Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Prediction Series: 2011-2012 Eastern Conference Standings

Hello again PPP. I am going to start a new preseason series of yearly predictions starting with this post: Eastern Conference Standings. Read on for my predictions for the East with an explanation for each. Please feel free to add your comments (or your predicted standings) in the comments section!

Star-divide

  1. Washington Capitals
  2. Boston Bruins
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins*
  4. Buffalo Sabres*
  5. Philadelphia Flyers
  6. New York Rangers
  7. Tampa Bay Lightning
  8. Montreal Canadiens
    ---------------------------
  9. Toronto Maple Leafs
  10. Carolina Hurricanes
  11. New Jersey Devils
  12. Winnipeg Jets
  13. New York Islanders
  14. Ottawa Senators
  15. Florida Panthers

    *I think that the Sabers will have more points than the 3rd place team (which I think will be Pittsburgh or Philly)

1) Washington Capitals
Washington has been consistently one of the best regular season producers over the last few years. Bringing in Thomas Vokoun, who I believe is arguably one of the best goalies in the game (3rd in overall S% over the last 4 years with a ridiculous 0.923). While their team scoring was inflated 2 years ago (playing off the percentages), I think it was overly deflated last year and will see a bit of a bounce back. They have rounded out a pretty solid defense this year and have a strong young core of forwards. I think they will win the presidents trophy.

2) Boston Bruins
This is simply based on goaltending. They have a pretty damn good (and young) corps of forwards, with Horton, Bergeron, Krecji, Lucic; less established prospects like Marchand, Seguin, and Caron; and good role players in Peverley and Kelly. There D is not great: while it is led by potentially the best defenseman in the game (Chara), I don't much like their depth beyond that. Seidenberg and Corvo are solid top 4 players, but I don't think they're more than that. McQuaid may develop into something. They seem to like Boychuk but I am not sold. Regardless this is a pretty silly discussion, because what will make this team great is goaltending. The top two goalies by overall S% over the last 4 years are Thomas and Rask. Further, if you look at the best single season S% of all time Thomas has the first and fourth best and Rask the eighth. So even if Thomas shows his age, Rask is right behind him.

3) Pittsburgh Penguins
This is the one team I am unsure of. In the end of last year they played very well as a team (and had great goal tending by MAF) to get over 100 points without Crosby or Malkin for a large part of the season. With Crosby unlikely to start the season, but Malkin back, many think them to be a top team in the league and I have trouble disagreeing. They have a very good D corps with many very good, but not great players (Orpiks, Martin, and Michalek) and a potential star in the making in Letang. They have a improved their forward corps even more with the addition of Neal and will now have Malkin to potentially feed him the puck. If Crosby returns they could go on a real tear. All that being said what makes me hesitant on Pittsburgh is MAF. While he carried that team in the second half of last year, he had a pretty poor first half (lost his starting job to Johnson for a while). He is 22nd over all with S% over the last 4 years. Over those 4 years he has had a 0.921 (in 35 games), 0.912, 0.905, and 0.918. I just don't trust his year-year consistency (for interests sake his playoff S% over that time has been 0.933, 0.908, 0.891, 0.899 with him winning the SC on the 0.908).

4) Buffalo Sabres
Simply put: I think they are going to be a very good team. First off their forwards: Derek Roy is an indisputable #1 C, being a player that consistently flirts with PPG. Thomas Vanek is one of the best goal scorers in the league. Over the last 4 years he is 11th in goals (2 goals behind Marleau and Perry who are tied for 9th). Pomiville is basically the epitome of a good, but not great, first line winger. He can consistently score above 60 points and around 25 goals (I realize he scored only 52 last year but he was slow coming back from an injury). While Brad Boyes goal scoring has diminished, he has still cracked 40 points in each of the last 4 seasons and 50 points in 3 of the 4. If he can score 15-20 G and 50+ points (which I think he can) he is a good second liner. While I agree that Leino is overpaid, it doesn't mean I think he is a bad player. I think he is definitely a top 6 forward. While it took him a while to get used to NA ice, since he found his stride in the playoffs 2 years ago (and was given minutes to reflect that, by increasing from ~13 minutes to more than 16 minutes/GP) he has scored 29 G and 79 points in 111 playoff and regular season games. Thats a 21 G 59 point pace over an 82 GP season. Drew Stafford scored at half a goal a game last year and while I don't believe that is sustainable, he has increased his shots on goal in nearly every season and I definitely believe he can crack 25 G if healthy. Tyler Ennis scored 20 G and 49 points, while Gerbe scored 16 G 31 points in 64 GP (40 point pace). With role players like Gaustad and Hecht, and prospects like Kassian and Adam they have a very deep and strong forward corps.

There goaltending is pretty simple. They have an incredible goaltender in Ryan Miller and a pretty damn good prospect/back up in Enroth. This should make a difference for them as Enroth can actually win games, while in the past they lost quite a few whenever Lalime was playing.

While there D is not spectacular it is improved. They have a very good (but again) defensive-D-man in Reghyr. A young up an comer who looks like he is good for 10/40 at least who can eat minutes in Myers. While Ehrhoff's defensive game is not special (and his contract is a joke (good cap hit though)) he is very good offensively. I am personally a large fan of Leopold's as a good defenseman who can do everything well but nothing great. As a number 3-4 defenseman thats a good thing to have. Sekera is also an up and coming defenseman who belongs in a top 6.

5) Philadelphia
I think they have the potential of overtaking Pittsburgh based on there young forwards play. Ignoring what happens with top prospect Brayden Schenn they have legitimate top 6ers in Giroux, Briere, Voracek, JVR, and Hartnell. Jagr is a bit of question mark at his age, but if he can come back strong he can be dangerous. Add in Schenn as a top prospect and Simmonds, Powe, and Talbot as legit top 9-ers. While there D is definitely aging it has 2 incredible players in Timmonen and Pronger, as well as 3 very good defenseman in Carle, Cobourne, and Mezsaros. While he may have gotten a ridiculous contract, Bryzgalov is inarguably a very good goalie and Bobrovski had a good rookie season.

6) New York Rangers
Any team goaltended by King Henrik should never be taken lightly. By bringing in Brad Richards they will likely improve their offense a lot (at least in the short term). I love their C depth in Richards, Dubinsky, Stepan, Anisimov, and Boyle. They have a great winger in Gaborik and a very good one in Callahan. While their D isn't incredible it is not something to laugh at either. Girardi is a good young defenseman and Mcdonough and Del Zotto look like they can be really good players. They stole Calgary's top prospect in Erixon and of course have one of the leagues top defensive defenseman in Staal. Add in an incredible goaltending tandem of King Henrik and Biron and you have a pretty damn good team.

7) Tampa Bay Lightning
These guys are a hard team to predict. They have explosive firepower in Stamkos, Vinny, and St. Louis. With solid depth in their forward ranks with Malone, Purcell, Downie, Moore, etc. My only concern on the forward front is that at 36 MSL may start showing his age. Their D is okay but nothing special. They have3 good veterans in Brewer, Kubina, and Clarke and an older veteran in Ohlund (who will likely be losing some strides). Obviously, they have a very good young player in former second over all, Victor Hedman. What makes me hesitant on them is that they are relying on a career back up (Garon) and a 42 year old (Roloson) who's last 5 years (playoff heroics notwithstanding) has been mediocre at best (0.909, 0.901, 0.915, 0.907, 0.914).

8) Montreal Canadiens
Montreal was basically the same as Toronto last year besides goaltending. They were tied with Toronto and Nashville for 21st for Goals with 213 while being tied with Toronto at 18th for Shots Against with 31/GP. There highest scoring player (Plekanec) would have been tied for 4th on Toronto. Simply put they were carried by Carey Price posting an excellent 0.923 S%. The problem for them is that over the last 4 years he has posted a 0.920, 0.905, 0.912, and 0.923. If he regresses at all they are screwed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

9) Toronto Maple Leafs
I think they have improved since last year and will have a respectable top 6 with Lupul, Connoly, Kessel, MacArthur, Grabovski, and Kulemin. With a 3rd line that can actually score some goals of Kadri (?), Lombardi, and Armstrong, the forward corps is at least good. With an influx of offense to our D with Liles and Franson I think our D should be improved from where it ended. The big question mark for the Leafs of course is...goaltending. Can Reimer repeat his incredible rookie season? Here's hoping.

10) Carolina Hurricanes
Simply put I don't think they improved all that much this off season. They retained Jussi Jokinen but lost Cole. They traded Corvo but added Kaberle (an improvement for sure). Skinner was damn good last year but something tells me he'll fall back some. I won't discount them though simply because a team with Staal up front and Ward in net never should be.

11) New Jersey Devils
This is probably the hardest team to predict. Last year they started ice cold, then found their stride last winter (when they went back to Lemaire behind the bench) and went on an incredible tear. That tear, having two of the best forwards in the game (Kovalchuk and Parise), and having one of the best goaltenders of all time (Brodeur) at first led me to want to say playoffs. However, the rest of their forward corps is either aging (Elias), not that good (Clarkson/Zubrus), young and unproven (Palmieri/Joseffson/Teddenby). Further there number 1 C, Travis Zajac, is expected to be injured through most of the fall. I have no idea who is supposed to play C for this team. Add to that that Brodeur is getting pretty damn old and I think they are in trouble.

12) Winnipeg Jets
They are a team that is moving in the right direction, by acquiring good young players and letting a lot of them grow together. Young forwards like Bryan Little, Evander Kane, Andrew Ladd, and Blake Wheeler, combined with young defenders Zach Bogosian, Tobias Enstrom, and Dustin Byfuglien, and their young goal tender Pavelec, together make a good core for the future. With some veterans like Oduya, Hainsey, Antropov, and Chris Mason I think they'll be able to win a few games, but I just don't think they are there yet.

13) New York Islanders
Similar to the Jets I think they are a team that has been doing a good job of stockpiling young talent, but just isn't there yet. It'll take some more time, and settling out of their goaltending situation for this young team to make the playoffs.

14) Ottawa Senators
Ottawa had one player crack 50 points and one player crack 20 goals. Spezza was the player to do both of those. Ottawa is a team that realized they had problems half way through last year and nuked there team. They are left with a couple very good players (Karlsson and Spezza), a goal tender who I think is very good Anderson, and a handful of veterans who either have injury problems (Michalek has no knees left), is very old (Alfredsson and Gonchar), or is a second liner or second pairing defenseman at best (Campoli). They have some good youth/prospects in Butler, Da Costa, Runblad, Lehner, Zibanajed etc. but I don't think they are going to be turning around Ottawa's future this season.

15) Florida Panthers
This was a team that has been carried by one of the best post lockout goaltenders and still couldn't make the playoffs. Not only did they lose him, but they have lost basically their entire team except for Weaver, Harrison, Kulikov, Weiss, Booth and their backup goaltender Clemmenson. They added one very good piece (Campbell), a bunch of good but not elite pieces (Versteeg, Theodore, Upshall, Fleischmann) and some questionable ones (Kopecky and Jovonovski). Ignoring the stupid prices they paid for most of these players, they have built an odd team that is simply not very good.

PensionPlanPuppets.com is a fan community that allows members to post their own thoughts and opinions on the Toronto Maple Leafs and hockey in general. These views and thoughts may not be shared by the editor of PensionPlanPuppets.com.

Comment 113 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Pension Plan Puppets

The West Is Won

May 2012 by JP Nikota - 609 comments

Halfway to Sochi

Feb 2012 by birky - 147 comments

Comments

Display:

I think your predictions are pretty spot on. The optimist in me believes that the Leafs will beat out the Canadiens for 8th.

Move along. Nothing to see here...

by Van Ryn's Neurologist on Sep 14, 2011 10:11 PM EDT reply actions  

I view those last two slots are pretty open because some teams are really going to rely on one key factor – goaltending. Particularly TBL and Montreal, as pointed out in the article. What that says to me is if Reimer can put up good numbers (not necessarily as good as Jan/Feb last year) and we manage to avoid key injuries to players like Kessel and Grabovski that we can squeek in there. I don’t think its a long shot, though I wouldn’t exactly lay a lot of money down on it.

by Goosemonster on Sep 15, 2011 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Since the unholy birth of the Eastern Conference (and likely well before that, but I got tired of checking), it has never been the case that the 8 playoff teams from one year have all made it back to the playoffs in the following year. I’m going to stick with history on this one, and suggest that one of, if not both, the Canadiens and the Lightning don’t make it.

Come get your duds in order...

by The Bag on Sep 14, 2011 11:29 PM EDT reply actions  

To be honest I didn’t notice I did that.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 14, 2011 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

this is an incredibly interesting fact that I suspect very few people are aware of.

Move along. Nothing to see here...

by Van Ryn's Neurologist on Sep 15, 2011 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Except it is an interesting fact that should have no baring on the future (just like how often a team historically makes the playoffs)

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

But I do think it shows that something will inevitably go wrong for one or more of the teams. If you could predict which one, you’d make a fortune in Vegas.

Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.

by red army line on Sep 15, 2011 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

It is very likely. I don’t predict any injuries in the offseason unless the player is (a) older, (b) has a large injury history, or © sort of a combination of a and b where a player is getting older and seems to be missing a few more games every year. But I do that for every team so I assume it balances out in these prediction.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

It wasn’t meant to be predictive, but more to highlight how we take it for granted that playoff teams from last year will repeat. The standings are a lot more volatile than people tend to think. From 09-10 to 10-11, the Leafs jumped 5 spots, the Devils fell 9 spots, Ottawa fell 8 spots, and Tampa jumped 7 spots.

Come get your duds in order...

by The Bag on Sep 19, 2011 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

I definitely did not know that.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Sep 15, 2011 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the tiers in the East are:

Heavyweights:
Washington, Boston

Cruiserweight:
Buffalo, Tampa, Philly

Bubble teams:
Montreal, Toronto, Rangers, Winnipeg, Islanders, Carolina, Devils

Lottery:
Ottawa, Florida

Wildcard:
Pittsburgh
.The Pens are a huge wildcard. Fleury is not the most important factor: he could post a .910 and they could still contenders. The big thing for them is Crosby and Malkin. Remember how good those 2 can actually be?

by samspade on Sep 15, 2011 12:24 AM EDT reply actions  

I'd add Winnipeg to the lottary teams. Their offense is atrocious.

Even without Crosby I put Pens in “Cruiserweight”. And above Philly. Remember how good Carter and Richards can actually be?

Chicken Little is dead. Long Live Positive Pete.
Lebda-free since July 3.

by nhlcheapshot on Sep 15, 2011 6:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’d put NJD in the wildcard as well. Their score-tied Corsi was top-5 in the league last year, and they gained back Parise.

Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.

by red army line on Sep 15, 2011 7:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Brodeur is one year older and they have no C’s.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 8:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Literally none.

Chicken Little is dead. Long Live Positive Pete.
Lebda-free since July 3.

by nhlcheapshot on Sep 15, 2011 8:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thats what really gets me. Parise did play C way back in the day. Do they try moving him back?

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 8:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Out 4-6 months

Chicken Little is dead. Long Live Positive Pete.
Lebda-free since July 3.

by nhlcheapshot on Sep 15, 2011 8:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Woah. I knew he was out, I didn’t know it was that bad.

And they traded Rolston, who even though he can’t score like he used to was still a half decent defensive forward. I still think they can grind it out and be in the picture with Parise back.

by samspade on Sep 15, 2011 8:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Up front they literally have Parise and Kovalchuk (AWESOME), an old Elias, and a couple of young guys they hope can improve DRASTICALLY. They have a meh (at best) defense and an ever aging Brodeur. I have no faith in that team.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 8:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I really don’t see them doing anything spectacular. Even if they somehow come out the gates well, I think they will stumble easily due to the factors mentioned above. They may be a bubble team, but that would be the MAX they could do.

by Goosemonster on Sep 15, 2011 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Could come down to coaching as well. They haven’t played well under a NOT-Lemaire coached team in…. feels like forever.

Chicken Little is dead. Long Live Positive Pete.
Lebda-free since July 3.

by nhlcheapshot on Sep 15, 2011 10:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

They’ll still be a boring team. No wonder no one watches them, they are one of my least favourite teams to watch vs. the Leafs.

by Goosemonster on Sep 15, 2011 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Elias is still a very productive player who won’t embarrass himself at C. EA lists Parise as a C (at least, in NHL09), so I’m guessing that DeBoer will try Parise at C at some point, and he’s such a great player I think that’ll work until Zajac gets back.

Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.

by red army line on Sep 15, 2011 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Philly still has depth at forward. Briere is a 30 goal guy, Giroux should be good for at least 20/60. JVR should be able to put up 20/50 and Voracek 45-50. HArtnell can crack 50 points too. Between Jagr, Simmonds, Schenn, and Nodl I am sure they can get a 6th guy in their top 6. A 3rd line of Talbot and some mix of Schenn/Simmonds/Jagr/Nodl is actually pretty good. They also won’t lack for defensive forwards. I think their biggest question mark will be their aging D, but they also have good younger D (not at the Pronger/Timmonnen level) in Cobourne/Carle/Meszaros.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 8:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not sure how the Rangers are a bubble team. I’d put them in cruiserweight – they didn’t get worse during the off-season and they have Lundqvist in net, who is among the best in the game.

by Goosemonster on Sep 15, 2011 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Boston is overrated.

by stevesmith19 on Sep 15, 2011 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

They have absolutely incredible goaltending and a deep corps of forwards.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Including a bunch of good defensive forwards.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Including a bunch of good defensive forwards.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

You don’t have to tell me twice…

But in all seriousness, as you pointed out in the article, their defense is quite terrible.

Yes, Bergeron is very, very good but Boston barely made it past Montreal in the playoffs. The same Montreal team that lots of people are saying isn’t a lock to make the playoffs because they depend largely on goaltending. Isn’t that an even more accurate description of Boston?

by stevesmith19 on Sep 15, 2011 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah but I have so much more faith in Boston’s goaltending. The big thing with them is that they have TWO incredible goaltenders. If one falters I think the other can take up the slack. As well their forwards are much better than Boston’s.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Honestly, I’ve never been impressed with Boston’s forwards other than Bergeron.

Boston to me is all goaltending (exaggerating for effect).

by stevesmith19 on Sep 15, 2011 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have always been a huge Horton fan. I always kind of saw him as the physical version of Kessel at similar ages. Obviously he kind of hit a wall around 22 or so and then regressed some, but I still like him. I think Lucic is wildly overrated, but I do think he belongs in a top 6. Krecji is a pretty damn good C. He was 23rd in C scoring last year and is 19th over the last 3 seasons. He is a number 1 C. They have some good youth coming through the system in Marchand and Seguin along with prospects like Spooner and Knight. Add to that pretty damn good bottom 6 forwards in Kelly and Peverley and I’ll have to disagree with you.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Horton-Krejci-Lucic played behind Bergeron, Marchand, Recchi, and Peverly in terms of competition. They had the most o-zone starts among Bruins forwards with >30 GP.

50% of Krejci’s production this playoffs came against Philadelphia. He’s pretty good though. Horton is a mystery to me. He’s put up big-goal seasons but I don’t think that there indicative of his skill. “Regressed” is a good way of putting it.

Lucic can’t skate.

by stevesmith19 on Sep 15, 2011 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thats the thing with Boston’s forwards is that it is full of a lot of good players without any superstars (you can argue if Bergeron is one if you want). I just think its a deep and pretty consistent corps of good players.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s a good description of the type of forwards Boston has but I’m just not sure that their team is “full” of them.

A lot of times, they seem unskilled and some of them are just plain slow.

by stevesmith19 on Sep 15, 2011 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

They did lose Savard who at times played at a “superstar” level. Recchi and Ryder too. I gotta think they hope that progression from Marchand and Seguin accounts for that. They could use both one more #5-7 forward and #3-4 defenseman to really balance out their squad. But no team is perfect.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m also willing to admit that my hatred for Boston could be blinding me to the truth. Seriously though, I just don’t see them as a top 4 team in the NHL.

by stevesmith19 on Sep 15, 2011 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

With the one-two punch of Thomas/Rask (number 1 and 2 in save percentage over the last 4 years) I think they are.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

With historic Thomas, yes. But like I said elsewhere, I’d take Pittsburgh, Philly, and Chicago over them, and probably Vancouver (getting to 7 games while scoring only 8 times is pretty impressive, though their expectations were higher) and Washington, maybe Detroit or San Jose. Goaltending is just so volatile, and I really think their defense is Chara/Seidenberg/Corvo and a bunch of losers winners.

Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.

by red army line on Sep 15, 2011 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

But they have a very damn good Rask behind them. His rookie season was the 8th best single season save percentage of ALL TIME.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

And Jose Theodore put up the same save percentage in more games in 2001-2002. Yet, it’s generous to even call him league average. It’s only 50 games. He only has 79 career NHL regular season games, 92 including playoffs. Not all that much. It could just be noise.

Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.

by red army line on Sep 15, 2011 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fair enough.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Building on that, I’m just not sure that if Thomas gets hurt, Rask can just come in and save the day for Boston. If he had a bit more experience then maybe, but Boston will definitely fall back if something happens to Thomas.

And really, that’s only if Thomas gets hurt, so if he doesn’t then I could see Boston definitely having another solid year. Maybe not as high as 2nd, but definitely in the top 4 for sure.

Let the reign of Chemmy begin

by MLS on Sep 18, 2011 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rask carried that team when Thomas was injured/off year 2 years ago. He also carried them through the vezina winner that year, playing better than him in the playoffs. (IMHO Rask WAS the best goalie that year and should have gotten the Calder over Myers)

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 18, 2011 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rask wasn’t better than Miller that year.

by Ben Schnell on Sep 20, 2011 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

I said Calder, not Vezina, unless you’re making a Myers winning Vezina = Miller winning Calder.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 20, 2011 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

that should have ended in “joke.”

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 20, 2011 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Krejci?

Chicken Little is dead. Long Live Positive Pete.
Lebda-free since July 3.

by nhlcheapshot on Sep 15, 2011 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Their defense though is one top pair D, two second pair Ds, and a bunch of marginal/3rd pair types. Way overrated. I think a tough forechecking, possession team like Chicago or healthy Pittsburgh or even Philadelphia (if they don’t implode, of course) can beat them more often than not.

Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.

by red army line on Sep 15, 2011 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

(I’ve seen more than my fair share of deep forward corps without a competent puck moving blueline from 2005-2010)

Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.

by red army line on Sep 15, 2011 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

And it usually did you well in the regular season which is all I am discussing.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also I agree that it is overrated

I just don’t think its atrocious. I would change what you said slightly and say its 1 all star defenseman and 2 second pairing defenseman. Boychuk and McQuaid are both young and Boston seems to think they are improving. Really I think with one more okay defender (read top 4 guy) they would have a solid D corps.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hate to say this, but I think Montreal is a lot better than people are giving them credit for (based mostly on an ‘overachieving’ point total based on pythagorean wins).

However, they did really, really well in terms of controlling the play last year, and had bad shooting luck. They also have a very good goaltender. Their system seems to be very successful at keeping play in their opponents’ zone, such that even with a poor shooting% season like last season, they can still make the playoffs.

I’d expect them to finish towards the bottom half of the playoff bracket, but I think there are other teams more likely to fall out of the playoffs (Philadelphia, Tampa, maybe even the Rangers).

by Shift on Sep 15, 2011 12:51 AM EDT reply actions  

It’s not just bad shooting luck – they don’t have a good group of forwards, and they are a pretty soft bunch as well (hence the atrocious Cole signing…but still). Their season hangs on Price’s neck, no doubts – even if the percentages swing back their way.

by Goosemonster on Sep 15, 2011 10:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

They are remarkably similar on paper to the Leafs except a more proven goaltender.

Chicken Little is dead. Long Live Positive Pete.
Lebda-free since July 3.

by nhlcheapshot on Sep 15, 2011 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

They were similar last year. I’d argue other than goaltending we have, roughly, a better team (especially with additions of Connolly, Lombardi, Franson, Liles). All Reimer needs to do is provide consistent and relatively stable, average goaltending and we have a good shot of displacing MTL.

by Goosemonster on Sep 15, 2011 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Despite the fact that their forwards are puny and overpaid, they seem to somehow demonstrate an ability to control possession, which bodes well for them. For instance, check out these charts. The Leafs last year did a pretty bad job controlling the play. I’m hoping the new additions can reverse those numbers, but looking at the numbers (crunched by ‘67 Sound on PPP2), it’s not looking so good.

From Behind The Net:

While Fenwick is the single-best predictor we have of team performance, it’s not the only one. For one thing, team records over just 82 games are a poor sample of a team’s ability, and much of a team’s record is actually just luck.
[…]
Together, Fenwick/Corsi and Luck account for around 3/4 of team winning percentage. What’s the remainder? Goaltending talent – which Tom Awad estimates at about 5% – and special teams, along with a very small sliver that’s due to shooting talent and the oft-mentioned “shot quality.”

The Leafs finished near the bottom in team Corsi and Fenwick last year. We need to drastically improve our possession numbers, or get really lucky (“lucky” not necessarily meaning fluky, but a combination of factors that are out of the players’ control falling into place at the right time). Reimer is part of it, but if we’re still getting badly out-shot and out-chanced, it’s going to be difficult to make the playoffs. When he got called up last year, I think the Leafs team shooting percentage went through the roof, so despite the fact that we allowed more shots and chances, the team started winning. We just got really lucky at the right time.

I’d expect Montreal to finish 7±1, and the Leafs to finish 10±1.

by Shift on Sep 15, 2011 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

Unfortunately, Ottawa also did better than the Leafs in terms of puck possession. Leafs were a lottery team this season from a possession standpoint.

by stevesmith19 on Sep 15, 2011 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly, which is why I’m not terribly optimistic about the Leafs’ chances this season. Reimer can only do so much; I like what ’67S wrote in the article I linked above (emphasis mine):

Goaltending is that important, and the Leafs’ fortunes will rise or fall in significant part on the performance of James Reimer.
With that said, however, the players in front of Reimer remain important. Goaltending can move a team several places above or below the talent level of its skaters, but those skaters still set the baseline.

I’m hoping Aulie, Liles, Connolly, and Lombardi will be revelations. Maybe Kessel, with a good centerman, will be a better possessional player. Maybe Lupul will do really well in a third-line role after Kadri takes over on the first line. I have no idea. But the Leafs do need to do a better job controlling the play if they want to improve their odds of making the playoffs.

by Shift on Sep 15, 2011 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why does everyone insist on putting Lupul on the third line

This is a guy who when healthy can put up 25 G and 50+ points.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Some one’s gotta be on the 3rd line when we acquire Parise at the deadline, duh

Chicken Little is dead. Long Live Positive Pete.
Lebda-free since July 3.

by nhlcheapshot on Sep 15, 2011 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m okay with that.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

True BCapp True !!!!

HE was very good in Philly and in Anaheim for a bit…

FLYERROB ! YOU STAY AWESOME FLYERS FANS ! ~ ~ ~ Lori Wilson Gray ~ ~ April 07th 1967 - May 27th 2011 ~ May you rest in Peace ~ I love you and miss you big Sis ! I cant believe at 44 yrs of age .. you went to sleep and never woke up. I promise to take care of Matt and Emily for you. With Love, your baby Brother.

by FLYERROB on Sep 23, 2011 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

We have improved both our D and F corps so hopefully that helps

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Leafs were one of the better Corsi teams prior to that, though. Tough to know which one is “real” and which is the aberration.

I think MTL has a deeper defense, and let’s not underrate guys like Plekanec and Gionta, who are fantastic two-way players. I think MTL is better at F, at D, and in net than Toronto.

Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.

by red army line on Sep 15, 2011 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Haha in other words Montreal is a better team…

by stevesmith19 on Sep 15, 2011 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think they are better on D or on F. There D got gutted losing Hamrlik and Wisniewski and I am not convinced that Markov will be healthy.

What kind of forward depth does Montreal have?

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

By forwards

I mean sure I like Cammi, Pleks, Gionta, and Pacioretti. But who do they have beyond that?

I’m not a big fan of either AK of Gomez. I am unsold if Cole will be any good away from Carolina/Staal. The last time he left he wasn’t very good. That is also missing the fact that I doubt he will play more than 60 games as he never seems to.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

That explains it. I’m comfortable with AK and Gomez beating seconds, and Pleks beating tops. They play pure PvP and it seems to work. Throw in some growth from Pacioretti, Desharnais, and especially Eller and I think they’re easily three good two-way lines deep.

On D: Markov, Spacek, Gill, Subban, Gorges. All five have played on their top pair within the last two years and looked fine doing so.

Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.

by red army line on Sep 15, 2011 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Spacek didn’t look good doing it (I think he has looked really bad), and Gill can only be good in a complementary fashion if someone faster is with him.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe just selective memory, but I remember him playing Ovechkin pretty well (not in the playoffs, that was Gill-Gorges I think, but regular season).

Everyone is faster than Gill.

Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.

by red army line on Sep 15, 2011 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

MTL fans have been saying Spacek might be the 7th dman next year.

Spacek is terrible.

Chicken Little is dead. Long Live Positive Pete.
Lebda-free since July 3.

by nhlcheapshot on Sep 15, 2011 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don’t see it in the numbers. Wisniewski dragged him down pretty badly (yet Hamrlik-Wiz was awesome…)

Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.

by red army line on Sep 15, 2011 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

He’ll be 37 and has looked like shit for years.

I hope Spacek gets Top 4 minutes next year so we can dance around him.

Chicken Little is dead. Long Live Positive Pete.
Lebda-free since July 3.

by nhlcheapshot on Sep 15, 2011 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I cant wait till Sabres fans realize that Regehr is no longer superman

Y'all Heard About Me, You Just Didn't Know It was Me

by JaredFromLondon on Sep 15, 2011 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Spacek is terrible.

Chicken Little is dead. Long Live Positive Pete.
Lebda-free since July 3.

by nhlcheapshot on Sep 15, 2011 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

he is really good at getting punched in his second chin

Y'all Heard About Me, You Just Didn't Know It was Me

by JaredFromLondon on Sep 15, 2011 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Perhaps, although I think Plekanec and Gionta are underrated—both do an excellent job of driving the play the right way, especially Plekanec, who plays against top competition and performs admirably, and still puts up a decent amount of points (career 0.66 PPG).

by Shift on Sep 15, 2011 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think Plek’s is a good comparable for Grabbo. Gionta is a good goal scorer (in fact his GPG over the last 2 years is pretty similar to Kessel’s), but he isn’t a great passer and is more of a complimentary forward. I am also a big fan of Cammalieri and think Pacioretti and a couple young guys (like Desharnais) can turn into something decent. That being said I don’t much love their depth forwards and think their D is going to take a step back this year. They lost Hamrlik and Wisnieski both big minute guys for them. They are gambling on Markov being healthy for the first time in 3 years, Subban taking a step forward and not back, and Gorges really stepping up.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think FLA will be that bad.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Sep 15, 2011 10:01 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree

Honestly, I would swap Winnipeg and Florida. A lot of Atlanta’s record last year was based on a ridiculous hot streak from Pavelec, Byfuglien and Enstrom. Unless Wheeler, Kane, and Burmistrov turn out to be revelations, I don’t think they’ll be even as good as they were last year. Florida, on the other hand, is a wildcard and could end up anywhere

by Holidays in the Sundin on Sep 15, 2011 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hate to be a grammar nazi but watch the there/they’re/their!

by Goosemonster on Sep 15, 2011 10:07 AM EDT reply actions  

I didn’t edit this piece. I know how to do the “there’s” properly, but rarely do it right and have to go back and correct them. This piece was over 2000 words and to be honest, I just didn’t bother.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

1) Washington
I agree with most of what you said here. McPhee pretty much had a perfect off-season, getting Vokoun at a steal of a price, Hamrlik is an adequate short-term replacement for Hannan, and they didn’t tinker too much (and have a potential lottery pick to boot). I think they addressed a lot of their needs this off-season, and if it they don’t get a deep run this year, I think Boudreau’s done and they seriously consider making some San Jose/Philly style changes next summer.

2) Boston
AKA the year in which Seguin begins to haunt Leaf fans for the next decade. Their defence continues to be wildly overrated because Corvo is a worse version of Kaberle. If Boychuk, Ference and McQuaid can’t step up like Chiarelli seems to believe they can, and Thomas falls back to earth, they could stumble.

3) Pittsburgh
On any other team, Crosby’s unknown status would be devastating. This year is going to be Jordan Staal’s coming out party and I think he makes Malkin expendable for help elsewhere. The supporting cast has been shored up with the Neal trade last year. Sid comes back by Christmas and these guys take off.

4) Carolina
Every 3rd year, for whatever reason, these guys suddenly become amazing again. 2002, 2006, 2009. It’s their turn again. Rutherford did a real nice job in the free agent market, getting his own guys re-signed pretty cheaply, upgrading from Corvo to Kaberle. They quietly amassed a nice little stable of young prospects; Sutter, Skinner, Zac Dalpe, McBain, and added Ryan Murphy this year. Carolina will push ahead of the East’s bubble benefitting from the Southleast but Cam Ward will probably drag them to the 2nd round.

5) NY Rangers
I’m concerned that their offence now hinges on a 31-year-old coming off of a concussion and one of the most brittle players in the league. But for once they’re actually building a very solid supporting cast with guys like Callahan, Dubinsky, and Anisimov, and Staal and Girardi anchor an underrated defence playing in front of one of the best goalies in the league. This ranking hinges on getting 140 games out of the Richards/Gaborik. They’ll miss the playoffs if they don’t get that out of them.

6) Buffalo
While I think BCapp overrates them (Stafford will regress from his second-half surge, Pominville’s an injury question mark, and Leino’s pretty overrated), the team as it is isn’t much different from the one that finished 7th last season. They spent money like a drunken sailor but all the money seemed to go to luxury players and they still have some pretty glaring holes up the middle (after Roy) and on defence. Miller needs to rebound because last season he was pretty average.

7) Montreal
Carey Price is good. Andrei Markov won’t stay healthy all year. Toronto wins the season series. They lose to Boston in the first round. We’ve been here before.

8) New Jersey
The team that lit up the league in the second half of the year starts out on a ridiculous tear. Then Parisemania starts causing distractions, the fact that their goaltenders are a combined 77 years old catches up to them and Brodeur starts to falter, and they back into the playoffs and get obliterated by a much better Caps team.

9) Tampa Bay
I think expectations in Tampa are going to be pretty high and they did not do a lot in the off-season to improve their team. They lost some of their depth by losing Bergenheim and Gagne, and Roloson really started to show his age in the playoffs. Tampa Bay loses some ground thanks to what I see is a surge from the Hurricanes and misses out.

10) Philadelphia
They’re putting an awful lot on the shoulders of their now young core. While Giroux and Van Riemsdyk might prove to be capable of filling the offensive load of Carter and Richards, are the likes of Schenn, Voracek and Simmonds ready to fill the secondary scoring provided by Giroux and Van Riemsdyk? I don’t think so. I also think that Pronger’s pretty much done and they don’t have a whole lot beyond Coburn.

11) Toronto
Basically everything we looked at said we need to improve the goal differential by about 35 to realistically make the playoffs. I think we’ll get about halfway there, dropping the goals against by about 12 and picking up about a half dozen goals. Overall I’m pleased with the direction and I definitely think we improve on the 85 points last year (I’m guessing about 89 this year), but I don’t think we are skilled enough (yet) to get by some of these other teams.

12) NY Islanders
If it wasn’t for the fact that half of this team is going to make league minimum to offset the other half that’s actually worthy of an NHL contract I’d be real bullish on these guys. Also their goaltending looks to be a hot mess again, because they probably have about 7 guys competing for an NHL job and I don’t know if any of them would be higher than #2 on any other teams’ depth chart.

13) Ottawa
Senators fans should become very accustomed to Jared Cowen getting burned on the outside by the speedy forwards from every other team in their division. Murray put a few real nice pieces in the cupboard, like Rundblad and Zibanajed, but this is still an ongoing rebuild. Anderson/Lehner play just well enough to keep the Sens from getting someone who would really help them, and forcing Murray to nail a draft pick in the 5-8 range again.

14) Florida
If I need someone to raze my franchise and stockpile draft picks to build up the prospect pool, I call Dale Tallon. As soon as I need someone to put some free agents in place to accentuate what I’m trying to build, I call anyone but Dale Tallon. if Tomas Vokoun and a year-over-year 920 SV% couldn’t get these guys anywhere, what’s Theodore going to be able to do?

15) Winnipeg
I don’t think this franchise has made a competent move in the calendar year, and it still won’t matter because they’ll sell out every game. It’s a good thing Nail Yakupov has been playing his OHL hockey in Sarnia as he’ll be adequately prepared for the soul-crushing boredom of Winnipeg.

Resident Capologist
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік

by clrkaitken on Sep 15, 2011 10:49 AM EDT reply actions  

Carolina
I like a bunch of their young guys (like McBain) and they did a good job of keeping most of their UFAs. I just don’t see how they are taking a step forward from last year.

NJ
I can’t get passed the fact that they have no C’s to start the year. Who on earth is going to do that with Zajac out so long?

Philly
I don’t think they are going to drop that far back. Philly was 3rd in the league last year 257 GF (2 behind first in the league) and were 4th in the league with a +36 goal differential. Even if they lose 20-25 goals from Carter and Richards (which I think is more than they will), their D shouldn’t be any worse and their goaltending should be improved. I think they are still a good team.

Buffalo
First off Stafford specifically: I do think he’ll slow down. Stafford scored at half a goal a game last year which would be a 41 G season. I said I think he can score 25. Over his career he has scored at 0.32, 0.25, 0.25, 0.20, 0.50 GPG. A 25 G season is scoring at 0.30 GPG (if you play the full season). What makes me think he can do this is his consistent increase S/GP. From his first year to now, they have been 1.63, 1.61, 2.32, 2.55, 2.89. As well every year except 2 years ago (where he shot at 7.7%) he has been above 10% in shooting. In regards to Leino, the question is not whether he is overrated, its whether he is a 2nd line winger. I think the answer is yes. In regards to their D why do you say they have so many holes? I also disagree with this:

the team as it is isn’t much different from the one that finished 7th last season.

They were missing 2 of their top 3 forwards for a big chunk of last season. They missed their number 1 C for almost the entire season and Pominville came back slowly. That alone makes them a better team. On D they brought in a good puck mover (which is good for a team with good possession skills) and a good shutdown defenseman (Regehr).
Finally I think we need to recognize the importance of playing Enroth over Lalime. Last year Enroth went 9-2-2. While it shouldn’t be predicted that he can necessarily do that well in the future, I think it is very likely that he will do better than the 5-13-3, 4-8-2, and 0-5-0 that Lalime has given them. A capable back up should be able to add a good 3-5 wins to their record which would be 6-10 points.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

And Winnipeg

I like a bunch of their youth, think they have enough competent veterans and am a very big fan of Enstrom. Add in some faith in Pavelec and I think they can do better than that.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Look at WPG’s top 9 forwards. If you can find a worse one outside of PHX, I’ll give you a shiny quarter.

Chicken Little is dead. Long Live Positive Pete.
Lebda-free since July 3.

by nhlcheapshot on Sep 15, 2011 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Flyers lost 101 goals from Carter (36), Richards (23), Leino (19), Zherdev (16), and Versteeg (7).

Giroux (25) and Van Riemsdyk (21) are going to be counted on to pick up some of that slack, along with the new guys Simmonds (14), Voracek (14), Schenn and Jagr.

So basically to match what they lost they need 146 goals out of Giroux, Van Riemsdyk, Simmonds, Voracek, Schenn, Jagr, and let’s include Max Talbot.

Talbot’s never scored more than 13; say he gets 10.
Jagr scored 25 three years ago, but declined to 19 last year in the KHL; let’s say he gets 15.
Simmonds’s high is 16, but he’s going to get more of a chance here; let’s be optimistic and say he gets 25.
Schenn’s a rookie; what’s reasonable here, 15? 20? Let’s say 15.
Voracek’s high is also 16; let’s say he springs for 20.

Making some fairly optimistic assumptions, that’s 85 goals from the new help. We’re still short the 60 goals they lost by trading Richards and Carter. Can Giroux and Van Riemsdyk combine for 60 goals next season?

Resident Capologist
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік

by clrkaitken on Sep 15, 2011 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think they can combine for 50 and take out some of your generosity (make that prediction 80) and they are at 130. Thats 16 goals short. They had a +36 goal differential so than they would have had a +20. I just think they have the safety to be worse but still more than good enough.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the hope in PHI is that Bryzgalov will continue to put up .920+ and the loss of goals won’t matter.

Chicken Little is dead. Long Live Positive Pete.
Lebda-free since July 3.

by nhlcheapshot on Sep 15, 2011 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

They gave up 216 goals against on 2471 shots last year; good for a 913 SV%
Assuming the same amount of shots, a 920 SV% takes them down to 198 Goals Against.

For reference, PIT and LA gave up 196 last season and were tied for 6th best.

Resident Capologist
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік

by clrkaitken on Sep 15, 2011 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Corvo is actually a better version of Kaberle. I wouldn’t think so by watching, but he played top lines and won in Carolina, playing frequently (IIRC…Dobber is behind a paywall now) with Gleason who’s regressed pretty badly the last couple of years.

Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.

by red army line on Sep 15, 2011 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think this franchise has made a competent move in the calendar year

I understand your point, but I like the trade for Fehr and the Bogo/Ladd signings, from their standpoint.

Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.

by red army line on Sep 15, 2011 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually I liked those signings too.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 15, 2011 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t see a substantial difference between the team that the wheels came off of in 2011 and the current team, except for the addition of Fehr.

Resident Capologist
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік

by clrkaitken on Sep 15, 2011 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s funny: they sucked at possession and were in the top-8, then suddenly got great at possession (I think coinciding with playing Byfuglien and Enstrom against tougher competition) but starting losing and losing.

Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.

by red army line on Sep 15, 2011 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pavelec regressed to the mean. Check out his save percentage splits.

914 OCT
951 NOV
922 DEC
908 JAN
880 FEB
886 MAR
885 APR

Resident Capologist
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік

by clrkaitken on Sep 15, 2011 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nice Post

Liked everything you said except the leafs prediction. Think you forgot to factor in some things.

Step 1: Somethings
Step 2: ???
Step 3: PLAYOFFS!!!!1

Its going to be a great season!

Pimpin ain't Parise!

by SPERO on Sep 15, 2011 11:18 AM EDT reply actions  

LOL

As a typical Leafs fan, I thought the same thing. I love it.

Let the reign of Chemmy begin

by MLS on Sep 18, 2011 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rangers and other Atlantic teams

I think the Rangers defense gets sold a little short because of the strong performances of Lundqvist on an annual basis. While it might have been true earlier in his career that he was the undisputed backbone of the Rangers D, the defensive ability of the top 4 (Staal-Girardi and McDonagh-Sauer) is fairly strong in their own right. However they don’t provide much in the way of offense. As for their forwards, health is obviously an issue for their biggest guns in Richards and Gaborik, but also guys like Dubinsky and Callahan are prone to picking up an injury due to their grinding style of play as evidenced by Callahan missing 20 games last year due to block shots against both Pittsburgh and the Bruins. I think they had some players that overachieved a little last year like Boyle and possibly Stepan who might see a dip in production if he’s slotted as 3rd line center, but there was also nice growth in players like Artem Anisimov who managed to increase his points quite nicely while moving up from more/less 4th line role to 2C.

Even without the services of Crosby for an indefinite period, the Penguins still have to be considered the division favorites. And I would say this has a lot to due with how strong their defense performed last year as much as havig a healthy Malkin. The upgrades they made prior to last season certainly paid dividends and I’d be willing to bet had no small part in helping Fleury get past his poor start of the season and put in what was arguably his finest regular season of his career. When and if Crosby does return they are primed to take the Eastern Conference crown.

The Flyers are a tough team to figure out. Losing a 150 or so points a year from Richards and Carter will be tough to replace. Do Claude Giroux and Dany Briere repeat last year’s performances? Is JvR ready to take his game up a notch or two? Looking at their defense, does the reliance on heavy minutes for Pronger and Timmonen start to reach the land of diminishig returns? I think a lot of those questions will determine the reboot of the Flyers more so than how well Bryzgalov fares.

It was the tale of two season for the Devils. Under MacLean they were aimless and Lemaire came in to restore order. So now they have yet another new coach, who’s system may or may not mesh well with Kovalchuk. I’m less concerned about Parise who seems to play well under any style, although a coming back from a knee injury isn’t a trivial matter. A very thin center ice and raw defense playing in front of an aging Brodeur could see New Jersey struggle to return to the playoff picture where they had so often resided for the past two decades.

I’m tempted to say that this is the year where things start to come to together for the Islanders. The nucleus of talent among their forwards look likes it could really turn into a decent offensive force. A full season out of both Okposo and Streit should up their goal scoring. Their weakness however will still be on defense and goaltending. They could very well end up being sort of a Lightning-lite, where scoring isn’t a problem but giving up as much as they score is.

by MyFavBaseballSquadron on Sep 15, 2011 11:23 AM EDT reply actions  

Without reading your predictions-here is mine:

1. Washington
2. Pittsburgh
3. Boston
4. Buffalo
5. Tampa
6. Philly
7. NY Rangers
8. New Jersey
9. Toronto
10. Carolina
11. Montreal
12. NY islanders
13. Florida
14. Winnepeg
15. Ottawa

I will admit that 7 through 11 are almost completely interchangeable depending on a lot of scenarios.
Time to read your post!

"You have to learn the rules of the game. And then you have to play better than anyone else."

Albert Einstein

by Say *plan the parade one more time*... on Sep 15, 2011 4:07 PM EDT reply actions  

Most people are coming up with pretty similar ones.

West might be more interesting than the East.

Chicken Little is dead. Long Live Positive Pete.
Lebda-free since July 3.

by nhlcheapshot on Sep 15, 2011 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep: gotta figure SJS, VAN, LA, DET, and CHI are in, rest of the field looks pretty even.

Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.

by red army line on Sep 15, 2011 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

think the panthers deserve more credit.

Seem like they could be a 8 to 13 type team. think toronto and new jersey will be more in it i mean brodeaur kovulchuck a full season of parise there going to be a good team if you ask me. Think the pens wont win there division. Philli. But the pens could i mean there a wierd team crosby comes back full strenth there great. he dosent and malkin is a bit slow they lost talbot they could struggle a little for pens standards.

by Jt Malley on Sep 15, 2011 10:03 PM EDT reply actions  

The East will shape up something like this:

DIVISION CHAMPS: Washington, Pittsburgh, Boston (in that order).

PLAYOFF TEAMS: Buffalo, Tampa Bay, Philadelphia (in that order).

BUBBLE TEAMS: Montreal, Toronto, NY Rangers, Carolina, New Jersey (not in that order).

BOTTOM FEEDERS: NY Islanders, Florida, Winnipeg (in that order).

REALLY, REALLY FUCKING TERRIBLE: Ottawa.

Visit my blog at: http://50-mission-cap.blogspot.com/
Leaf fan for life! (No, really. They gave me a no-trade clause when I was born.)

by FiftyMissionCap on Sep 16, 2011 2:48 AM EDT reply actions  

As for the West:

DIVISION CHAMPS: Vancouver, Los Angeles, Chicago (in that order)

PLAYOFF TEAMS: San Jose, Detroit, Anaheim, Nashville (probably that order)

BUBBLE TEAMS: St. Louis, Minnesota, Dallas. (not in that order)

TEAMS THAT PROFESS TO BE BUBBLE TEAMS BUT IN REALITY DON’T HAVE A HOPE IN HELL: Calgary.

BOTTOM FEEDERS: Columbus, Phoenix, Colorado. (in that order)

GONNA BE RATHER DISAPPOINTED WHEN THEY REALIZE THEY’RE ONLY GETTING A NO. 2 PICK THIS YEAR: Edmonton.

Visit my blog at: http://50-mission-cap.blogspot.com/
Leaf fan for life! (No, really. They gave me a no-trade clause when I was born.)

by FiftyMissionCap on Sep 16, 2011 2:57 AM EDT reply actions  

BCapp.. Nice Post ... Nice Detail stating your reasonings why...

While I agree with you with numbers 1, 2, & 3, and 5, I think We disagree with 4th seed. I think that will be Tampa Bay. While I agree with you with your statement about the Tampa Goaltending being Iffy at best and hard to predict but Rolo reminds me of Gump Worsley .. an old ugly cagey Goalie who got better and better as he got older.

I disagree with Buffalo being 3rd because … like I have said.. this team coached by Lindy Ruff has a big tendency to sit back and watch how many Saves Miller can make while not even getting out there and trying to move up ice and score. They have been bounced out of the playoffs first round allot lately and thats a coaching issue as well.

While I am a fan of FLYERS I agree they should be 5th but .. you mentioned Powe.. he is gone.. but they have some good young guns in Andreas Nodl, Eric (I am not the fat one) Wellwood, Tom Sestito, Zack Rinaldo, & Mike Testwuide .. add in Max Talbot and Jagr and that makes a 3rd and 4th line Depth.

I have Buffalo 6th for the reasons why as I stated above and Montreal 7th for similar reasons you have them 8th But I do not have the NY Rangers in the top 8th at all !! I have them 9th (HAHA !) and just missing the playoffs because I think that the team has allot of holes in their lineup and questionable healthy players and questionable Chemistry and a Head Coach thats becoming more of a Head Case than a Head Coach. Torts is a modern day Mike Keenan.

Who Do I have 8th ? Surprise ! Toronto Maple Leafs !!

Here is what I got below

1. Capitals
2. Bruins
3. Penguins
4. Lightning
5. FLYERS
6. Sabres
7. Canadiens
8. Maple Leafs
9. Rangers
10. Hurricanes
11. Devils
12. Jets
13. Senators
14. Panthers
15. Islanders (Again in the Basement ~ going to start wearing game day Wool Sweaters instead of Jerseys because its damp and cold in the basement!)

Thats my Opinion… That opinion with a Toonie can get you a large cup of Timmy Ho’s Coffee.

FLYERROB ! YOU STAY AWESOME FLYERS FANS ! ~ ~ ~ Lori Wilson Gray ~ ~ April 07th 1967 - May 27th 2011 ~ May you rest in Peace ~ I love you and miss you big Sis ! I cant believe at 44 yrs of age .. you went to sleep and never woke up. I promise to take care of Matt and Emily for you. With Love, your baby Brother.

by FLYERROB on Sep 16, 2011 10:22 PM EDT reply actions  

I was waiting on your take

I had forgotten they traded Powe for the 3rd round pick, but I also don’t have a problem with Philly’s depth. I think they definitely lost elite forwards, but the they should be fine in that regard.

In regards to the Buffalo, NYR, Tampa discussion I guess only time will tell.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 18, 2011 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes we shall see shall we.

LETS GO FLYERS !!

and

GO LEAFS GO !! GET TO THE 8TH SPOT >…. Playoffs just aint as much fun without a Toronto Philly matchup !!

FLYERROB ! YOU STAY AWESOME FLYERS FANS ! ~ ~ ~ Lori Wilson Gray ~ ~ April 07th 1967 - May 27th 2011 ~ May you rest in Peace ~ I love you and miss you big Sis ! I cant believe at 44 yrs of age .. you went to sleep and never woke up. I promise to take care of Matt and Emily for you. With Love, your baby Brother.

by FLYERROB on Sep 20, 2011 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

This is a very solid list

I’d have to agree with you on almost all counts. The only thing that I can really disagree on is Boston being so high, and the bubble teams, but of course bubble teams can end up anywhere and only time will tell with them. As far as Boston, while goaltending carries teams, I just don’t think that it can propel Boston to 2nd in the east. I would definitely say they will finish in the top 4 and win the Northeast, but I don’t see them finishing 2nd.

As for the Leafs… Well, everyone’s either saying 8th or 9th, so I guess we should all just cheer PLAYOFFS really loud and hope for the best.

Let the reign of Chemmy begin

by MLS on Sep 18, 2011 6:07 PM EDT reply actions  

Last year I said 10th +/-2 and I think they have improved some so I’ll say 9th +/-2. I really don’t have much confidence in the specific order of 8-11. If Pavelec doesn’t play well the Jets could be much worse than predicted.

I am drinking the Kule-aid!
Certified Kule lover!

by BCapp on Sep 18, 2011 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your best source for quality Toronto Maple Leafs news, rumours, analysis, stats and scores from the fan perspective.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

N907005365_1934770_7971_small
PPP Salary cap Challenge - Paper bag Leaf fan
Lifeasaleaffan_small
(Old) Marlies Game Photos
Newman_small
PPP Salary cap Challenge - samspade
Small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge - DaSim85
Globeatar_small
How Much Should You Spend On A Top 4 D?
Phaneufkessel_small
TOI-weighted NHL Team Ages
48839cd14228986f0ad0d2e405f1_small
Casting Call
Petering_small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge - Self Destructive Zones
Globeatar_small
The Fancystats Exchange, Part 1
Or-wallpaper-1680x1050__1__small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge-BCapp #2

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

StatCounter

wordpress visitor


Chief Blogging Officers

Calvin_small PPP

Aen1_small Chemmy

PPP's Girlfriends

Don_t_panic_small SkinnyFish

Picture_1_small JP Nikota

Fg_small birky

Christian-hanson-wrecks-brian-o_1__small Bower Power