seems like a more Sundin, strong, silent type. If Olli is a demanding, grumpy gus, as long as he plays hard, bring him in. I don’t think he’d infect anyone.
by Leaf in Habland on Mar 10, 2010 1:24 PM EST up reply actions
hmmmmmm….I was personally hoping for no UFA signings over 1mill….but
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. Not sure if I agree but certainly a well thought out arguement.
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 2:30 PM EST up reply actions
call me crazy but that shrimp taco looks good right now
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
you’re crazy
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 10:37 AM EST up reply actions
looks good right now
That’s the key.
Also, you’re crazy.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
yea i shouldnt skip breakfast, i could end up making a horrible mistake come lunch time
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 10:42 AM EST up reply actions
Hockey Broads Redemption
I enjoyed that read…couldn’t comment on the website, but if the writer comes here at all – keep writing! I enjoyed it.
Anyone know who that is?
Wendel Killer Joseph
agreed, very good peice. Really makes me feel a hell of a lot better too
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 11:12 AM EST up reply actions
Interesting piece but I don’t buy that Kessel made Hagman and Stajan that much more valuable that they got us Phaneuf. Hagman had a worse PPG rate with the Leafs than last year and Stajan’s was barely higher.
No doubt Stajan’s PPG rate was higher this year with Kessel than without (haven’t looked it up but I’m assuming), but I think his value was pretty well established by last year’s season.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 11:19 AM EST up reply actions
Ohh I don’t buy it either. Stajan is on pace for 5 more points and Hagman’s PPG is lower. White might finish with about 10 more points this season. But I think that was expected. The Phanuef trade was the result of 2 desperate GM’s more than anything, especially Sutter.
But I did enjoy reading it, whether I agree with all the points or not. (The exagerration and terms associated with 1st round picks part I liked.) The fact that I had a passionate response, was important.
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 11:33 AM EST up reply actions
Oh yeah
That’s hockeysense’s blog.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
Cool, I look forward to more.
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 11:35 AM EST up reply actions
I thought it was a good read too. I was intrigued by what was included about Wendel Clark. Of course we all love the guy, so I’m wondering what people thought of the claim that Wendel didn’t justify his claim as a “lottery” draft pick. I don’t agree with it personally. Now this is not to say that we can reasonably compare Clark to the likes of Mario Lemieux, but I think it is fair to say that Wendel Clark did have a transformative effect on the Leafs and thus justified his selection.
Plus… c’mon, it’s Wendel freakin’ Clark, isn’t that sort of criticism basically sacrilegious?
leaf fan stuck in ottawa, a localized black hole that will suck everything in that area to oblivion.
It is dangerous and sacreligious but…
It’s a good point. ’84 got Lemieux, ’85 got Wendel. Shows that tanking can get you good players but not necessarily the greatest. Also, that Pittsburgh is fucking lucky.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
Prior to the Lemieux draft, the North Stars offered all 12 rounds of their draft picks to Pittsburgh in exchange for first overall.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 11:47 AM EST up reply actions
woulda been worth it
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 11:48 AM EST up reply actions
Considering the only player they drafted that made the NHL was Ken Hodge? Yes, I’d say so.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 11:52 AM EST up reply actions
and if the pens had done that they never would have made it out of the 80s as a franchise
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 11:53 AM EST up reply actions
Also 1991
Also 1999
Also fuck norm green
Also really, fuck norm green for removing one of the most awesome sweaters from the league
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 11:55 AM EST up reply actions
yeah, wendel was clearly the best player in the 85 draft so its not like the leafs went off the board or whatever or got unlucky and the 30th over all turned into yzerman or whatever
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 11:47 AM EST up reply actions
Joe Nieuwendyk is the only other player of significance in that draft.
At worst, the Leafs got the second-best player available, and without injuries, he probably rates higher.
The problem is that the 1985 draft was lousy. Lots of B-listers, very very few A-listers.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
yeah, but ill take the best player in a B list draft than the worst one in an A list (stefan, daigle)
especially with how awesome Wendel is
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 11:51 AM EST up reply actions
easily, not to mention saved the lives of hundreds of NHL enforcers
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 11:54 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I remember seeing him interviewed one year during the playoffs, early in the development of my Leafs fandom. I knew he was awesome then, and that we needed a winger for Sundin. THey said he was 35 and I was like “WHY ISN’T HE PLAYING WITH MATS”
Then my dad explained to me his knee issue and i was so sad.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
indeed, truly a man far too awesome for the limits of the human body to endure
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 11:57 AM EST up reply actions
I can relate, though not really in my lifetime. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5ib3qcVs-M
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 11:59 AM EST up reply actions
Yeah
Loved Neely.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
Yeah that too.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 12:03 PM EST up reply actions
The only other good players from that draft
Joe Nieuwendyk – 2nd rnd
Mike Richter – 2nd
Stu Grimson – 7th
and
Igor Larionov – 11th
I've always wanted to be a PPP Princess. You see kids, you can be anything you want to be; so long as Jay Leno doesn't also want to be that.
ah yes, Larionov, id put him ahead of wendel in the pure skill department, but wow what a late round steal
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 11:52 AM EST up reply actions
Cheating
They did that just to take a flyer. It was basically throwing a pick away.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
I knew what the writer was getting at, but you can’t measure those intangibles Wendel had. He became the Leader of the team.
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 11:51 AM EST up reply actions
Thank you very much for the kind words! I’m in school, so writing is quite an intermittent hobby of mine, but I’ll do my best!
Nice…when you can of course.
Here’s the bad news, it doesn’t get any better after school. Writing was an “intermittent hobby of mine” in Uni…it’s a practically non-existent hobby now.
But keep your chin up!
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 3:11 PM EST up reply actions
To go with your lede . . .
The following is reportedly an image of Taco Bell’s top two executives:

Just sayin’.
"Procrastination is the art of keeping up with yesterday." -- Don Marquis
The Bluenote Zone - Because you KNOW you want to know more about the St. Louis Blues!
Well of COURSE the DONUT KING wants to paint other restaurants in a bad light.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 11:18 AM EST up reply actions
they may look stupid but they would be rich as fuck
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 11:21 AM EST up reply actions
Thought I'd throw some stuff up since it seems relevant
I posted this about Kulemin yesterday:
penalties-taken-vs-penalties-drawn-and-nikolai-kulemin
and then this today about Gunnarsson, who is another excellent looking up and comer:
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
anyone else see this?
@kausatoday GMs recommend No. 1 tie breaker for determining standings is regulation/OT wins instead of all wins, meaning shootout wins are eliminated.
What’s the point of having the shootout, then?
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
Points.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 12:19 PM EST up reply actions
continuous overtime! every 5 mins of not being able to score you take away one player until eventually it is just the goalies on the ice
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 12:22 PM EST up reply actions
Seeing goalies try to score on each other would be the highest of high comedy.
leaf fan stuck in ottawa, a localized black hole that will suck everything in that area to oblivion.
Marty Turco may have some worth afterall!
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
What’s even the strategy for that?I mean, I guess the puck starts at center ice? So you what, see if you can skate to it faster?
Hmmm, I want to see this now.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 12:28 PM EST up reply actions
me too
and I would love to see Brodeur vs. Turco.
This should be in the all star game.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
I wanna see if Thomas can shoot.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 12:29 PM EST up reply actions
Roy would have owned at this, p.s.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 12:30 PM EST up reply actions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=429QFwN8Yy4
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 12:30 PM EST up reply actions
Hextal too
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 12:32 PM EST up reply actions
Oh yeah, absolutely.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 12:32 PM EST up reply actions
i think he’s the only one to score on a direct shot with another goalie in the net
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 12:33 PM EST up reply actions
He scored on an empty net, but so has brodeur.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 12:34 PM EST up reply actions
really? I swear there was a goalie (thought hextal) that scored with another goalie in the net
it was on a rock-em-sock-em
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 12:36 PM EST up reply actions
personally i think it would be at its funniest when it was down to 5 mins of 1 on 1. two players trading chances trying to guage if they should change for fresh legs or stop a scoring chance, gigantic cluster fuck
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 12:30 PM EST up reply actions
plus, they’ll be trying to steal the puck from one another and we’ll have awesome things like that time Eddie charged out of the net and then went down on his side, pads first, and took the puck away from the player.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
haha yeah, it would be crazy dump and chase, goalies going for the strech pass
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 12:32 PM EST up reply actions
you pull your goalie for the two on one. No one else on the ice, it’s easy.
by Leaf in Habland on Mar 10, 2010 1:14 PM EST up reply actions
Goddamn, the rangers would dominate at that. Gaborik and Lundqvist vs. whoever you want, tough guy.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 1:15 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah you have to be careful with your rebounds.
by Leaf in Habland on Mar 10, 2010 1:19 PM EST up reply actions
one on one
don’t be the guy that takes a penalty
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
Albert Einstein
by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Mar 10, 2010 4:29 PM EST up reply actions
Malkin would be awful.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 4:32 PM EST up reply actions
i am so full of good ideas
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 12:29 PM EST up reply actions
i know right?
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 12:26 PM EST up reply actions
It has about as much hockey relevance as the shootout. I’m on board.
Proud supporter of Leafs/Flames trades since 1991.
by Sergei Puckizin on Mar 10, 2010 1:38 PM EST up reply actions
yeah, they need to bring that back
and take out the over the glass call
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 12:27 PM EST up reply actions
Trapezoid – gone
No touch icing – in
over the glass – stays
3pts for a regulation win – in
I've always wanted to be a PPP Princess. You see kids, you can be anything you want to be; so long as Jay Leno doesn't also want to be that.
Only because of Sweden. 
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 12:32 PM EST up reply actions
If we’re going to have the OT and, especially, the shootout, then I think we need 3 points for a regulation win. Regulation wins should mean more. Why should you get the same credit for beating a team in 60 minutes than another team who could only tie and gets credit for a win for being better in a skills competition?
leaf fan stuck in ottawa, a localized black hole that will suck everything in that area to oblivion.
Let’s get rid of the shootout and institute a tie after OT.
However the home team will get a “Post OT win” worth 0 pts and ignored in tie breakers. This will allow them to put “HOME TEAM WINS” on the scoreboard and blow the air horns for the dregs of society who don’t like ties.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
2 pts for a win (regulation or OT)
10 minute overtime (NO points for an OT Loss)
Either go back to ties(favoured) or allow shoot outs… winner gets 1 point, loser gets nothing – yes, this means that 1 point games are possible.
Teams do not deserve 2 points for winning a fucking skills competition.
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
Albert Einstein
by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Mar 10, 2010 4:32 PM EST up reply actions
Yes. The way you win is when it gets down to one-on-one, you pull the goalie. One guy gets the puck, one guy covers the man. Breakaway.
by Leaf in Habland on Mar 10, 2010 1:14 PM EST up reply actions
Assuming you win the faceoff.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 1:15 PM EST up reply actions
yeah if both coaches are smart, it is a race to get the puck and see who can do it first.
by Leaf in Habland on Mar 10, 2010 1:15 PM EST up reply actions
right
so the tie breaker for someone having the same points is whoever has more shootout wins, loses.
But if they have more points than someone else who has more actual regulation and OT wins, they still get into the playoffs over them?
That’s dumb.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
What’s the point of having the shootout, then?
I’ve been asking myself this question since the day it was introduced.
What’s the point of having the shootout, then?
It can be exciting. But it’s not hockey.
Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.
by nhlcheapshot on Mar 10, 2010 12:33 PM EST up reply actions
I’m not afraid to say, I love shootouts!
by CanadianMaple09 on Mar 10, 2010 12:39 PM EST up reply actions
you like leno more than conan though
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 12:40 PM EST up reply actions
I’m a perfect specimen. Love the Leafs, love Leno, love shootouts. What more can I say?
by CanadianMaple09 on Mar 10, 2010 12:43 PM EST up reply actions
As much as one can love a late night host. Different than the love I feel for the Leafs or my girlfriend or my mom or cute puppies.
by CanadianMaple09 on Mar 10, 2010 12:47 PM EST up reply actions
Gonna have to do a better hack job than that to sway my allegiance. ;D
by CanadianMaple09 on Mar 10, 2010 12:50 PM EST up reply actions
I already commented on that one in the fanshot.
by CanadianMaple09 on Mar 10, 2010 12:58 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, I have no idea why anyone would choose to be born with a chin like that…
by CanadianMaple09 on Mar 10, 2010 1:20 PM EST up reply actions
I watched
my first hockey game in two weeks and, last night was just weird because I had gotten used to watching Olympic-caliber hockey
a win’s a win however
Everybody wins: John Mitchell just got hurt at practice! Hooray we got rid of him let’s call up one of our prospects from our deep talent pool!
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
wooo!
Kadri emergency call up!
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 12:42 PM EST up reply actions
I’m not sure, Sjostrom was hurt so I’m not sure we needed to sit any forwards.
Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.
by nhlcheapshot on Mar 10, 2010 12:44 PM EST up reply actions
Rosehill got demoted.
Proud supporter of Leafs/Flames trades since 1991.
by Sergei Puckizin on Mar 10, 2010 1:42 PM EST up reply actions
Call up Tim Brent or Rosehill?
Dear God we really have no one left in the Marlies do we.
Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.
by nhlcheapshot on Mar 10, 2010 12:46 PM EST up reply actions
I like Rosehill, really wouldn’t mind seeing him again.
by CanadianMaple09 on Mar 10, 2010 12:47 PM EST up reply actions
Loved watching the game last night, not the outcome tho.
Your Leaves played well, but let’s be honest, everyone looks good against the B’s this year. Without Chara the B’s have only one shut-down D guy out there (Stuart) and he looked terrible. Your speed wreaked havoc against a really mediocre team D.
Just sayin’, I know it feels good to win just be careful, your Leaves were playing against a depleted team who lack any fire and intensity at all.
I hate that I can't sign off with "bt" anymore.
Thank you for coming here to temper our expectations.
I’ll cancel the scheduled post about our first round playoff matchup.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
by Chemmy on Mar 10, 2010 12:59 PM EST up reply actions 4 recs
From last night’s postgame:
That gives the Leafs five points since Chemmy famously bet that they would not pick up more than ten of their final 40 points
This is on par with where our expectations were after the trade deadline. So far, not bad considering.
Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.
by nhlcheapshot on Mar 10, 2010 1:01 PM EST up reply actions
Still comfortable with my bet.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Would you care for a shrimp taco? You can earn good money around here for eating one.
I've always wanted to be a PPP Princess. You see kids, you can be anything you want to be; so long as Jay Leno doesn't also want to be that.
mmm…
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 1:53 PM EST up reply actions
Bruins are in a playoff race. Why would they not have fire and intensity?
They were missing their two best players. We get it. But at this point we’d consider it an accomplishment to beat a good AHL team
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 1:07 PM EST up reply actions
The Bruins are missing fire and intensity in the same way I’m missing a billion dollars.
I didn’t ever have a billion dollars but I’m really hoping it’ll appear in the next few weeks.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
by Chemmy on Mar 10, 2010 1:08 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
You didn’t have a billion dollars last year
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 1:09 PM EST up reply actions
Exactly.
Listen, not trying to be a downer, seriously, it’s just that you all seem bipolar with your sentiments about this team.
The B’s probably won’t make the playoffs, or at least, they shouldn’t. They are the skating dead. Analyzing your team against them can be very misleading. That’s all I’m saying.
And yeah, I’ve seen what you’ve done post the trade deadline. Not that impressed, or at least not as impressed as you all seem to be.
I hate that I can't sign off with "bt" anymore.
Both teams are bad and both recent games have been close, I don’t know why you’re trying to bring them down just because their team won a game.
Of course clawson did tell me “plan the parade” when the Bruins won at home last week so
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 1:17 PM EST up reply actions
we’re the 29th placed team in the league (and based on talent that’s where we belonged) and we beat the team that is currently 16th.
And we can’t be happy?
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
Stop getting your hopes up. The Leafs aren’t impressive.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
NO IT IS NOT ALLOWED WEREN’T YOU LISTENING?
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 1:18 PM EST up reply actions
We’re optimistic for the future and realistic about the present. I don’t call that being bipolar. Like any good fans we support our team through thick and thin. I apologize for not being a community of emo whiners who are constantly down about our terrible season. Actually no, I don’t apologize.
by CanadianMaple09 on Mar 10, 2010 1:19 PM EST up reply actions
hahaha that’s pretty funny
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 2:49 PM EST up reply actions
I think our collective attitude is “Wow this team really sucks on paper, and probably will next year too, but at least there’s hope for the future. Wait, what? We got 5 pts in first 4 games post deadline? What a nice surprise”. Hardly bipolar.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 1:21 PM EST up reply actions
huh?
This guy is worse than me
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 2:42 PM EST up reply actions
Writing “Leaves” is the last refuge of the mentally deficient.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
everytime i read
leaves’ i want to smash my monitor
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 1:56 PM EST up reply actions
I just sigh. It’s sad and pathetic and shows that they don’t understand how proper nouns work.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
Me fail English? That’s unpossible.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
by clrkaitken on Mar 10, 2010 2:04 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Bait taken.
“sound of fishing pole reel” working
I hate that I can't sign off with "bt" anymore.
“Hey guys! Watch this! I”m going to get some Leafs fans to call me stupid!"
“Wait, how are you going to do that?”
“I’m going to pretend I have no idea how to write the English language!”
“….”
“HAHAHA LOOK AT THAT! THEY CALLED ME DUMB! THOSE IDIOTS!”
“…”
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
by PPP on Mar 10, 2010 2:28 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
don't worry
It’s eyebob
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
Albert Einstein
by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Mar 10, 2010 4:36 PM EST up reply actions
YEah, I'm a Morrissey fan too
I would have thought that plagerism is the last refuge
This is fun
I hate that I can't sign off with "bt" anymore.
Plagiarism?
God, just when you think you couldn’t get any dumber.
And I was paraphrasing Samuel Johnson. Not that I am shocked that you wouldn’t know.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
Too bad, Morrissey had more to say about it
“it” being a refuge.
I hate that I can't sign off with "bt" anymore.
Are you being serious? What the fuck does it matter who YOU thought the comment was referring to?
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
I like this guy. He’s cute. Can we keep him PPP? Please????
I've always wanted to be a PPP Princess. You see kids, you can be anything you want to be; so long as Jay Leno doesn't also want to be that.
I like it here.
Gotta admit, it’s waaaaay tooooo easy to needle you guys/gals.
Like a bad marriage where a guy can’t do anything right.
Pins and needles. Love walking on them amongst you.
I hate that I can't sign off with "bt" anymore.
It is
We bristle at stupidity and you bring it in spades.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
I've changed my mind
Let’s not keep him.
He’s unoriginal, non-sensational, and very bad with his pop culture references. Like all others who venture in here looking to be a big man and start some shit with the local Laffs fans, you’ve begun backpedaling faster than Fred Flintstone trying to stop at a red light.
The first rule of trolling is to stick to your guns and not waiver from your initial stance. You have failed at this. Rule #2 is that you don’t want to play nice, you want to play mean. You fail at this too. Rule #3 is to actually have useful knowledge to back up your asinine claims and rants. You also fail at this.
Seriously just go back to making random posts on Litterbox Cats about trading Thomas for Vokoun straight up; or to On The Forecheck claiming how a guy who can just score like Micheal Ryder deserves a $5M+ contract. You’ve crossed paths with intelligent hockey fans here and your complete ignorance and shear stupidity are showing more than your epidermis.
I've always wanted to be a PPP Princess. You see kids, you can be anything you want to be; so long as Jay Leno doesn't also want to be that.
by SkinnyFish on Mar 10, 2010 3:03 PM EST up reply actions 7 recs
you’ve begun backpedaling faster than Fred Flintstone trying to stop at a red light.
That is just made of win.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
rec’d for epidermis reference
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 3:55 PM EST up reply actions
It’s funny because it’s true, see? Your epidermis is your hair.
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
Albert Einstein
by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Mar 10, 2010 4:37 PM EST up reply actions
Naw
I have a pretty high tolerance for stupidity but this guy is special.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
I have a pretty high tolerance for stupidity
Point in case: me :)
Phaneuf Phever, an upgrade in skill and alliteration!
Wow.
chill, at what point did I say you coldn’t be happy or optimistic? I’m just saying keep it real. Good grief. Do you not recall the torment you put yourself through the whole year prior to…..well….Toskala leaving? That’s bipolar.
I’m happy that you have some exciting yoots, but please, don’t tell me that them smacking around the B’s is an accurate indication of what you really have for assets.
I hate that I can't sign off with "bt" anymore.
Here’s what you don’t/won’t get. No one is getting irrationally exuberant here. The crayons remain in the box, parade route unplanned. We’re just enjoying a win and some good performances. That’s what fans do.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 1:47 PM EST up reply actions
“Hey, I come here and make a dumb point and use a stupid pejorative for your team and you are upset? Fuck, there is no pleasing anyone”.
please, don’t tell me that them smacking around the B’s is an accurate indication of what you really have for assets.
That’s right. Because we all know that the Bruins are not actually a good team and basically had every bounce go their way last year. The Leafs beat a team that they’ll pass on the way up in a year or two. Nothign to get excited about.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
by PPP on Mar 10, 2010 1:48 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
erm, that blog post is meaningless
“Last year the Bruins won a lot of games. I think that’s unsustainable. Look at this year they don’t win as many games. This proves that their record was unsustainable.”
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
It’s more than that but ok.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
He should have gone into more detail but those changes are a by-product of their shooting percentage falling, their save percentage falling, their PDO number regressing towards 100, and other unsustainable rates proving that they are, in fact, unsustainable.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
So what you’re saying is that article makes sense if you apply a bunch of statistical principles not even casually mentioned in the article.
I’m going to stick with “blog post is meaningless”.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Fine
Be difficult. The point the post makes is still valid. It just needs a lot more detail to completely make the case.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
It doesn’t make any case. You made the case by pointing out the reasons the Bruins were unsustainable.
This would be like me saying “I’ve invented cold fusion.” but not telling you how or what I did and then claiming I was right all along when someone explained to you how cold fusion works.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
It’s more like he said he invented cold fusion, explained the biggest indicator that it works, and ignored explaining all of the working parts.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
His only indicator is that now the Bruins record is worse than it was last year despite the change in shot differential.
He doesn’t mention shooting percentage. He simply shows that their record when being outshot is now below .500.
Don’t the Leafs outshoot a lot of teams? Didn’t we decide that being outshot doesn’t correlate very well with winning?
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Aside from the Savard contract, their cap management has been terrible this season.
They traded their top goalscorer for lottery tickets and now can’t score.
They signed a 35 year old to a fat extension then stuck him on the bench for their prized prospect.
They paid $8 million for Lucic and Krecji.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
If things continue, you're right
Methinks that PC and CJ may be gone before then tho.
I hate that I can't sign off with "bt" anymore.
You forgot the Wideman for Boyes trade
And letting two tough D go along with Axelsson and Yelle.
I hate that I can't sign off with "bt" anymore.
And then he and Stralman would have needed raises, and oh look you’re spending the same on White & Stralman that you are on Komi & Gunnarsson.
No, because the argument there is that they are both RFAs not UFAs so re-signing them is in the Leafs control. They have more wage control.
They can also lock them down longer at a price that is commensurate with their contribution at first and hopefully less than commensurate as the deal shifts along.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
but who would actually play defense on that defensive group? Beauchemin and White?
Stralman and Kaberle are both almost purely offensive defensemen. Schenn has struggled. Gunnarsson is a rookie. We’d have to be hoping that Finger could remember how to play like he did last year, or else we’d be relying on XLB too much.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
In my hypothetical actually, I just realized, we’d still have Kubina since we wouldn’t have needed to unload him for garbage to have the money to sign Komi.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:40 PM EST up reply actions
But Kubina costs more money than Komi, so we’d actually have MORE money tied up in defense in your scenerio.
Look, I agree that getting the best bang for your buck is what is needed to be successful in the NHL. Hence, trading Ponikarovsky and having Kulemin step into his role. But you have to have someone fit the role, and replacing Komi/Beauch with Stralman – or anyone else currently on t he Leafs’ roster – doesn’t make any sense, because they don’t fill that role.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
Kubina's deal expires this year
I’m looking at the future. With Schenn, Phaneuf and Gunnar all at least decent defensively, and with my grudgingly acknowledging we probably needed to at least sign Beauch, and with a potential defensive-minded guy like Aulie in the pipe, I don’t think we really need what Komi offers—or at least, not at the price.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 2:53 PM EST up reply actions
Frankly, I think the only reason that we didn’t need what Komi offered this year is because he was so injured.
I think that had he not been injured, he would’ve been worth the money and had an excellent effect on the team.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
I hope you’re right. 11-16-7 with him. Better, but not much.
I just think we have way too much cap space tied up on the blueline going forward, he’s the easiest target, and the money/term of his deal has worried me since day 1. Hopefully Burke will ease the logjam this summer somehow. These guys need to play > 20mpg to be worth it and there isn’t enough ice to go around.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 3:04 PM EST up reply actions
By “these guys” I mean our massive collection of $3MM+ D.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 3:06 PM EST up reply actions
Finger’s the one causing the massive problem. Not Beauchemin or Komisarek.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
He’s the biggest problem obviously but I’m looking at Burke moves, not Uncle Cliffie. Man I hope MLSE agrees to bury him.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 3:20 PM EST up reply actions
But if you get rid of Finger, you get rid of the salary cap problem.
Neither Komi nor Beauchemin are being paid a rediculous sum of money for what they do.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
Beauch is actually a relative bargain for how versatile he is
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 3:35 PM EST up reply actions
$23MM for 6 guys (Phaneuf, Komi, Beauch, Kabs, Schenn, Gunnar) is still an awful lot.
SJ: $20MM
WAS: $16MM
Just to cite the two best teams in the league. And their defence is, ahem, a little better than ours.
I wouldn’t call Beauch a bargain. I’d say he’s just about right for a 2/3 guy.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 3:52 PM EST up reply actions
Washington’s defense is meh at best after Green and Schultz. Look to Detroit, Philadelphia, and a healthy Boston for comparable d.
I've always wanted to be a PPP Princess. You see kids, you can be anything you want to be; so long as Jay Leno doesn't also want to be that.
good goaltending solves all problems
San Jose has it in spades, and WSH’s Thoedore has looked pretty good this year as well.
Would San Jose and Washington look as good with 25+ games in front of Toskala?
I have nothing interesting to say.
or with players like thornton, heatly, marleau, ovie, backstrom and semin replaced with Grabbo, poni and Blake
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 3:57 PM EST up reply actions
That’s what I’d say that ’67’s theory is right but I’d hold off until next year to judge it’s application.
The NHL, under a cap system, is an efficiency contest. Every penny saved by having players outperform their contracts is a penny that can be used to fix another hole.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
exactly
but you still have to have the right players in place.
The Pens won with Malkin on his ELC, spending money on other players while Malkin far outperformed his contract. You need cases like that to win, not an Anton Stralman.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
Yes. The better the player the more they’ll outperform which is why first rounders don’t really get traded and why MF37’s big complaint about the Kessel trade is that now the Leafs will have one guy maybe matching his production to his cost instead of two kids outperforming theirs.
But, every penny is vital.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
Basically, you guys are getting too bogged down in the specifics.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
Because the specifics are what’s being debated. To death. And then some.
Nobody questions whether effective cap management and talent distribution are valuable. We’ve had 250+ posts dealing with the relative merits of keeping Anton Stralman.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
this is why we are the best fanbase in the world
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 4:11 PM EST up reply actions
hahaha
Yeah and basically what I am getting at is that we agree on the major point so…
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
Yeah…probably are
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 4:11 PM EST up reply actions
This is exactly my point. To get good results, you don’t need to stockpile 6 guys who are good enough to play in your top 4. It’s a waste of money in a cap world. The goal isn’t to have the best looking D corps on paper. It’s to win games and SJ and WAS are much better than us at that. They have awesome Os because they don’t overspend on D.
I can’t believe I’m the only one that thinks our cap is woefully lopsided to the D.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 3:59 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t think it’s as big a deal as you make it out to be.
It’s high right know because all our potential is up front; we needed to bring in free agent D because there was nothing beyond Schenn and Gunnarsson. As the ledger starts to swing back the other way, we’ll spend more on forwards and replace the high-cost D with the low-cost ones, and reinvest in our forwards.
Gotta take a long-term view.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
we don't disagree
there is too much money on D, that can’t be argued.
But the solution is not to keep Stralman at the expense of Komisarek.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
Stralman
at the expense of Finger makes a million times more sense.
Komisarek wasn’t just brought in for his on ice abilities, but his locker room presence as well.
Burke’s mandate wasn’t to just remake the team on the ice, but off it as well. Komisarek was brought in for that reason.
I have nothing interesting to say.
Well of course I’d prefer to get rid of Finger but that was out of Burke’s control.
I’m very skeptical of paying guys for chemistry. To me winning creates chemistry much more often than the opposite.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 4:06 PM EST up reply actions
its a combination with a guy like Komi, he can shut down the best offensive threats in the NHL and then lead the team in a rousing tween period speach
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 4:08 PM EST up reply actions
i dont think we have truley felt komisareks impact on this team yet, i never liked him in montreal (for obvious reasons) but from what I saw of him on the ice and in interviews the first half of this season I saw something in komisarek that I think will be of great value to us moving forward. The guy is pretty fearless and will sacrifice himself for the good of the team, his shot blocking ability has been elite in the past and he seems to be one of the hardest working guys on the team. I think, long term komisarek will be a very good thing for the organization
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 4:09 PM EST up reply actions
Both San Jose and Washington have VERY top heavy defense that gets thin once you’re out of the top 3.
Despite how they’ve played this year, the Leafs have 6 solid defensemen.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
and if either of those teams had a forward corps like the leafs they would be much worse than the leafs with their select D
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 3:54 PM EST up reply actions
Yes Yes Yes
Good teams are top heavy in EVERYTHING. The Leafs’ problem for the past five years is we are TOO balanced. To many middle 6 forwards, and middle pair D that give terrible bang for the buck. Not enough elite performers which we can’t afford because of all the glorified 3rd liners and #4D eating our cap.
Burke has now gone a long way to solving this problem. I just think Komi’s deal remains an obstacle.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 4:01 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t see why you think it’s Komi’s deal that is an obstacle when Finger isn’t even playing and is getting paid 78% of what Komi is paid.
When in the line up, Komi was the #1 defenseman.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
Finger is OBVIOUSLY a bigger problem but I’m talking about issues created by our current GM, not his predecessor.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 4:10 PM EST up reply actions
Obstacle how?
That’s the question for me. What is he costing the Leafs beyond Anton Stralman (who HAD to go in order to trade for Kessel, dominoes falling etc…)
I have nothing interesting to say.
$4.5MM
And Karina, Komi averaged almost 20mpg. Those are 3/4 minutes, not #1. I challenge anyone to find a good, well-managed team that’s paying their 3rd or 4th defenceman $4.5MM or more. The only ones I can think of are disaster contracts like Campbell and Redden.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 4:09 PM EST up reply actions
Komi’s minuites this year are pretty off kilter due to injury and recovery time, when you only play what, 20 games? 4 or 5 games of reduced minuites because he left early due to injury or was getting back into his groove alter the curve
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 4:12 PM EST up reply actions
Komi has never played over 21MPG
He’s usually 19-20. Anyone who thought he was going teo be a #1/2 was dreaming in technicolour. He can be a nice #3.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 4:15 PM EST up reply actions
And if he spends that 20 minutes playing against the other teams best line and keeping them off the scoresheet, that’s valuable.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
i never expected komi to do anything except defend the shit out of our zone and be a beast on the pk
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 4:17 PM EST up reply actions
but Kaberle is a bargain at 4.25 when he is the exact opposite of the coin?
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 4:18 PM EST up reply actions
burke must really feel his leadership abilities put him up to 4.25, plus the fact that he had to overpay a little to get him away from montreal. He managed to hurt the habs by prying him away from them as well. Also, the thought of komi/kaberle as his top unit really had burke excited
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 4:20 PM EST up reply actions
Did you look at his ES time numbers?
Besides, minutes played is not necesserily the sole indicator of #1D. Beauchemin averaged the most minutes in Anaheim, would you argue he was #1 over Pronger and Neidermayer?
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
Pronger played more than Beauch
And Nieds missed a big chunk of the season and was getting in shape.
In 08/09 Beach was a clear #3, 2 mins less than the others.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 4:17 PM EST up reply actions
the year they won the cup
Beauchemin averaged 27:03 of ice time in the playoffs.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
beauchemin was also the ducks best d man in the series against detroit last year
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 4:21 PM EST up reply actions
Last year
Komisarek played 3:24 per game on the PK, more than any other MTL defender.
Beauchemin played 4:50 a game on the PK, tops in the league.
I have nothing interesting to say.
Phaneuf will carry more of the weight of the team on his shoulders, that way komisarek doesnt have to stress about being ‘the man’ on the backend as much and can focus on being a really solid shutdown guy. I have a really good feeling komisarek bounces back big time next year.
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 4:05 PM EST up reply actions
so the Leafs pay a bit too much on defense, so what?
Comparing them to teams like the sharks and the caps in that category is rediculous because those teams are mainly good because of their OFFENSE
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 3:53 PM EST up reply actions
I dunno if I’d hold up two teams who
a) haven’t won jack; and
b) have some serious cap hoops to jump through this summer
as models of how to split cap spending between forwards and D.
Washington’s cap situation is so dire they can’t even afford to have their 2 best D prospects on their roster.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
Are you kidding?
WAS have 13 guys under contract for next year at $36.7MM, including 4 of their best 5 players (Backstrom’s an RFA). The Leafs have 15 under contract for a whopping $49MM. WAS’s cap situation is way better than ours. And they’re actually, you know, good.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 4:04 PM EST up reply actions
Honestly, I don’t think we can point to one team in the NHL that isn’t under cap trouble, whether it’s the league cap or a self-imposed cap. That is the state of the league right now – the salaries still have not balanced from the lockout.
Washington is closer than most, granted, but it’s not like they can be willy-nilly with the room.
Prefers pugnacity to truculence.
So they have at most $16M to re-sign 10 players, one of which will be a 21 year old centre having a breakout season and in line for a big raise, and they’re expected to challenge for the Cup. And Semin is a UFA next year, and Varlamov I believe is an RFA.
The Leafs have about $4M to re-sign 8 players, (more if Finger/Kaberle leave), and nobody expects anything out of them.
If the Leafs can’t fix the cap situation next year, they move bad contracts and continue to replenish their youth pool. If Washington can’t fix the cap situation next year, their window potentially closes.
Are YOU kidding that their situation is better?
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
No. I’m not. Washington has an awesome team and lots of cap space. We have almost none and, at present, a crap team.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 4:13 PM EST up reply actions
they are so f’n lucky they won the draft lottery in 04…
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 4:14 PM EST up reply actions
considering 6 mill or so of the ton of cap room they need will be going to one player (backstrom) and probably 5 or so next year for Semin it isnt so rosy for them
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 4:15 PM EST up reply actions
i think every team with more than a handful of all stars will have the exact same problem. to be honest, id rather have 5 all stars and a fucked cap then the other way around… Pitt seems to balance it pretty well
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 4:16 PM EST up reply actions
CHI is obviously in the biggest pickle… They’re going to have to work with Kane/Toews/Hossa/Keith/Huet/Campbell contracts… pretty much everyone else will have to be league minimum.
Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.
by nhlcheapshot on Mar 10, 2010 4:20 PM EST up reply actions
and they could probably still skate circles around us
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 4:21 PM EST up reply actions
Fleishmann and Fehr RFAs too. They’ll be getting a raise next year, especially Fleishmann.
And unless they’re willing to go with Varlamov and Neuvirth, they’ll need a goalie as well.
Not saying they’re in a bad spot, but it’s not perfect either. Backstrom going to be getting a HUGE raise
Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.
by nhlcheapshot on Mar 10, 2010 4:11 PM EST up reply actions
SJ has 10 signed at $35.2M
- 5 forwards, 4 d and 1 goalie (backup), $21M to sign 9 guys, give or take
TO has 15 signed at $48.7M
- 7 forwards, 7 d and 1 goalie (starter) $12M to sign 5 guys, give or take
WSH has 13 signed at $36.7M
- 7 forwards, 5 d and 1 goalie (backup), $20M to sign 7 guys, give or take
SJS – $2.3M per signing
TML – $2.4M per signing
WSH – $2.8M per signing
both Washington and San Jose need a starting goalie next year…
I have nothing interesting to say.
So WSH has more money/signing, and SJ basically the same. But both have much better players already in place. I think that’s an advantage.
Nobody’s cap is perfect but to say we’re in a better position than them is blue and white coloured glasses.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 4:14 PM EST up reply actions
with $28M in cap space currently
and $6M of it being held up next year by a starting goalie.
Whoever starts in 2011 won’t be making that kind of coin, we’ll end up saving money.
I have nothing interesting to say.
maybe, maybe not, who knows what will happen with Gustavsson or Riemer in 2 years
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 4:23 PM EST up reply actions
not to mention they manage to find guys like brendan morrison for cheap
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 4:15 PM EST up reply actions
thing is
those signings are risky… it’s a crap shoot to see if they pan out. You can’t count on them, they have to be balanced somehow.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
good pro scouting and a gm with a good sense of his team and what it needs can really help make that an educated risk
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 4:18 PM EST up reply actions
No but you act as if everyone’s contract is Brian Campbell’s.
Assuming no one moves, Kaberle’s contract comes off the books in 2011, Finger and Beauchemin’s in 2012, and Komisarek and Phaneuf in 2014.
As they expire, either we re-sign them at prices that make sense, or replace them with guys like Aulie.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
I definitely do not think they are Campbell/Redden contracts. Those are in another stratosphere.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 4:20 PM EST up reply actions
Can you please acknowledge that the contracts are structured in a way that Burke has a vision of what the D will look like.
He didn’t pull a Sather and just start handing money out. There’s clearly a plan in place.
Resident Capologist
Toskala Cap Counter - RIP
Yeah, it just seems a bad plan
Paying your $4 and 5 D-men over $3MM is bad cap management. And that’s ignoring Finger.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 4:22 PM EST up reply actions
Schenn is $3MM for cap purposes
Gunnar and Exelby are 6 and 7.
Phaneuf, Komi, Beauch, Kaberle, Schenn. 5 guys making $3MM+, without counting Finger.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 4:26 PM EST up reply actions
Next year Schenn is $3M for cap purposes not this year.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
We don't know what bonuses he earned, right?
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 4:27 PM EST up reply actions
True
Good point. So he could.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
He never signed Finger though….and Beauch and Komi are good 3-4 guys
Toronto Maple Leafs: Looking at next year since 1967
i dont like to even view it as 1-2 or 3-4, each guy has a role to play and they play in those situations. Like komi could be considered a 3-4 guy 5 on 5 but he is a #1 guy on the Pk and when there is a faceoff in our zone with the oppositions best on the ice
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 4:25 PM EST up reply actions
One last point
Komi is tied for 23rd highest paid D in the NHL. I assume we all agree that all things considered he’s nowhere close to the top 25 in NHL D (please don’t make me list all the guys better than him. I’d start with Phaneuf and Beauch, and by as early as next year, Schenn and Gunnar too, just on this team).
I understand he’s a UFA and all and they aren’t cheap but isn’t that the point? Don’t spend on UFAs unless they can justify their lofty salaries by being that good. Chara is the #1 paid D and he’s worth it. Lidstrom, J-Bo, Boyle, those guys are top 10 type guys and worth the money. Komi just isn’t.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 4:35 PM EST up reply actions
I just can’t argue you on this anymore. And Brian Campbell is the #1 paid D in the league. And he’s #3 D on his own team.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
7.5 > 7.14
Brian Campbell makes my point. He’s just a much more extreme example than Komi.
Let me be clear: Komi’s contract is WAAAAAY better than Campbell’s.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 5:05 PM EST up reply actions
based on this year Stajan is better than Savard
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 4:45 PM EST up reply actions
hheh, based on next year their salaries arent far off either. at least the cap hit
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 4:46 PM EST up reply actions
yes, but savard is paid more you see! he is therefore worse to the cap!
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 4:47 PM EST up reply actions
At hockey or at remembering what he had for breakfast?
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 4:46 PM EST up reply actions
both, but savard has him beat in drooling
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 4:48 PM EST up reply actions
You’re making my point. Stajan is now overpaid.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 5:02 PM EST up reply actions
no, he isnt, my point is that savard has been injured most of this year and hasnt been able to live up to his contract.
Stajans contract is actually pretty reasonable for the offense and two way play he brings.
Komi MIGHT be over paid by half a million. 4 mill is right around where a game changing shut down D man of his potential should be paid. he also brings intangibles like leadership and locker room presence that bumps up the cost a bit more, and then throw in the whole UFA thing and the leafs actually got a pretty good deal. Had he played all season like he did when he came back from his first injury i doubt anyone would be calling him over payed.
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 5:06 PM EST up reply actions
there is a difference between being overpaid and being paid market value.
Not every player on a team can be underpaid.
Stajan’s new contract is reasonable value for what he can bring to the table.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
Stajan’s new contract is reasonable value for what he can bring to the table.
So he’s like Denny’s?
Phaneuf Phever, an upgrade in skill and alliteration!
ew no
Denny’s is the Wade Redden of restaurants. They can’t even make real food, let alone give you good value for what you pay.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
I thought Denny’s was good at least for breakfast
WWGRD? (What Would Gary Roberts Do?)
by PassivelyTruculent on Mar 10, 2010 7:07 PM EST up reply actions
thats because everyone who goes there is too hungover to tell, or still drunk
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 7:08 PM EST up reply actions
Oh like Markham Station on Shepard & Markham Road
WWGRD? (What Would Gary Roberts Do?)
by PassivelyTruculent on Mar 10, 2010 7:09 PM EST up reply actions
After clubbing @ 3 am?
WWGRD? (What Would Gary Roberts Do?)
by PassivelyTruculent on Mar 10, 2010 8:57 PM EST up reply actions
That’s why it looks more and more like we need to trade Kabby and waive/kill Finger
both them off next years cap gets us to 13 players signed, $41m committed.
That being said, we have some RFAs needing signing as well… Kulemin/Hansen/Gustavsson to start.
Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.
by nhlcheapshot on Mar 10, 2010 4:17 PM EST up reply actions
hanson wont get much i dont think…. hasnt realyl proved anything yet
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 4:19 PM EST up reply actions
I’ll believe MLSE will burn $7MM when I see it.
What’s the name of this blog again? Something about pension plans?
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 4:19 PM EST up reply actions
yeah, i mean its not like Finger spent 90 percent of the current season getting paid to eat nachos in the press box
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 4:20 PM EST up reply actions
what an amazing life…
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 4:23 PM EST up reply actions
how?
in the AHL, at least he’s getting paid to PLAY
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
From MLSE’s perspective, at least Finger now occupies a roster spot they don’t have to pay someone else to fill. OTPP, who ultimately call the shots, don’t give a damn about whether or not Finger plays.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 4:24 PM EST up reply actions
and they can justify him on the marlies by saying he is mentoring the kids and stabilizing the farm team
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 4:25 PM EST up reply actions
OTPP/MLSE don't give a shit about that
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 4:27 PM EST up reply actions
really? because that sounds like protecting a future investment to me, it at least makes as much sense as “occupying a roster spot” by sitting in the press box
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 4:28 PM EST up reply actions
how are they burning $7 mill???
They would be if they buried Finger.
Ottawa buried Cheechoo’s contract. I can see it happening.
Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.
by nhlcheapshot on Mar 10, 2010 4:21 PM EST up reply actions
I say a prayer every night. But again, I’ll believe it when I see it.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 4:23 PM EST up reply actions
right now there isnt a point to burying him, he is better than exelby and now that there is no reason to showcase the nut case he might as well put finger on display
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 4:26 PM EST up reply actions
can Kulemin and Grabbo be the next Poni and Antro (minus the obvious difference in Height)??
...Being surrounded by Sens and Habs fans makes me lose faith in humanity...
I hope so!
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
Kuli will be better than either, Grabbo will be as good but smaller.
Phaneuf Phever, an upgrade in skill and alliteration!
Here's something y'all will enjoy
Vancouver media: Wellwood not fat, just happier, heavier.
"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky
fat
I've always wanted to be a PPP Princess. You see kids, you can be anything you want to be; so long as Jay Leno doesn't also want to be that.
For Jared
http://www.scifisquad.com/2010/03/04/warehouse-13-returns-this-summer-now-with-more-jewel-stait/
I've always wanted to be a PPP Princess. You see kids, you can be anything you want to be; so long as Jay Leno doesn't also want to be that.
i dont know what warehouse 13 is, but i know ill be watching it
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 3:39 PM EST up reply actions
CRISIS AVERTED!
Crosby’s missing hockey stick and glove found!
leaf fan stuck in ottawa, a localized black hole that will suck everything in that area to oblivion.
Chemmy called it.
Patrice Bergeron pulled his groin during the Olympics presumably while pretending to be Sidney Crosby while alone in his hotel room. No word on Crosby’s missing gloves and stick.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 3:43 PM EST up reply actions
Hahahaha!!! That is so awesome
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 4:02 PM EST up reply actions
I was looking at regular season.
Doesn’t surprise me with long OTs in the playoffs they’d lean on the younger legs a bit more.
by The '67 Sound on Mar 10, 2010 5:01 PM EST up reply actions
I ated the purple berries!
They taste like.. burning
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Mar 10, 2010 4:51 PM EST up reply actions
He’s going to smell like hotdogs.
...rely a bit to heavily on alcohol and irony...
by My Poor Friend Me on Mar 10, 2010 4:55 PM EST up reply actions
Lol! that is comedic genius.
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 4:55 PM EST up reply actions
you smell like dead bunnies
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 4:56 PM EST up reply actions
well, ive been staring at that shrimp taco since 9am and i still want one
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
Eat 2. Keep a journal of the next 24 hours. Post it here for all to enjoy.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Mar 10, 2010 4:56 PM EST up reply actions
dont forget the fries supream!
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 4:56 PM EST up reply actions
I hadn’t been to a Taco Bell in Canada in as long as I can remember before last August. So Fries Supreme were not something I had ever seen before. I ordered some as a curiosity, but damn, were they tasty.
...rely a bit to heavily on alcohol and irony...
by My Poor Friend Me on Mar 10, 2010 5:02 PM EST up reply actions
It looks good to me too, damn good. I just can’t imagine my stomach agreeing with me on it’s goodness.
ever hear of “The scoots”?
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 4:59 PM EST up reply actions
I’m craving shrimp tacos now, too. Fortunately, in CA there are alternatives. Rubio’s for dinner? I think so.
...rely a bit to heavily on alcohol and irony...
by My Poor Friend Me on Mar 10, 2010 4:59 PM EST up reply actions
RU-BI-OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOS

Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 5:01 PM EST up reply actions
That kid grew up to make some delicious tacos!
...rely a bit to heavily on alcohol and irony...
by My Poor Friend Me on Mar 10, 2010 5:04 PM EST up reply actions
hahahahahahaha…Rubio
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 5:09 PM EST up reply actions
We’ve got alternatives in Ontario, Taco Del Mar being one of them.
The Guess Who sucked, the Jets were lousy anyway
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Mar 10, 2010 5:11 PM EST up reply actions
mmmm Taco Del Mar…Yeah i prefer them to Taco Bell.
Also they do shrimp there, and I’ve actually enjoyed it.
Wendel Killer Joseph
by MapleLeafMole on Mar 10, 2010 5:19 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah we have Taco Del Mar. It’s ok. My first choice is a taqueria. Preferably one where, if you don’t order in Spanish, there is a 50/50 chance of them getting your order right.
...rely a bit to heavily on alcohol and irony...
by My Poor Friend Me on Mar 10, 2010 5:25 PM EST up reply actions
What the hell??!
I have to listen to jim hughson and craig simspon call Leafs games while Harry Neale is currently doing the colour for the Sabres?!
The Guess Who sucked, the Jets were lousy anyway
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Mar 10, 2010 7:13 PM EST reply actions
yeah, he lives in buffalo and the drive to the ACC was getting to be a bit much in his old age
Who wants to go to the Olive Garden?
by JaredFromLondon on Mar 10, 2010 7:21 PM EST up reply actions
well at least that’s the reason. Glad he’s still able to work.
The Guess Who sucked, the Jets were lousy anyway
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Mar 10, 2010 7:49 PM EST up reply actions
Whose gonna break it to him that Sundin’s not playing for us anymore?
WWGRD? (What Would Gary Roberts Do?)
by PassivelyTruculent on Mar 10, 2010 8:53 PM EST up reply actions
I just thought he had retired (Neale) didn’t think he was working elsewhere.
The Guess Who sucked, the Jets were lousy anyway
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Mar 10, 2010 9:05 PM EST up reply actions




























