Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

REFLECTIONS AT THE HALF

 

I had predicted that the Leafs would make the playoffs following the pre-season and in "Reflections After the First Quarter", I said I thought they still had a shot despite a poor start.  I'm now afraid the playoffs aren't going to happen this year. 

Note however that the Leafs have 5 forwards: Grabovski, Kessel, Macarthur, Kulemin and Versteeg with 30 points or more (ok the Ks are at 29, but very close).  I haven't checked them all, but I wonder how many teams have that many forwards with those point levels.  Granted, we do not have the 40+ point stars (at the half) that most contenders do, but we do have talent. As management never tires of pointing out, this is also young squad.  So there is still promise.

The inability to score goals at the outset seems to have subsided, but the defense and goaltending are underperforming. This is significant as they gobble up most of the salary. The leafs are also not truculent.  Biggest needs are more consistent defence and goaltending and a big dominant center who can play with Kessel and, most likely, Versteeg.

At the quarter I rated everyone as either A (outperforming), B (meeting expectations) or C (underperforming).  This confused all of you who were used to seeing F's on your report cards, so in light of your squawking, this time we will have the five ratings you are used to A,B,C,D and F.

 I'm only rating players that have played more than 10 games and that are with the team now. Assume that those who started with the Leafs and are now with the Marlies would get a D or an F.

 After the jump for player by player ratings.

Star-divide

As last time, we'll start in net and work our way out.

Jean-Sebastien Giguere

A C might be generous.  The bottom line is that this is an expensive goaltender who has not been the difference in many (any?) games.  His play does not match his salary. The nagging groin injury compounds the problem.

Jonas Gustavsson

 C

 

I had Gustavsson "trending towards A"  at the quarter. Although he hasn't had much support, like JSG, he has not been the difference on many nights.  His positional play seems off at times, and he goes down early, a fact that is clearly known around the league - see how often people go high on him.  Still lots of potential, but it might be a long season for the Monster if JSP stays out (although Reimer is looking promissing).

Dion Phaneuf

D

Dion sat out a fair bit due to his injury, but his numbers have not improved from the quarter. Where are the big hits? Why can't he hit the net on a point shot? If he were doing both those things I at least could forgive defensive lapses, but bottom line is that the captain is underperforming given his salary and expectations.

 Numbers: 1 goals, 6 assists and -4

Mike Komisarek

D

Trending towards F given his salary.  The giveaway king on this team, which is saying something. Not looking like a good acquisition and overpaid.

 Numbers: 1 goal, 8 assists and -1

Francois Beauchemin

C

At the first quarter Beauchemin was playing solid stay at home defence. He still does that on most nights, but has caught a bit of the giveaway bug.  Down to a C.  I still like him overall and expect that he will pick it up for the balance of the season.

 Numbers: 1 goal, 9 assists and -4

Luke Schenn

B

Down from an A in the first quarter.  Schenn is still our best defenceman, but he has not been quite as dominant as he was out of the gate. He could be tired. 

Numbers: 2 goal, 7 assists and -3

 

Tomas Kaberle

B

Some of you were upset witht the C rating after the first quarter.  I gave him a C on the basis that as an offensive defenseman his stats should be better. They are now. Going  from 10 to 27 assists brings him up to a B.  And look at his plus minus, which is much better than last year.  Kabi, now that you picked it up, could you please waive your no trade clause.

Numbers: 1 goals, 27 assists and -1

 

Carl Gunnarsson

B

Same assessment as last time: Ever so quietly doing his job.  Nothing fancy, but solid defensive work. No sophomore slouch here.

Numbers: 1 goal, 4 assist and -1

 

Brett Lebda

F

Brett Lebda was the main reason everyone was clamoring for an F rating. Here you go guys.

Brett has actually looked slightly better, but his numbers are still absolutely terrible.

Numbers: 0 goals, 1 assists, -18.

Tyler Bozak

D

Half a season is enough time for Bozak to prove that he is not a number one centre. His rating suffers, perhaps unfairly, because of the expectations this team puts on him. I do not see potential here based on his performance so far.

Numbers: 7 goals, 9 assists, -10

Mikhail Grabovski

A

Still an A. The best Leaf.  Great speed.  Great scoring touch.  Good playmaking.  Good on backcheck.  The number one centre and MVP on this team.

Numbers: 17  goals,15 assists and +5.

 

Nikolai Kulemin

A

Up from B.  Great chemistry with Grabo and Macarthur.  Grinds in the corners, hits, backchecks, great playmaking and he scores. 

Numbers: 15 goals, 14 assists and +1.

Phil Kessel

C

Down from a B, which was on the generous side at the quarter.  He needs obviously needs a better center, but not much to watch on most nights.

Usually a much faster skater when heading away from his own goal, which accounts in part for the godawful plus minus.  As does his annoying tendency to carry the puck across the blue line and onto the sticks of the opposition. Ok scoring, although not on track for 40 goals as hoped  and few clutch goals. 

Still promise if matched with a dominant center and could still make 40 if he picks it up for the second half.  Come on Kessel, we know you can do it.

 

Numbers:17 goals12 assists, -15.

Kris Versteeg

B

Up from C.  Said he could easily turn things around at the first quarter, and he has.  Less giveaways, more playmaking and better shots on goal.  -10 looks bad, but he was -8 at the quarter, so has impoved significantly (as have goals and assists - he had 5 in each category at the quarter.  Great trade.

Numbers: 12 goals, 18 assists and -10.

 

Clarke MacArthur

A

At the quarter there was still a possibility that his scoring and overall good play was fluke, but not so. He is the real deal.  Prediction: Burke will pay 2.5 million to re-sign MacArthur and keep his line together.   Does it all: scoring, playmaking, working the corners, checking and backchecking. Great signing.

 

Number: 12 goals, 21 assists and even

 

Fredrik Sjostrom

C

Down from a B.  Sjostrom is still good on most nights. Doesnt seem to have the same checking energy he did at the start. May have been adversely affected by the absence of Mike Brown who complements him well.

Numbers: goals 1, assists 3 and -7.

 

Colton Orr

B

Not sure how your rate a fighter, but he seems to give and take punches as well as most in the league, so we cant fault him.

 

John Mitchell

D

Not impressive at all.

Numbers: 1 goal, 1 assist and -2.

 

Tim Brent

C

Still fulfilling his role as a fourth line plugger. Good energy, but showing some defensive lapses. Down from B.

 

Numbers: 3 goals, 3 assist and -7

Colby Arstrong

C

Im leaving him at a C.  He has spent too much time out to merit a reassessment. The comment at the quarter was that he needed to draw more penalties.  He has done that well - perhaps at the expense of his health - since his return from the thumb injury.  If he keeps it up he should be up to a B soon.

Numbers: 5 goal, 4 assists and -1.

PensionPlanPuppets.com is a fan community that allows members to post their own thoughts and opinions on the Toronto Maple Leafs and hockey in general. These views and thoughts may not be shared by the editor of PensionPlanPuppets.com.

Comment 134 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Pension Plan Puppets

Marlies & Devils

May 2012 by JP Nikota - 681 comments

Marlies miss huge opportunity

May 2012 by birky - 30 comments

How Do You Spell Denial? J-E-T-S

May 2012 by SkinnyFish - 389 comments

Kule & some links

May 2012 by birky - 178 comments

Seen & Heard

Apr 2012 by JP Nikota - 824 comments

Comments

Display:

At the quarter I rated everyone as either A (outperforming), B (meeting expectations) or C (underperforming). This confused all of you who were used to seeing F’s on your report cards, so in light of your squawking, this time we will have the five ratings you are used to A,B,C,D and F.

Thank fuck you fixed your broken system. Now the grades will make sense…

Jonas Gustavsson
“he goes down early, a fact that is clearly known around the league – see how often people go high on him”

ie: the book on every butterfly goalie in the world.

Tomas Kaberle
“I gave him a C on the basis that as an offensive defenseman his stats should be better.”

Top 10 in defencemen scoring. That’s an A.

Brett Lebda
“Brett Lebda was the main reason everyone was clamoring for an F rating. Here you go guys.”

Congratulations on being able to understand why giving anyone the same grade as Brett “Blutarsky” Lebda was a flaw in your previous rankings.

Phil Kessel
“Usually a much faster skater when heading away from his own goal, which accounts in part for the godawful plus minus.”

You forgot to bemoan the fact that he doesn’t hit and doesn’t scrum in the corners. Kessel’s PDO is .956 which is pretty well below 1.000 which is the level that PDO moves towards. That’s a big reason for his poor +/-.

Kris Versteeg
“- 10 looks bad, but he was -8 at the quarter, so has impoved significantly "

Versteeg’s PDO is .965. Again, big reason why his +/- is so shit.

Colby Armstrong
“The comment at the quarter was that he needed to draw more penalties.”

He’s drawing 1.3 penalties per 60/EV and taking only 0.9 which is ok. The former is second best on the team among regular-ish players behind Kadri who draws 2.3 penalties.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Jan 8, 2011 1:32 PM EST reply actions  

Kaberle

Maybe top ten in points – no way he is top ten in scoring. I gave him a B up from a C, which is not clear from your excerpt. I accept that he could be rated even higher though.

by wwwty on Jan 8, 2011 1:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Are you differentiating between points and scoring?

No, not top 10 in goals.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Jan 8, 2011 3:06 PM EST up reply actions  

in fact

Not top ten in points, even after getting 4 points last night. If you want to be the big kahoona know it all you should at least check your stats.

by wwwty on Jan 8, 2011 3:41 PM EST up reply actions  

he’s tied for 9th with Jack Johnson and Brian Rafalski with 28 points for a defenseman

that qualifies Cochise

Rule #20

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 8, 2011 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

So if YOU want to come at the big kahoona then maybe you should check YOUR stats first.

/boom

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Jan 8, 2011 4:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Doesn’t everybody?

by ATARI on Jan 9, 2011 9:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Most people that know a bit about how hockey stats work, no.

I'm tired of the Leafs half-assing it like a chick with one butt cheek.

by happiergilmore on Jan 10, 2011 3:35 PM EST up reply actions  

PDO

It’s not PDO, it’s PDP – poor defensive play. As noted, Versteeg is much improved.

by wwwty on Jan 8, 2011 2:16 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

hahaha

It’s PDO.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Jan 8, 2011 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

i dont understand PDO, i googled it and i got an article from pensburg. It didn’t shed any light on it, anyone here able to explain it better or have a better article?

by pho king awesome on Jan 9, 2011 5:50 PM EST up reply actions  

quick and dirty explanation

it’s the sum of the team’s SV% and SH% while the player is on the ice (not their own SH%, but that of the entire team)… think of it as a +/- in percentage form.

Oddly the thing trends towards 100% (or 1000 as usually described for no particular reason) for most players from season to season. Players will deviate one year to the next, but if they were wildly above or below the number, you can basically assume it will come closer to 1000 the following year.

The same realistically holds true for any segment of games, but it’s less meaningful in the short term. Like most statistics, it’s more relevant when you have a larger sample size (or set of data) to work with.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 9, 2011 11:30 PM EST up reply actions  

oh okay that makes sense, so above 1.000 is abnormally good and you would expect it to go down the next year? But wouldn’t you expect ‘elite’ players to always be well above the norm

by pho king awesome on Jan 10, 2011 1:41 AM EST up reply actions  

huh?
Oddly the thing trends towards 100% (or 1000 as usually described for no particular reason) for most players from season to season

but

Like most statistics, it’s more relevant when you have a larger sample size (or set of data) to work with.

If it is going to trend toward the same norm over time, which I don’t get, it will be less, not more relevant over time, as everyone will have the same or a similar PDO.

by ATARI on Jan 10, 2011 5:46 AM EST up reply actions  

i dont understand PDO, i googled it and i got an article from pensburg. It didn’t shed any light on it, anyone here able to explain it better or have a better article?

by pho king awesome on Jan 9, 2011 5:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Kaberle

Mirtle also gives him a B (not even a B+, which is an option under his grading system). From his report card:

Tomas Kaberle: B

Quiet and dependable, as per usual, Kaberle still frustrates with soft play in his own end, but has formed a solid pairing with Schenn and been a big help on the Leafs power play. The oldest player on the team and the longest serving Leaf, he’s settled into a role out of the spotlight and as a No. 3 or 4 defenceman with solid quarterbacking skills.

by ATARI on Jan 12, 2011 8:03 PM EST up reply actions  

From your review of the first quarter:

Schenn has demonstrated that the sophomore slump was indeed a sophomore slump.

From this one:

Half a season is enough time for Bozak to prove that he is not a number one centre.

Schenn’s 2nd year troubles get written off because he bounces back and you have the advantages of hindsight and now you proclaim him our best defenceman – even though Beauchemin plays more – and harder – minutes.

Bozak’s 2nd year struggles see him written off even though nobody knows how he’ll develop over the course of his career.

Hmmmm…

©1979-2010 article1 All rights reserved. Terms and conditions available on request. May be freely reproduced by anyone except those answering to the description 'Thieving Mittenstringer'.

by article1 on Jan 8, 2011 1:56 PM EST reply actions  

ok

In your book Bozie has number one center potential. Hmmm

by wwwty on Jan 8, 2011 2:06 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

yes, that is exactly what he said

Rule #20

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 8, 2011 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m willing to be open to the idea that player development may be a more protracted process than simply saying that – after having played less than a full season in the NHL – Bozak has no chance of fulfilling the promise that he has shown. Especially since last year, much the same was being said about Luke Schenn, who’s now, according to you, amazing.

Jumping the gun much?

©1979-2010 article1 All rights reserved. Terms and conditions available on request. May be freely reproduced by anyone except those answering to the description 'Thieving Mittenstringer'.

by article1 on Jan 8, 2011 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

No

On your poor analysis every second year center has first line center potential. I am saying this one doesn’t. I wouldn’t build a plan around him fulfilling that role. If you would, more power to you.

by wwwty on Jan 8, 2011 2:24 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

No, because other players have different skill sets and different levels of potential. My point is that last year, Bozak showed enough promise to suggest that he has the ability to develop into a quality player and that, despite struggling this year, that he is a young player who is learning his craft and that potential hasn’t necessarily disappeared. To illustrate this, I compare him to Luke Schenn, whose struggles last year were of a similar nature to Bozak’s and who has bounced back to become a valuable member of the team this year.

©1979-2010 article1 All rights reserved. Terms and conditions available on request. May be freely reproduced by anyone except those answering to the description 'Thieving Mittenstringer'.

by article1 on Jan 8, 2011 2:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree quality player

Disagree first line center.

by wwwty on Jan 8, 2011 2:45 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

But it worked in NHL 11..

I'm tired of the Leafs half-assing it like a chick with one butt cheek.

by happiergilmore on Jan 8, 2011 4:36 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Agree

Bozak too early to discount Bozak’s potential as a first line centre.

by ATARI on Jan 8, 2011 5:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Your reading comprehension seems to be as poor as your initial grading rubric. What part of article1’s comments suggested your ludicrous suggestion that he believes that every second year centre has first line centre potential?

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Jan 8, 2011 3:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I said

Not number one center material.
He said to soon to tell.

by wwwty on Jan 8, 2011 3:35 PM EST up reply actions  

And then you said:

“On your poor analysis every second year center has first line center potential.”

Which is not supported by anything article1 wrote. Easy to understand…I thought.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Jan 8, 2011 4:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Did you ban wwwty

because of his poor reading comprehension?
I hope not, I’m terrible at reading (and writing and arithmetic)

by ATARI on Jan 8, 2011 5:32 PM EST up reply actions  

haha

No, I deleted more of his comments. Too many pointless personal attacks over a long period. He got a warning and threw a hissy fit. I don’t need the aggravation.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Jan 8, 2011 5:36 PM EST up reply actions  

fair enough

we don’t need rablerousers. Too bad though, as I do think this was an excellent post.

by ATARI on Jan 8, 2011 5:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Although

I seem to be getting some personal attacks here…

by ATARI on Jan 9, 2011 1:27 PM EST up reply actions  

me thinks he doth protest to much

Rule #20

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 9, 2011 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Do you know what that line is from?

by ATARI on Jan 9, 2011 2:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Hamlet, and the actual line is “the lady doth protest to much, methinks”

Rule #20

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 9, 2011 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know what a google is

Rule #20

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 9, 2011 2:32 PM EST up reply actions  

sorry

it’s a search engine

by ATARI on Jan 9, 2011 2:41 PM EST up reply actions  

what’s a search engine?

Rule #20

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 9, 2011 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry

go to google.com and type “search engine”

by ATARI on Jan 9, 2011 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

this is the greatest thread ever

Introducing the all new and improved Me! Now with more Me then before! Get the new Me while supplies last! Quantities are limited!
Offer not guaranteed to contain Me, New Me, or any quantities of Me. Offer limited to Me. No refund of Me will be issued.

by Casey_bat on Jan 9, 2011 2:56 PM EST up reply actions  

since its your first thread, it should by default be the best one

Rule #20

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 9, 2011 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

maybe I don’t know what a thread is

by ATARI on Jan 9, 2011 3:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Then how did you make it to this page? How did you sign up? How are you posting replies?

Introducing the all new and improved Me! Now with more Me then before! Get the new Me while supplies last! Quantities are limited!
Offer not guaranteed to contain Me, New Me, or any quantities of Me. Offer limited to Me. No refund of Me will be issued.

by Casey_bat on Jan 9, 2011 4:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I just didn’t think was “my” thread, but as I say, I might not understand the nomenclature

by ATARI on Jan 9, 2011 4:08 PM EST up reply actions  

wwwty helped him here.

I'm tired of the Leafs half-assing it like a chick with one butt cheek.

by happiergilmore on Jan 10, 2011 3:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Bozak

now has 15 goals and 43 points in his first 77 games in the NHL.

That may not be 1st line material, but it’s a lot better than around 75% of NHL forwards.

He deserves some slack because it’s his sophomore year, and yes there are large expectations, but to argue that he’s “proven” anything after playing less than 82 NHL games is horribly idiotic.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 9, 2011 11:33 PM EST up reply actions  

keep in mind

75% of NHL forwards don’t get as long a try out on the first line as Bozak has. On a better team he would have less ice time, less productive line mates and, it might follow, less production himself.

by ATARI on Jan 10, 2011 5:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Good Post

I agree with most of the ratings. Thanks for taking the time. This board needs posts like these.

by ATARI on Jan 8, 2011 4:54 PM EST reply actions  

Surely you can’t be serious.

PPP's resident pencil artist.
My Portfolio

by CanadianMaple09 on Jan 8, 2011 4:58 PM EST up reply actions  

If he isn’t serious, can we still call ATARI Shirley?

Bitter Leaf Fan: Skepticism, not cynicism.

by mf37 on Jan 8, 2011 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Also, I can see that this account was created from the same IP as wwwty about 5 minutes after he was banned. I don’t know if you’re the same person or not. If not, welcome. Thanks for joining.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Jan 8, 2011 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I do not know what an IP is

or what wwwty is
or why anyone would want to call me shirley
just saying this is a first rate post.

by ATARI on Jan 8, 2011 5:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I hadn't

realized that was an active link. hadn’t seen that in ages. very funny. makes me want to see the whole movie again

by ATARI on Jan 8, 2011 5:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I really liked this comment.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Jan 8, 2011 5:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks

You do a wonderful job with this site.

by ATARI on Jan 8, 2011 5:22 PM EST up reply actions  

i am dying

I <3 Dueling Watermelons

by Fergus30 on Jan 9, 2011 4:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I volunteer

to attempt resuscitation

by ATARI on Jan 9, 2011 4:59 PM EST up reply actions  

He’s a dude

Rule #20

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 9, 2011 5:01 PM EST up reply actions  

with a HUGE weiner

I <3 Dueling Watermelons

by Fergus30 on Jan 9, 2011 5:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Only Women

Refer to that portion of the male anatomy as a “weiner”.

by ATARI on Jan 9, 2011 5:03 PM EST up reply actions  

when you have one this big, you can call it whatever you want

I <3 Dueling Watermelons

by Fergus30 on Jan 9, 2011 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought

You were going to say you call it “Mr”.

Anyway, you’re cute – not just for a guy.

by ATARI on Jan 9, 2011 5:06 PM EST up reply actions  

And there it is

Ask for digits, dawg.

Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell

by bkblades on Jan 9, 2011 5:15 PM EST up reply actions  

?

Very hip lingo the meaning of which escapes me.

by ATARI on Jan 9, 2011 5:17 PM EST up reply actions  

please let this never end

I <3 Dueling Watermelons

by Fergus30 on Jan 9, 2011 5:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok

Here’s my contribution.

by ATARI on Jan 9, 2011 5:19 PM EST up reply actions  

"Digits"

I was not clear whether that was a reference to some sexual act involving the hand (and other parts) or a phone number.

by ATARI on Jan 9, 2011 5:21 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

It also includes the toes.

Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell

by bkblades on Jan 9, 2011 5:31 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

If

“digits” refers to a phone number, it is an interesting idea. We communicate so much more over the Internet. I wonder if it would be the same if the phone had been invented after. Wouldn’t we be like – hey this is awesome, we don’t have to write to eachother anymore – we can just pick up the phone and talk.

by ATARI on Jan 9, 2011 5:41 PM EST up reply actions  

That's deep, son

u a professor, bro?

Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell

by bkblades on Jan 9, 2011 6:05 PM EST up reply actions  

No

Just roll’n in my 5.0 with my rag top down so my hair can blow

by ATARI on Jan 9, 2011 6:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Good Hangover Remedy

Iron-Bru. Orange pop from Scotland. Really clears the head.

by ATARI on Jan 9, 2011 6:55 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s spelled Irn-Bru.

©1979-2010 article1 All rights reserved. Terms and conditions available on request. May be freely reproduced by anyone except those answering to the description 'Thieving Mittenstringer'.

by article1 on Jan 11, 2011 4:14 AM EST up reply actions  

The all caps gives it away

BS

by MapleLeafMole on Jan 10, 2011 7:35 PM EST up reply actions  

The only place I used all caps was in my handle.

by ATARI on Jan 10, 2011 8:26 PM EST up reply actions  

What’s a handle?

Certified Grabbo Lover

by SkinnyFish on Jan 10, 2011 10:21 PM EST up reply actions  

My name.

Where’d I use all caps?

by ATARI on Jan 10, 2011 11:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Caps? This is a Maple Leafs blog. If you want to talk about the Caps you should head over to Japer’s Rink.

Certified Grabbo Lover

by SkinnyFish on Jan 11, 2011 10:05 AM EST up reply actions  

you mean Jasper’s right?

Rule #20

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 11, 2011 11:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Nice?

That’s a city in France. If you want to talk about things dealing with the French, you should head over to the Habs Eye on the Prize.

Certified Grabbo Lover

by SkinnyFish on Jan 11, 2011 2:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Titles are a handy and helpful tool used on the SB Nation sites which allows members to minimize large posts and pictures, thus providing a cleaner and more easily readable thread. I suggest you incorporate their use in the circumstances I’ve stated above in your future time here.

Certified Grabbo Lover

by SkinnyFish on Jan 11, 2011 9:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Be mine.

I <3 Dueling Watermelons

by Fergus30 on Jan 11, 2011 10:11 PM EST up reply actions  

what’s an earlpitts

BS

by MapleLeafMole on Jan 11, 2011 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

earlpitts.us is an internet website that boasts itself as being the official home of Earl Pitts and Uhmerikun. You can also buy Earl Pitts themed CDs and other stuff. If you are interested in purchasing said items, you should head over there and peruse their wares.

Certified Grabbo Lover

by SkinnyFish on Jan 11, 2011 6:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Lol…he created an alternate account to pat himself on the back. He must be like 12.

by Theodles on Jan 8, 2011 7:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Pre-teen, giving us youngins’ a bad rep.

I'm tired of the Leafs half-assing it like a chick with one butt cheek.

by happiergilmore on Jan 8, 2011 7:25 PM EST up reply actions  

psht, pre-teens, they’re still babies

Hey, if you’re gonna call us birds you might as well call us chickens.
The universe moves depending on where Sidney Crosby is on the ice - IHeartPenguins
Recently-converted Certified Grabbo lover. GET WELL SOON, SID

by Leafer87 on Jan 9, 2011 12:57 AM EST up reply actions  

.

If you have the same IP Address as the goomba who wrote this post (and the wonderful BOZAK post as well) then you must be one person.

I'm tired of the Leafs half-assing it like a chick with one butt cheek.

by happiergilmore on Jan 8, 2011 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know internet technology well enough to dispute this comment. Maybe someone else here does.

by ATARI on Jan 8, 2011 8:02 PM EST up reply actions  

IP address are assigned to computers or routers, and the router directs traffic to the correct computer on the network. So either you are using the same computer, or are on the same network as wwwty.

Introducing the all new and improved Me! Now with more Me then before! Get the new Me while supplies last! Quantities are limited!
Offer not guaranteed to contain Me, New Me, or any quantities of Me. Offer limited to Me. No refund of Me will be issued.

by Casey_bat on Jan 8, 2011 8:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm tired of the Leafs half-assing it like a chick with one butt cheek.

by happiergilmore on Jan 8, 2011 8:27 PM EST up reply actions  

must be same network

by ATARI on Jan 8, 2011 8:35 PM EST up reply actions  

So you’re living in the same house/apartment building as the guy? Fishy…

I'm tired of the Leafs half-assing it like a chick with one butt cheek.

by happiergilmore on Jan 8, 2011 8:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Didn’t register from home. Thanks all for your interest and false accusations.

by ATARI on Jan 8, 2011 8:51 PM EST up reply actions  

So you registered at the same library/starbucks/other hotspot that wwwty made his last post at?

Introducing the all new and improved Me! Now with more Me then before! Get the new Me while supplies last! Quantities are limited!
Offer not guaranteed to contain Me, New Me, or any quantities of Me. Offer limited to Me. No refund of Me will be issued.

by Casey_bat on Jan 8, 2011 8:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Either you are willfully ignorant or a liar. Pardon us for connecting the dots

Rule #20

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 8, 2011 8:55 PM EST up reply actions  

.

I'm tired of the Leafs half-assing it like a chick with one butt cheek.

by happiergilmore on Jan 8, 2011 9:41 PM EST up reply actions  

He also has a thing for caps just like wwwhatever. ;)

by Theodles on Jan 8, 2011 11:23 PM EST up reply actions  

If you think that, you have no idea what network means. that or you’re feigning ignorance because you ARE wwwty, and somehow think nobody will notice.

Introducing the all new and improved Me! Now with more Me then before! Get the new Me while supplies last! Quantities are limited!
Offer not guaranteed to contain Me, New Me, or any quantities of Me. Offer limited to Me. No refund of Me will be issued.

by Casey_bat on Jan 8, 2011 8:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Try to use reply to keep the conversations threaded. Thanks.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Jan 8, 2011 5:03 PM EST up reply actions  

No problem. Helps make following convos easier.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Jan 8, 2011 5:20 PM EST up reply actions  

30 point forwards

Does anyone know how many other teams have 5 forwards with 30 points. The Penguins don’t, but I haven’t checked other teams. It does seem like the Leafs should be better with that much production.

by ATARI on Jan 8, 2011 5:42 PM EST reply actions  

Without looking

I’m going to venture… none.

And the problem is the lack of offense from the D and the bottom 6 forwards.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 9, 2011 11:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Dallas

Anaheim, Philly, San Jose and Colorado all have 4.

Toronto actually only has 3… but you seem to want to include Kessel and Kulemin in your arbitrary cutoff at 29.

They could be the first team to get there if Kulemin and Kessel both get a point tomorrow night in LA… but we’ll have to wait and see.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 9, 2011 11:48 PM EST up reply actions  

all teams will make the playoffs

by ATARI on Jan 10, 2011 12:23 AM EST up reply actions  

They did

The Leafs are now the only team in the league with five forwards with thirty points. All for naught.

by ATARI on Jan 11, 2011 12:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Although

As PPPP noted elsewhere, the Leafs do have a defenseman who is among the top ten in points. Most teams do not.

by ATARI on Jan 10, 2011 5:50 AM EST up reply actions  

response to
the problem is the lack of offense from the D and the bottom 6 forwards

by ATARI on Jan 10, 2011 5:51 AM EST up reply actions  

this post is the most fun i’ve had on the internet in a good long while!

Rule #20

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 9, 2011 12:59 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your best source for quality Toronto Maple Leafs news, rumours, analysis, stats and scores from the fan perspective.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

N907005365_1934770_7971_small
PPP Salary cap Challenge - Paper bag Leaf fan
Lifeasaleaffan_small
(Old) Marlies Game Photos
Newman_small
PPP Salary cap Challenge - samspade
Small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge - DaSim85
Globeatar_small
How Much Should You Spend On A Top 4 D?
Phaneufkessel_small
TOI-weighted NHL Team Ages
48839cd14228986f0ad0d2e405f1_small
Casting Call
Petering_small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge - Self Destructive Zones
Globeatar_small
The Fancystats Exchange, Part 1
Or-wallpaper-1680x1050__1__small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge-BCapp #2

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

StatCounter

wordpress visitor


Chief Blogging Officers

Calvin_small PPP

Aen1_small Chemmy

PPP's Girlfriends

Don_t_panic_small SkinnyFish

Picture_1_small JP Nikota

Fg_small birky

Christian-hanson-wrecks-brian-o_1__small Bower Power