Lashoff trade signals free agent signing...my money is on Kennedy
The move for Lashoff looks like a simple salary dump by the Lightning; they don't have to pay the $550,000 to play in the minors, while we will gladly pay that in order to open up some space to make a signing and provide even more depth on the AHL team back-end.
I think the obvious play is Tim Kennedy. Only 24 years old who had a decent first full season in the NHL last year. You gotta think that the most we would have to sign this guy is 1 mm (amount awarded in arbitration), although given some of the signings this UFA season (Torres comes to mind) i'm thinking he can be had for even less. Looking back at his career statistics he was a point a game player through his NCAA days and just shy of that in his one full season of the AHL.
His offensive stats aside, his profile over at hockeyfutures notes his strong defensive play and willingness to take the body, qualities that Big Bad Burke likes in a player (not to mention his American heritage).
It seems that the Sabres writers were pretty upset with letting this guy go. Not that I trust/like what the writers have to say but I'll give them the benefit of the doubt given that I am sure they have watched this guy play way more than I have. Although I do recall some small forward on the Sabres taking it to the Leafs last season. (I hope I'm not confusing TK with one of the other million undersized forwards the Sabres have).
The decision by the Sabres to let this guy go is an obvious result of the cap era taking shape as well as their ridiculous young depth on the offensive side of the puck (ennis & gerbe being the prime suspects). A guy this young and with a decent amount of upside usually isn't available in the UFA pool; signing this guy seems like the move to make.
Throw in the likelihood that we can probably lock him up for under 1 mm; 1 mm at the max and I think it's a lock that we will see this guy in a Leaf uniform within the next couple of weeks. Who knows, maybe we can even get this guy on a 2 way contract.
My only reservation with making this signing is where TK fits in with the team and furthermore which player he takes a spot away from. I envision him right now on the Leafs roster fitting in on either the 2nd or 3rd line. Adding to our PK depth and maybe a couple shifts on the PP from time to time. If he's taking a spot from Caputi/Mitchell/Hanson i'm fine with it, if he's taking it from Kadri...no thanks.
Whatever the case, he brings some more depth and more competition come camp; and if he can be had on a two-way contract (pretty sure I read that somewhere)...we got a steal.
PensionPlanPuppets.com is a fan community that allows members to post their own thoughts and opinions on the Toronto Maple Leafs and hockey in general. These views and thoughts may not be shared by the editor of PensionPlanPuppets.com.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Close!
It was a UFA forward but looks like it’s Clarke MacArthur.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
MacArthur vs. Kennedy
I think I would rather Kennedy. The only reason really is that MacArthur has had more time in the NHL with only moderate results. I would assign a little more upside to Kennedy but probably nothing too statistically significant. Either way, the signing is similar to what I was looking for and therefore I like it.
Also, he is entering his 4th season I believe…isn’t there something about guys producing in their 4th season? think I read that over at dobber hockey. Maybe Burkie is looking into the statistical influence in the NHL after all.
Yeah, typically forwards tend to hit their stride around season 4 and/or 24-25 years of age. Of course, it depends on when they start and what you consider a ‘season’, but it’s usually around then.
(and by ‘season’ I mean look at a guy like Filatov..has he played one season yet? Two? Zero?)
by Death_By_Leafs on Aug 29, 2010 9:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Oddly enough, the “Season 4” rule also usually applies to TV shows.
by Death_By_Leafs on Aug 29, 2010 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions
now that I think about it the hobbit really isn’t a prequel
by ShahofToronto on Aug 30, 2010 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions
CC-ish: hobbit is in serious limbo
guillermo del toro has had to pull out of the project because there have been so many delays and they still havent started filming
its an amicable split, and he is leaving all of his creative contributions with the movie, its just already been 2 years or something since he’s been in new zealand, and with no start date in the near future he has to move his family back to north america where their lives are.
he hopes it turns out awesome, he’s just disappointed he wont be around to translate his sketches/vision to the screen, but he’s eager to see what p.jackson and the new director can come up with.
by Death_By_Leafs on Aug 30, 2010 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions

by 























