Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Measuring Puck Possession - vs Anaheim - 27/11/11

2d6my5c_medium

Continuing my series measuring puck possession in the offensive zone, I've now compiled the numbers for Toronto's game against the Anaheim [Mighty] Ducks from last night. If you're not familiar with how this works, what I'm doing is measuring how long each team has control of the puck in the offensive zone over the course of the game. I mark the beginning of a possession as the time at which the attacking team first gains clear control of the puck in the offensive zone, and I mark the end of a possession as either the time when the puck leaves the zone, or when a defender gains clear control of the puck and is not under significant forechecking pressure. I call the resulting statistic Time On Attack (TOA). After looking for insights in the numbers themselves, I compare them to other statistics like Corsi to see how well they line up.

Star-divide

First off, here are the Time on Attack numbers broken down by period:


Toronto Anaheim
1st Period 02:30 03:39
2nd Period 05:58 04:18
3rd Period 01:56 03:29
Total 10:24 11:26

Despite the score, Anaheim was the better team in the first by this metric. Toronto's performance in the 2nd period was actually even better than the numbers make it appear - half of Anaheim's TOA that period came on three shifts from their big line. The numbers in the 3rd favour Anaheim by a wide margin, but Toronto was playing in a defensive shell at the time, something they've been doing more and more lately. I don't remember the Leafs doing this the previous two season's under Ron Wilson, but whether that was a coaching issue or an execution issue I couldn't say.

Now for a look at how the TOA ratio compares to Corsi and Fenwick:

TOA 0.476
Corsi 0.519
Fenwick 0.565

For the second game in a row, the TOA number differs a good deal from the other stats. Like with the game against Tampa, Toronto's TOA numbers look much worse than their Corsi and Fenwick numbers. As I said last time, it's possible we may be seeing some score effects here, which is something I want to look at in more detail once I've collected a larger sample of games.

PensionPlanPuppets.com is a fan community that allows members to post their own thoughts and opinions on the Toronto Maple Leafs and hockey in general. These views and thoughts may not be shared by the editor of PensionPlanPuppets.com.

Comment 11 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Pension Plan Puppets

Happy Anniversary, Brian!

Nov 2011 by JP Nikota - 1101 comments

Leafs Vs. Quacks

Nov 2011 by JP Nikota - 21 comments

Comments

Display:

TOA and Corsi are nearly as far away from one another as Corsi and Fenwick.

"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr

Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.

by Frag on Nov 28, 2011 9:05 PM EST reply actions  

TOA 0.476
Corsi 0.519
Fenwick 0.565

To clarify, these numbers mean the Leafs are losing the TOA battle, but winning the Corsi and Fenwick one? As in, Toronto directed more shots towards the Anaheim net, then Ana did towards the Leafs net.
But Ana spent more time in the Toronto zone?

"I will actually score as many times as Kulemin assists me."
-Mikhail Grabovski

by MapleLeafMole on Nov 29, 2011 9:47 AM EST reply actions  

You are correct.

The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull

by Draglikepull on Nov 29, 2011 10:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Interesting. Seems to be a bit of a trend so far for the Leafs (And this data). Also seems to jive with their style of attack – off the rush, underwhelming cycle game, does not sustain pressure in O-Zone well.

"I will actually score as many times as Kulemin assists me."
-Mikhail Grabovski

by MapleLeafMole on Nov 29, 2011 10:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Actually, the Leafs had great TOA numbers when they were winning, but now have worse numbers when losing. I’m wondering if score effects are playing a role here.

The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull

by Draglikepull on Nov 29, 2011 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

I asked what these numbers mean before but I can’t remember the response, is this Fenwick percentage and TOA percentage? That is, the leafs TOA divided by total TOA?

by theninjagreg on Nov 29, 2011 11:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah. It might be more clear if I expressed them as a percent (ie. the Leafs had 47.6% of attacking zone time), I just use the ratios because TimeOnIce.com, where I get the Corsi/Fenwick data from, uses that format.

The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull

by Draglikepull on Nov 29, 2011 11:35 AM EST up reply actions  

This is an interesting stat to note, but wouldn’t you agree that it is not necessarily a good indicator of which team is “better”? Look at it this way, a team can spend an eternity in the offensive zone with clear control of the puck, but the only thing they may be doing the whole time is cycling the puck around the perimeter and never actually getting a scoring chance on net. However, if a team is able to gain control of the puck and immediately go to the net and score, that team was much more effective with the puck, though they spent considerable less time in the offensive zone. What do you think?

by gettingcozywithsarkozy on Nov 29, 2011 9:56 AM EST reply actions  

I think that you may be correct. That’s part of what I’m trying to look at by tracking this information.

The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull

by Draglikepull on Nov 29, 2011 10:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Presumably this is where you start seeing style issues coming into play. There will be some teams who play a possession game predicated on endless cycling that build up to some good chances, and that keep you the heck out of their own end. Other teams playa more counter-attacking style where they soak up pressure in the neutral ice or their own zone, or just chasing back and forth with nobody able to set up much, but then strike quickly as part of that fluid back and forth play. Both strategies might be successful if executed well, and both presumably need different types of players to run well.

Glory glory Man United, AND the other MU, AAAAnd the Leafs. Experiencing cheering whiplash for decades..

by Wan Ihite on Nov 29, 2011 11:58 AM EST up reply actions  

I haven’t been contributing much (or anything) to the conversations here, but I just wanted to express my appreciation. I think this is a very worthwhile project, and I think we will probably learn a lot come season’s end.

by Lemonstyx on Nov 30, 2011 10:52 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your best source for quality Toronto Maple Leafs news, rumours, analysis, stats and scores from the fan perspective.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

N907005365_1934770_7971_small
PPP Salary cap Challenge - Paper bag Leaf fan
Lifeasaleaffan_small
(Old) Marlies Game Photos
Newman_small
PPP Salary cap Challenge - samspade
Small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge - DaSim85
Globeatar_small
How Much Should You Spend On A Top 4 D?
Phaneufkessel_small
TOI-weighted NHL Team Ages
48839cd14228986f0ad0d2e405f1_small
Casting Call
Petering_small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge - Self Destructive Zones
Globeatar_small
The Fancystats Exchange, Part 1
Or-wallpaper-1680x1050__1__small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge-BCapp #2

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

StatCounter

wordpress visitor


Chief Blogging Officers

Calvin_small PPP

Aen1_small Chemmy

PPP's Girlfriends

Don_t_panic_small SkinnyFish

Picture_1_small JP Nikota

Fg_small birky

Christian-hanson-wrecks-brian-o_1__small Bower Power