Leafs Shot Locations: Individual Breakdowns
In my first post, I took a look at the entire team's shot locations. In this post, I'm focusing solely on shots taken at 5-on-5 while the Leafs were on the road. To a large degree, the patterns are dictated by a players' position, and reflect very basic ideas about where players stand. Wingers will usually have a few more shots on their side of the rink, centers are often driving the net, and defensemen usually tee up a few feet off the blue line. Beyond these mundane observations however, are interesting little differences in how each player approaches their position.
One nice aspect of this study is that it can help confirm or dispel any ideas we have about the "style" a player plays. Similar to the way that advanced stats are often best when they match up with what you already know about the player, these shot locations help us visualize what we often already generally know to be true.
Luke Schenn and Dion Phaneuf, for example, have wild differences in their respective shot patterns that I would be very reluctant to write off entirely as a sample size difference. Schenn, for instance, sticks almost exclusively to his side of the ice and fires from the most remote corner of the offensive zone, while Phaneuf roves all over the place. Do we know that Phaneuf likes to try to jump-start our offence? Yes. Do we know that he also gets caught pinching somewhat more frequently than a guy like Schenn? Oh my, yes.
A good thing to keep in mind when looking at these graphs is this one, created by Gabriel Desjardins, which shows the chance of scoring from different areas of the ice:
There are a few players that you won't find in this bunch of graphs, simply because they didn't take enough shots for me to bother making a graph for. John Mitchell and Mike Zigomanis, for example, have been left out of this little chart party. I didn't use any particular cutoff, but I doubt any of you will be very curious about the players I've omitted.
Also, in response to Chemmy's request, I've added in NHL rink lines to help situate the shots, as it can get difficult if there isn't a large sample size to suggest where the net is.
Armstrong is often described as a hard-nosed kind of player, and though he's definitely got the nose to support such a claim, it's hard to say for sure what it is exactly about his style of play that puts him in such good areas to shoot. We're not looking at a lot of shots here, but most of them are coming in the prime scoring areas: right around the net and the middle of the slot. It's this kind of thing that makes him a serviceable plug for your second line in case of injury.
Shocking news story of the day: Keith Aulie is another stay-at-home defender. He doesn't leave his side of the ice, has never shot even as deep as the hash marks, and keeps his big wookie ass close to the line in case he needs to start retreating. Of course, you would too, if your partner was Dion Phaneuf most of the time.
Beauchemin, as you will probably have guessed, likes to slide across the blue line every now and then, and makes a very rare attempt to pinch to the hash marks. Note the two shots behind the blue line, which probable indicate he was dumping the puck on net for some fast-moving forwards to swoop down on the goalie looking for rebounds.
Again, we're dealing with a very small number of shots, but Darryl Boyce isn't showing us that he has any kind of preferred shooting range or area. He doesn't seem to have picked up rebounds with any consistency, otherwise you'd think we'd see more close-range chances. This suggests that he's not one of those players willing to "go to the hard areas".
Now here's a snake-bitten man. Bozak went to the right areas to score, but wound up with a 12.5% shooting percentage (I know, not terrible), which is a bit of a drop off from the previous season's 15.7%. If he continues to skate to these areas (and happens to play with his good buddy Phil from time to time), I suspect we'll see that shooting percentage bob up just a little. Shooting more often would help him most, though.
Tim Brent does not seem to have what folks in the hockey world call a "nose for the net". Firing shots from all over the map, very few of them are from high-chance areas. If you just thought "yeah, that's about what I'd expect from a replacement-level player", you're right.
The two main differences between Brown's shot locations and Brent's are the number he took, and a slight shift inward towards the net. Brown's a fourth-line guy, and shoots that way.
Not quite so far out as Brent, but also more evenly distributed on each side of the ice than Brown, Crabb took a lot of mediocre-quality shots this year. I think he also benefited from spending some time with Phil Kessel on his wing.
Here's what a #1 or #2 center's shot locations look like. His shots concentrated around the net and high slot, Grabovski knows where the net is, and brings the puck there before shooting. Sure, we're also dealing with a big jump in sample size, and a guy like Crabb may have looked better with some more ice time, but not this good.
I find it interesting that Gunnarsson pinches more than many of his fellow defenders, but that he never strays onto the other side of the ice. Schenn, his most common partner at even strength, certainly sticks to his own side as well, so it's possible they're having an influence on each other. Ditto for Komisarek.
When it began to look inevitable we were going to lose Kaberle, a lot of people hoped that Gunnarsson would be able to step up and fill at least some of the void left by the apple-cheeked Czech. While it never seemed entirely out of the question, their shot locations emphasize some differences in their respective games.
Kaberle is a much more mobile player along the blue line, but he doesn't pinch (or join the rush) as often as you'd think. I suspect that this is partially due to the fact that people conflate the idea of a 'puck-moving defenseman' with what you might call a 'rushing defenseman'. I guess I wouldn't characterize Gunnarsson that way either, but Gunnar seems to pinch a little more often.
I'm really reluctant to make any comments about Kadri's shot locations, since we don't have enough of them to say for sure, but, similar to Grabovski, we see most of his shots concentrated in the middle of the ice, in the high slot or close to the net. I'll take this as a very small, but good sign.
Whoa. Phil Kessel would shoot from outer-space if he was sent up there with a puck. He's basically a pitching machine on skates. I don't mean to say that this is entirely bad, because I'm positive that his linemates are the beneficiaries of a lot of rebounds, so it's still driving offense. We can only see a little concentration in the shots around the net (compared to Grabovski or Kulemin), though I do notice that he usually sticks to his own wing.
I have a theory that Phil Kessel's goal-scoring slumps may be quite closely linked to where he is taking his shots, but more on that in the next article.
Stay-at-home defender.
Now here's a winger who knows where the net is. I would speculate that this has a lot to do with the jump in his shooting percentages this year. I would not be at all surprised to see that yes, his shooting percentage (which was unusually high this past year) goes down, but that he also shoots from farther away.
Despite being billed as a guy with wheels, and someone that could spark some offense, Brett Lebda did not do anything of the sort, and doesn't appear to have even taken any shots trying to do so. This looks like a slightly smaller sample size of Carl Gunnarsson.

Top-six winger. Concentrations around the net and high slot.
Here's another top-six winger. MacArthur does have quite a number of shots that, plotted, make roughly a 45-degree angle to the net off his wing, which I would guess means he shoots on the rush quite a bit.
Phaneuf is some kind of roving monster. The guy is just all over the map. You'd hardly know by looking at this that he plays the right side with any kind of regularity, but it's abundantly clear that he loves to shoot, and he doesn't mind walking in across the top of the circles to start firing.
Luke Schenn appears to be nearly afraid of the net, but in his case, it's more about being afraid of who's at the other net. It's a safe playing style to adopt when you're a stay-at-home defenseman, and your goaltenders have been Vesa Toskala, Jean-Sebastien Giguere, and Jonas Gustavsson for the bulk of your tenure as an NHL player.
You let your ol' buddy Mikhail Grabovski take care of the shooting there, Luke.
Replacement-level forward fires from everywhere. Scores few goals.
Versteeg is a bit of a funny animal, in that he had a pretty good (if limited) run on the PP cranking shots from set locations, but doesn't seem to have pushed his way to the net often enough at regular strength. There is a slight concentration in front of the net, but there are a lot of long bombs here that off-set those good chances.
76 comments
|
16 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What’s sad about the Beauchemin graph is I know exactly what shot the one at the edge of the blue paint is without having to do any sort of research.
Fucking Tim Thomas.
Resident Capologist
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
Ha ha yeah. Same with Versteeg’s goal to send it to OT against Boston.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jun 29, 2011 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions
And Schenn’s end-to-ender, now that I look at that one.
Resident Capologist
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
And his snipe show against the Predators.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jun 29, 2011 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions
Lebda’s goal is the shot from the top hashmark.
No. Not even in the face of Armageddon. Never compromise.
by article1 on Jun 29, 2011 12:04 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Wasn’t that on the other side of the net?
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Yes. I’m pretty sure that shot was the one at -10, -75, but it should read +10. Also, MacArthur played RW, not left – yet the higher concentration is on the left side of the net.
JP, you may have your Y axis flipped.
This is where a witty signature might go.
This is where a witty signature might go on drugs.
by Bower Power on Jun 29, 2011 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions
The Tim Thomas save happened during a Leafs home game. These are road shots for the Leafs only. Y axis should be good.
Nifty Mittens
by MapleLeafMole on Jun 29, 2011 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Aaaahhhh. That explains it. Thanks.
Wow, I’d love to see Phil’s home and road shots added together…must just be an absolute blanket of the zone.
This is where a witty signature might go.
This is where a witty signature might go on drugs.
by Bower Power on Jun 29, 2011 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions
MapleLeafMole has it right. Had to flip everything into one end. Even “away” games had their second period flipped.
Oh, you better believe that's a paddling.
PS solid work. Very interesting, especially in light of Gabe’s work chance of scoring from different areasof the ice
Nifty Mittens
by MapleLeafMole on Jun 29, 2011 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Phil
needs to learn to hold on to the puck until he’s inside the hash marks when he’s on the rush.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 8:15 PM EDT up reply actions
Phil’s home and road shots added together would look like a giant blue blotch in the offensive zone.
Nifty Mittens
by MapleLeafMole on Jun 29, 2011 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions
That was a home game though wasn’t it, the Thomas save?
I think htese are road shots only.
I had the same thought, and had to re-think it.
Nifty Mittens
by MapleLeafMole on Jun 29, 2011 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions
Ah yes, all the specific goals we mentioned here are from home games. (except Lebdas)
T
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jun 29, 2011 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Whoah this is excellent
I may fire you an email to see how you efficiently got the shot data because I’ve been thinking of doing this for the Canucks.
"Playin hurt, baby that don't faze me. I don't got time for pain. The only pain I've got time for is the pain I put on fools who don't know what time it is!"
I enjoy Kessel’s chart. SHOTS SHOTS SHOTS SHOTS SHOTS SHOTS!!!
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jun 29, 2011 11:15 AM EDT reply actions
he does need to get a little more hard-nosed though, and drive to the net. this isn’t a cliche, even though I’m sure Healy probably said it about 30 times this year. sometimes he can snipe from the boards, but he needs to mix it up and drive a bit harder sometimes.
Move along. Nothing to see here...
by Van Ryn's Neurologist on Jun 29, 2011 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Vast majority of his shots are from below the tops of the circles. Seems like a pretty good chart to me. On the right side it would be good to see more from inside the dots but I’d guess a lot of those are ones he goes wide and shoots.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
I'd say like
30-35 of those shots by Kessel are practically useless bombs from outside 40 feet. Multiply that by two and you get 60-70 shots, out of his 325. That’s between 18 and 21% of his shots… or roughly 1 in every 5 shots.
If he fired slightly less often, he’d be shooting a higher percentage, and wasting fewer opportunities. I don’t think the majority of his shots are bad… 80% being decent is pretty solid actually… but I’d still like to see it improve.
By way of comparison, Grabovski’s number is closer to 15 or 16, so roughly 30 in TOTAL on the year, which translates to roughly 12-13% of his 239 shots. He’s making decent shots closer to 9 out of 10 times, and his shooting percentage is much higher as a result.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions
This post is awesome………..great going, more please.
Toronto Maple Leafs: All about the Lemon Grabs
Twitter
Kulemin’s shot chart is an awesome cone, not too many bad shots there
Toronto Maple Leafs: All about the Lemon Grabs
Twitter
this should provide support
to those of us that don’t see a huge reason to doubt he can continue to do what he’s doing… if he keeps on shooting from the good parts of the ice, there’s no reason to think his numbers won’t maintain… particularly if he shoots MORE.
It also provides ammo to think that Bozak’s numbers should improve drastically based on his chart.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 8:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Next year should be even better
for the Marlies
by GettinGiggy on Jun 29, 2011 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions
Whoah
Kadri took two shots from BEHIND the net? That’s thinking outside the box.
Don't follow me on twitter: @theninjagreg
That was a great article!
Would it be also possible to see the shots that turned to goals? To better illustrate good shooting areas?
I like this suggestion… also maybe faceoff circles? I don’t know if that’s possible on the template your using but it sure would make the data a little easier to contextualize.
Let the Wookie win.
Twitter is a thing!
there are
faceoff dots in the pictures… they’re just faint.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions
The shooting chart for Bozak seems to mesh with what I’ve noted from watching the games – that Bozak gets lots of good scoring chances but sometimes has trouble finishing. Noticing how similar his chart is to Kulemin’s makes me hopeful that Bozak is more talented than he looked last year and that he’ll be on an upward swing in the coming season.
I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
his bigger problem last year were assists. his shooting % fell a little, but even if he finished better he’d probably only have potted one or two extra goals.
his assists were down about 50% off of the previous season though. i have no explanation for this. …
Move along. Nothing to see here...
by Van Ryn's Neurologist on Jun 29, 2011 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions
playing
less with Kulemin and more with Crabb ? Kessel can’t score all the goals on the line.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions
interesting comment for a couple of reasons
Noticing how similar his chart is to Kulemin’s makes me hopeful that Bozak is more talented than he looked last year and that he’ll be on an upward swing in the coming season.
The only discernible TALENT most NHL players have control over offensively is getting shots from good areas. The only players in the NHL currently that have shown any indication that they can shoot above their expected shooting percentage consistently are Tanguay and Kovalchuk… beyond that shooting percentage just varies around what the expected number is.
It’s all randomness beyond what the avg. player can control. The fact that Bozak gets to the right areas virtually guarantees that his shooting numbers improve eventually, as most of the goal results come from some level of random luck. All he can do is keep shooting and his puck luck should change.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions
What about Kessel then? If he’s only scoring at an average level from the places he’s shooting from then his all-over-the-place shooting should translate to a pretty big liability.
that's actually
why his shooting percentage is so low… if he shot from better locations it would probably increase.
And I do think his all over the place shooting is a pretty big liability.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions
even if you look at the likes of Alex Ovechkin
and his career 11.9% shooting percentage, most of his scoring has come from his ridiculously high volume of shots. He’s fired 2526 shots in only 6 years, or an average of 421 per season… which is frankly nuts.
That’s a large part of why he has scored 50 goals 4 times already, and over 45 in 5 out of his 6 years.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 9:23 PM EDT up reply actions
he doesn't
actually shoot from better locations particularly, he just shoots far more often.
That’s actually true of MOST 30+ goal scorers. Of the 53 occasions where a player scored 30 or more goals in the past two years, 48 of them fired over 200 shots, and 32 of them fired over 250 shots.
It’s almost impossible in the NHL to score 30 goals without shooting over 220-250.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions
no player has scored over 40 goals in the last two years
without shooting at least 260 shots.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions
oh and getting a S%
over 14%. Lots of opportunity, lots of luck, and lots of doing it from the right places.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions
so to ask the obvious stupid question then, couldn’t you turn any random scrub into a 30 goal scorer by just telling them to take more shots?
Or is it a skill to get shots off at all in the league?
it's a skill
to get shots on net and get them from a decent enough location that the coach would ask you to do it repeatedly.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions
the guys doing the shooting
are typically better at getting off good shots than guys that don’t… remember JFM? Think about how he’d skate himself OUT of shooting positions.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions
some of it
just comes down to decision making.
A great example of a player who is NOT good at decision making from a shooting perspective? Dion Phaneuf.
He averages over 3 shots per game in his career which is insanely high for a guy with a career 6% shooting percentage.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions
The only other D men
with 6 or more seasons with 160 or more shots since 1999-00 are Lidstrom (6.8%), Blake (6.2%), Chara (6.3%), Gonchar (8.3%), Pronger (6% – including last year’s 3.6%), Niedermayer (7.1%), Schneider (7.2%).
So basically out of that entire group, Phaneuf is the least likely to score a goal – aside from the more recent and ancient Pronger.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions
6% isn’t unworldly bad compared to 6, 6.2, 6.3, 6.8, 7.1, and 7.2. Sure it’s at the lower end, but that means that over an entire season he only scores about one less goal.
Except
those other guys generally fire under 200 shots… he typically fires around 250.
He shoots way too much.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions
and considering
he only scores on roughly 1 out of every 20 shots he takes… firing an extra 80 shots just to score 3 or 4 more goals is kinda dumb… considering forwards would be far more likely to score than he would.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions
the other side of this
is if the Leafs aren’t doing a good job of picking up Phaneuf’s rebounds down low, it’s a bad play… we need PF help to make this work from a play perspective.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Now this seems like a more compelling anaylsis. If he shoots at about the same percentage as other elite defencemen (lower, but just a smidge), that isn’t bad. But if we aren’t prepared to make best use of the consequences of those shots, then it’s not so great.
right
but that’s part of what makes me say what I did about decision making… on ice awareness has to include the fact that if you know the guys on the ice aren’t going to make solid use of the potential rebounds, you maybe shouldn’t be making that same play?
I dunno… I just think the Leafs weren’t effective with point shots for a reason, and a lot of their goals came off the rush and from the low slot.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions
i.e.
limited net presence makes the point shot a less then stellar weapon.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jun 29, 2011 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions
whoa
awesome stuff, even prettier graphics. How did you get the data for this? I’d love to see if I could do one for the Hawks, to echo Semi_Colon’s sentiment above.
Tweets @ChiBlackhawks, blogs at Blackhawks Down Low, and contributes to Intent to Blow.
President of the Dave Bolland Apologist Society. (I called dibs, hah!)
Rather than reply to each comment, I'm just gonna say thanks.
I appreciate the kind words.
Oh, you better believe that's a paddling.
You can shift through hundreds of shots for each player over 40 games but you can’t give us individual thank yous? You’ve changed.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jun 29, 2011 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Great work on this post, JP!
AULIE AULIE OXEN FREE!!!1
Follow me I'm Boring!
Devour my Revolution!
by blindfolded tank driver on Jun 29, 2011 11:27 PM EDT reply actions

by 




















































