Why not bottom 5 this year.
After the major roster overhaul the Leafs had - they finished their season with 13-10-2 record - which put them on pace for 6th in the East over a 82 game season. I will try to prove my point without going into statistical details. Why not stats you may ask? Well, for one, I am not good at Math. Two, they only pretend to show you what could or could not happen. If the stats were always correct to point things out, scientist should be able to predict the future for us. Anyways, here are some logical reasons, Leafs will not end up in bottom 5.
As Burke likes to build his team from net out, lets start talking from the Goaltending Position.
Goaltending:
One of the main reasons why Toronto Maple Leafs ended second last in the league was Goals Against. Why did this happen? Well for one, we had horrible goaltending. I won't blame Vesa Toskala for ALL of it, but I will blame him for most of it. Here's the reason why: we had a completely new defence coming into the season. Ron Wilson was trying out the young kids in pre-season games. That led to our new and "improved" defense not having the time to gel, and get used to each other, which in turn led to shaky defence. Now when the defence is shaky, strong goaltending is needed. The goalie doesn't necessarily have to make LOT of saves, he just needs to make TIMELY saves. Toskala did not provide Leafs with that. That on the other hand put a lot of pressure on Jonas Gustavsson whose heart couldn't really handle it.
Since the addition of Jean-Sebastien Giguere, who has been a great mentor to Gustavsson. He has provided Leafs with some stability to the Leafs' goaltending situation. That, alongside with one year in #50's belt, he must be ready to prove to the world that what he REALLY is made of. I am sure hes eager to put the losing season behind him, and start this season the way he finished the last.
Defence:
As mentioned above, Toronto had a problem with new set of defenceman coming in, who has NEVER in their lives played with each other, and are asked to play first parts of the regular season games with each other. With non timely goaltending provided, Leafs ended up with a 0-7-2 start. This happened because, we had defenceman trying to earn their full 5 million dollar paycheque on their first shift, that caused mistakes, which caused them to try to prove to fans that last shift was just a mistake, and that 5 million dollar contract will be earned in this shift. The cycle went on and on. To top it all off, when every mistake starts costing the Leafs goals, d-men start to hold their sticks tighter, and starts to collapse a lot earlier, which gives the other team's offence way more time and room to maneuver. This causes more and more goals to go in our net.
I believe, they have learned from their mistakes and now will play with much needed poise and patience. They will be able to provide us with some great defensive plays, and their errors won't cost them, much. Leafs have some great defence, atleast on paper. Let's hope that, our defence will be our Number One star every single night.
Offence:
Leafs offence was also one of the league's worse in 2009-2010 season. For most of the year, we had a "sniper" who was good at showing us fans what other team's logo looked like. Or, we had playmakers, who were good at making tape to tape passes with other team's defenceman. Let's face it, we HAVE improved our offence this offseason, not by alot but somewhat. Let's be honest, Kris Versteeg is an improvement to Alex Ponikarovsky, and Colby Armstrong is an improvement to Jason Blake. Even though we have Kadri in the system, I am one of those to believe that Kadri should be sent into minors, if not for the whole season, but better part of the season. Let him learn the Pro game at the AHL level, it will be beneficial to us in the long run. On the other hand, Leafs may not have good offensive unit, but I believe our defence is capable of scoring. Leaf's defence may not be capable of filling up ALL the holes on the offence, but atleast a little bit. Scoring by committee, lets see how that works for the Leafs.
All in all, my opinion is that, Leafs have improved in 2 areas, they just need to improve the scoring to be a considered a threat to make a deep run to the playoffs, or a playoff race.
Overall, my prediction is Leafs will be a bubble team, they will end up somewhere between 7th and 11th place.
PensionPlanPuppets.com is a fan community that allows members to post their own thoughts and opinions on the Toronto Maple Leafs and hockey in general. These views and thoughts may not be shared by the editor of PensionPlanPuppets.com.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I like your style posting at 2 am. It’s late I’m ripped and this was a great new read.
by jmobes on Aug 23, 2010 1:56 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Lol thats how I do things. Thanks
by hockeyphreak on Aug 23, 2010 2:13 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Just an FYI, your title is slightly confusing. I originally thought you were trying to make an argument why the Leafs could potentially finish bottom 5 again.
Good work though
Resident Capologist
Yeah looking back it was the wrong title. I agree!
by hockeyphreak on Aug 23, 2010 2:14 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I’m not sure that Versteeg > Poni. He was resident whipping boy in the Hawks fanbase, from what I gather, with laziness seemingly in his backcheck or whatever and Poni is a Corsi star.
If you want content, go to the Copper and Blue. If you want numbers, go to Behind the Net. If you want craziness, go to Pension Plan Puppets. If you want humor, go to Battle of California.If you want discussion, go to Broad Street Hockey. If you want bravery, go to Five For Howling.
If you want all of the above, go to Japers' Rink.
My blog and Twitter.
Poni is vastly underrated. +/- is usually a meaningless stat but this guy was a + every year post-lockout for a collection of terrible teams. That means something.
by The '67 Sound on Aug 23, 2010 9:16 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree, but my thought process was more of clutch scoring. I have seen versteeg when he played for the hawks, loved him. My only problem with poni is, he could have been a better player. Especially when you look at his body, but I agree he was a good player.
by hockeyphreak on Aug 23, 2010 2:17 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Is Armstrong an improvement on Jason Blake offensively?……no way……Blake is the superior offensive player.
Toronto Maple Leafs: Nowhere to go but up!
but I do think goaltending is the be all-end all for this team…….without reliable goaltending, this team will crash and burn
Toronto Maple Leafs: Nowhere to go but up!
by LeafFan1989 on Aug 23, 2010 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Isnt that the case with most teams?!?
by hockeyphreak on Aug 23, 2010 2:19 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
yes… but teams like philly, washington, detroit, even chicago had average goaltending yet their lineup was so spectacular they could get by with average goaltending. The Leafs need stellar goaltending if they are going to reach the post season this year
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Aug 23, 2010 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Blake is a superior offensive player, but he plays better when he plays on the edge. Armstrong will bring that feistiness in my opinion
by hockeyphreak on Aug 23, 2010 2:18 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions

by 































