26 Days of Scoring: The Leafs After Dion
Big glove tap to birky for his piece, "What do you think this is...", to Chemmy for his "pythagorean chart", and to '67sound for some "possible line combinations."
There are a lot of question marks about this young team, but one of the biggest has to be: "will we score enough goals?" I was a little split how to answer this question, as I think we can all agree that the 09-10 Toronto Maple Leafs just aren't the same as the 2010-11 Leafs will be. We obviously won't be getting goals from Stajan, Hagman, or Blake, and the increased roles to kids like Kulemin, BOZAK, and newcomers like Phaneuf mean that last year's numbers probably aren't a great indicator for the year to come.
So this post focuses on what kind of play we saw from the Leafs in the only era we care about now: A.D. Sometimes mistranslated as Anno Domini, it really means "After Dion." We'll be looking at who was scoring goals in the 26 games after 2 February 2010 and more importantly, the rate at which we were scoring
The first thing I want to get out of the way is the big disclaimer: THIS IS A VERY, VERY SMALL SAMPLE SIZE. I'll have a couple notes on the painfully obvious individuals who've been hurt or benefited by this, but please recognize that this isn't gospel. Moving on...
The objective was to figure out how efficient our skaters were scoring in the 26 games A.D. I decided to pull ATOI and scoring information from the last 26 games to figure out the scoring rates of players per sixty minutes of TOI (obviously only for players who would be on this team in the foreseeable future)...
|
Player |
Age |
GP A.D. |
Goals |
Assists |
Points |
ATOI |
g/60 |
a/60 |
p/60 |
|
|
Beauchemin |
29 |
26 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
25:36 |
0.09 |
0.27 |
0.36 |
|
|
BOZAK, Tyler |
23 |
26 |
7 |
14 |
21 |
20:16 |
0.80 |
1.59 |
2.39 |
|
|
Caputi, Luca |
21 |
19 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
14:37 |
0.22 |
1.08 |
1.30 |
|
|
Finger, Jeff* |
30 |
39 |
2 |
8 |
10 |
13:47 |
0.22 |
0.89 |
1.12 |
|
|
Grabovski |
26 |
17 |
3 |
7 |
10 |
17:25 |
0.61 |
1.42 |
2.03 |
|
|
Gunnarsson |
23 |
26 |
2 |
6 |
8 |
21:43 |
0.21 |
0.64 |
0.85 |
|
|
Hanson |
23 |
25 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
13:58 |
0.34 |
0.69 |
1.03 |
|
|
Kaberle |
31 |
26 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
20:58 |
0.22 |
0.44 |
0.66 |
|
|
Kessel, Phil |
22 |
26 |
13 |
9 |
22 |
19:26 |
1.54 |
1.07 |
2.61 |
|
|
Komisarek* |
28 |
34 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
19:56 |
0.00 |
0.35 |
0.35 |
|
|
Kulemin |
23 |
26 |
6 |
10 |
16 |
18:45 |
0.74 |
1.23 |
1.97 |
|
|
Mitchell, John |
25 |
26 |
3 |
9 |
12 |
15:48 |
0.44 |
1.31 |
1.75 |
|
|
Orr, Colton |
27 |
26 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
06:55 |
0.67 |
0.00 |
0.67 |
|
|
Phaneuf, Dion |
24 |
26 |
2 |
8 |
10 |
26:21 |
0.18 |
0.70 |
0.88 |
|
|
Schenn, Luke |
20 |
26 |
3 |
5 |
8 |
19:48 |
0.35 |
0.58 |
0.93 |
|
|
Sjostrom |
26 |
19 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
13:41 |
0.46 |
0.69 |
1.15 |
|
|
Kaberle* |
31 |
82 |
7 |
42 |
49 |
22:21 |
0.23 |
1.38 |
1.60 |
|
(My only two notes for the above graph is that Colton Orr was greatly benefited by his two goals, and he just isn't a more efficient goal scorer than Grabbo. I've also included Kaberle's annual output just to highlight how far below his season average he was playing in his last 26 games, though I'll use his A.D. numbers going forward.)
Then we're looking to account for the offensive output of our imports: Versteeg, Armstrong, Lebda, and Mike Brown. Since A.D. makes no difference in their play, I used their full season totals. I think it's important to note, though, that Versteeg and Lebda will likely see softer roles
|
IMPORTS |
|
Age |
GP |
G |
A |
P |
ATOI |
G/60 |
A/60 |
P/60 |
|
Armstrong* |
27 |
79 |
15 |
14 |
29 |
14:48 |
0.77 |
0.72 |
1.49 |
|
|
Versteeg, Kris* |
23 |
79 |
20 |
24 |
44 |
15:44 |
0.97 |
1.16 |
2.12 |
|
|
Brown, Mike* |
24 |
75 |
6 |
1 |
7 |
08:21 |
0.57 |
0.10 |
0.67 |
|
|
Lebda, Brett* |
28 |
63 |
1 |
7 |
8 |
14:59 |
0.06 |
0.44 |
0.51 |
|
Then we've got that pesky second scoring line's left wing slot. I'm assuming that there won't be some trade for any bonafide NHLer between now and opening day, so we'll be tossing in one of a couple contenders, scheduled to battle it out for the last scoring forward slot. Further in this post, I'll use Caputi's name, simply because - as he has the most experience in the NHL of these new kids - he seems most likely to get the slot in my mind, but it could just as easily be any of the other current minor-leaguers who have a break out year.
|
EQUIVALENCIES |
Age |
"FOREIGN" STATS |
NHL EQUIVS |
TRANSLATED PPG |
||||||||
|
Irwin, Brayden |
22 |
39 |
15 |
19 |
34 |
0.41 |
13 |
16 |
29 |
0.16 |
0.20 |
0.36 |
|
Kadri, Nazem |
19 |
56 |
35 |
58 |
93 |
0.3 |
15 |
25 |
41 |
0.19 |
0.31 |
0.50 |
|
D'Amigo, Jerry |
19 |
35 |
10 |
24 |
34 |
0.41 |
10 |
23 |
33 |
0.12 |
0.28 |
0.40 |
|
Mueller, Marcel |
22 |
53 |
24 |
32 |
56 |
0.52 |
19 |
26 |
45 |
0.24 |
0.31 |
0.55 |
|
Caputi, Luca |
21 |
54 |
23 |
24 |
47 |
0.44 |
15 |
16 |
31 |
0.19 |
0.20 |
0.38 |
|
Brent, Tim |
25 |
33 |
13 |
15 |
2 |
0.44 |
14 |
16 |
31 |
0.17 |
0.20 |
0.37 |
So we've got the expected scoring rates per player per game (please note: per game, not per 60 minutes, because ATOI info wasn't available). Now to put everyone into a realistic ATOI for the whole season. I'll be using lines based on '67sound's piece, suggesting that our first scoring line will lead ice time, followed by the first checking line, second scoring, and second checking. We'll divy up ice time accordingly, and figure out average goals per game for each line (G/GP/line) and the team's total goals per game.
|
G/GP/line |
Forwards |
|||
|
0.975 |
Kulemin-BOZAK-Kessel |
(19 mpg) |
80 |
|
|
0.501 |
Sjostrom-Mitchell-Armstrong |
(18 mpg) |
41 |
|
|
0.507 |
Caputi-Grabovski-Versteeg |
(17 mpg) |
42 |
|
|
0.159 |
Brown-Hanson-Orr |
(6 mpg) |
13 |
|
|
Defense |
||||
|
0.111 |
Beauch-Phaneuf |
(25 mpg) |
9 |
|
|
0.073 |
Kaberle-Komisarek |
(20 mpg) |
6 |
|
|
0.141 |
Gunnarsson-Schenn |
(15 mpg) |
12 |
|
|
2.466 |
GPG |
G/82: |
202 |
|
Now I don't have any interesting numbers regarding our defense, except for, again, the performance in the last 26 games. We allowed 68 goals in 26 games, averaging 2.62 GA/GP, which rates out to 214 GA over the course of a season.
So coming in at 202 GF and 214 GA, we can use Chemmy's Pythagorean Chart, to see a painful truth: The fun hockey we were all watching last year A.D. was still not a playoff team. It's an 84-86 point team, which last year was good enough for about 10th place in the East, a playoff bubble bubble, if you will.
So what do we need to make the playoffs? Hopefully Gustavsson's development means we'll be able to cut down those GA a little more, but if we're going to make the playoffs on 214 GA, we'll need 220-225 goals minimum.
This means, above all else, the young kids to going to need to show some steady development. 11 of our skaters (including the Competition slot) are 25 and below, and these players are going to need to make up a big part of the next 20 goals. Kessel needs to be flirting with 40. Versteeg needs to be flirting with 30, and to do that, he'll really have to take advantage of both the new linemates and the softer competition.
And we need someone to clearly, definitively win the Competition Slot. Caputi's scoring rate over the last 26 games puts him at 5 goals over the whole season based on 17 minutes of ice time. Totally unacceptable if he's going to be playing a role on the one truly sheltered forward line we can afford to have. I'm excited for preseason based on the Competition Slot alone.
It's been mentioned, but our offensive defensemen really need to wake up. Phaneuf's 0.18 g/60 is in part because he was eating up minutes, but it's also because he wasn't putting the puck in the net. He'll need to be another source of goals going forward. I think this also reinforces that Kaberle needs to look more like Kaberle. Over the whole year, he posted 1.38 assists per sixty minutes of ice time. Over the last 26 gp? Just 0.44. Kaberle needs to find whatever he lost in the middle of last year, and needs to learn how to apply his game to this new forward corps.
And lastly, what we all know: The power play needs to get better. This data includes the PP info from the last 26 games (since I didn't distinguish PK, PP, or ES time), and another couple goals on the PP could really help to make up the 20-30 goals we need.
I've made an excel sheet to do all this, and it's available on Google Docs here, if you'd like to pull down a copy. Click "File," then "Download as".
PensionPlanPuppets.com is a fan community that allows members to post their own thoughts and opinions on the Toronto Maple Leafs and hockey in general. These views and thoughts may not be shared by the editor of PensionPlanPuppets.com.
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I remember scrolling through the comments the other day and someone wrote that Dion plays the right side of the ice, even though he has a left hand shot. Is that true? And is there a place that keeps track of this stuff?
I still remember how last season Luke had to switch sides (from right to left) when paired with Beauchemin and how that screwed up his progress. It seems like not many people are discussing the importance of having D-men play in their comfort zone or GMs building their teams with a 3 Left, 3 Right D-Men approach.
Beauchemin shoots left, plays left side.
Kaberle shoots left, plays left side.
Gunnarsson shoots left, but played both sides last year.
Phaneuf shoots left, plays right side
Komisarek shoots right, plays right side.
Schenn shoots right, plays right side.
Is it impossible to ask a defenseman to play his off-side? No. Is it something I would encourage the Leafs to do? No. Gunnarsson may be the only player on this team that can play both, but I thought he looked better on the left side, his natural side, last season
Negative. I am a meat popsicle.
One of the questions that I had from Chemmy’s chart the other day was whether it accounted for OTL points. Apparently it does, looking at last year’s stats.
As with anything, remember that it’s just a model. Ottawa was 6th in the conference despite being outscored on the season. Still, to make the playoffs you definitely want to score more than you give up.
I still think that this team has to learn a defensive game more than anything. If you can’t score a ton, make sure that the handful you can score are enough.
Leaf, the universe and everything.
Now in year 44 of the 42-year saga.
Although the Cup winning Ducks had offensive firepower to spare, they were definitely built as a defensive team. The common quote you’d hear about that Ducks team was that they were tough and loved to fight and were heavily penalized.
The truth is that they were 16th in the league for penalties against. Their PK however was second best.
This is my signature.
by blurr1974 on Aug 20, 2010 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions
A bunch of these mathetmatical models
that have been coming out lately seem to be pointing towards an approximate 9-12th in the East.
Not exactly optimism-inducing, but it’s obvious that there still needs to be a few adjustments to the Leafs in the next few years if we ever want to be considered contenders again.
Whether it’s internal development or further acquisitions, something eventually gotta give.
Then again, I wonder what the projections for Colorado and Phoenix were last summer…
There's always money in the banana stand.
A drinking team with a hockey problem.
bottom and bottomer. Puck prospectus’ VUKOTA had Phoenix #28, Colorado #27, and LA #25… so nobody knows exactly how a team will perform.
by Death_By_Leafs on Aug 21, 2010 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions
Can’t speak to LA, but Tyler Dellow did some great math about Phoenix and how they’re unlikely to repeat as a 100 point team next season (crazy luck in the SO and above average back-up goaltending). It’s worth a read.
I think many underestimated the impact Craig Anderson would have in Colorado – or perhaps didn’t appreciate just how bad their goaltending was running out Budaj and/or Raycroft each night.
Bitter Leaf Fan: because sometimes there's no option but to be bitter...
Nice piece BP. I think you’re right that we need to be a little better than we were last year AD in terms of goal differential because we got pretty lucky with one goal games during that stretch. I’m hoping that improvement can come from continued growth by our many young players. The majority of our team is on the right side of 27; that can’t hurt.
I don’t mean to nitpick, but you have Caputi listed as 19 years old under the equivalences chart. Still, I would take 15 goals and 31 points from Caputi in 54 games this season in a heartbeat
Negative. I am a meat popsicle.
I’d also question those projections for Don’t blame Mueller. I know you’re just going by the numbers from Gabe, but there have been so few German forwards to come over in the past decade. Especially for someone who has never been considered an elite talent, I just doubt he scores 19 goals.
Negative. I am a meat popsicle.
Congratulations, she’s a cute girl.
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Aug 23, 2010 8:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks for the catch – came from an error I had earlier where I read his GP for his age. It’s since been corrected.
Also, yes, there’s no way anyone could expect Mueller to be a 20 goal scorer his first year in the N. If he is, he’s not just a catch, he’s a steal. But that’s one of the reasons why I used Caputi for the final tally, rather than Mueller’s numbers.
If I'm losing an argument, I ask myself "What would a real journalist do?"
Then I cower behind: "You still don't get it. Deal with it." Thanks, James Wallace.

by 
































