Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Don't Panic! Kovalchuk, the Deal, In Perspective.

Okay Leafs Nation, knock it off with the Kovalchuk whining, alright?

 

 

Ilya Kovalchuk was never close to signing with Toronto. Get over it, okay? PLEASE???

 

 

Brian Burke is many things, including a gambler, but spreading $102 million over 17 years to lock down a talented but one-dimensional player in a contract that everyone knows he will never fulfill is not a gamble – it's a suicide pact.

 

Kovalchuk and the Devils are now bound together for the hockey equivalent of eternity.

 

There is no backing out. The Devils are now forced to make him gel with their team, and somehow turn him into a winner. Meanwhile, Kovalchuk has to produce, and continue producing, for a long time...if one side of this equation does not work out, things will get messy fast.

 

There is a short list of players that are in the same situation with their respective clubs...Alex Ovechkin, Rick Nash, Marian Hossa, Nick Backstrom, Henrik Zetterberg, Mike Richards...three of these men wear the “C,” three are excellent two way forwards, Zetterberg and Hossa have won the Cup, Nash and Richards have won Olympic Gold, and this group's combined awards and trophies are too numerous to count.

 

What has Kovalchuk done to earn a spot alongside these players?

 

Well, Waddell slapped the “C” on him because no one else would take it...he won the Rocket Richard with a whopping 41 goals back in '04...and before this last season he had 4 playoff games to his name – all losses. At least this season he won a (single) game in April!

 

 

 

That said, I think it's safe to say that, right now, Kovalchuk in his prime is definitely worth $6 million, but definitely not worth $10 million. In other words, it is difficult to turn $6 million of cap space into 40-50 goals, but many clubs would expect more production from $10 million of cap space. Agreed?

 

So, if Kovalchuk will outperform or perform to his contract AT THIS POINT in his career, this begs the question: at what point will Kovalchuk fail to be worth $6 million?

 

Let's assume for the moment that Kovalchuk is actually a generational talent. How much will his production depreciate over the length of his new contract, and at what point will he become a potential cap problem?

 

 

 

 

In the first 7 years of his career, Kovalchuk put 297 goals up on the board and collected 557 points.

 

Let's compare his career stats with those of fellow Russians and generational talents...Alex Mogilny, Sergei Fedorov and Pavel Bure.

 

In their first 7 seasons, Mogilny scored 266 goals with 551 points, Pavel Bure scored 254 goals with 478 points, and Fedorov scored 242 goals with 592 points.

 

These are very similar numbers to what Kovalchuk has recorded to date. So let's see what would have happened if Mogilny/Bure/Fedorov had been signed to a Kovalchuk-esque deal after their 7th season.

 

Mogilny played 9 more seasons, recording 207 goals and 481 points, or an average of 23 goals and 53 points per season. Bure only played 5 more seasons, recording 183 goals and 301 points for an average of 36 goals and 60 points per season. Fedorov stuck around the longest, playing 12 more seasons and recording 241 goals and 587 points, but averaging very low at 20 goals and 48 points per season.

 

Although these players definitely showed flashes of brilliance in their later years, I think we can all agree that none of these players would have lived up to their contract, and furthermore, would be looked upon as severe cap problems in their final 2-3 seasons.

 

Imagine if the Leafs had signed Kovalchuk for 17 years and he averaged 20 goals and 48 points over a 12 year span...how disappointed would you, or in this case, your children be?

 

(*note* Now, I know what you might be thinking – Kovalchuk is playing in a different era than these Russian superstars of the past. While this is true, and the early numbers of Mogilny/Bure/Fedorov may be inflated, this segment of my analysis is about future potential for production after year #7...it will be interesting to see if the drop-off in scoring that can be seen in the 80's/90's Russians will prove even more dramatic for Kovalchuk because he will be playing through the day-to-day grind of the modern NHL, or less dramatic because the 80's/90's Russians finished their careers during the "dead-puck" era. I guess time will tell - until then, this is just speculation based on what we have already seen!)

 

Even if Kovalchuk's contract had been offered to some of the best players in NHL history, I believe that it would still be considered a terrible deal.

 

Peter Forsberg recorded 169 goals and 580 points in his first 7 seasons. In 5 seasons after that he only averaged 16 goals and 61 points. Steve Yzerman scored 291 goals and put up a whopping 692 points in his first 7 seasons. In his final 15 years he averaged 26 goals and 70 points. That's a little better.

 

In fact, only Wayne “fuckin'” Gretzky could make this deal smell like Roses.

 

Wayne put up 481 goals and 1337 points in his first 7 seasons...in his last 14 seasons his production was cut in half, but he still averaged 29 goals and 108 points. I don't think Kovalchuk will come anywhere near that...

 

 

Okay, so back to my question...again, at what point will Kovalchuk fail to be worth $6 million?

 

In his first 7 seasons, Kovalchuk scored an average of 42.2 goals and 79.5 points per season. Let's take the average of the goal/point rates from Bure, Mogilny, Fedorov, Forsberg and Yzerman over the span of their playing years following their 7th season...leaving Gretzky out for the sake of realism, this number comes to 24.2 goals and 58.4 points. Again, that is the average rate of production after season #7 of those 5 fantastic players combined.

 

Therefore, since Kovalchuk's numbers to date are similar to these players, if Kovalchuk's production decreased at the same rate as these generational talents, he should record 242 goals and 584 points over the next 10 years. If this depreciation happens gradually, Kovalchuk's career stats could look someting like this:

 

 

2010-11 G: 40 P:100

2011-12 G: 40 P: 90

2012-13 G: 30 P: 80

2013-14 G: 30 P: 70

2014-15 G: 30 P: 70

2015-16 G: 20 P: 50

2016-17 G: 20 P: 50

2017-18 G: 15 P: 29

2018-19 G: 10 P: 25

2019-20 G 7 P: 20

 

 

In 2015, with 12 years left on his deal, and Kovalchuk's production essentially cut in half, what kind of situation will the Devils find themselves in?

Feel free to poke holes in this argument as much as you want, but as a Leafs fan, I'm happy that Burke went fishing instead.

PensionPlanPuppets.com is a fan community that allows members to post their own thoughts and opinions on the Toronto Maple Leafs and hockey in general. These views and thoughts may not be shared by the editor of PensionPlanPuppets.com.

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Pension Plan Puppets

Devils ain't got a prayer

Dec 2011 by birky - 377 comments

11

Apr 2011 by PPP - 165 comments

Maple Leafs v. Thrashers

Dec 2010 by PPP - 522 comments

Comments

Display:

Wow to 17 years.. and good that leafs didnt sign him, these long term deals stagnate the league to the point where player movement is saddled to the second tier players, id rather of him went after Gagne but after reading his comments okay moving on… Kabs next big thing after that its filler till training camp

Jembries

by oneKesselcul on Jul 20, 2010 11:02 AM EDT reply actions  

I think the Leafs have plenty of "filler"

Right now Burke has to condense assets, like in the Versteeg deal. Turn 3 assets into 1 great asset. Hopefully he can pull off a similar move to acquire a center.

But I agree, these deals do stagnate the league – if the NHL would just say “no year of any contract can pay out less than half of the most expensive year,” front-loaded deals like this wouldnt exist.

by TMLSiegeinVancouver on Jul 20, 2010 12:28 PM EDT reply actions  

The Leafs have done this so many times that I’m starting to worry they don’t have any mediocrity between garbage and good. And by that I mean Burke’s ego is too big to trade half of our mediocrity.

by raskofalltrades on Jul 20, 2010 7:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

or no one wants our mediocrity?

"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."

Albert Einstein

by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Jul 20, 2010 8:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sutter will!

Tick Tock, Tomas. Tick Tock.
A drinking team with a hockey problem.

by nhlcheapshot on Jul 20, 2010 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Some guys produce well late into their careers. Joe Sakic, another guy with a great shot, scored 100 points at 36 years old or something. We’ll see what Kovy can do, but at first glance I think he’ll do better. Shooting % is largely driven by an ability to get into a good position to score according to BtN, and Kovalchuk can do that very well.

Cидни Kросби: Александр Oвечкин, он твой папа теперь
матовая Клими, Михал нуивирт ваш папа теперь
Red Line Station: for Capitals fans who can bear reading something less intelligent than a story at Japers' Rink
Follow me on Twitter!

by red army line on Jul 20, 2010 11:04 PM EDT reply actions  

So many variables. What if his knee gets Cheechood and he becomes a shadow of his former self? What if he plays 5 great years in NJ then jumps to the KHL? The former is a huge lose for NJ, the latter a humungous win.

Median path is that they have 5 years of great value, a couple of years of so-so value, and then nearly a decade of boat anchor, until he retires or moves to the KHL.

Or at least, that’s how it was looking till the NHL nixed it. Presumably now everything will wind down till Friday and then he’ll just sign a slightly nerfed version with NJ that lops a couple of years off, and very slightly ups the pay for the last few years… Just enough to get it into the Hossa zone. At this point NJ gets may 3 or 4 years of very good deal, 3 or 4 years of meh value, and then nearly a decade of boat anchor until he retires or moves to the KHL for another big payday (thus leaving him and NJD ecstatic)

Glory glory Man United, AND the other MU, AAAAnd the Leafs. I think I need a drink now.

by Wan Ihite on Jul 22, 2010 3:47 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your best source for quality Toronto Maple Leafs news, rumours, analysis, stats and scores from the fan perspective.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

N907005365_1934770_7971_small
PPP Salary cap Challenge - Paper bag Leaf fan
Lifeasaleaffan_small
(Old) Marlies Game Photos
Newman_small
PPP Salary cap Challenge - samspade
Small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge - DaSim85
Globeatar_small
How Much Should You Spend On A Top 4 D?
Phaneufkessel_small
TOI-weighted NHL Team Ages
48839cd14228986f0ad0d2e405f1_small
Casting Call
Petering_small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge - Self Destructive Zones
Globeatar_small
The Fancystats Exchange, Part 1
Or-wallpaper-1680x1050__1__small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge-BCapp #2

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

StatCounter

wordpress visitor


Chief Blogging Officers

Calvin_small PPP

Aen1_small Chemmy

PPP's Girlfriends

Don_t_panic_small SkinnyFish

Picture_1_small JP Nikota

Fg_small birky

Christian-hanson-wrecks-brian-o_1__small Bower Power