Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

The Decline of Tomas Kaberle

Photo

Tomas Kaberle's days are numbered with the Toronto Maple Leafs.  Perhaps that was true before this season even began but it's become far more evident as yet another non-playoff edition of the Toronto Maple Leafs winds down to a summer of second guessing and rebuilding.

Early on this year, and during much of last off-season, Kaberle's name was in regular circulation as a potential captain and his early season production indicated a level of rededication to his craft that was admirable.  His quarterbacking skills were amazingly valuable on the power play and the Leafs started off the year as one of the top units in the NHL with the man advantage.  He led NHL defensemen in points over the first part of the year and frankly looked like a keeper as the team was rebuilt in Brian Burke's new mold.

Despite his skills with the puck though, the team failed to win, and defensive woes were obviously a large part of the problem.  Improvement was needed in the Leafs zone, and Kaberle's area of expertise was at the other end of the ice.

As the season progressed, the team struggled mightily and fell to the bottom of the Eastern Conference with some of the worst penalty killing in NHL history.  The Olympics and trade deadline quickly approached and it became inescapable that the 2009-10 Leafs were bound for an overhaul as Brian Burke reformulated the product on the ice.

Star-divide

Despite the fact that players Niklas Hagman, Mikhail Grabovski, Phil Kessel, Mike Komisarek, Jonas Gustavsson, and yes, Tomas Kaberle were all named to Olympic hockey teams, the Leafs weren't working as a defensive unit and their penalty killing was atrocious.

The Olympics and NHL trade deadline may be the turning point for Tomas Kaberle's season and the beginning of the end of his career as a Toronto Maple Leaf.

As of February 8th, Kaberle had a +/- rating of -9.  Not particularly wonderful, but not bad on this Leafs team all things considered.  Since then, his +/- rating has dropped another -7, to it's current -16 level.  So what happened?  At the beginning of February, the Leafs made the first of their major trades of the season, sending Ian White, Niklas Hagman, Matt Stajan, and Jamal Mayers to Calgary in exchange for Dion Phaneuf, Fredrik Sjostrom, and prospect Keith AulieVesa Toskala and Jason Blake were also dealt to Anaheim in exchange for goaltender J.S. Giguere.

Kaberle was likely shaken by the deal.  He may not have realized how much of a turnover Burke had in mind for the team or perhaps didn't expect such a fundamental change to the make up of the team and the defense pairings of the future.  Hagman was a valuable veteran under contract for coming seasons.  Blake was the Leafs top scorer from 2008-09 and under contract to the Leafs for another 2 years.  Vesa Toskala was the team's nominal starting goalie.  Stajan and White were career Leafs who had some of their best years ahead of them.  Obviously Burke's intentions were relatively earth shattering.

Despite the addition of Phaneuf, who to all appearances would give Kaberle his best partner on the point of the Leafs power play since the departure of Bryan McCabe, Kaberle's play seemed off.  He went away to the Olympics unsure of his future and discussion began around his being traded at the deadline.

On the March 3rd trading deadline, Lee Stempniak, and another career Leaf Alexei Ponikarovsky were both dealt for picks and prospects.  Further trades likely shook Kaberle even more.  He decided to assert some level of control over his career prospects and offered Burke a very limited 3 team list with which he could discuss trading options.  Nothing was worked out but Kaberle had begun to stare reality in the face.

Since the day of the trading deadline, Kaberle's play has been anything but high caliber.  In fact since the day of the Ponikarovsky and Stempniak trades, Kaberle's numbers have been astonishingly bad.  He has produced 1 goal and 2 assists for 3 points in the past 19 games.  This after producing 46 points in the first 60 games of the season.  That's a drop from 0.77 ppg to 0.16 ppg or a decline of 79% in production.

Dion Phaneuf is the Leafs leading blue line scorer since his arrival, with 8 assists in 23 games, trumping Kaberle's 2 goals and 4 assists over the same stretch.  Kaberle's contributions are certainly being missed on offense as the power play's anemic production dissappoints with alarming regularity. The power play is now ranked 30th in the NHL, a sharp drop from the lofty heights of it's 2nd overall ranking back in October.

If Kaberle wished to decrease his trade value on the open market (and I have no idea what purpose that would serve), he's doing a bang up job of it.  NHL teams have room on their roster for strong offensive players who are relatively soft defensively.  Tomas Kaberle is currently neither strong defensively OR offensively.  He has been on the ice for 75 even strength goals against and only 58 even strength goals for.

The irony is that Kaberle may be playing himself into a position where Burke doesn't think he can get fair value on the trade market and thus he plays out his career for the Leafs.  Should that happen, it likely means his next season is his last one in Toronto.  Other NHL teams will likely be attempting to swindle Burke as much as possible when it comes to Kaberle and low ball offers may be amazingly common this summer.

It will be interesting to see what way things go but one thing remains certain: Tomas Kaberle's trade value pre-deadline was probably as high as it will ever get during his time in Toronto.  That reality is as unfortunate as it is worrying. 

Poll
What has Tomas Kaberle's decline in play done to his trade value?
Nothing at all. He's still the Czech equivalent to Paul Coffey.
103 votes
Nada - but he wasn't worth a 1st rounder to begin with.
119 votes
It will be a bit lower, but he'll still get us a 1st round draft pick.
345 votes
What trade value?
84 votes

651 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 152 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Pension Plan Puppets

Grumble

Apr 2012 by JP Nikota - 27 comments

Dumb and Dumberer

Apr 2012 by birky - 178 comments

Comments

Display:

I think the heady days of Jeff Carter are long gone. If Burke nets a decent prospect and a mid round pick for Kaberle now, we should be pleased. Maybe in some sort of package deal with another warm body on the roster, or in some plot to alleviate a team’s cap issues, Burke might net a more generous return.

Brain: The irony of it all, Pinky. Years of trying to take over the world, and all I had to do was say "truculence".
Follow me I'm Boring!

by blindfolded tank driver on Apr 4, 2010 12:09 PM EDT reply actions  

I don’t know that a stretch of play from the trade deadline to the end of the season – which is what, 6 weeks? – will have that much of an impact on what the Leafs can get for Kaberle. I think other GMs will be more likely to blame the rest of the team, as well as the incredible changes made, for Kaberle’s lack of production, rather than Kaberle himself.

"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky

by Karina on Apr 4, 2010 1:00 PM EDT reply actions  

Players don’t forget how to play. They have these things called slumps which can be a result from many external or internal forces. He will still be considered a premiere player and the way I see it, if Burke and company got Phaneuf for what he did and in the same day miraculously dumped both blake and Toskala… I can’t say what will happen with Thomas but I’m sure and hope Burke will hit another home run.

"There's been four different Cup winners the last four years, and I got one of them (Anaheim) and it was a fighting team. We're playing it that way regardless." - B. Burke, Toronto Maple Leafs GM

by BlueBuds on Apr 4, 2010 1:06 PM EDT reply actions  

….slumps?

If my nose was full of nickels I would blow it all on you.

by Kenjamin on Apr 4, 2010 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Kaberle will still get us a first round pick from a desperate team but I wouldn’t be surprised if he only nets a second round pick now that he’s regressed.

My concern? He doesn’t have chemistry with anyone. He’s 32 years old. He can’t play defensively. He’s not playing offense either. Would he bounce back in a different environment? Maybe in a low pressure place like Anaheim, Los Angeles, or Winnipeg -whoops, I meant Phoenix - where he wouldn’t be recognized on the street.

by RJinSoCal on Apr 4, 2010 1:19 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

If he could only get a 2nd round pick i’d rather re-sign him. He’s worth more than Dominic Moore.

Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.

by nhlcheapshot on Apr 4, 2010 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Odin has seen (or sees) your comment

It has (will) definitely been flagged

I am the commenter formerly known as Belligerent Burkie

Follow me on twitter @CoolJ90

by CoolJ90 on Apr 4, 2010 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think landing Phaneuf was the beginning of the end for Kaberle. Schenn, Komisarek, Beauchemin and Phaneuf aren’t going anwhere and that’s about $15M in cap right there.

The Leafs cap situation, Kaberle’s contract status and his age make him more expendable. The fact that he’s one, if not the only, asset that Burke has left, it’s all but a certainty that Kaberle will be traded this summer.

As for a few other bits…

Kaberle was likely shaken by the deal.

This strikes me as an odd conclusion to draw when you consider how much turnover this team has had in the past 24 months (Kubina, Tucker, Raycroft, McCabe, Sundin, Steen, Cola, Stralman, Devereaux, Kilger, Belak, Moore, Tlusty, Bell, May, Williams, Antropov – and that’s just off the top of my head).

Why would a five player swap cause a sudden drop-off in play?

Blake was the Leafs top scorer from 2008-09 and under contract to the Leafs for another 2 years. Vesa Toskala was the team’s nominal starting goalie.

If Kaberle didn’t think the Leafs would jettison these two at the first opportunity, he’s got much bigger problems than his poor second-half play.

Despite the addition of Phaneuf, who to all appearances would give Kaberle his best partner on the point of the Leafs power play since the departure of Bryan McCabe,

Pavel Kubina, Kaberle’s former PP partner, scored 14 goals to Phaneuf’s 10 in 2008-09. In terms of PP, Kubina more than doubled Phaneuf’s totals, putting up 9 goals to Phaneuf’s 4. Phaneuf’s accuracy makes me long for Jason Blake’s shot – at least Blake could hit the net.

The stunning and sudden decline in Kaberle’s totals suggest to me it’s a matter of coaching, not talent.

Kaberley is no longer the primary puck mover as the team has, to my eyes, moved away from the options of a stretch pass or carrying the puck out of the defensive zone. The d-men are now moving short passes to the forwards who can carry the puck through the neutral zone with speed.

The powerplay’s emphasis on Kessel at the half-boards has not been productive, yet the team continues to use this approach.

Has Kaberle’s value diminished? Absolutely, especially if the days of a 1st and Jeff Carter are the yardstick.

Will Kaberle continue to struggle? I doubt it.

I’d wager that Kaberle does what most successful players do when the are no longer coached by Ron Wilson: bounce back and put up great numbers.

For a small taste of Kaberle without Ron Wilson, just consider his 1 goal and 2 assists for 3 points in 5 games in the Olympics. Sure, it’s a small sample size, but it tells me that Kaberle still has the offensive skills and that he can thrive under a different system.

Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...

by mf37 on Apr 4, 2010 1:26 PM EDT reply actions   2 recs

1 goal and 2 assists for 3 points in 5 games in the Olympics. Sure, it’s a small sample size, but it tells me that Kaberle still has the offensive skills and that he can thrive under a different system.

an olympic calibre roster may have had something to do with that.. why hello washington, you say your olympic calibre roster could use another puck mover?

This hunger strike for Leaf playoffs sucks.. soooo .. hungry.. must eat.. soon.

Toronto Maple Leafs: Blue Chip Dmen

by AkiSchennberg on Apr 4, 2010 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m with mf37 – claiming that the trades got into Kaberle’s head is a silly exercise in mind-reading. Personally I’m still in the camp that says Kaberle has never been the same player since Janssen bashed his head. With a better team he will likely do better but I don’t think he’ll ever again be the player he was.

The “lofty heights of (the powerplay’s) 2nd overall ranking back in October” was really just one 5 for 9 game in Anaheim combined with a small sample size. The rest of the month was very ordinary – and the Leafs’ worst run on the powerplay has come since Kaberle got bumped to the second unit.
 He’s not playing well, but it’s been a very long time since he has, unless you feel obligated to include that November hot streak (at a time when Kessel was almost literally on fire).

I've been looking at the sky

by Back In Black on Apr 4, 2010 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Since when has he been on the 2nd PP unit?

He’s on the top PP unit with Phaneuf.

Gunnarsson and Beauchemin are the 2nd PP unit.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

There were a couple games where RW experimented with Beauch-Phaneuf and Kaberle-Gunnarsson.

by Bower Power on Apr 4, 2010 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also, if you toss out the Anaheim game

which I admit skewed things a tad, the Leafs still had a 21.4% production rate on the power play in the first 20 games of the season. That would still have them in the top 5 in the NHL. The Anaheim game brought it up to 25% (they were 5 for 10 not 5 for 9).

They’ve been a lot softer since then, but it wasn’t JUST the Anaheim game, despite the impression you have.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lastly, Kessel's November hot streak

had nothing to do with the Power Play back in November.

None of his first 10 goals were scored on the PP. He didn’t score on the PP until December 12th.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

The turnover

has been going on for a while, but none of those outgoing players were previously sent out in a single day with 6 leaving.

Add in the fact that another two roster players left less than ten days later, and that’s 8 roster players out… roughly a 3rd of the team. That’s a bit shocking to anyone.

As for the comparison between Kubina and Phaneuf:

Kubina’s career high in points is 40. Phaneuf’s is 60.
Kubina’s career high in goals is 17. Phaneuf’s is 20.
Kubina’s career high in PP goals is 9. Phaneuf’s is 15.
Kubina’s career high in shots on goal is 189. Phaneuf has had over 215 shots in every year of his career so far.
Kubina has 6 goals this year, with 2 on the PP. Phaneuf has 10 goals this year with 5 on the PP.
Kubina has had two seasons with over 10 goals. Phaneuf has had NO seasons with less than 10 goals. (He actually had 11 goals last year, to go along with 36 assists for 47 points. Kubina only had 26 assists last year giving him 40 points).

I’m sorry, but Kubina is not superior offensively to Phaneuf.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

woops I can't count

Kubina has 5 years with over 10 goals… 17, 14, 11, 11, and 11. He also has years of 6, 7, 5, 3, 8, 9, and 1. Five over 10, Seven under 10.

Phaneuf has 20, 17, 17, 11, and 10. 5 for 5.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Steve,

Your contention was that Phaneuf was Kaberle’s best partner on the PP since McCabe.

One look at Kubina’s final season in Toronto shows that this is certainly not the case.

Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...

by mf37 on Apr 4, 2010 6:50 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

No my contention was the following:
the addition of Phaneuf, who to all appearances would give Kaberle his best partner on the point of the Leafs power play since the departure of Bryan McCabe

“would give” as in when the deal was made that is what people were anticipating. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to argue that a player who has scored 16, 13, and 11 pp goals in various seasons is the closest thing the Leafs have brought in to the years when McCabe was scoring 13 or 11 goals on the PP (‘05-’06 and ‘06-’07).

Kubina’s career high was 9 PPG last season. He also had 22 power play points, while Kaberle only had 19.

During McCabe and Kaberle’s best years on the PP they were recording 45 and 51 PP points respectively. Phaneuf has years of 33, 31, 33 and 21 PP points. He obviously isn’t quite to the level of McCabe yet, but I think you get my point. I’m saying the potential is there, and I’d say it’s superior to Kubina’s.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t get your point and I was rather explicit at the time of the trade that the potential wasn’t there.

One look at Phaneuf’s declining goal production, especially his anemic PP totals of late, should have provided a simple counterbalance to the assumption that Kaberle had found his next McCabe.

There’s a reason Phaneuf was on the market and it wasn’t because of his mad pp skillz.

Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...

by mf37 on Apr 4, 2010 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

So on the basis of the fact that Phaneuf

has gone from 20 to 10 PP goals in 5 seasons you’re convinced he’s incapable of ever producing a 15 PPG season again in the future?

I’m not sure how we can argue Kubina is superior to Phaneuf when he has fewer PP goals this season if we’re discussing decreased totals as the basis for this argument.

I’m of the opinion that Phaneuf was on the market because he wasn’t adjusting well to a reduced role on an NHL club. He went from being the top offensive option to a secondary one behind Bouwmeester.

In his rookie 20 goal campaign, the only Flame to play more ice time on the PP was Iginla (Phaneuf played 5:19 per game). In year 2 he played 5:34 a game on the PP. In year 3 he played 5:02 a game on the PP. Last year in year 4 he played 5:34 a game on the PP. This year in Calgary it dropped to 3:46 per game.

That’s a HUGE reduction in Power Play ice time from one season to the next, and it likely has a lot to do with his reduced production. He’s also gone from playing 18:33 in ES ice time per game two years ago, to 18:14 last year, to 18:10 this year in Calgary.

In Toronto he’s back up to 4:37 in PP ice time per game, which isn’t as high as his best days in Calgary, but is a larger chunk than he was seeing earlier this year. He also is taking a larger role at even strength.

Overall his production is likely associated with those numbers to some extent, and it doesn’t help that he’s gone from playing on a power play with the likes of Jarome Iginla who regularly has 10+ PP goals in a season, to one featuring Phil Kessel who has yet to score over 8 goals on the PP in a single season.

Tomas Kaberle’s abilities to produce offense also don’t seem to be having a huge impact yet with Phaneuf, so it’s interesting to see who is being blamed for whose decline in production.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

It just seems to me that Phaneuf isn’t a 17-20 goal/60 pt player, nor is he a 10 goal/30 pt player. He’s probably going to end up being a 13-15 goal/50 point player.

by birky on Apr 4, 2010 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is what I’m arguing:

1. Kubina was Kaberle’s best partner on the PP since the departure of McCabe.
2. In order for Phaneuf to assume that title, he has to outperform Kubina’s 2008-09 totals
3. Phaneuf will not and cannot hit Kubina’s totals from 2008-09 this season.
4. Therefore, Phaneuf will not give Kaberle the best partner he’s had since McCabe.

Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...

by mf37 on Apr 4, 2010 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

cannot?

He’s exceeded them more than once in his career already, which to me implies he’s capable of doing so.

As for the will-not, I suppose if Kaberle’s gone after this season it’s a moot point. I do think Phaneuf will score over 14 PPG again at some point in his career, and I don’t think surpassing 40 points is out of the question either.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 5, 2010 12:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Phaneuf will not and cannot hit Kubina’s totals from 2008-09 this season.

Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...

by mf37 on Apr 5, 2010 1:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

sorry

missed the “this season” part. Agreed that won’t happen.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 5, 2010 1:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Either way

you’re referring to reality… I’m referring to the original optics of the deal.

Phaneuf came in with the idea being that he’d be a solid PP point shot to go along with Kaberle. Whether or not he matches up to Kubina’s numbers that was the expectation.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 5, 2010 1:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Whose optics?

In my original post on the tradePhaneuf’s dramatic decline in goal production was a red flag for me.

I certainly didn’t see him suddenly lighting it up in Toronto and he hasn’t.

Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...

by mf37 on Apr 5, 2010 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

You seeing it

and the general perception are not identical, and you are probably aware of that.

I also think your original post was more focused on the COST of Phaneuf, rather than his actual production. Based on your original statements you seem more concerned with the fact that his production was comparable to Beauchemin offensively, and that his D was worse than Komisarek and Beauchemin both.

For the season, Phaneuf’s GF/60 is 2.52 which would rank him alongside Lubomir Visnovsky and Chris Pronger, and his GA/60 is 2.56 which ties him with Adam Foote, and puts him in the ball park of Doug Murray and James Wisniewski.

You made a mistake in your original posting regarding Komisarek’s GA/60 being 1.88 (that’s his GF/60), it’s actually 2.29.

Beauchemin’s GA/60 is 2.58 which is worse than Phaneuf’s, and his GF/60 is 2.04 which is quite a bit worse.

Since joining Toronto, Phaneuf’s GF/60 has been 2.28, and his GA/60 has been 2.28.

That’s better than Beauchemin and Komisarek defensively, and his offense has still been better than both of them also.

I’m not sure how much of the offensive decline is Phaneuf’s fault and how much of it is just a lack of synching with Kaberle and the rest of the team. Kaberle’s decline in production is far more severe than Phaneuf’s since the trade though.

Last year Phaneuf’s GF/60 was 3.48, and his GA/60 was also 3.48. He’s far less risky on the ice at this point than he was last season, and the possibility of his offense returning still exists.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 5, 2010 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Steve, the fact remains: Phaneuf will not outpoint Kubina this year. Kaberle is all but certain to be traded. Therefore, Phaneuf will not be Lennon to Kaberle’s McCartney, Fred to Kaberle’s Ginger Astaire or Batman to Kaberle’s Robin (or whatever duo you’d prefer).

Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...

by mf37 on Apr 5, 2010 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ok I'm not denying that fact.

We seem to do this a lot, but we’re arguing in circles.

You’re saying you knew Phaneuf would never outproduce Kubina’s numbers from last year. I’m saying I think the organization’s hope was probably that Phaneuf and Kaberle would make beautiful music together.

Obviously since the 2nd one didn’t come to pass, the first one is going to come true. The fact that hope didn’t line up with reality is what I was originally drawing attention to… but you’re trying to use Kubina’s numbers from last year, and Phaneuf’s numbers from this year as some sort of “a ha” argument to prove yourself correct when I never really disagreed with you in the first place.

Kaberle’s gone, I think he should be gone… and I think he already is in his own mind.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 5, 2010 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Steve,

We’re not arguing in circles. My position hasn’t changed, yet you keep moving the goalposts.

Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...

by mf37 on Apr 5, 2010 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, there have been a lot of roster moves, but you’re still pretending to see inside his head. I could just as easily say he stopped playing well once it became clear the Leafs weren’t going to make the playoff this year back around Christmas. Or maybe he had a fight with his girlfriend.

I've been looking at the sky

by Back In Black on Apr 4, 2010 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually...

the one about not making the playoffs is very relevant, because it means his No Trade Clause is gone during the off season.

Again that contributes heavily to his concerns about being moved in the off season. In reality I think his drop off in play is due to discomfort with a large number of realities in Toronto:

1. He isn’t the best player on the team’s D anymore, and might not be the best offensive contributor back there either.

2. He’s quite likely expendable.

3. He’s one of the oldest players on the team, being one of only 4 remaining players on the roster who are 30 or over. The only one that predates this season is Jeff Finger, and he’s not exactly a regular contributor. The others are J.S. Giguere, and Wayne Primeau. Primeau is quite likely gone after this season.

What that translates to is a lot of new people, young blood, and a lack of familiarity overall. I don’t get the impression that Kaberle is the most outgoing person, and that may mean the reduction in age of the team has put him on the outside of the core leadership group with this club.

I’m not pretending to see in his head so much as postulating reasons for some of the worst play in his NHL career. I’m more than willing to acknowledge there are reasons beyond what I’m theorizing. Coaching style, new players, concerns over his future, etc. All of those are relevant. The key point I’m trying to make is that his production is a lot lot worse than it has been, and he isn’t playing like he wants to play in Toronto anymore.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Leafs don’t play “the goaltender will stand on his head you five go score” hockey anymore. Since that point Kaberle has been bad.

It’s because he’s bad at playing defense.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Apr 4, 2010 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's a large piece of it too

If he isn’t prepared to hold up his end of things defensively he won’t last in Toronto.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

How do you figure it is Ron Wilson? Wilson was the coach for the first two months of the season when Kaberle was tearing it up, wasn’t he?

by Leaf in Habland on Apr 4, 2010 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

One of the reasons I’m finger Wilson is because, from what I can tell, the Leafs have changed their approach to the game at about the same time Kaberle’s numbers went dry. Once Bozak and Stalberg made the jump to the bigs (mid-January), the team changed the way they’re using the d-men.

One result of this has been a reduced emphasis on generating points off the back-end. The Leafs are scoring off a forward rush with speed or from a deep forechecking cycle among the forwards. Both of these pressure points take the D-men out of the counting stats.

Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...

by mf37 on Apr 4, 2010 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t know if it’s as cut and dry as that. The Leafs have been playing a deep collapsing style of defense all season. The importance of the breakout pass is greatly reduced, while forwards are responsible for carrying the puck up the ice. To be honest, I don’t know if any defenceman is going to put up huge numbers in the Leafs current system. I think Kaberle’s production in the first half of the season is more out of place than his current production.

by birky on Apr 4, 2010 9:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

So, I’m agreeing with you on most parts, just that the Leafs have been playing a collapsing style all season, not just since mid-January.

by birky on Apr 4, 2010 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

hmm, an interesting take.

Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...

by mf37 on Apr 4, 2010 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

sorry, i wasn’t trying to simply regurgitate what you said. If the Leafs had changed their style in mid-January, you would expect changes in point production show up in the splits of the Leafs other two “offensive defenceman” on the team at the team, White and Beauchemin. But the best months, statistically, for those two players wasn’t in October or November. In fact, White was steady at about 7 pts a month until his trade, and Beauchemin had a 10 pt month in december, and around 3-4 points in October, Novermber, January, and March.

by birky on Apr 4, 2010 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is something I was wondering about – has Kaberle’s decline mirrored the rest of the d-men.

It seems to me the Leafs used to generate way more points off the back-end than they do now. The question is, why the decline? Is it a change in talent, systems, or a little of both.

In the case of Kaberle, I’m willing to wager that if he gets dealt he’ll put up 45+ points next year.

Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...

by mf37 on Apr 4, 2010 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I completely agree. Kaberle is going to produce 40+ points for the next couple of years, granted he stays healthy. I think he had a hot month in October, and has had an abnormally cold stretch since early January. The system change has definitely had an impact on his numbers. If you take out his ridiculous October numbers, Kaberle is a ~.50 ppg player since Wilson became coach. Under Quinn he was at ~.57 ppg, and under Maurice he was ~.71 ppg. So if anything, he put up his best numbers under Paul Maurice. It seems that he’s closer to being a 37-42 points per season player than the 50+ he had under Maurice.

I think he’s still a good player, but a luxury the Leafs don’t need since they don’t use a system that promotes a player of his talents, as compared to a system like New Jersey or Boston, and he’s certainly out of place as your 5th defenceman. The Leafs have needs at other positions, and Kaberle’s more valuable to other teams than he is to the Leafs.

by birky on Apr 4, 2010 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Interesting. Good points.

"Defense! Defense! Common! Do you call that blowing!?"

by JP Nikota on Apr 4, 2010 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kaberle's actually

a 0.59 ppg player since Wilson became coach. Under Quinn he was only a 0.57 ppg player for 2 years, and he averaged 0.51 ppg. Under Maurice he was a 0.75 ppg player when he was 27-29 years of age… basically his prime.

He’s scored more under Wilson than he did under Quinn so you’ve got those two reversed.

Based on his 2 years under Wilson you should estimate his production at 48 points a year.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 5, 2010 1:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

As for his season this year

he’s been good most of the year, and really only been bad in the last month of the year. He had 3 points in 5 games in February, and he was only below 0.6 points per game in January up until the horrid month of March… I wouldn’t call that atrocious production for most of the year.

I think a fair bit of the drop off in production could also be tied to a lack of offense from the forwards in general as the entire team is scoring over a goal less per game since the trade deadline.

Beauchemin has 6 points since the new year began… he’s been pretty horrible offensively also… and his PP production has dropped off the map also. He gets a pass because he’s useful defensively though.

Schenn and Gunnarsson’s production has been relatively consistent all year. Phaneuf has also been relatively consistent.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 5, 2010 1:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

If you take out Kaberle’s numbers from October, like I said, his ppg under Wilson is not .59.

by birky on Apr 5, 2010 8:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nope it's 0.51

Of course if you take out his worst month (March) then he’s back up to 0.56… which is still higher than Quinn where he was a 0.51 ppg player.

If you’re taking out the best month, you should probably take out the worst one unless you want to completely fudge your point.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 5, 2010 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Also

if we take out all the games where Kaberle scored more than 1 point, and all the games where he scored less than 1 point, we could basically say he’s a 1.0 ppg player… but that would be ridiculous.

So let’s go back to saying he’s a 0.59 ppg player under Wilson, a 0.51 ppg player under Quinn and a 0.75 ppg player under Maurice.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 5, 2010 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

He's already put up 45+ points

this season… at no point am I arguing that Kaberle is incapable of scoring 45+ points in the NHL.

I think the issue is that he’s completely checked out for the end of this season. His effort level has been crap to my eyes, and he isn’t doing much to impress at either end of the ice.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 5, 2010 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Beauchemin + Kaberle

yes.

Rest of the team, not really.

The Phaneuf deal has changed the PP pairings, and I wonder if that’s part of the issue. Maybe Beauchemin and Kaberle would do better to play together, and Phaneuf should be seeing time with Gunnarsson.

Considering the problems on the PP, I’d be inclined to change things if I was Wilson.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 5, 2010 1:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

It wasn't a 5 player swap.

The Leafs traded away 6 players and brought in 3, while adding another prospect.

They then dealt away another 2 players at the deadline.

8 players out, 4 in from other teams, with another 3 or so promoted from the minors. That’s a bit of a huge turn over.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Big Reason

All the other reasons contribute maybe, but this is the big one for the drop in production:

Kaberle is no longer the primary puck mover as the team has, to my eyes, moved away from the options of a stretch pass or carrying the puck out of the defensive zone. The d-men are now moving short passes to the forwards who can carry the puck through the neutral zone with speed.

The powerplay’s emphasis on Kessel at the half-boards has not been productive, yet the team continues to use this approach.

by general borschevsky on Apr 5, 2010 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

The other issue is

the Leafs lack a net presence to cause screens or tip ins consistently. Hence that practice where they focused on tip ins, and screening goalies, and the regular repeated efforts to find a power forward elsewhere.

The Leafs point shots won’t result in many goals until they have someone doing something in front of the net. They need to teach Hanson to plant himself in front of the opposition goalie, and perhaps encourage him to be more of a pain in the ass to the other team in general.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 5, 2010 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

During the Leafs 2-man advantage in the first period Saturday, Wilson had 3 D-men on the ice – Kaberle and Phaneuf at the point and Beauchemin in front of the net. I think they were trying to Hanson something…

by general borschevsky on Apr 5, 2010 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah I caught that

Frankly if I was one of the Leaf forwards that would bother me.

To me that’s basically Wilson delivering a bit of a wake up call. “Hey guys, this older D man can tip shots and screen a goalie better than you… anyone want to help out a bit?”

I don’t think it had much of an impact though.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 5, 2010 9:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

I have noticed Kulemin parking his ass at the crease a lot more recently, In the game against the Rangers he did it with regularity

Have a point? Make it. Don't? Fake it.

by JaredFromLondon on Apr 5, 2010 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

He goes to the net

but is he causing much in the way of havoc. Is he irritating the goalie, or causing him to miss shots from the point?

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 5, 2010 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

no, not yet anyways, right now its just a screen, but thats still better than before

Have a point? Make it. Don't? Fake it.

by JaredFromLondon on Apr 5, 2010 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Stats are not enough

Statistics do not impact trade value enough to warrant any concern .. if stats were the major indicator, then NHL teams wouldn’t have professional scouting staffs.

by Kats Hockey on Apr 4, 2010 1:44 PM EDT reply actions  

Agreed that stats alone do not indicate everything

But I am of the opinion that Kaberle’s play has declined in other aspects. He’s making more lazy plays away from the puck, his positioning has been less than stellar, he isn’t taking the body consistently enough. His defensive play has dropped off, and his focus doesn’t seem to be with the team frankly.

I think his head has checked out of the building already.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s not stats alone but this year has really highlighted how poorly Kaberle plays defence.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Apr 4, 2010 8:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tomas Kaberle’s trade value pre-deadline was probably as high as it will ever get during his time in Toronto. That reality is as unfortunate as it is worrying.

I understand what you’re getting at when you say that Kabby’s value might have been higher pre-deadline, IF he didn’t have that handy no-trade clause. But in a more real and concrete sense, by only giving permission to Burke to speak to two teams on the day of the deadline, his value was lower. Proof? If his value was greater at the deadline to one of those two teams, he’d already have been traded. In the summer, we can peddle him to the highest bidder.

"Defense! Defense! Common! Do you call that blowing!?"

by JP Nikota on Apr 4, 2010 2:18 PM EDT reply actions  

but the highest bidder this summer might actually have a lower bid than what Burke saw at the trade deadline.

"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky

by Karina on Apr 4, 2010 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Brian Burke doesn’t think so, and neither do I.

"Defense! Defense! Common! Do you call that blowing!?"

by JP Nikota on Apr 4, 2010 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Brian Burke

has also said he wants to bring Kaberle back.

Let’s take that with a grain of salt.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I also don’t think he would say that he wants to let him go either. I think saying that was just a standard response. He probably wants Kaberle to at least play for something.

by BlindSight on Apr 4, 2010 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

How do you know that? Really? Where has Burke said “We can get more for Kaberle at the draft than we were offered at the deadline”? And even if he did say that, which he hasn’t, why would you believe it would be anything other than positioning? If the reported offer from Vancouver of Grabner, Hodgson and a 1st is true, I would be entirely shocked to get more than that at the draft. 1.25 seasons of Kaberle is worth more than 1 season of Kaberle.

"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky

by Karina on Apr 4, 2010 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

if burke didn’t do grabner, hodgson and a 1st he should be shot, not just fired..

This hunger strike for Leaf playoffs sucks.. soooo .. hungry.. must eat.. soon.

Toronto Maple Leafs: Blue Chip Dmen

by AkiSchennberg on Apr 4, 2010 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

The rumor was that it was around the trade deadline, and Vancouver wasn’t on Kaberle’s list.

by rpop on Apr 4, 2010 6:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

while I doubt Gillis offered that much for Kabby , Burke would have been all over that like wellwood on a stick of butter

Have a point? Make it. Don't? Fake it.

by JaredFromLondon on Apr 4, 2010 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I sincerely doubt that offer was ever on the table.

It would have put Vancouver $2.66 million over the cap, and they would have had to make other deals to clear the space.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh and

that $2.66 mill is only for this year. Next season Kesler’s salary jumps from $1.75 million to $5 mill a year. Not sure it makes any sense really.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

well the deal would have been done before the Kesler signing, so had it happened who knows what would have gone on with that

Have a point? Make it. Don't? Fake it.

by JaredFromLondon on Apr 4, 2010 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah good point.

It still doesn’t make sense from THIS season’s perspective.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

also IF the deal was on the table there was probably some more involved, salary coming back and a prospect or something going out

Have a point? Make it. Don't? Fake it.

by JaredFromLondon on Apr 4, 2010 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think that it does. There were other moves they could have made to get under the cap and Gillis has to think that they have a very good chance of winning the Cup this year.

He likely would have noticed that windows have been getting shorter.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Apr 4, 2010 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just think that's a lot of balls to have in the air

On such short notice.

Was Vancouver one of the three teams Kaberle suggested? If they were, would they have been able to pull the trigger on enough deals on such a short schedule?

Is it against NHL rules to pass a trade through that puts you over the cap by $2.66 million? I forget that off the top of my head.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

it depends on the remaining cap hit doesn’t it, and they could have shipped somebody back with enough to put them below the ceiling.. i just don’t think it makes sense in value terms for vancouver

This hunger strike for Leaf playoffs sucks.. soooo .. hungry.. must eat.. soon.

Toronto Maple Leafs: Blue Chip Dmen

by AkiSchennberg on Apr 4, 2010 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don’t they have a good amount of cap space because Willie Mitchell’s on LTIR? That’s the only way I figured they could fit Kaberle.

"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky

by Karina on Apr 4, 2010 10:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Easy.

If, at the trade deadline, Brian Burke thought for a second that he could get more for TK from one of those two teams than he could later on in the year, he would have dealt him then. The proof is in the pudding. Instead, he thought, “No. These teams are not offering enough, because they know they’re short-listed.” (or whatever other reason). It’s a fact. If Brian Burke thought he could get more for Kaberle at the deadline from one of those two teams – because it’s not worth talking about other teams that he didn’t agree to go to – then he’d already be traded. End. Of. Story.

"Defense! Defense! Common! Do you call that blowing!?"

by JP Nikota on Apr 4, 2010 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

no, he couldn’t. Because Kaberle didn’t waive his NTC.

"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky

by Karina on Apr 4, 2010 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

But it’s totally pointless talking about the teams that Kabby wouldn’t waive his NTC for! The reality is that Burke had the option of trading TK to one of two teams at the deadline. When neither of those teams offered anything good, its made it easy to categorically say that we COULD NOT get anything good for him at the deadline, period. Trading him in the summer AUTOMATICALLY becomes more lucrative.

"Defense! Defense! Common! Do you call that blowing!?"

by JP Nikota on Apr 4, 2010 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

I.E.

Brian Burke decided that Kabby would be worth more at the deadline.

"Defense! Defense! Common! Do you call that blowing!?"

by JP Nikota on Apr 4, 2010 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

meh. I think it was more of a case where Burke wanted to get a roster player or two off of a potential trading partner, and the teams interested in Kaberle were probably not interested in doing that, especially if they were in the playoff hunt.

by birky on Apr 4, 2010 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, because you’re missing the fact that teams who wanted Kaberle already bid on him at the deadline, with the idea of loading up for the playoffs. What Burke could have gotten then had Kaberle been willing to waive to go to ANY team, as opposed to just the two teams he stipulated, is very much likely more than he can get at the draft, when there is only the possibility of the playoffs for any given team.

Burke didn’t decide Kaberle would be worth more at the deadline. Kaberle hand-tied Burke from making any deal at the deadline by limiting the teams he would go to.

"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky

by Karina on Apr 4, 2010 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, I'm getting it. Read my original comment again.
I understand what you’re getting at when you say that Kabby’s value might have been higher pre-deadline, IF he didn’t have that handy no-trade clause.

All I’m saying is that trading him to these other teams was not a viable option. So we work with the ones we have.

1. Trade him to one of these two teams.
2. Wait, and trade him for something else at the deadline.

Now, which one did Brian Burke choose? Ergo, which one did he decide would net us the best return?

"Defense! Defense! Common! Do you call that blowing!?"

by JP Nikota on Apr 4, 2010 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

  1. wasn’t even an option. But now I get your point.

"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky

by Karina on Apr 4, 2010 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

That was the rumour we were told on deadline day, when things were getting down to the wire. I wanna say it was Dreger, though I’m not %100 on that one.

"Defense! Defense! Common! Do you call that blowing!?"

by JP Nikota on Apr 4, 2010 10:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Copied and pasted from Dreger's twitter:
As the day unfolds the plot thickens with Kaberle. Says he has an agreement with Burke … That Burke will tell him what the offers are.

"Defense! Defense! Common! Do you call that blowing!?"

by JP Nikota on Apr 4, 2010 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think it’s better we trade Kaberle on Draft day than at the deadline for two reasons:

1. If you get a pick, you know exactly where it is going to be
2. You can get players that you wouldn’t have been able to get while teams are chasing the Cup. For example (and this is strictly an example because everyone is using his name, OK? I in no way, shape or form think this trade will happen. Burke is not getting this player for Kaberle. OK?) Philly wouldn’t give up Jeff Carter while chasing the Cup, but in the off season when there is re-tooling, they may consider it.

I am the commenter formerly known as Belligerent Burkie

Follow me on twitter @CoolJ90

by CoolJ90 on Apr 4, 2010 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, from the trades I looked through doing that TK article, I found that there was no obvious spike in value for big name players in either the summer or the deadline.

"Defense! Defense! Common! Do you call that blowing!?"

by JP Nikota on Apr 4, 2010 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

He needs to go. As much as I’ve liked kaberle over the years he just doesn’t seem to fit into this new team. I want to this team develop into a contender over the next few years and I just don’t see kabs there a year or two from now so nows the time.

by BlindSight on Apr 4, 2010 2:32 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Kiss Kabby goodbye

One of two things MUST happen this summer; either Kabby gets re-signed (not a chance) or he gets moved. Doesn’t matter what the return is at this point because once that trade window closes Kabby will hold all the cards again.(potentially no return)

There just aren’t enough minutes (and cap space)for Dion, Beauch, Komi, Schenn, Gunner AND Kabby!

by Johnny Bower's Pokecheck on Apr 4, 2010 2:40 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

The Stars would take Kaberle, depending on what we need to give up. We desperately need a number-one defenseman.

Here's to all us girls who love hockey...and the men who play it.

by Brad_Richards_Rocks on Apr 4, 2010 3:03 PM EDT reply actions  

James Neal?

We’d take Neal or Eriksson actually.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think we have a shot of getting Eriksson, didn’t they just lock him up for like 6 years?

Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.

by nhlcheapshot on Apr 4, 2010 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Neal, Benn, Glennie, Roman, 1st rounder
any of those would perk up my ears

Have a point? Make it. Don't? Fake it.

by JaredFromLondon on Apr 4, 2010 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Neal Broten? I’m down with that!!!

October 25, 1966. Thank you Lord Kelvin

by Chuck Diesel on Apr 4, 2010 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Er...

how about Morrow? Or Ribeiro? :P

Here's to all us girls who love hockey...and the men who play it.

by Brad_Richards_Rocks on Apr 4, 2010 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

there was a nasty rumour pre-deadline that Burke was interested in Ribeiro.
You should’ve seen the anger here.

"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky

by Karina on Apr 4, 2010 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

as much as I hate ribeiro, he would look damn fine racking up points with Kessel, and If the Leafs got him for Kaberle I wouldn’t be too upset…eventually

Have a point? Make it. Don't? Fake it.

by JaredFromLondon on Apr 4, 2010 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ugh I hate Ribiero.

Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.

by Chemmy on Apr 4, 2010 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah, but 52 points in 63 games

Have a point? Make it. Don't? Fake it.

by JaredFromLondon on Apr 4, 2010 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's not exactly

a Burke type player is he. He also wouldn’t clear up the issue of power forward for the front of the net. Dallas actually has a number of larger physical forwards I bet Burke would be into. Something tells me Ribiero isn’t one of them.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

The other reason this idea sparks some interest in me

Is because of the Joe Niewundyk – Leafs connection. There’s a chance he’s willing to work things out with a club he’s familiar with I would think. He also has personal knowledge of what he’d be getting in Kaberle from actually playing with him.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

oh of course not, I doubt he is even on Burkes radar, but just say that was all dallas was offering and Burke couldnt find a better deal anywhere else, I wouldn’t be terribly disappointed in a return like Ribiero

Have a point? Make it. Don't? Fake it.

by JaredFromLondon on Apr 4, 2010 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

but is Andy McDonald a “Burke type player”?

"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky

by Karina on Apr 4, 2010 9:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

he’s almost exactly tyler bozak… college free agent top line skill guy

This hunger strike for Leaf playoffs sucks.. soooo .. hungry.. must eat.. soon.

Toronto Maple Leafs: Blue Chip Dmen

by AkiSchennberg on Apr 4, 2010 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Isn’t Ribeiro a centre? With Boazk, Grabbo and Kadri I have to wonder if this team can take on another soft pivot.

Didn’t Burke say he’s looking to add talent on the wings?

Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...

by mf37 on Apr 4, 2010 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

he plays center and wing, mainly center recently though

Have a point? Make it. Don't? Fake it.

by JaredFromLondon on Apr 4, 2010 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

hmm

I’ve only seen Ribeiro at center, but mf37 makes a good point. We have no size in our top six forwards besides Kulemin – although I think we’re also hard pressed to find more than 4 players who look legitimately top six at this point (Kulemin, Kessel, Bozak, Grabovski). It does make a lot more sense for Burke to acquire some size.

"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky

by Karina on Apr 4, 2010 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

since we’re talking about Ribeiro….

granted I haven’t watched a ton of Kadri, he strikes me as being eerily similar to Mike Ribeiro, minus the douchebaggery. Roughly 6ft, never going to crack 195 lbs. Great stickhandler, fairly flashy, never going to score 3o goals a season.

Anyone else see the same thing?

by birky on Apr 4, 2010 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

never going to crack 195 lbs. Great stickhandler, fairly flashy, never going to score 3o goals a season.

I think it is way too early to start projecting or limiting his weight or goal totals in the NHL.

As for his douchebaggery, some non-Leaf fans could argue the throatslashing in the WJCs was borderline.

Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.

by nhlcheapshot on Apr 5, 2010 6:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yes

He said he was going to look for a top six winger. Whether it’s an acknowledged one or one he thinks can be a top six winger wsn’t clear.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Apr 4, 2010 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Understandable.

Ribs is a complete dick. But once you get to know him, it’s very endearing. His showboating can get old, but I think it’s entertaining.

Here's to all us girls who love hockey...and the men who play it.

by Brad_Richards_Rocks on Apr 5, 2010 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Still

Do not want.

We already have Kadri coming up in the system as a potentially endearing, entertaining dick.

Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.

by nhlcheapshot on Apr 5, 2010 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

we also have grabbo, his main of hair could win over anyone

Have a point? Make it. Don't? Fake it.

by JaredFromLondon on Apr 5, 2010 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Kabby’s value (which I think is still very high) has tanked then we shouldn’t trade him. If his value is a 2nd rounder then keep him. 32 isn’t very old and he hasn’t regressed as much as people think. Carter and a first was never his true value either that is overinflated for him at the best of times. A 1st rounder and a couple of prospects is much closer to his worth. I think we should be able to get what we gave up for Leetch. Other than him we have no one who can skate into the offensive zone and set up a play. Kessel sometimes does but he tends to hold the puck too long and causes turnovers. Everyone else does a dump and chase. I’m not going to try and defend his defensive shortcomings but in my opinion your first line isn’t there to play D it’s there to play D by playing O and Kaberle does just fine with that. Keep him on the PP and on the first line and don’t put him out for Defensive zone faceoffs. If you can’t get a good return for him then it’s positive expected value to keep him

October 25, 1966. Thank you Lord Kelvin

by Chuck Diesel on Apr 4, 2010 3:40 PM EDT reply actions  

at the time of the Kaberle for Carter and a 1st it was actually pretty good value as Carter hadn’t broken out yet and many were considering him bust like. He had his break out year the season after

Have a point? Make it. Don't? Fake it.

by JaredFromLondon on Apr 4, 2010 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

One of the issues I think we have here is

Many Leaf fans think that if we deal away Kaberle the team is somehow screwed from an offensive perspective.

The Leafs have had a better winning percentage without Kaberle contributing offensively than they have had when he was the best offensive player on the team. Why then would we worry so much about his offensive production.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 3:50 PM EDT reply actions  

The question is what would you rather have:

Kaberle

or

a 1st round pick

or

a top-end prospect (maybe not Hodgeson, but a Grabner, Neal, or Benn)

or

a top-six forward (not sure this has ever been a possibility, as Jared pointed out that the Jeff Carter we might have had was a prospect at the time not a top-six lock—Kaberle was part of a potential Kessel deal though.)

?

This is the question you need to ask yourself.

by Leaf in Habland on Apr 4, 2010 4:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Any of the last three for me. A top end prospect (which I would not count Neal as – he’s already had 2 seasons in the NHL, and has shown a knack for goal scoring), a 1st round pick, or a player further along to being a top 6 forward thank a Stalberg or Hanson, all seem to be glaring needs over what Kaberle brings to the table. We just need to find a team who has trouble getting out of their own zone and quite a few forwards who could be top six (Dallas and St. Louis are the two teams that I think match up here).

"The only way out is in a body bag. Go Leafs Go." - Blinky

by Karina on Apr 4, 2010 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Phoenix has this guy with almost 30 goals…Lee something…

by Leaf in Habland on Apr 4, 2010 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Remember, there's a cap in this league...

…which means it’s not how good he is, but how good he is for the money. And at $4.25-million, he’s a bargain. That’s for 1 year, which limits the value—so don’t expect a long-term contract in return. But the 1 year left is also a plus with a 32-year-old: you can see how he does before talking extension.

As for this year’s performance, consider the context. The Leafs were awful. His defensive partners often hung him out to dry. Defencemen on other teams have goalies to cover their mistakes; he had Toskalol.

Fans, media and now coaches have little love or respect for him, despite his being our best player for much of the year. Like everyone else, he knows he’s done here, and he’s playing out a meaningless string of games for a team that’s going nowhere this year and has no use for him after that. Sure, professionalism demands effort. But how hard would you work in these circumstances?

by DaveDaytona on Apr 4, 2010 6:56 PM EDT reply actions  

So when we're considering his performance

we should remember that his offensive decline is a fault of his defensive partners? When they added a more offensive D man in Phaneuf to upgrade on the PP over Beauchemin as his partner, and he suddenly stops producing on the PP, or when they improve the goaltending by replacing Toskala with Giguere we should be ok with his PP production basically coming to a halt, and his defensive numbers continuing to be the worst on the club?

That’s something we should “take into account” isn’t it?

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also

does it make sense for teams to really seek out a player that apparently stops working as hard when situations increase in difficulty?

That might worry me a bit if I was the GM of another team.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 4, 2010 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the relatively weak free agent market

could very well force a team to give up a first rounder for Kabby

by Hanzi on Apr 4, 2010 7:37 PM EDT reply actions  

if he brings in anything higher than the 25th over all pick I will be shocked, ecstatic, but shocked

Have a point? Make it. Don't? Fake it.

by JaredFromLondon on Apr 4, 2010 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here's a question for you

Do you want a high 1st/low 2nd + maybe some mid-level prospects for Kaberle

OR

A comparable forward?

I think if we’re really going to go with this speed re-build, then we should go after the top-6 forward who is pretty much developed (hopefully under 30 though)

I am the commenter formerly known as Belligerent Burkie

Follow me on twitter @CoolJ90

by CoolJ90 on Apr 4, 2010 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah a comparable forward would be nice

but what team right now would want to do a straight up dman- for- forward swap?

by Hanzi on Apr 4, 2010 11:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

You never know how the summer shakes out. Who thought Heatley would be a Shark early on last off-season? I’m not suggesting we’re getting a Heatley-caliber player, just an example

I am the commenter formerly known as Belligerent Burkie

Follow me on twitter @CoolJ90

by CoolJ90 on Apr 5, 2010 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

the question is what is a comparable forward?
defense to forward is a hard translation to make, even with a pure offensive defenseman like Kaberle.
I think the best result would probably compare to the Carter and a 1st deal, retro-active to Carters value at the time. A late ass first and a Good young forward who isnt filling his potential. The best comparable player I can think of is Mueller, but then he is suddenly tearing it up in Colorado

Have a point? Make it. Don't? Fake it.

by JaredFromLondon on Apr 5, 2010 8:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

Goood point. There aren’t that many options otherwise.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Apr 4, 2010 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can you imagine the insurance premiums on UFAs Colaiacovo and Mike Van Ryn?

Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...

by mf37 on Apr 4, 2010 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think we should all forget about first or second round picks coming back in return for Kaberle. I think we’re looking more at teams moving big contracts around to get better balance under the cap. A team like Philadelphia would love to move a forward like Gagne or Briere (Danny is pretty close to unmovable) for a goalie. Boston would love to move a goalie for a puck moving defenseman or a goal scoring winger. New Jersey would love to get a puck moving defenseman as well, but they’d only offer prospects. I think we’ll see teams try to move assets around, not just draft picks.

by birky on Apr 4, 2010 8:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Question.

Right before the trade deadline, a Canucks’ fan suggested that they could trade Grabner for Kaberle straight up. I said he was dreaming in technicolour. Would folks around here really be happy with a return like that? I sure wouldn’t.

"Defense! Defense! Common! Do you call that blowing!?"

by JP Nikota on Apr 5, 2010 12:59 AM EDT reply actions  

Nope.

That’s a low ball offer… of the sort I’m referring to.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 5, 2010 1:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ya I’d be disappointed with that straight up.

That + a 1st? Maybe

Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.

by nhlcheapshot on Apr 5, 2010 6:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ok let me put all of this in a bit of perspective

Kaberle is in the longest “drought” of his NHL career right now.

This is his second worst month+ long stretch of hockey from a points perspective in his 11 year career. That’s pretty damn horrible considering the last time he suffered like this was during an 8 game month of December in 2003.

He didn’t score any points in the last 7 games of the year last year either, but he was coming off an injury so that’s not quite the same.

This current stretch of 3 points in 19 games is remarkable for that reason alone.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 5, 2010 1:16 AM EDT reply actions  

Kaberle is always going to put up decent offensive numbers. The reasons he’ll be traded are:

1. he’s being paid over 4 million dollars a year to be your 5th defenseman
2. he’s more valuable to a team like New Jersey or Boston, who play a style better tailored to Kaberle’s strengths
3. the Leafs have gaping holes in the top 6 forwards, and Kaberle is still, albeit depreciated, the best chance of acquiring a scoring forward.

by birky on Apr 5, 2010 8:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

30 game perspective

The first 5 games immediately following the Olympics, Kaberle was a minus 6 and had zero points. Since then, in 13 games his plus/minus is even and he’s had 3 points. For the 12 games immediately preceeding the Olympics, Kaberle’s plus/minus was even and he had 6 points.

So in the last 30 games, there’s really only a 5 game stretch, the 5 games immediately following the Olympics, where you could say Kaberle played horribly. The other 25 games both before and after that 5 game stretch, his numbers are: 25 games, 9 points, plus/minus EVEN.

Kaberle’s fine. Zero panic.

by general borschevsky on Apr 5, 2010 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hmmm

That doesn’t really work for me.. he’s been a minus player in 8 games since the break, and a plus player in 4 games.

Yes he’s been even in the other 18… despite a complete lack of offense.

He has 3 points total in that span, and considering his PP point production that usually doesn’t help his +/- all that much.

I’m more concerned with the fact that he has 1 PP assist since the return from the Olympics, and the Leafs PP has produced at a ridiculously crappy rate.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 5, 2010 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry...

I was still functioning in the 30 game mode.

He’s been even in only 4 games.

So that’s 8 minus games, 4 plus games, and 4 even games.

I’m not sure why we’re tossing out the 4 minus games at the beginning when he has 4 other games where he’s been a minus later on.

This is all goal post moving on the original point in an attempt to argue that Kaberle’s fine and we shouldn’t have any issue with his play whatsoever.

He has 3 points in 18 games… that’s the worst point production over a stretch that long in his entire career when he hasn’t been affected by injury.

Something is wrong. Maybe it’s the set up on the PP, maybe it’s the age of the team, maybe it’s his D partners, maybe it’s reduced ice time… but whatever it is… he ISN’T being productive.

Despite the fact that the team is “winning” since the trade, he hasn’t really been a part of it at all.

They’re winning thanks to better D, and better goaltending.

He isn’t essential to the team winning, thus his value is most useful as trade bait. Unfortunately his crap play is doing 2 things. First, it’s proving he isn’t essential to a winning team. Second, it’s showing that his ability to produce in a more restrictive defensive environment may be reduced.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Apr 5, 2010 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Kaberle had a 5-game stretch from Oct 24 to Oct 31 where he scored 13 points. If we take out those 5 games as an anomoly, it would only be fair to take out the 5 games immediately following the Olmpic break where Kaberle was held pointless and posted a terrible plus/minus. I’m just saying, without those 5 games, his defensive numbers is the last 30 games aren’t so bad, same way as if we take out the 5-game hot streak in October makes his offensive totals look not so spectacular.

He had 5 bad games after the Olympics for whatever reason. Otherwise, it’s been kind of an up and down season, maybe more downs then ups lately but the team’s been winning a bit more lately so Kaberle’s point production isn’t critical to our success. I guess that’s a good thing for us to figure out, and probably what the coaches intended.

by general borschevsky on Apr 5, 2010 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

I always hated the whole ‘take x out and he has this stat..’

revisionist history – no GM in their right mind is going to ignore a stretch of games in which a player did horribly or went on a hot streak – such is the nature of pro sports.

I ask for a moratorium on all ‘if you take out…’ talk

"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."

Albert Einstein

by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Apr 5, 2010 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

If a player scored 10 goals in 5 games and then didn’t score for 25 would you say he’s a good player because he has 10 goals in 30 games?

Same thing here, just reverse – a player goes minus 6 through 5 consecutive games yet for the last 30 games he’s still a minus 6. Is he bad defensively because of 5 bad games? Most people seem to think so.

by general borschevsky on Apr 5, 2010 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t mind it when it is used to compare to the season as a whole – you are still showing the big picture – I have a problem with ignoring a chunk of the season in the effort to present an argument that the player is really bad/really good ‘if you take out x games between this date and this date.’

To isolate a stretch in a season and compare it to the whole isn’t the issue.

"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."

Albert Einstein

by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Apr 6, 2010 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Before Draft Day 2010

I’d love to see a Tomas Kaberle post that lists all 29 Teams, what picks/prospects/players they have that we would be looking at for a trade (realistically and unrealistically alike).

i.e.

Vancouver Canucks (20th pick overall)

Picks:
1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th (example, I don’t know which picks they still have)
Prospects:
Schneider (G), Hodgson (C ), Schroeder, etc. etc.
Players:
M. Raymond, Grabner, Edler, Bernier

I’d do it myself, but I just don’t know the picks/prospects well enough. The speculation is going to happen anyway, it’d be interesting to have all the info & possibilities in one place. Just an idea.

Leafs Nation: A drinking team with a hockey problem.

by nhlcheapshot on Apr 5, 2010 4:44 PM EDT reply actions  

Wysh linked to this over at Puck Daddy. Nice job Steve.

His best days are behind him. 4.25 is too steep given his numbers. It will be interesting to see how badly Burke wants to deal him. However, I know a Swedish center you can have if you want to trade the Caps straight up.

"You ever use smelling salts, every time you type a bad blog?" Brooks Laich

by Carl Putnam on Apr 6, 2010 1:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Oh Tomas…

Could be his final game tonight.

I will always love him.

Sports And The City

A Toronto sports blog, where unabashed homerism is alive and well...

PLAYOFFS!!!!1

by eyebleaf on Apr 6, 2010 1:17 PM EDT reply actions  

Id say nothing short of a extremely large home town discount will see Kaberle in another jersey next year. It will be sad to see him go, but so is the world of pro sports.

by blueandwhite89 on Apr 6, 2010 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your best source for quality Toronto Maple Leafs news, rumours, analysis, stats and scores from the fan perspective.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

N907005365_1934770_7971_small
PPP Salary cap Challenge - Paper bag Leaf fan
Lifeasaleaffan_small
(Old) Marlies Game Photos
Newman_small
PPP Salary cap Challenge - samspade
Small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge - DaSim85
Globeatar_small
How Much Should You Spend On A Top 4 D?
Phaneufkessel_small
TOI-weighted NHL Team Ages
48839cd14228986f0ad0d2e405f1_small
Casting Call
Petering_small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge - Self Destructive Zones
Globeatar_small
The Fancystats Exchange, Part 1
Or-wallpaper-1680x1050__1__small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge-BCapp #2

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

StatCounter

wordpress visitor


Chief Blogging Officers

Calvin_small PPP

Aen1_small Chemmy

PPP's Girlfriends

Don_t_panic_small SkinnyFish

Picture_1_small JP Nikota

Fg_small birky

Christian-hanson-wrecks-brian-o_1__small Bower Power