Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Lebda_fantasy

Brett Lebda is currently the last ranked player (1527 out of 1527) according to Yahoo Fantasy Hockey. A bigger version of the above picture can be found here.

over 1 year ago Don_t_panic_tiny SkinnyFish 69 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Pension Plan Puppets

Allow Me to Reintroduce Myself

Sep 2011 by Bower Power - 35 comments

Nitpicking on a Friday

Aug 2011 by SkinnyFish - 528 comments

BRIAN BURKE GOT RID OF BRETT LEBDA

Jul 2011 by Chemmy - 1167 comments

Comments

Display:

hahahaha
wish the picture was bigger but can still see it.
Its funny cuz all the guys above him are NA

by Ben Schnell on Jan 28, 2011 12:12 PM EST reply actions  

that says

FA… not NA… Free Agents as in nobody owns them.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 28, 2011 12:36 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s NA – because they’re currently not playing in the NHL, they’re in the AHL, or Europe, or something like that.

God help someone that actually owns Lebda.

Oh, four! I mean five! I mean fire! Now available in lite version!

by chillin411 on Jan 28, 2011 12:37 PM EST up reply actions  

no… in red letters beside their name.

TOMAS KABERLE: LEAF FOR LIFE

by daoust on Jan 28, 2011 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

ah missed that

and you guys are correct. the small printing is amazingly hard on my eyes on my tiny netbook.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 28, 2011 12:39 PM EST up reply actions  

It means that people who aren’t playing in the NHL are actually better for your fantasy team than Brett Lebda.

The experiment failed: Get rid of the trapezoid.

by Bower Power on Jan 28, 2011 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

He's

basically in the negatives because of his atrocious +/-

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 28, 2011 12:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t realize that Kovalchuk was a -29. Or that Chris Phillips was a -23. Wow.

TOMAS KABERLE: LEAF FOR LIFE

by daoust on Jan 28, 2011 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes

but NJ and Ottawa are both worse than Toronto… and they play every night… Lebda’s played less than half our games, which makes his -22 amazing.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 28, 2011 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

sort of like

why Kessel’s -19 is less worthy of mention than Lebda’s -22

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 28, 2011 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Updated with link to embiggened picture.

Certified Grabbo Lover

by SkinnyFish on Jan 28, 2011 12:57 PM EST up reply actions  

it’s a perfectly cromulent word.

Dion Phaneuf: turning the tunes up since '10

Follow Me On Twitter!

by thenumber14 on Jan 28, 2011 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

frankly I am shocked by this!

no wait, I’m not, what is the opposite of shocked?

Rule #20

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 28, 2011 12:14 PM EST reply actions  

validated

Unabashed fan of the surprise 2012 Stanley Cup champs

by pevans on Jan 28, 2011 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

He was Mr. Irrelevant in the D1 draft for a reason.

Purveyor of Pension Plan Puppets Podcast Post-Production

by puckurgently on Jan 28, 2011 12:15 PM EST reply actions  

Come on, 8 PIM are worth something to somebody- he even has a PPA!

And who plays with +/- in today’s game?

@yearofme

by laser358 on Jan 28, 2011 12:21 PM EST reply actions  

Sadly, nearly everyone.

by Learn2Leaf on Jan 28, 2011 12:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd say like 84% of fantasy leagues use +/-.

With no data to back my % guess up.

20 miles to Legoland!

by nhlcheapshot on Jan 28, 2011 12:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I was kidding before, but I’d say the only ones to not use +/- would be the points only leagues, or the ones with weird themes , like only PIM counts.

@yearofme

by laser358 on Jan 28, 2011 12:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I do not understand

the point of creating a league like that.

I could totally doing a negative league though… where you modify everything to the exact opposite of what it should be, so you end up wanting the worst possible collection of players.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 28, 2011 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

That’d be really tough (and really interesting) – you’d probably have to look at huge boatanchor contracts that can’t get sent down to the A.

Oh, four! I mean five! I mean fire! Now available in lite version!

by chillin411 on Jan 28, 2011 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I played in one of those leagues for fantasy baseball a few years ago. Lowest batting average, strikeouts, and CS actually got you points. The hard part was finding players that would actually stay in the roster regardless of their stats.

@yearofme

by laser358 on Jan 28, 2011 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

I’d add a measure on GP as a multiplier or something… just to ensure it was guys that stayed up.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 28, 2011 12:53 PM EST up reply actions  

In H2H leagues where you’d set your rosters every week, you’d have to make sure that your players weren’t sent down for poor play, or they’d be useless in that matchup.

@yearofme

by laser358 on Jan 28, 2011 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

The only draft in which Toskala could go #1 in.

20 miles to Legoland!

by nhlcheapshot on Jan 28, 2011 12:56 PM EST up reply actions  

well assuming someone would hire him.

I had a dream last night in which I was hanging out with someone who said they knew Toskala really well as a person. Apparently they liked him, and i felt mildly bad for not liking him even though I’ve obviously never been face to face with him.

I don’t know what it says about me that this was a real actual dream I had, and that I ’m not making this up.

Glory glory Man United, AND the other MU, AAAAnd the Leafs. I think I need a drink now.

by Wan Ihite on Jan 28, 2011 2:27 PM EST up reply actions  

I had a hockey-related dream last night as well.

I don’t remember much about it except I got into a huge argument with Steve Burtch and it featured a multi-player trade with Philadelphia that centred around us getting Chris Pronger and them getting Nikolai Kulemin. And when I say I argued with Burtch, I mean face-to-face – I have no idea where, and since I don’t know what he really looks like I think my brain made him look a bit like Steve Buscemi due to the sort-of-similar name, but it happened. Sort of.

by Be26 on Jan 28, 2011 2:39 PM EST up reply actions  

The reason for this is

there is NO way to penalize crappy defensive players that put up points otherwise… so you add the + / – to keep things semi-legit.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 28, 2011 12:37 PM EST up reply actions  

You make a valid point, but sometimes +/- is hard to predict, and can ruin perfectly good players

@yearofme

by laser358 on Jan 28, 2011 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

to some extent this is true

but I don’t know if I’d say it “ruins” them.

If they’re so unlucky that the +/- isn’t their fault (like Lebda) then they could compensate for that by putting up points.

Otherwise, they’re part of the problem… in which case they aren’t strong defensively.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 28, 2011 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Rick Nash had 41 goals, a ton of shots and PIM in his 2nd season. But his -35 might have caused owners to bench him

@yearofme

by laser358 on Jan 28, 2011 12:45 PM EST up reply actions  

and isn't that

sort of valid? -35 is pretty atrocious.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 28, 2011 12:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, but it’s also reflective of the team, the d-men, or the goalie- not necessarily what you’re looking for with forward categories (in fantasy at least)

@yearofme

by laser358 on Jan 28, 2011 12:59 PM EST up reply actions  

That's all well and good as an argument

but Nash had the worst + / – on the team, and he was -9 worse than the 2nd closest guy on the team, David Vyborny, who only finished -26.

When you’re that much worse than everyone else it’s probably because YOU are a large part of the problem, especially if you’re putting up offensive numbers. 19 of his 41 goals came on the PP which means he only scored 22 at Even Strength… he really was shite defensively that year.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 28, 2011 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Scott Lachance and Andrew Cassels

were the only other players below -20 on that team. NONE of the D men other than Lachance (-23) and Klesla (-16) were below -15… less than half as bad as Nash.

And their starter that year was Marc Denis who posted a .916 save percentage… so there goes that excuse.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 28, 2011 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Nash was just unlucky.

TOMAS KABERLE: LEAF FOR LIFE

by daoust on Jan 28, 2011 1:42 PM EST up reply actions  

anyone in a standard league

Follow me on twitter @CoolJ90 or add me to XBox Live - CoolJ90
Donate to Movember and the PPP team at http://ca.movember.com/mospace/731868/

by CoolJ90 on Jan 28, 2011 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

This inspired me to check his standing in my three Yahoo leagues.

He’s last in two with -13.2 and -8.8 respectively. In the third league, he’s amassed an astonishing 1.5 points. Although that’s only because I set it up to include blocks and blocked shots. He’s a free agent in all three, which begs the question, how deep would a league have to be to actually consider picking him up?

Leafs fan stuck in England. I tweet, @Hail_Grabovski, mostly hockey related nonsense. Occasionally just general nonsense.

by dbfinch on Jan 28, 2011 12:37 PM EST reply actions  

infinity deep

TOMAS KABERLE: LEAF FOR LIFE

by daoust on Jan 28, 2011 12:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I’d rather have Chelios on my team.

On the Mike Weber bandwagon (no longer with a lack of stupid boarding penalties!)

by Ubiquitous on Jan 28, 2011 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

You’d begin to run into situations where an empty roster spot is preferable to a filled one. I think Lebda would qualify as one of those situations.

The Flying V was offside every time.

by Nirbo on Jan 28, 2011 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Ron Wilson should take note of this.

Newly-converted Certified Grabbo lover

by poison Ivy on Jan 28, 2011 2:11 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

This is surprising why?

©1979-2010 article1 All rights reserved. Terms and conditions available on request. May be freely reproduced by anyone except those answering to the description 'Thieving Mittenstringer'.

by article1 on Jan 28, 2011 1:13 PM EST reply actions  

because

he’s largely behind a large number of players that aren’t even in the league.

It’s one thing to say he’s got the lowest value IN the NHL… it’s another to point out that he’s the least valuable player to be on a roster at all since the start of the season.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 28, 2011 1:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Further proof that Burke could learn from his colleagues, when it comes to cutting bait.

by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jan 28, 2011 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

BTW, Gustavsson does rank ahead of Khabibulin, so the Leafs don’t own that distinction at least.

by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jan 28, 2011 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

This is surprising why?

©1979-2010 article1 All rights reserved. Terms and conditions available on request. May be freely reproduced by anyone except those answering to the description 'Thieving Mittenstringer'.

by article1 on Jan 28, 2011 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

it's not really surprising at all

and in reality it does help make the point about his atrocious luck, because seriously? He’s not as bad as the guys ahead of him on the list.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 28, 2011 1:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Aulie?

(kinda sad to see a wookie on the last page of the list)

Glory glory Man United, AND the other MU, AAAAnd the Leafs. I think I need a drink now.

by Wan Ihite on Jan 28, 2011 2:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Vastly underrated.

Let the Wookie win.

by Kenjamin on Jan 28, 2011 2:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Its fantasy

ie you need offense to have value…Aulie will never be worth much in fantasy

I am drinking the Kule-aid!

by BCapp on Jan 28, 2011 5:49 PM EST up reply actions  

fair nuff

Glory glory Man United, AND the other MU, AAAAnd the Leafs. I think I need a drink now.

by Wan Ihite on Jan 28, 2011 7:24 PM EST up reply actions  

this

The universe moves depending on where Sidney Crosby is on the ice - IHeartPenguins
Certified Grabbo lover. GET WELL SOON, SID

by Leafer87 on Jan 29, 2011 5:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey, do you guys remember when he first signed with the Leafs and said he hoped to be a “pivotal” player on the team? Someone should tell him that he’s pivoting in the wrong direction.

Newly-converted Certified Grabbo lover

by poison Ivy on Jan 28, 2011 1:49 PM EST reply actions  

I can’t turn Left. I’m not an ambi-turner.

20 miles to Legoland!

by nhlcheapshot on Jan 28, 2011 1:53 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

zig'd

for Zoolander sweetness.

Glory glory Man United, AND the other MU, AAAAnd the Leafs. I think I need a drink now.

by Wan Ihite on Jan 28, 2011 2:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Well tell me something I don’t know motherfucker.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 28, 2011 2:21 PM EST reply actions  

Your mom is the reason I’m a motherfucker. /wink

Certified Grabbo Lover

by SkinnyFish on Jan 28, 2011 2:23 PM EST up reply actions  

touche salesman.

Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?

by ohshrit on Jan 28, 2011 2:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I will totally pick him up

For the last week if I am way out of the playoff race

by Its Cold In Here on Jan 28, 2011 2:40 PM EST reply actions  

Why?

Newly-converted Certified Grabbo lover

by poison Ivy on Jan 28, 2011 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Same reason puckurgently took Brett Lebda with the last pick in the PPPPPD1 draft this year. Because doing so is a funny thing.

Certified Grabbo Lover

by SkinnyFish on Jan 28, 2011 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Just thinking out loud here, but Lebda's ATOI is 14:41

How good our PK would have to be to just play with 4 men instead of 5 with Lebda out there? I mean, Lebda’s a -19 in 22 games, so if we took say, an average of roughly 7 penalties per game (to account for his 14 mins), killed at a rate of 78%, we would have allowed 34 goals.

At a rate of 90%, however, we’d only have let in 15 goals.

Right now, the league’s average kill rate is 81.73.

AN AVERAGE TEAM’S PK WOULD ALMOST BE GOOD ENOUGH TO PLAY 4-ON-4, AND BE BETTER OFF THAN WITH BRETT LEBDA.

Of course, if he played for an average team, he probably wouldn’t have a -19, but really, this is still terrible.

Oh, you better believe that's a paddling.

by JP Nikota on Jan 28, 2011 11:13 PM EST reply actions  

Should read what I was writing before I started shouting, but I was in a big rush, and not being careful.

Oh, you better believe that's a paddling.

by JP Nikota on Jan 29, 2011 12:45 AM EST up reply actions  

OK, but still. A league average PK would mean that only 29 goals would be scored.

With a top-of-the-league PK (like Philly) at 88.5%, only 18 goals would be scored.

So, Philly is better with on the PK than we are with Brett Lebda.

GAH.

Oh, you better believe that's a paddling.

by JP Nikota on Jan 29, 2011 12:50 AM EST up reply actions  

ALSO

Philly leads the league with 7 short-handed goals, which means that not only have they been scored on LESS at 4v5, they have scored MORE.

SON OF A BITCH.

Oh, you better believe that's a paddling.

by JP Nikota on Jan 29, 2011 12:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Should have read what I was writing…

There I go again.

Oh, you better believe that's a paddling.

by JP Nikota on Jan 29, 2011 12:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Burch’d-without-your-pills

The Flying V was offside every time.

by Nirbo on Jan 29, 2011 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your best source for quality Toronto Maple Leafs news, rumours, analysis, stats and scores from the fan perspective.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

N907005365_1934770_7971_small
PPP Salary cap Challenge - Paper bag Leaf fan
Lifeasaleaffan_small
(Old) Marlies Game Photos
Newman_small
PPP Salary cap Challenge - samspade
Small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge - DaSim85
Globeatar_small
How Much Should You Spend On A Top 4 D?
Phaneufkessel_small
TOI-weighted NHL Team Ages
48839cd14228986f0ad0d2e405f1_small
Casting Call
Petering_small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge - Self Destructive Zones
Globeatar_small
The Fancystats Exchange, Part 1
Or-wallpaper-1680x1050__1__small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge-BCapp #2

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

StatCounter

wordpress visitor


Chief Blogging Officers

Calvin_small PPP

Aen1_small Chemmy

PPP's Girlfriends

Don_t_panic_small SkinnyFish

Picture_1_small JP Nikota

Fg_small birky

Christian-hanson-wrecks-brian-o_1__small Bower Power