Reimer in, Gustavsson Waivering?
What a difference a year makes. Last year the Leafs did not have a chance with their goaltenders as Vesa Toskala and Jonas Gustavsson. Now they have three potential starters and Jussi Rynnas in the minors. Jonas was their top performer in net last season and he seems to be buckling under the pressure this season. The Leafs seem poised to make a move with one of their goaltending prospects or the veteran presence. The facts are this. Everyone knows Gustavsson's confidence is almost broken because he has gotten more and more frustrated every time he is on the ice and a shot goes by him. His spasm on the bench in New York clearly showed that the pressure is getting to him.
Nonetheless, we like that. If anything having a freakout shows that The Monster cares. But a report from a Globe and Mail blog today is saying that the Leafs may put him in the minors. If the Leafs send him down he will be placed on waivers for a short period of time. Who knows what will happen then? Any other team could claim him and we would get nothing in return. I don't think anyone in this city wants Gustavsson out but if he isn't playing well his potential could certainly diminish. Having a brief stint in the minors I think would be good for him but I am not willing to take the chance that he could be snatched away. Long term Gustavsson is better because he is more experienced and has many games behind him already. Reimer is great for now and seems to be responding well to his coaches. What they do with their goaltending is going to be very important headed into these next few months. One person has to know if they're going to be the legit starter otherwise the wheels are going to fall right off this team.
Predictions:
Canes: Leafs 4-1 (Two Goals for Mikhail Grabovski) - Jean-Sebastien Gigeure gets the start tonite.
Lightning: Leafs 2-1(SO) - We will get to see Optimus Reim in net for the Leafs again.
Maple Leafs vs Hurricanes preview
The Leafs will be right back in the hunt after the All-Star break. Maybe its not realistic but a guy can dream right?
PensionPlanPuppets.com is a fan community that allows members to post their own thoughts and opinions on the Toronto Maple Leafs and hockey in general. These views and thoughts may not be shared by the editor of PensionPlanPuppets.com.
44 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wilson is killing Gus
The biggest problem I can find with Gus’ game this season is his coach. When Giggy first went down this season with the groin thing, Gus had really huge numbers but couldn’t buy a win because the Leafs scored about 0.3 goals every time he got the start. When it was his turn to carry the mail he put more great games together and things were looking really good. Then the very first night Giggy is back on the bench, Gus gets pulled after – what? 3 goals? 2? I forget – and has never looked the same since. BTW, putting Giggy in that night cold basically led to him reinjuring his groin and missing significant time since then – a very nice 1-2 punch of Wilsonomics. Then when they call up Reimer, they START him for 5 games in a row over Gus simply because they are winning. Does anyone really think that Gus would have started 5 games in a row over Giggy no matter how many of them he won? Not a chance. So why is it ok to hand that mantle to Reimer? Short answer: it’s not. But then Wilson seems to have a real problem with anyone who shows passion of any kind and it’s not a new thing with him.
On a different tack: when Francois Allaire spoke about Gus last year, he said he was ahead of Hiller (whom he also coached) at the same point in their careers and we all know that we got Giggy because Hiller took over that #1 job in Anaheim. I doubt he would say the same thing now and I don’t think the finger can be pointed at Allaire as the problem…..
The man is a poison to young talent. He should be coaching a beer league team.
by Thistle, Shamrock & Rose entwined on Jan 24, 2011 2:36 PM EST reply actions
The man is a poison to young talent. He should be coaching a beer league team.
someone should tell Grabbo, MacArthur, Kulemin, Schenn and Gunnarsson
Rule #20
by JaredFromLondon on Jan 24, 2011 3:06 PM EST up reply actions
or perhaps Kadri, Bozak, Hanson, Kessel or several others who don’t play here any more. And Gunnarsson? Seriously? He’s on a sharp learning curve, is he? Maybe if they would stop pairing him with Komisarek and Lebda.
I notice that you chose the one line in my comment that had nothing to do with Gustavsson (or goaltending in general) to quibble with. Can I assume you don’t disagree with the main thrust of my criticism?
by Thistle, Shamrock & Rose entwined on Jan 24, 2011 3:41 PM EST up reply actions
Kadri played 18 games, he is not ready
Hanson was a project when he signed here and is just now showing some promise in the AHL, he was also not ready for the NHL
Kessel has been fantastic, if you don’t think so, I would question what team you are watching.
Bozak is again catching his stride after a slow start, he has 47 points in 84 NHL games, that is pretty good, especially for being thrown to the wolves night in and night out against some of the NHL’s best lines and being asked to carry the offensive load
Gunnarsson is rounding out nicely this year, he started poorly but is finding form and confidence again
Development is not a straight, line sprint. It takes time, years and multiple seasons even, the Sedins didnt break out until their early 30.
All the players (except macarthur) who have shown vast improvement under Wilson played significant time under him, not one season, but at least double that.
the only one who has shown to be a possible train wreck of development is Gustavsson, and no coach on the face of the earth bats 1000
I chose that comment specifically because it didnt have anything to do with the above statement and is a blatantly false assumption that many leaf fans have and i am fucking sick of it
Rule #20
by JaredFromLondon on Jan 24, 2011 3:59 PM EST up reply actions
Someone needs a new dictionary
Kessel has been “fantastic”?
He isn’t even leading his team in scoring, the one area he has any talent in whatsoever. He’s soft, he constantly mishandles the puck in his own end, he constantly turns away from a tough play, he has maybe three moves in his pocket and is the most one-dimensional player on the Leafs since Sergei Berezin. If that’s “fantastic” then I don’t care what team you are watching, I’d like to know the SPORT.
Pierre Larouche scored 50 goals on three different teams. I’m thinking that record may be broken somewhere down the line by Phil Kessel.
Sorry I trod on your toes and made you “fucking sick”. You would think Leaf fans might be a little less sensitive after having so long to get used to these kinds of comments. If you don’t look any farther than the way Wilson treated Kadri this year while he was up with the big club – and no, I don’t mean ice time or anything so concrete – you can make exactly the case I made. But he’s been a coach for long enough for me to have formed an opinion of his “style” without having to just pull shit out of my ass, as you seem to think I have done. And as a complete non-sequitur: anyone who has a problem with Patrick Marleau’s effort really should be doing something else for a living.
My perfect snapshot of Ron WIlson is this: it was reported that he wasn’t even going to watch the Junior finals this year because the USA wasn’t in it. He watched the bronze medal game and was ignoring the gold until the third period. That, I think, speaks volumes to his “commitment” to young players – he’s simply not interested in them.
I’ve never cared for Wilson’s methods nor results from afar and up close I find them even more objectionable. It’s not an “assumption”, it’s something I’ve taken a while to develop. And it has everything to do with his handling of Gustavsson whether you think so or not. You can just lump it.
I score a 3.6 on the Healy Scale, how about you?
by Thistle, Shamrock & Rose entwined on Jan 25, 2011 12:10 AM EST up reply actions
I'm not the biggest Ron Wilson fan, but...
My perfect snapshot of Ron WIlson is this: it was reported that he wasn’t even going to watch the Junior finals this year because the USA wasn’t in it. He watched the bronze medal game and was ignoring the gold until the third period. That, I think, speaks volumes to his "commitment" to young players – he’s simply not interested in them.
That is a completely asinine assumption to make. You mean Ron Wilson doesn’t spend every waking hour to watch a junior hockey game when he has other issues to deal with, mainly the Toronto Maple Leafs? I get you’re clearly not a Ron Wilson fan. but that aforementioned quote isn’t analysis or fact and quite frankly, derails your entire argument because it’s a completely biased opinion based on your belief that not watching IIHF hockey equals “not interested in them (young players)”.
Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell
Kessel is on pace for 33 goals and 57 points, thats only 3 goals and 3 points less than his best season when he was playing with Savard, only this time he is playing with a slumping Bozak and an AHL plug in Crabb
Just because another line has caught fire and other players are putting up a better scoring pace than him doesnt mean he cant also be playing well.
You obviously havnt watched Kessel very close if you think he is so one dimensional.
Sorry I made an attempt to crack through your close minded bullshit. but you have clearly made up your mind
you havnt been around here long enough to know how talked to death this topic is so I’ll give you a pass on the “sensitive” bit.
If you don’t like to be confronted when you spout such one sided opinionated bullshit without fact or even sound reasoning to back it up, then I suggest you go elsewhere
Rule #20
by JaredFromLondon on Jan 25, 2011 5:35 AM EST up reply actions
A case in point
Sorry I made an attempt to crack through your close minded bullshit. but you have clearly made up your mind
you havnt been around here long enough to know how talked to death this topic is so I’ll give you a pass on the "sensitive" bit.
If you don’t like to be confronted when you spout such one sided opinionated bullshit without fact or even sound reasoning to back it up, then I suggest you go elsewhere
This is uncivil and causes someone new to the board to feel unwelcome. Why is it permitted?
CYBERPOLICE
L'eggo my Eggo.
All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity. ~Gordie Howe
by happiergilmore on Jan 25, 2011 6:57 PM EST up reply actions
Also, because it’s entertaining.
Why is fighting in hockey permitted?
L'eggo my Eggo.
All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity. ~Gordie Howe
by happiergilmore on Jan 25, 2011 6:58 PM EST up reply actions
so what do you do with your life when you arn’t complaining on the internet?
Rule #20
by JaredFromLondon on Jan 25, 2011 9:47 PM EST up reply actions
You can have any opinion you want as far as I’m concerned, but if you’re not willing to have a reasonable debate, or refute our argument once we’ve finished picking apart yours, you are absolutely on the wrong site.
People that have been here for years have very fundamental disagreements on how the team should be built. But because they’re respectful to the opinions of others (most of the time), and also don’t start playing the “uncivilized” card in a hypocritical manner, we’re able to have a rational and intelligent discourse.
Try any of the major news sites if you just want mouthbreathing dolts who’ll take your opinion as gospel.
Resident Capologist
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
I endorse this statement.
you are good people, clrkaitken
"You have to learn the rules of the game. And then you have to play better than anyone else."
Albert Einstein
by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Jan 26, 2011 4:51 PM EST up reply actions
You might be confusing me with someone else. I was not engaged in any debate on this thread and my use of the word “uncivil” cannot therefore be hypocritical. Saying you wish you could punch someone in the face is not civil. Your refernce to “people that have been here for years” reinforces the cliquey nature of this post generally and that newcomers are not welcome.
I’m quite familiar with other new (and blog) sites. Thanks.
My perfect snapshot of Ron WIlson is this: it was reported that he wasn’t even going to watch the Junior finals this year because the USA wasn’t in it. He watched the bronze medal game and was ignoring the gold until the third period. That, I think, speaks volumes to his "commitment" to young players – he’s simply not interested in them.
hahaha or….it means that he’s American. Look, you’ve got your axe to grind with Wilson. Some things are definitely valid criticisms but let’s not enter the realm of make-believe. The guy coached one of the rookie-heaviest teams ever last year. He’s brought a lot of young guys along.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
I’m obviously way late in this discussion but I wanted to add: No coach is a rookie’s coach. Rookies can suck it for the most part. They haven’t earned sh*t and don’t deserve to be handed sh*t. All coaches in the history of hockey who have a job on the line would pick a vet to play over a rook. Coaches need to win or they’re going to lose their paycheque. A rookie’s development comes second to their bank account development.
October 25, 1966. Thank you Lord Kelvin
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 25, 2011 1:23 PM EST up reply actions
I agree in part with you for sure. At a base level, the coach definitely will play veterans. But some coaches do a good job of balancing that out and I think in that sense at least Wilson’s done a good job. He’s got Schenn and Gunnarsson logging heavy PK minutes, he’s putting the forwards out against tough competition enough, but…his systems don’t work and his goalies stink.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
When it was his turn to carry the mail he put more great games together and things were looking really good.
Gustavsson played 6 in a row from when Giguere went down to when he came back. He went 2-3-1 with a 0.924 SV%. While good, it’s not exactly the second coming of Jacques Plante.
Then the very first night Giggy is back on the bench, Gus gets pulled after – what? 3 goals? 2? I forget –
2 goals. On 6 shots. Through the first 26 minutes of the game. Against the Edmonton fucking Oilers.
BTW, putting Giggy in that night cold basically led to him reinjuring his groin and missing significant time since then – a very nice 1-2 punch of Wilsonomics
First, how do you put in a backup goalie that’s not cold? Unless you’re changing your goalies on the fly all game, any goalie that comes into a game midway is by definition “cold”.
And are you insinuating that it’s Wilson’s fault Giguere got reinjured? Gustavsson let in 2 GOALS ON 6 SHOTS IN ALMOST HALF A GAME! Brett Lebda in net was probably a better option on this night.
Then when they call up Reimer, they START him for 5 games in a row over Gus simply because they are winning.
Reimer played 6 out of 7 games in that stretch. The one game he didn’t play Gustavsson almost blew a 5-2 lead in the third period. Reimer also put up a 0.931 over that stretch that was significantly deflated by the Phoenix game. I wonder why they kept playing him.
Does anyone really think that Gus would have started 5 games in a row over Giggy no matter how many of them he won? Not a chance.
Because every time gustavsson has had to play that many games in a row, he’s gone into the tank.
So why is it ok to hand that mantle to Reimer?
Statue constructions are a bitch to stop midway. Also, because he’s the only goalie even remotely close to NHL calibre in six years.
it’s not
Because you say so?
But then Wilson seems to have a real problem with anyone who shows passion of any kind and it’s not a new thing with him.
I enjoyed the lengthy discussion of concrete factual evidence you had to support this… oh what’s that? It’s meaningless bs you pulled out of your ass? Carry on.
On a different tack: when Francois Allaire spoke about Gus last year, he said he was ahead of Hiller (whom he also coached) at the same point in their careers and we all know that we got Giggy because Hiller took over that #1 job in Anaheim. I doubt he would say the same thing now and I don’t think the finger can be pointed at Allaire as the problem
Is it at all possible that maybe Allaire was (gasp) wrong in his assessment? Or that Gustavsson hasn’t been able to grow accustomed to the NHL game as well as HIller?
I’m far from Wilson’s biggest defender, but Wilson has a proven track record with young talent that Jared’s outlined already. Goaltending has been a shitshow, but how you can pin Giguere’s papiermache groin and Gustavsson’s issues with confidence on Wilson is incredible. I have just one more question for you:
How does it feel to be so wrong all the time?
Resident Capologist
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
I supposed it feels the same
as being a complete douche, but I would have to bow to you on that one.
I’m not going to bother defending all my comments to such an obvious hockey God as Dr. Aitken there. Sorry to disappoint you. I will make one point, though: 2 goals on 6 shots in 26 minutes of hockey – if that truly is what happened – is absolutely no reason to ever shatter the confidence of the goalie that you really should be building your future around. In fact, many goalies feel it’s a lot tougher to play with so few shots, especially against a team with the explosive firepower of that young Edmonton team.
This has been an entertaining 5 minutes, lads, but really it’s ended up being exactly the same as every other discussion board out there. What a shame that “well-written” doesn’t equal “intelligent”. Amazing to see how quickly it got personal. You’d think some of these people were Wilson’s family the way they took it to heart.
Good luck with the blog. I shan’t bother you again.
I score a 3.6 on the Healy Scale, how about you?
by Thistle, Shamrock & Rose entwined on Jan 25, 2011 12:17 AM EST up reply actions
it’s ended up being exactly the same as every other discussion board out there
By this, I assume you are referring to all those discussion boards where you are the sole critic of Ron Wilson, fighting off a deluge of Wilson’s supporters and/or relatives?
I dunno dude. As a Sens fan, I think I might have a relatively unbiased view of the typical internet discussion boards that deal in Ron Wilson love/hate debates. Without going into my own thoughts on the coach, let me just say that the debate on every site I read tends to slant heavily towards the Fire Wilson camp, whereas this site seems to boast a balance between the two sides.
Maybe you came across two Wilson supporters here today, but I assure you that a quick search of the keywords Ron+Wilson would return just as many articles and comments that were almost as critical as your own.
I say almost, because you seem to be inviting responses with your choice of wording. I know it can be hard to get noticed when you are new to a site, so I can’t exactly blame you for trying your best to stir the pot here today. You want to be taken seriously as a knowledgeable and passionate contributor.
My advice would be that if you are not interested in having people come down hard on you, then don’t jump right in to the site with such incendiary comments. Or at the very least, don’t rush to be “first” on a thread and title your post with a phrase like “Wilson is killing Gus”.
That kind of thing cannot possibly be expected by you to receive zero opposition, can it?
Anyway, I am not totally up to speed with the exact rating system of your own Healy Scale, but is it possible that you score a little higher than a 3.6, if in fact you grade the most obnoxious and pompous pundits closer to 10?
I know I would liberally rate myself at least a 6, and surely you are trying to do your best Mike Milbury impression in order to carve out a niche. Why not give yourself a few months, or at least a week, before going balls to the wall with your opinion pieces. You know, try dipping your toe in first, to gauge the temperature.
/mytwocents
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jan 25, 2011 1:04 AM EST up reply actions
a quick search of the keywords Ron+Wilson
It occurs to me that the overuse of the shortened ‘RW’ to denote the coach might cause this exercise to be less than scientific.
I mean, it’s one thing if your GM is named GM, and you start calling him GMGM, but when you use the phrase RW on a hockey blog, chances are that some confusion will arise. It’s kind of a pet peeve of mine, both here and on Red Wings sites.
You just don’t see that particular brand of annoying negligence on Sens blogs when people are talking about our GM being a big pile of shit.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jan 25, 2011 1:10 AM EST up reply actions
Bingo
My advice would be that if you are not interested in having people come down hard on you, then don’t jump right in to the site with such incendiary comments.
You get what you put in.
don’t rush to be "first" on a thread and title your post with a phrase like "Wilson is killing Gus".
That kind of thing cannot possibly be expected by you to receive zero opposition, can it?
Right on again.
I know it can be hard to get noticed when you are new to a site, so I can’t exactly blame you for trying your best to stir the pot here today. You want to be taken seriously as a knowledgeable and passionate contributor.
The normal way is to make reasoned and thoughtful posts in case anyone is wondering. There’s more than enough real reasons to hammer Wilson without making them up.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
We’ve gone over them a lot.
Word of warning don’t post google image searches of Truculence. Just don’t.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jan 25, 2011 7:00 PM EST up reply actions
Agree
Many on this board would rather pick away at every comment than post decents posts themselves or even encourage them. This dilutes the quality of board, as it discourages newcomers and perpetuates the same little clique of “holier than though” (read pathetic) commenters. But then again hard to quibble with brilliant criticism like this:
Kessel has been fantastic, if you don’t think so, I would question what team you are watching.
Agree
People should let people state whatever they want without ever calling them on their bullshit.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
I notice that you chose the one line in my comment that had nothing to do with Gustavsson (or goaltending in general) to quibble with. Can I assume you don’t disagree with the main thrust of my criticism?
He out and out CHALLENGED people to wade through his bullshit argument and pick it apart.
I happened to be bored.
IN short, go screw yourself.
Resident Capologist
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
Alright
Let’s dial it back. We don’t need to be overly sensitive when we challenge everyone and we don’t need to correct people too aggressively.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
lol
The basic lesson is if you start out aggressive then people will respond in kind. I don’t mind that he leaves because it’s not a hard lesson to learn without throwing a hissy fit and leaving.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
hey, that sounds like unfair targeting, why do you always have to single me out?
Rule #20
by JaredFromLondon on Jan 25, 2011 12:05 PM EST up reply actions
If you make dumb comments – new or not – you will get schooled. It happened to me when I first got here (and still happens on occasion)
Check your facts and draw reasonable conclusions from what those facts tell you and your arguments won’t get blown out of the water.
This site doesn’t take kindly to bullshit, but when you come in with an attitude with the bullshit, be expected to be called on it – Every time.
If you can’t take the heat, then don’t bother posting. The preceding statement may sound a bit harsh but just about everyone who posts on here regularly has been criticized at one point or another by multiple people.
This site isn’t for everyone. If you can take your lumps and learn from your mistakes, this site is an amazing community.
Also, as for the ‘clique’ – that is garbage. The only advantage the ‘older’ posters have is the credibility they have built up from countless fan posts or discussions.
Do those who have been around a while make mistakes? Yes, they do – tenure has nothing to do with it. If you do read this site as much as you say you do, you will see that many of the long time posters get into long, drawn out arguments all the time.
There is no ‘us vs the new guys’ thing going on here. If you feel that the new people are being ‘discouraged’ then perhaps it is because how these new people are approaching their arguments?
I don’t agree with everything written by senior members of this site – quite the contrary as I see comments/posts that I disagree with all the time. It is all in how you present your argument. Just because I disagree with someone doesn’t mean I don’t respect their opinion.
If someone has a logical, well thought out argument backed up by facts – but I don’t agree with their conclusions – I respect that argument a lot more than someone who uses hyperbole and inference to make a point that I would normally support.
There are quite a few people who came on here as a newbie and impressed me with their eloquence and logical discussions.
Then again, there are quite a few new people who came on here and made a fool of themselves as well.
"You have to learn the rules of the game. And then you have to play better than anyone else."
Albert Einstein
by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Jan 26, 2011 5:19 PM EST up reply actions
Don’t be so sensitive. When you roar in blustering sometimes there’s pushback especially when you’re making completely unfounded accusations.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
Kadri- not a good example. You think Wilson has been handling him incorrectly? I think the only thing he’s done wrong was bringing him up earlier this year, it was too early in the season. But he’s doing fine in the minors at a PPG pace.
Bozak- started off last season with the Marlies, but he was called up and played 37 games with the Leafs, notching 27 points. Slated as the number 1 center to play alongside Kessel, there was a world of opportunity for Bozak to be a 50 point player this year, but he just hasn’t performed well this season.
Kessel- playing with less than adequate talent this and last season, he salvaged 30 goals and 55 points last season, and is at 19 goals and 33 points through 47 games this season.
Can’t say I know much about Hanson, but he’s been spending most of his time in the AHL (deservedly so) and has put up decent numbers.
I don’t see where he’s mishandled these guys.
L'eggo my Eggo.
All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity. ~Gordie Howe
by happiergilmore on Jan 24, 2011 4:10 PM EST up reply actions
heh
Ah, the ‘axe to grind’ comment.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
not for nothing
does my handle start with “thistle”
by Thistle, Shamrock & Rose entwined on Jan 24, 2011 3:41 PM EST up reply actions
sent Gustavsson down
waiver risk be damned.
Sending him out there to get shelled all season, and then next, because we’re “afraid of losing him” makes no sense.
There’s no point in being afraid to use him on the big club. And having him start next year in the minors makes no sense since if he’s good and we call him up he will 100% get claimed then.
This franchise is due for a little good luck, so i say we unleash the monster on the AHL for the rest of the year and hope he finds his game enough to grab the #1 job next training camp with the big club.
Unabashed fan of the surprise 2012 Stanley Cup champs
So being afraid of losing him makes no sense, yet you want him competing with the big club next camp?
Maybe I’m stupid, but I’m not following the logic there.
If he gets claimed, we lose him. Period. Done. He’s outta here. There is no ‘next training camp.’ All that’s left behind is a chunk of his cap hit, I believe.
He’s just going through a rough spell. That’s all there is to it. The fact that this team hasn’t seen anything remotely close to decent goaltending in a long time has a lot of fans up in arms about it. Give him a little time and some regular starts, he will snap out of it.
Judging by his comments so far, he knows he needs to be better, and he’s working hard to be better. That’s the attitude that will help him snap out of this current skid and be successful for a long time in this league. That’s the attitude Vesa Toskala should have taken about 3 years ago, and he might have been better off for it.
Sending down Gus because ‘this team is due for a little good luck’ is not a good decision for the team to make at this point.
I'm thinking that when the Leafs win the Cup, I'll lose my drinking problem.
by leafsfan4life94 on Jan 25, 2011 1:41 AM EST up reply actions
It follows. Pevans is saying that you can’t be afraid to do the right thing for his development which he thinks is sending him down to the minors to get playing time and build his confidence. If they do that, he could come in next year and compete.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
The solution
is trading Giguere.
Not yet of course. But the Leafs can carry three goalies for the short term and give Gustavsson some time in the press box or wherever he needs to be right now. Next couple weeks they can further assess if The Statue is the real deal, and if he seems to be able to handle himself, Giggy becomes expendable. There’s gotta be some team who could use some insurance in goal for the playoffs. Washington? Chicago? Dallas? Someone’s gotta be willing to give up a pick for this guy. Future considerations anyone?
And even if Reimer falters, it still wouldn’t hurt to give Giguere a (last?) chance at a championship and play the kids out. The season’s a bust. Who cares what pick Boston gets cause nobody will be able to score on our goalies in two years.
The team has long term plans (or at least next year) with Gustavsson and we’ve all seen, albeit for short periods of time, that he has the tools to be a capable starting goalie. It just seems like he needs to grow some balls right now, which as fans, we can only assume he will.
Toronto has goaltending options going forward, but the Monster is still (for now) the main one. No point in risking losing him for nothing when the team has another out.
Shameless optimism
trading Giguere.
Good luck with that… at that cap hit and his current performance, he’s not going anywhere
20 miles to Legoland!
by nhlcheapshot on Jan 25, 2011 9:01 AM EST up reply actions
$1.3-$1.5M I think. Not the worst but his performance has to come up for sure.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
No waiver risk...
… the Leafs can send Goose down to the Marlies, without having to clear waivers, for a maximum of 14 days on a conditioning stint if Goose agrees to it. And he’s already said that he would agree to it.
Btw, this is my first post.. I made the account when I saw all the worry about waivering.
Welcome
Thanks for joining. The question is whether the league would agree to it. The FTB has the CBA language and it seems like they have to prove that he needs it.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.


































