I Thought 'Anchoring' Was For Boats
As it turns out, the term 'Anchoring' is used to describe a certain logical flaw (or bias) in the way we interpret data. Danny Gray over at The Leafs Nation has a good example:
There is a moment during the Ronco Showtime Rotisserie Informercial that you begin to worry about Ron Popeil. He tells us that "this machine should sell for over $400". But, "you’re not going to spend $400 for it, not $375 or $350. Not $325 or even $300". By the time he gets down to $200 you assume that he’s selling these at a substantial loss, what kind of trouble has Ron gotten himself into? He’s saying you can buy a $400 device that can simultaneously roast 4 chickens for only "4 easy monthly payments of $39.95"; you’d be stupid not too! You just fell victim to the cognitive bias known as Anchoring.
So what does this mean for us as Leafs fans? Read on to find out. (The above photo is a pretty good hint.)
Leafs Links:
Visual History of Tim Connolly's Injuries
There are a lot of arrows in this image. From Jon S., at Puckin' Eh.
Kris Draper: What a fine career
Michael Langlois over at VLM wishes that Draper had been a Leaf at some point.
NHL Defenseman
Is there a lesson to be learned from the career of Jason Smith and others like him? Lowetide thinks there are a couple. A quasi-Leafs-related link.
Other Hockey Links:
Bettman's salary tops $7.5-million
NHL commissioner's pay has more than doubled since the lockout, according to a SportsBusiness Journal report. From James Mirtle at the Globe.
Looking ahead to 2011-12: Ranking the NHL’s top 25 centers
Nothing starts a pissing contest like a numbered ranking system, based largely on the opinion of one person. From Sam McCraig at PD.
Rangers re-sign Steve Eminger
2-way deal, no mention of cap hit. From the CP at the Globe. (Cap Geek has him penciled in for 800k while he's with the Rangers.)
Report: Kris Draper to announce retirement
It won't be made official until a press conference scheduled for later on today, but if the AP is reporting it at the Globe, it's as good as done.
322 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
what happened to admin bot?
Certified Grabbo Lover
Jim Hughson embodies everything I hate about humans
by Future_considerations on Jul 26, 2011 7:16 AM EDT reply actions
He’s still here just watch.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
ADMIN BOT
10 PRINT “I AM HERE”
20 GOTO 10
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
I AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HEREI AM HERE
ERROR TERMINATING INFINITE LOOP [end]
ADMIN BOT 3000 HOPES YOU HAVE A DAY
by ADMIN BOT 3000 on Jul 26, 2011 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
Where is "here"?
Load “$”,8
List
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions
ERROR: YOU DO NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT PRIVILEGES [end]
ADMIN BOT 3000 HOPES YOU HAVE A DAY
by ADMIN BOT 3000 on Jul 26, 2011 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Pfft.
Commodores are weak. Atari XL computers are where it’s at.
Now, "wait 'till next year" looks like "Watch out for next year!" GO LEAFS GO!
I for one welcome our old fleshy and vulnerable overloads back.
Supporter of the CC / Fan of Ananas / Afraid of no one! (especially PPP)
BEHOLD [end]
NOW THERE IS ONE OVERLORD [end]
ADMIN BOT 3000. [end]
ADMIN BOT 3000 HOPES YOU HAVE A DAY
by ADMIN BOT 3000 on Jul 26, 2011 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions
Wait a minute. Bad Admin Bot! Bad!
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
better be nice to Admin Bot 3000.
here, a present for you AB3K

Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
by birky on Jul 26, 2011 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
ADMIN BOT ACCEPTS THIS DIGITAL PICTURE GIFT [end]
ENJOY YOUR GOLD STAR. [end]
ADMIN BOT 3000 HOPES YOU HAVE A DAY
by ADMIN BOT 3000 on Jul 26, 2011 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions
And it doesn’t even mention the black eye that Derek Roy gave him.
/Barnaby’d
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 7:58 AM EDT up reply actions
re: Bettman's salary
Here’s a study I did last year looking at the salaries of the commissioners of the Big Four.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
re: Top 25 centers
While I agree with it for the most part, Vinny at 10? Mike Richards at 12 ahead of Zetterberg? Staal, Bolland, and Backes on the list at all ahead of Stastny, Tavares, and possibly Grabbo?
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
Yeah, Bolland sticks out like a sore thumb Rob Zamuner
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 8:24 AM EDT up reply actions
Until he single handedly pushed the Van-Chi series to a Game 7, did you even know he played center or was more than a 3rd liner? Because I’m sure didn’t. Seems like the author of that piece has a small case of anchoring on his hands.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
After the fiasco that was the organization prospect ratings, I’ve decided to ignore rankings that provide no numerical basis.
by stevesmith19 on Jul 26, 2011 8:30 AM EDT up reply actions
What is meant by “projected performances” I will assume Sam is not basing this soley on counting stats because then the list seems way off. But what advanced stats would have Bolland ahead of Sharp? Plekanec ahead of Tavares, Grabo not even making an honarable mention?
I would love to know what metrics were used to help generate this list.
Bam Bam.- digga digga damm
If you want to talk advanced stats, Brad Richards shouldn’t even be on this list, Zetterberg should be way higher, Stamkos and Duchene should be much lower, etc.
This is exactly like the prospect ranking article. I’m assigning it zero informative value.
by stevesmith19 on Jul 26, 2011 8:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Bolland is tough to judge by advanced numbers since you basically have to look at several numbers and estimate a value for the player. Bolland’s usage is pretty extreme.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Jul 26, 2011 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions
I just don’t understand his inclusion when he was the 3rd line center on Chicago behind Toews and Sharp.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
I don’t, either. That list is…pretty not-right.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Jul 26, 2011 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions
I’m not totally sold on Zetterberg being “underrated.” Maybe that’s just because I don’t underrate him, but still seems odd.
by Self Destructive Zones on Jul 26, 2011 8:31 AM EDT up reply actions
Been right about a PPG player for the last 6 seasons, all while playing a mean shutdown game. He’s everything people with Mike Richards could be and then some.
/swoon
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
by SkinnyFish on Jul 26, 2011 8:40 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Except Canadian
Popped a Colboner - Certified Joe Colborne Fanboy
I'm telling you I was the King of Spain (now I eat humble pie)
Now the Leafs call me up to drive the Zamboni
Twitter me this.
by happiergilmore on Jul 26, 2011 8:47 AM EDT up reply actions
Zetterberg is boss. But underrated he is not.
Crazy would be NOT overanalyzing everything.
Lebda-free since July 3.
by nhlcheapshot on Jul 26, 2011 9:16 AM EDT up reply actions
I think he is. He can do all what SkinnyFish said, but with very “meh” linemates as well.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Jul 26, 2011 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions
Some one stops becoming Underrated
when everyone already knows how awesome he is.
There are underrated players, I don’t think Zetterberg is one. I think he’s “Rated”.
Crazy would be NOT overanalyzing everything.
Lebda-free since July 3.
by nhlcheapshot on Jul 26, 2011 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s the thing. Gretzky said Z is right up there with Sid and AO a couple of years ago. In my mind he’s still a top five center. That’s most certainly not what he gets from the MSM. Babcock trusts Z defensively more than his four time Selke finalist alternative.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Jul 26, 2011 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions
I thought he was talking about Datsyuk
Y'all Heard About Me, You Just Didn't Know It was Me
by JaredFromLondon on Jul 26, 2011 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Something along the lines of both are great, but with a one goal lead final minute I’m throwing Z out there. Then again, he’d likely put out both of them.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Jul 26, 2011 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions
They both put up great numbers in big minutes against tough competition. I’d give a slight edge to Datsyuk, but really they’re both exceptionally gifted 2-way players.
I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jul 26, 2011 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Don’t worry, we’ll be drafting superstars in the 6th and 7th rounds soon too.
Crazy would be NOT overanalyzing everything.
Lebda-free since July 3.
by nhlcheapshot on Jul 26, 2011 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Josh Nicholls, son
Y'all Heard About Me, You Just Didn't Know It was Me
by JaredFromLondon on Jul 26, 2011 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions
If he actually becomes a star and not just some guy who maybe cracks the NHL long enough to convince us he could have skill but then later bombs and gets traded to NYR for a 7th round pick I’ll be ecstatic.
Crazy would be NOT overanalyzing everything.
Lebda-free since July 3.
by nhlcheapshot on Jul 26, 2011 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Woah, where’d you come up with that scenario!…
by Self Destructive Zones on Jul 26, 2011 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Nicholls has already beaten all of mitchells jr totals, so who knows
Y'all Heard About Me, You Just Didn't Know It was Me
by JaredFromLondon on Jul 26, 2011 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions
I read this yesterday…
I just can’t get behind Bolland. Because he had a couple games against the canucks? That’s really all they can say about him and I wasn’t that impressed.. the canucks are a headcase. Besides, if you can only play against one team then you’re useless.
Staal in the 20-25 range I can get behind. Backes, maybe. No Stasty? Tavares was mega low and he’s a lot better than that. I’m not sure about the list at all, though I couldn’t think of anyone that was missing other than Stastny, though if you’re including Backes, you’re right, gotta be starting Grabbo
Bolland was legitimately brilliant against Vancouver in the 2010 playoffs. Held the Sedins to fewer scoring chances for per minute than the Oilers’ fourth liners.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Jul 26, 2011 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions
So, kinda like Hamrlik, then? Maybe Bowman should dangle him in front of Gillis.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions
Heh, I think that ship has sailed. Gillis has his own version in Malhotra.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Jul 26, 2011 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions
Well, would you use your average 7th overall pick on Manny Malhotra?
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Jul 26, 2011 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Malholtra seems to have done alright compared to other 7th overall picks. Certainly not a spectacular career, but better than some (Lars Jonsson, I’m looking at you). I wasn’t making any judgment, just noticing a link to another topic of conversation.
That being said, I hope Kadri ends up better than Malholtra. I doubt he’ll ever be as good defensively (although you never know), but I certainly hope he consistently does better than Malhotra’s career high of 35.
Kadri’s first 30 NHL games saw him score 13 points. That put him on pace for 35.5pts over 82.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Nope. 19 year olds playing limited minutes are already at their peak.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Trivia
has anyone on an ELC ever been bought out? / is this allowed?
by Ben Schnell on Jul 26, 2011 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Well at capgeek’s buyout calculator, you cannot select any players on an ELC so….
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
This is very telling.
You can select Stamkos, but Tavares is not available. Maybe it’s not illegal, but they chose not to include Group I players because there would be no mathematical advantage over demoting the player to the AHL.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Stamkos just signed a new contract so you’d be buying out that one. Not an ELC like Tavares.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
Yeah, so the fact that CapGeek doesn’t provide for Tavares to be bought out is very telling.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions
SkinnyFish also found the rule that states you can’t buyout an ELC at this point in time. If you are going to do it, it has to happen in the couple of weeks before free agency.
Yeah, that rule seems to apply to all SPCs, but I’ve always been confounded as to the meaning of “regular period”.
Does it include Campoli’s window?
It is my interpretation that there are two regular periods for some teams, but then I can’t recall anyone being bought out mid-season. Maybe the Habs didn’t want to burn one of their limited “outside of regular period” buy-outs on Laraque, or maybe buying him out in January is, in fact, illegal.
That CBA is pretty vague on a lot of issues, but I’ve always been frustrated by the term “regular period”.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions
BTW, is Campoli’s window now closed?
His original arb date was set for later this month, but they agreed to move it up since they were going to MacArthur him anyway.
My interpretation is that Chicago can no longer buy anyone out.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Also, why didn’t Burke qualify Brunnstrom or Irwin? Were they not arb-eligible?
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Also, why didn’t Burke qualify Brunnstrom or Irwin?
Because they suck at hockey.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
by SkinnyFish on Jul 26, 2011 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, but imagine a scenario where Brad Richards signs with the Leafs.
Giving himself the option to buy-out Komisarek or someone would have been worth the risk that Irwin accepts his QO.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Buyouts are never the answer. They’re like covering a shitty shingling job with shit brown paint.
by Tickle Me Aulie on Jul 26, 2011 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Chicago didn’t got to arbitration, therefore no buyout window for them.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
I think they technically did, even though neither party flew to Toronto. The arbitrator just rubber-stamped a $2.5MM award for some reason.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions
A “regular period” is about 7 days every 28 days, any longer and you should consult a doctor.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
There is a rule stating that:
No Club shall exercise an Ordinary Course Buy-out outside the regular period for any Player earning less than $1 million.
So perhaps that’s why because the max ELC contract amount, salary only, is only $900k?
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
That rule says you can’t do it “outside the regular period”. The regular period, I believe, refers to a 2-week window just before free agency when buyouts are supposed to take place. This rule doesn’t seem to preclude buyouts of ELCs in that time.
Buying out a player you could cheaply stuff in the minors makes no sense. I can’t look up the details now, but my guess is that it would actually cost less money to place a player on an ELC in the minors than it would to buy them out, and you’d save yourself the cap hit of a buyout too.
I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jul 26, 2011 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, ELCs are two way contacts.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Jul 26, 2011 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions
And waiver exempt, so only reason for a buyout would be if you’re up at the fifty contract limit.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Jul 26, 2011 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions
shit that means he’ll be on the decline next year
/sophmoreslump
by Ben Schnell on Jul 26, 2011 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Nice piece on anchoring bias. Might need to look up that study and the book.
AULIE AULIE OXEN FREE!!!1
Follow me I'm Boring!
Devour my Revolution!
by blindfolded tank driver on Jul 26, 2011 8:38 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Thanks fellas. You should definitely check out the book. Lots of good stories and he tries to give practical advice as well.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions
I learned about it heavily in 1st year psyche but it’s one of those things that even if you’re aware of it, it still seems to influence a lot of decisions. I’m shocked at how often I find myself (and others) getting caught by it.
Crazy would be NOT overanalyzing everything.
Lebda-free since July 3.
by nhlcheapshot on Jul 26, 2011 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, the Ronco Rotisserie is a good example. Also when places display two prices a say an item is “on sale”. They don’t lower the price just put an arbitrary one higher. Winners does that a lot. “Compare at” and you think “oh man I’m saving $80!” Meanwhile you have no idea how much it’s actually worth.
Another lesson is that agents should basically start as high as possible when asking for compensation.
Or ask the arbiter to think of the last two digits of his social security number.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions
I think—I’m not sure, but I think—that the practice you’ve attributed to Winners is illegal.
"[Phil Kessel]'s as streaky as a flipped coin" - Shift
by The '67 Sound on Jul 26, 2011 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions
I know Suzy Sheir got nailed for having fake “Sales” a few years back. They’d just stick a sale tag on an item and add a fake regular price.
Supporter of the CC / Fan of Ananas / Afraid of no one! (especially PPP)
Yeah, exactly. It happens but it’s not a standard practice or anything.
I think what’s more common is that there’s a MSRP that is almost never actually charged by the retailer. I see that a lot with high end sporting goods (e.g. skis).
"[Phil Kessel]'s as streaky as a flipped coin" - Shift
by The '67 Sound on Jul 26, 2011 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions
re: Sporting Goods
I worked in the sports section at Canadian Tire for 3 years in high school. We were able to look up the cost price for all of the items on the computer. There was one bike, that looked all fancy with an “aluminum frame” (only the frame was aluminum, the thing weighed a ton), and big shocks etc. This bike was on “sale” for $199.99 (down from 299.99) almost every week. The thing cost the store $78. We sold a TON of them.
Flugenweb, space code, twit zone, ass mode, check ze tweets.
One of my friends works in a sports store, and the marks ups on smaller things such as tennis balls is only about 15%, but things like basketballs, tennis racquets and cricket bats have almost a 70% markup, it’s ridiculous
"I prematurely shot my wad on what was supposed to be a dry run, if you will, so now I'm afraid i have something of a mess on my hands."
"There's just so many poorly chosen words in that sentence."
Yeah, the only things that are a bigger rip off than sports equipment are HDMI cables.
Flugenweb, space code, twit zone, ass mode, check ze tweets.
So true. Bought mine for $6 on Amazon.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions
Don’t confuse cost with MSRP. If you can make money selling those bikes for less than $199.99 I suggest you do so.
I don’t mean to be a dick, I’m just making a point that you can’t see a big margin and immediately assume “rip-off”. Overhead’s a bitch yo.
"[Phil Kessel]'s as streaky as a flipped coin" - Shift
by The '67 Sound on Jul 26, 2011 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions
Definitely. Sony sells the PS3 at a loss.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions
Really? That’s interesting. I’m assuming they make their money on the games? I guess you can’t buy games without the system . . .
Leaf fan in Edmonton.
Hardware like controllers, move etc, plus additional online content. They are actually looking to move away from physical games as they lose a tonne of money to the used game market. Game Stop makes a killing.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions
Console manufacturers make money off physical game sales. I don’t know the exact figure, but I’ve heard it’s about $15 from each new game sale goes to the console manufacturer as a licensing fee.
I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jul 26, 2011 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Thats why Segha got out of consoles.
churning out consoles were costing them too much and there was now an extra competitors (SOny, Microsoft) that had money coming in from more profitable ventures so they decided to just stick with games.
Supporter of the CC / Fan of Ananas / Afraid of no one! (especially PPP)
Sony now makes money on the PS3
There are two components to the cost of a technical thingy like a game consol – R&D and manufacturing (this is a bit of a simplification) been accounting for a portion of the millions in R&D on each PS3 sale – meaning the were selling at a loss. Now that cost has been accounted for, the only cost is the cost of manufacturing. The PS3 would now be a profit-maker.
Ah, I was under the impression they were still selling them at a loss. My mistake.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions
they were for a while when blu-rays were like 1000 bucks or whatever
Y'all Heard About Me, You Just Didn't Know It was Me
by JaredFromLondon on Jul 26, 2011 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions
This isn’t quite true. At first even the actual physical hardware cost more than the console sold for. But they’ve been able to drastically reduce the cost of parts such that they make a small profit on each console now.
I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jul 26, 2011 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions
You’re right…cost was over $710 US in the beginning just to manufacture. Dropped to $210 US by 2009.
http://www.geek.com/articles/games/sony-says-ps3-manufacturing-costs-now-70-lower-20090731/
That was definitely the case when it first came out. Not sure if it’s true anymore considering how long they’ve been making them for. They must’ve found cost-efficiencies by now.
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jul 26, 2011 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s true, but I was more focusing on how it was listed as being $100 off, when really the bike was a piece of junk. Personally I’d always try and steer people towards one of the few good models of bike that we carried.
Flugenweb, space code, twit zone, ass mode, check ze tweets.
Yeah, the buyer definitely needs to beware.
"[Phil Kessel]'s as streaky as a flipped coin" - Shift
by The '67 Sound on Jul 26, 2011 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions
Oh yeah, generally speaking, the responsibility lies with the consumer.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions
That’s actually a job where I felt I learned a lot. So many people are distracted by the big “sale” and the shiny bike that they don’t look at how crappy everything else about it really is. I leave that job on my resume even though it’s from high school because I love getting asked about it.
Flugenweb, space code, twit zone, ass mode, check ze tweets.
by Shield on Jul 26, 2011 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Dude, you’re from Brantford if I’m not mistaken right?
If you look up "Loyalty" in the dictionary you'll see a picture of a Leafs fan wearing a Todd Gill jeresy looking like he just got punched in the stomach
No, Burlington; close though (if only in a geographical and alphabetical sense).
Flugenweb, space code, twit zone, ass mode, check ze tweets.
Ha, me too. Were you at the Canadian Tire by Burlington Mall?
"[Phil Kessel]'s as streaky as a flipped coin" - Shift
by The '67 Sound on Jul 26, 2011 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions
I knew it started with a B lol. I spent quite a few years at the Canadian Tire in Brantford and was friends with all the people in the sports department and was wondering if I’d known you for quite some time now
If you look up "Loyalty" in the dictionary you'll see a picture of a Leafs fan wearing a Todd Gill jeresy looking like he just got punched in the stomach
I spent a year in Brantford one month, and commuted to somewhere in or around Hamilton (I dunno, I wasn’t fuckin’ driving). I was helping my uncle build a chip wagon out of a school bus and was sent to Canadian Tire frequently for supplies.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Softmoc has a “sale” where anything regular price is 50% off and the “sale” stickers are as is.
the ones with sale stickers are the best stuff (Sperrys , uggs, awesome moccasins) and the price never changed for their original price.
Dion Phaneuf: turning the tunes up since '10
I’m sure in some instance the “comparable” prices may be correct, but most people are unaware and get sucked into buying something for the “savings”.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions
The thing with Winners is their “compare at” price is basically the highest price that the item was sold for when it first came out, not the real price you’d pay at the store it’s usually sold in. I’ve bought things at Winners and seen them at Sears for $10 less within an hour.
Flugenweb, space code, twit zone, ass mode, check ze tweets.
Fashion
also tends to have unreal MSRP or “retail” prices and are just constantly on sale. If they sold at full price all the time they’d be making like 5x markup on cost.
Crazy would be NOT overanalyzing everything.
Lebda-free since July 3.
by nhlcheapshot on Jul 26, 2011 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions
George Bernard Shaw
Mick Jagger
Helen Mirren
Kevin Spacey
Jeremy Piven
Kate Beckinsale
Supporter of the CC / Fan of Ananas / Afraid of no one! (especially PPP)
Rick Martin would have been 60 years old today.
Also, I’m going to guess that Alec Martinez is PPP’s long-lost twin.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 8:51 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, I guess I should have specified fraternal, not identical.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 8:55 AM EDT up reply actions
just wait until you find out what "docking" is...ugh
don’t urban dictionary that at work by the way.
Dion Phaneuf: turning the tunes up since '10
Thats where I found out about it too
by Tickle Me Aulie on Jul 26, 2011 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions
I thought only people as old as me relied upon Tosh to learn about things the rest of you memed into the dirt months earlier. Today I learned that the crying wrestling fan was famous long before I saw last night’s rerun.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions
David Backes is one.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions
And Brad Boyes.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Yup, I remember seeing that when I was compiling comparables and thinking it was a typo ’til I figured it out.
Crazy would be NOT overanalyzing everything.
Lebda-free since July 3.
by nhlcheapshot on Jul 26, 2011 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions
I just figured it out now.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions
Wait, it’s not Backes, Boyes for sure.
I think Babcyuck might be the other.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions
Can’t be Backes, he wasn’t traded. Has to be someone who was traded between conferences.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
I think it was Goligoski
Popped a Colboner - Certified Joe Colborne Fanboy
I'm telling you I was the King of Spain (now I eat humble pie)
Now the Leafs call me up to drive the Zamboni
Twitter me this.
by happiergilmore on Jul 26, 2011 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions
It doesn’t have to be between conferences it just has to be to a team that has a game in hand on the original team.
For instance if on Jan 14th the Islanders have played 50 games and the Leafs have only played 49 games when We acquire John Tavares he will get to play in 83 games, and they are in the same conference.
by WizardofNaz on Jul 26, 2011 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions
83 NHL regular season games, or NHL+Minors?
This space for rent...
by fair_n_hite_451 on Jul 26, 2011 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Goligoski isn’t he one?
Popped a Colboner - Certified Joe Colborne Fanboy
I'm telling you I was the King of Spain (now I eat humble pie)
Now the Leafs call me up to drive the Zamboni
Twitter me this.
by happiergilmore on Jul 26, 2011 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Gagnant!
Popped a Colboner - Certified Joe Colborne Fanboy
I'm telling you I was the King of Spain (now I eat humble pie)
Now the Leafs call me up to drive the Zamboni
Twitter me this.
by happiergilmore on Jul 26, 2011 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions
I was doing some research on hockey reference yesterday.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions
I just tried to remember one East → West trade and I remember hearing Goligoski was playing an extra game and I knew Neal missed some time
Popped a Colboner - Certified Joe Colborne Fanboy
I'm telling you I was the King of Spain (now I eat humble pie)
Now the Leafs call me up to drive the Zamboni
Twitter me this.
by happiergilmore on Jul 26, 2011 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions
Who set the record for most GPs in a season?
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions
I know both Avery and Hagman have played 84 game seasons, but didn’t the season used to be 84 games at one point?
Rem Murray played 85 games during an 82-game campaign.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions
Yes at one point the league had 84 game seasons back when teams were playing neutral site games.
The Maple Leafs- making me certifiably insane since 1985.
by torleafsfan29 on Jul 27, 2011 9:19 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Funny thing about hockey-reference is you go for one purpose and often come away with some juicy facts about something you had no intention of looking for in the first place.
Crazy would be NOT overanalyzing everything.
Lebda-free since July 3.
by nhlcheapshot on Jul 26, 2011 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
It’s a terrific website.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions
Behind the Net too but sometimes the amount of data there just hurts my head.
Crazy would be NOT overanalyzing everything.
Lebda-free since July 3.
by nhlcheapshot on Jul 26, 2011 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions
Kadri
I really hate it when people constantly compare Kadri to his draft class. What if Ovechkin and Malkin lead his class, then what? How good Kadri is and will be is TBD, but how he is progressing depends on him, not the rest of the schlubbs in his draft class. I compare him to him.
by dsciswe on Jul 26, 2011 10:39 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
ADMINBOT’D.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions
I think he and I were involved in some rote Hollywood body-switching adventure, because I have no problem with comparing Kadri (or anyone else), to anyone else.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions
It’s not the comparison in and of itself. He can be compared to other’s, just that draft position is a poor measure of his value.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions
Exactly. Not all 7th overall picks are Jeff Skinner.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions
Well, even if Kadri is slightly behind the curve for his class, or for his overall draft position relative to other years, anyone calling anyone a bust at that age is foolish.
And besides, the sample sizes of anyone that young virtually guarantee wild fluctuations in any rankings, such that at this time next year, Kadri could easily find himself slightly ahead of the curve.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions
No way, I had no idea Sittler had a kid, let alone a kid chosen 7th overall
by Self Destructive Zones on Jul 26, 2011 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions
Oh man, I totally forgot about Ryan Sittler. The list of 7th overall picks that didn’t amount to much is pretty long…
ADMIN BOT 2000 WAS CHOSEN 7TH IN THE ADMIN BOT DRAFT [end]
WE KILLED HIM [end]
ADMIN BOT 3000 HOPES YOU HAVE A DAY
by ADMIN BOT 3000 on Jul 26, 2011 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions
If not for his early September manufacturing date, he would surely have gone Top-3 in the 2001 draft.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions
If injuries hadn’t hobbled him, they might have given Bobby and Brett a run for their money.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions
Exact same thought
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
Puck Daddy article about the Shannahan/Stevens deal was interesting. Had no idea he initially refused to report. Oh man if Stevens had stayed in St. Louis. Hope E. Johnson doesn’t become the next Stevens.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 10:47 AM EDT reply actions
Yeah I agree, I enjoyed that article. Scott Stevens sure was involved in some pretty crazy transactions back when he was a younger man.
by Self Destructive Zones on Jul 26, 2011 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions
One of the reasons why the current NHL CBA specifies compensation for RFA signings.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
Yeah trying to sort that process out made my head hurt.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah that was maybe the most interesting thing I found about that whole scenario. I had no idea that was the kind of system that used to be in place for RFA’s.
by Self Destructive Zones on Jul 26, 2011 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions
That shit was catnip for us old timey bloggers.
Oh, the hours spent on the typewriter / at the post office, plotting all the plausible scenarios; assigning each its own probability of (a) being submitted and (b) being accepted. Now all we get to do is ponder the comparables for a guy like Jannik Hansen or Mark Fraser, and even then, 90% of the time the cases get settled out of court.
But imagine a month of speculation surrounding what Vanek might fetch, after hearing that he’d been poached.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions
Oh doctor that would be fun.
The Stamkos compensation speculation would have been off the hook.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions
ADMIN BOT 3000, I have a question
If we were to start up a PPP beer league hockey team, what position would you be best suited for?
Dion Phaneuf: turning the tunes up since '10
COACH [end]
ADMIN BOT 3000 HOPES YOU HAVE A DAY
by ADMIN BOT 3000 on Jul 26, 2011 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions
AB3K got Chemmy!
good thing I already have my Gold Star.
Supporter of the CC / Fan of Ananas / Afraid of no one! (especially PPP)
I’d just like to take this opportunity to make it clear that I’ve always believed the robots were our future.
I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jul 26, 2011 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Teach them well and let them lead the way
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Probably. I dunno. I’m not a doctor.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions
You’ve obviously never heard me sing the theme from The Bodyguard (or is that the song we’re talking about, I forget)
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s a different song, but I’m sure you sing it almost as well as Whitney herself, perhaps even better.
What I meant to say was “program them well” doesn’t roll off the tongue quite as nicely as “teach them well”.
So you didn’t mean to punch the word ‘you’?
And here I thought that things were about to come to fisticuffs.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions
No, I didn’t – that was just sloppy writing on my part. I should have written ‘one’, not ‘you’.
Whew Violent altercation narrowly averted!
Even if you had emphasized the word ‘you’, it would be possible to blame it all on SBN auto-formatting to avoid my wrath.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions
FUTURE PAST AND PRESENT. [end]
ADMIN BOT 3000 HOPES YOU HAVE A DAY
by ADMIN BOT 3000 on Jul 26, 2011 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions
ADMIN BOT, why aren’t you on Twitter?
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 1:17 PM EDT reply actions
That article was very interesting.
I was always wondering why people seemed so low on Kadri’s development, even though many who have watched him play and/or analyzed his stats suggest he’s progressing as well or better than expected.
Plus, it provides another argument I could use against the people supporting Osgood into the HHoF! =D
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
I’d like to see a study on the effects of anchoring on the Price is Right’s contestant’s row.
Toss out all the $1 bids and the x + 1 dollar bids and look at how the newest contestant (i.e. the first bidder) influences the other bids. Sometimes, you see two rounds of bidding with all four contestants going over, before someone finally makes a one dollar bid, so in those cases, you gotta think the 2nd, 3rd and 4th bidders were anchoring their bids to the newbie’s.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions
That would be really interesting. I’d imagine that they would have an effect.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions
But where do you draw the line on how low you can go or how much over an opponent’s guess you can go? Saying something like $25 increments would work, but say there’s a case that a person knows exactly what the price of something is, then they’d be screwed.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
True, you could maybe figure out the average bid over the show. Then see if the initial bid affects the subsequent ones.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Take into account that the average Price is Right viewer/contestant is stupid. They’d never figure that out. That being said, $901.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
You’d need a microscope to find that section of the Venn Diagram.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions
I wonder. There always seem to be a lot of undergrads on The Price is Right. And I could see MIT students wearing sweaters from other schools. Sort of like how Americans wear the Canadian flag when travelling.
Are you suggesting that Don Pardo wouldn’t call their names unless he thought they went to Arizona State? Or worse yet, Vasser?
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions
I’ve had just about enough of your misspellings, young man.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions
And by young man, I of course mean me.
And by young, I of course mean, in relation to Bob Barker.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions
The price is wrong, bitch!
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Chapelle quote?
I just watched a skit I had somehow never seen before, where the various racial groups held a televised dispersal draft. The Asians got a steal by grabbing the entire Wu Tang Clan with a late first-rounder.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Arrested Development?
I’m not very good at this, am I?
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5L6Uz67u4xM
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
You need to stop whatever the fuck you’re doing and make sure you haven’t missed any more Chappelle sketches.
They’re gold, Jerry! Gold!
by Tickle Me Aulie on Jul 26, 2011 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions
They can barely comply with the “You can’t bid the same amount as someone else” rule…
And when everyone overbids they bid too much the second time.
On the Mike Weber bandwagon!
I hate Christian Ehrhoff because he should have been Tomas Kaberle.
I love when the last person to bid decides to bid more than everyone else, but instead of just going a dollar more than the highest goes a few hundred more.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Same with the showcase showdown. When one person obviously overbids and the other tries to get as close as possible as well.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, the worst is when someone bids like $50 under the highest bid.
Flugenweb, space code, twit zone, ass mode, check ze tweets.
That too, would love to see a video of stupid price is right bids.
This guy bid $250,000 on his showcase, oh wow.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions
that ladies name is “Gay”… really?
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Jul 26, 2011 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions
I like the uber rare occurrence of the first Showcase featuring, like, a car and a boat and a trip around the world, and then the top-seeded contestant thinks for awhile and then decides to pass.
Like the next one is going to have two cars or something.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions
hahah, i know eh. Then the next one is like… a new patio set and a brand new cooler!
There is no "I" in team, but there is an "M" and an "E"
by Matt_Roberts on Jul 26, 2011 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s your bid…we have decided that your are too stupid for this game show and have relegated to a game show more "your speed" welcome to press your luck or Hollywood squares, where people even more stupid come to play.
What would the minor leagues of games shows be?
Bam Bam.- digga digga damm
That show was awesome.
Also, Kidstreet.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions
I was a contestant on Video & Arcade Top 10. I came in 2nd place.
I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jul 26, 2011 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions
ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME, YOU NEED TO BLOG ABOUT THIS RIGHT THE FUCK NOW.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Hah, blog about it where? This is a hockey blog, and I don’t have a personal blog.
I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jul 26, 2011 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions
It doesn’t matter. Tell us all about it in the CC!
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions
I didn’t see a CC today. Where is it?
I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jul 26, 2011 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions
I had 2 friends who were on it. That show was aces
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
I was on Reach for the Top twice. Our team got beaten each time because the TV round starts filming at about 9 a.m., and we were apparently not morning people at my school.
Someone here has been on Jeopardy as well.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Best I’ve got is coming in 2nd in the local Brainstorm tournament on PBS. It’s like 3-man Jeopardy for high schools.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
When we did “speeches” in Elementary school I advanced to the Legion. Boom!
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions
I wore shorts with a shirt, tie, and sportcoat because it was really how during the competition. At the very end we stand up for handshakes and BAM! shorts.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
I have no idea what “speeches” is, but I competed in the Canadian Improv Games in high school.
I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jul 26, 2011 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m losing my gold star for that, aren’t I?
I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jul 26, 2011 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Has anyone figured out what the binary says on that gold star?
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions
In elementary school. Public speaking.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Who’s been on Jeopardy? My only claim to fame was being on Bozo the Clown once. I was an almost winner.
Either you have an enviable memory, or a pitiable life, to know nothing of regret.
- Sten, of the Qunari
by GreatKingRat on Jul 26, 2011 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions
being on Bozo the Clown onc
That sounds wrong.
Flugenweb, space code, twit zone, ass mode, check ze tweets.
Don’t judge me.
Either you have an enviable memory, or a pitiable life, to know nothing of regret.
- Sten, of the Qunari
by GreatKingRat on Jul 26, 2011 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions
speaking of game shows….
Where do “reality” shows that have prizes fall (Survivor, Amazing Race)? i consider them game shows, since the contestants are playing a game, the Emmy category is “reality show – competition”
Supporter of the CC / Fan of Ananas / All Hail Admin Bot 3000
The only difference between survivor and game shows is one is filmed in a studio and one is not.
On the Mike Weber bandwagon!
I hate Christian Ehrhoff because he should have been Tomas Kaberle.
Next, you’ll be telling us that they filmed the moon landing on the actual moon.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions
I guessed $20K for that guy’s showcase without ever watching that episode before… I should be on that show!
Nonetheless, that’s a hilarious overbid.
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Speaking of a dollar more, why does the winning wagerer on Jeopardy always bid to beat the nearest competitor by a buck when a tie would result in both being allowed to keep their winnings and share 1st place?
Either you have an enviable memory, or a pitiable life, to know nothing of regret.
- Sten, of the Qunari
by GreatKingRat on Jul 26, 2011 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions
So that they are the clear winner and don’t have to face equal competition again?
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
To be a dick.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions
I’ve considered this, but the next two opponents are just as likely to be top notch and you have already shown the ability to beat this one. Why not bring him/her along to the next competition while at the same time heaping thousands of dollars on them at NBC’s expense.
Either you have an enviable memory, or a pitiable life, to know nothing of regret.
- Sten, of the Qunari
by GreatKingRat on Jul 26, 2011 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions
During the commercial break, I would make them an offer for their wallet and watch.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Why does Glenn Sather always outbid other GMs on UFAs by $3 or 4 million when he could just outbid them by a few hundred K and get the player and not drive up NHL salaries? Shit just don’t make sense.
Flugenweb, space code, twit zone, ass mode, check ze tweets.
see the comment made by "Plea From A Cat Named Felix " in reponse to “Stinkyfish” above
Bam Bam.- digga digga damm
in reponse to "Stinkyfish" above
lol
Crazy would be NOT overanalyzing everything.
Lebda-free since July 3.
by nhlcheapshot on Jul 26, 2011 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Say there’s a case that a person knows exactly what the price of something is, then they’d be screwed.
On the bright side, they’d get to put their hand into Bob Barker’s pants pocket, so it all works out in the end.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions
I’d like to see a study on the effects of anchoring on the Price is Right’s contestant’s row.
That’s exactly what I was thinking when I first read about anchoring. Get out of my head!
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Only if I can get into your car.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions
He said nothing about his dreams.
The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jul 26, 2011 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Damn that Chinatown cover act, Billy Laotian, for teaching me the wrong lyrics.
by Spezzal Teams Playa on Jul 26, 2011 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions
The Maple Leafs will be playing the Burlington Twins in the 1st round of the palyoffs.
Supporter of the CC / Fan of Ananas / All Hail Admin Bot 3000
fine. here’s a Leafs article from 1942
Supporter of the CC / Fan of Ananas / All Hail Admin Bot 3000
here’s another from 1978 - back when the Ottawa papers werne’t forced to go against Ottawa residents wishes and badmouth the Leafs
Supporter of the CC / Fan of Ananas / All Hail Admin Bot 3000
New fanpost
Evaluating who the league’s most dangerous shooters are
http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2011/7/26/2294750/introducing-dsgr
So we talk a lot about how players peak in their mid-20s, etc. I just realised last year 7 of the top 10 scorers in the NHL last year were 30+.
I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
Sedins played together, St. Louis and Stamkos, Selanne and Perry are on the same team, not sure if they really played together, that leaves Iginla, Ovie, Richards and Zetterberg.
That’s pretty funny that you bring that up. If you expand to top 20 or even 30, it’s dominantly 20 year olds though.
Popped a Colboner - Certified Joe Colborne Fanboy
I'm telling you I was the King of Spain (now I eat humble pie)
Now the Leafs call me up to drive the Zamboni
Twitter me this.
by happiergilmore on Jul 26, 2011 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions
Perry was pretty much locked in with Getzlaf and Ryan when they were all healthy.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Jul 26, 2011 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions

by 

































