The Maturation of Luke Schenn
Drafted fifth overall in 2008 Luke Schenn was Toronto's first big name first round draft pick in a long time. His arrival was a ray of hope for Leafs fans wondering when their playoff drought would end (spoiler: not for a while). Schenn stepped into the lineup immediately as a 19 year old as part of a defensive group that incluced Pavel Kubina, Ian White, Jeff Finger, Tomas Kaberle, Anton Stralman, Jonas Frogren and Mike Van Ryn.
That season the future of the Leafs was only Schenn, Justin Pogge and Jiri Tlusty.
Schenn's arrival made him an instant fan favorite. He promised to be a bruising stay at home defenseman. People have written at length about how fans of the Leafs want a tough lunchpail player like Wendel Clark over a flashy guy like Pavel Bure and Toronto was ready for "The Human Eraser".
Now in his fourth season Luke Schenn is the local whipping boy. "He's had four full seasons to learn the game" people say. "He hasn't developed" others say. This article isn't about defending Luke Schenn from all of his criticism, I think there's valid points that his footspeed may not be up to par which can cause his positioning problems.
I'd just like to urge a little bit of caution. We're all well aware that defensive contributions aren't generally made by young players. Young forwards can score a lot but generally are high event players: the puck ends up in the back of their net a lot.
Want some examples? Think about Steve Yzerman who figured out playing defense to become one of the best players in the game. Chris Pronger joined the Hartford Whalers under Brian Burke as a 19 year old. His seasons in Hartford were disappointing, his footspeed wasn't there, he was traded to St. Louis when he turned 21.
Defense can take time to develop. Pull comps if you don't believe me. It's hard to evaluate shutdown D on counting stats but using ice time as a proxy we see some good comps are Eric Brewer, Bryan McCabe, Robyn Regehr and Marc-Edouard Vlasic.
Then there's the offense. If Luke Schenn isn't an offensive contributor (no power play time) it's worth pointing out that as a 22 year old Duncan Keith scored 22 points. This season as a 22 year old Luke Schenn is on pace for 25. Zdeno Chara at 22? 11 points.
Keep your pants on, I'm not saying Luke Schenn turns into a premier offensive defenseman, but what I am saying is that regardless of NHL service he's a 22 year old kid and you don't see many 22 year olds who are good at playing defense.
Give Schenn time. This is that patience thing.
229 comments
|
6 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thank You! what I’ve been saying for a couple days now, minus some of the comparables research.
So your thoughts probably have more weight
by Chi-town leafs on Jan 14, 2012 11:44 AM EST reply actions
I've been saying this type of thing
for a lot longer than the past few days. Schenn is a 22 year old kid, he’s not going to be a shut down guy at this age – virtually no D men are.
His production offensively also gives hope to the idea that he has an offensive game and potential.
Generally speaking what my main concern is on trading him now is – his value is likely at an all time low for his career thus far. We wouldn’t maximize return in any way…. which is always the issue in contemplating dealing a kid from your roster that was a top 10 overall pick who seems underwhelming at the moment.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 11:47 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Good post. I’d be very leery of trading Schenn for anything less than a proven difference-maker. van Riemsdyk doesn’t qualify for me.
My degree is worthless
Van Riemsdyk
is the fwd equivalent to Schenn. He’s obviously very talented, but he’s still developing his game – and he’s progressed every year with some caveats such as his zone start ratio and his line mates.
Overall though the two are fairly comparable from a value perspective.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 11:49 AM EST up reply actions
I’d move Schenn for elite offensive talent or to bring in somebody like Ryan Suter.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
but in either of those
situations, he’d be part of a larger package – he won’t get you those guys on his own.
I’m assuming you know this already – I’m just stating it explicitly.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 11:50 AM EST up reply actions
Suter will be UFA on July 1. He’s not bringing back much more than Luke Schenn.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
“I’d move Schenn for elite offensive talent or to bring in somebody like Ryan Suter.”
Concur – as the centerpiece for a Getzlaf type player. Ryan Suter, I’d rather wait until 1 July and make an offer.
I think he ends up in Detroit though.
My degree is worthless
I don’t think we’ll have the option to make an offer July 1.
I think Nashville moves him at the deadline and trade talks include a contract extension.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
It will be real interesting to see how Nashville (6th in the West) handles this situation.
It’s not like Florida with Bouwmeester and Dallas with Richards where they were on the outside looking in, and basically bet that a successful playoff run would convince them to stay (terrible bets, btw)
Nashville’s probably good value for a playoff spot, but I think to be able to move Suter during a playoff run they need to re-sign Weber first.
Cynically Sarcastic
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
I disagree
but ok. I think Suter can bring back more than Luke Schenn.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 11:55 AM EST up reply actions
Really? Kovalchuk and Hossa deadline deals brought back worse prospects and late 1sts.
Schenn’s worth more than either of those packages. Suter ain’t Kovalchuk. Suter ain’t Hossa.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Yeah, I think the rumoured price tag/return on the Suters and Getzlafs this year are wildly inflated. Two A prospects, a first, and a young roster player for Getzlaf? Break me a fucking give.
My degree is worthless
Getzlaf is also still under contract for next season, and is one of the top 5-10 centres in the league when he’s healthy. Bit of a different situation between him and Suter.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 12:03 PM EST up reply actions
Mike Richards was under contract for several more seasons, and is a top 10 centre in the league. He didn’t cost two A prospects, a first, and a young roster player.
My degree is worthless
Getzlaf is worth more than Mike Richards, no question. Richards is a 60 point guy most years who plays well defensively. Getzlaf has been a dominant force who scores at over a point per game pace.
Also, I thought the rumoured price for Getzlaf was two roster players, a first round pick, and a prospect. I think the Leafs could actually swing that. Look at it this way:
If we assume Grabovski isn’t coming back next year (and maybe he is, but go with me for a minute), we can trade him to a contender for a 1st and a prospect. Package that with MacArthur and Kadri, send it to Anaheim for Getzlaf. We lose two guys currently playing on our 3rd line & a centre we weren’t going to re-sign anyway, and we get one of the best centres in the league in return. Hell yes I would do that deal.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 12:14 PM EST up reply actions
And you can re-work those pieces a bit if you want. Maybe it’s Schenn and MacArthur, or Kadri and Franson, or whatever. I think it’s very workable.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 12:15 PM EST up reply actions
i dunno if trading for the unicorn is worth it. do you really think were making it very far in the playoffs this year, assuming we can keep it together and make the playoffs in the first place. We have some young guys who, hopefully, can continue to grow into productive NHL players.
I think we should all just be patient, and see how things progress from here. No need to giveaway all those pieces just yet, lets wait until july 1.
by JohnerstonRex on Jan 14, 2012 4:12 PM EST up reply actions
There are no core age #1 centres reaching UFA this year. Or next. Or basically ever.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 5:19 PM EST up reply actions
I think the term on his deal was considered risk (so a negative asset)…I view it otherwise since I love the deal, but that is how I rationalize it.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Jan 14, 2012 12:42 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
I seriously wonder if Mike Richards is a top 10 centre. I think he would fall outside of the top 10.
For fun, lets try.
C’s ahead of Richards:
Crosby, Malkin, Stamkos, Getzlaf, Kopitar, Sedin, E Staal (before this year he was), Zetterberg, Datsyuk, Backstrom, Toews
Questionable but probably not:
Spezza, Kesler, Bergeron, Stastny, B Richards, Carter
*Note I didn’t include Giroux because I was thinking of this summer before Giroux’s season.
At best I would call Richards top 15 not top 10. But it is close.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
Krejci?
Popped a Colboner - Certified Joe Colborne Fanboy
I'm telling you I was the King of Spain (now I eat humble pie)
Now the Leafs call me up to drive the Zamboni
Twitter me this.
Welcome home Chaim Weisswasser!
by happiergilmore on Jan 14, 2012 1:11 PM EST up reply actions
I’m asking about Krejci
Popped a Colboner - Certified Joe Colborne Fanboy
I'm telling you I was the King of Spain (now I eat humble pie)
Now the Leafs call me up to drive the Zamboni
Twitter me this.
Welcome home Chaim Weisswasser!
by happiergilmore on Jan 14, 2012 1:13 PM EST up reply actions
Ha! I hit post after typing out Bergeron.
Bergeron is better than Krejci and probably helps him look good. Lots of d-zone starts against tough competition.
by stevesmith19 on Jan 14, 2012 1:16 PM EST up reply actions
Getzlaf is posturing by Anaheim.
I don’t think they’re in any rush to move their captain but if someone wants to pony up Murray’s asking price…
Cynically Sarcastic
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
Look at their last 5 games. He tried and succeeded to light a fire under them. Just good enough to get 9th in the conference and get a middling draft pick
"They build a statue, they knock it down and piss on it, and now they will be out there building it again."
by ThickSkinnedAlive on Jan 14, 2012 12:37 PM EST up reply actions
We don't have behindthenet.ca
numbers for this far back, but it’s worth pointing out that Robyn Regehr’s first 4 years in the NHL saw him go a combined -42. He wasn’t that great defensively early in his career either.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
The Devil’s Advocate would point out that you’ve cherry picked some success stories just as you’ve accused others of doing when talking about Sex Panther.
I agree fully with your viewpoint that Schenn’s current struggles are not as big of a deal as some make them out to be, but that point above needs to be said for full disclosure.
The only defenceman on the roster that’s younger than Luke is Jake Gardiner. That can’t be forgotten.
Cynically Sarcastic
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
Sure I did, but the counter to that is “show me 22 year old d-men who are good at playing D”. I can’t find any.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Not quite answering that
These are the only guys to do it 2+ times:
1 Drew Doughty 2009 2011 LAK NHL 3
2 Marc-Edouard Vlasic 2007 2009 SJS NHL 3
3 Zach Bogosian 2010 2011 ATL NHL 2
4 Victor Hedman 2010 2011 TBL NHL 2
5 Tyler Myers 2010 2011 BUF NHL 2
6 Dion Phaneuf 2006 2007 CGY NHL 2
7 Luke Schenn 2009 2011 TOR NHL 2
8 Brad Stuart 2000 2001 SJS NHL 2
9 Ossi Vaananen 2001 2002 PHX NHL 2
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
Same idea
Here are the defenseman with 200+ GP by 21
There are 13 of them.
Of course the thing with both of these groupings are that they are highly based on GM and coaching decisions and may not reflect actual skill/ability as much as some other stats. But it is what I found.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
I think you’re right- it has more to do with " how high were they drafted?" than actual ability.
That's "Da-ooo". I killed a turkey once, with a shovel.
Drew Doughty, Tyler Myers, Karl Alzner, Alex Pietrangelo…you are right that those types are rare, though.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Jan 14, 2012 12:44 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
how many of those guys are good at actual defense?
Resident Internet Tough Guy
by JaredFromLondon on Jan 14, 2012 2:41 PM EST up reply actions
Doughty, Myers and Pietrangelo?
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
The Tyler Myers who playsin front of a .938 sv%?
Paedophiles are using an area of internet the size of Ireland.
Mike Weaver, tall version
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 5:20 PM EST up reply actions
…all of them? You want more names?
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Jan 16, 2012 10:08 AM EST up reply actions
Only
5 Defenders have played 70+ games 3 times prior to the age of 22 in the NHL in the past 10 years.
Schenn, Vlasic, Phaneuf, Meszaros, and Doughty.
The Leafs have 2 of those guys on their roster.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
and if you look at the list of those guys?
it’s a pretty damn elite list of D men. I don’t see Schenn being the one huge glaring error on the list.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 11:56 AM EST up reply actions
Let’s be honest, Schenn played his 18 and 19 year old seasons with the Leafs because our defence was a black hole of awfulness, not because he was genuinely a good NHL defender.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 11:56 AM EST up reply actions
And yet the argument is he played three full seasons in the NHL already why isn’t he amazing? Getting run over with awful goaltending, bad partners and no goal scoring doesn’t scream “will develop quickly”.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
If anything, I think the fact that he entered the NHL so early may have put back his development by forcing him to put on too much weight too early so that he could be strong enough to out-muscle 25-30 year olds.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 12:00 PM EST up reply actions
“bad partners”
This I think is really crucial. Anthony Petrielli has pointed out that Schenn’s entire career (except his stints with Gunnar), he’s been on the ice to bail out a defensively suspect partner, which is not a great way to learn how to play D yourself.
I would love if the Leafs acquired Gleason, paired him with Schenn, and took the pressure off Luke, and allowed him to thrive as part of a shutdown pairing.
My degree is worthless
I like any plan that involves bringing in shutdown D.
I think “Shutdown D” is a hard job to objectively evaluate and since those guys tend to not score they’re probably undervalued.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
An effective shutdown D to me is the guy you barely ever hear about, because his job is essentially to forget about doing anything fancy, and not fuck up.
by Self Destructive Zones on Jan 14, 2012 12:08 PM EST up reply actions
I like the idea too, but I am concerned that Philly is also interested and can drive up the price. I don’t want to pay a Beauchemin price for him.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
Boston is also interested. And I’m sure some Western conference teams. I think Carolina might find themselves getting a much nicer return for Gleason than he realistically merits.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 12:17 PM EST up reply actions
he's also
UFA at the end of the year.
Same for Bryan Allen.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:29 PM EST up reply actions
I like any plan that involves bringing in shutdown D.
This would exclude Gleason. He’s really not very good.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
Many around the league seem to think he is. Why don’t you?
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
The Hurricanes’ defense corp is a fucking joke. He and Allen are the only defensive-ish guys, so they get fed the tough minutes.
Gleason gives up a ton of shots and he wanders out of position looking for the big hit and he takes a lot of penalties.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
I agree. I think Schenn has (almost) always been in a position where he’s probably felt like he’s had to do too much.
by Self Destructive Zones on Jan 14, 2012 12:07 PM EST up reply actions
Interestingly, Schenn’s best season by far was last year when he played with the supposedly defensively suspect Tomas Kaberle. I think Kaberle actually bailed Schenn out a fair bit last year.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 12:07 PM EST up reply actions
Kaberle played fine defense last year. For a few years after the Janssen hit Kaberle did fuck all.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
I really think Kaberle’s defensive ability was over maligned and was as good as Schenn’s at most times.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
No, it really wasn’t. Last year Kaberle went back to his pre-Janssens self but for a while Tomas Kaberle in our end was comically bad.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Which is fine. He was bad for a bit. But you hear most people talk about him and they act like he was a 4th forward his whole career. Like MAB levels.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
Its a shame that Luke couldnt have had an easier introduction to the league through the AHL.
Being a Leafs fan makes me bipolar.
Plenty of us advocated that at the time. It wasn’t an option because of the hype around him. He was the only thing worth watching on the Leafs after Sundin.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Which is true. It was more a decision of necessity, its just a shame. I hope he can overcome any slow development lost in his early career and turn into the defenseman we all want him to be. I dont think hes going to be traded since he hasent shown this season that hes worth the return we need….unless some GM is nuts + believes what we all want to believe about him.
Being a Leafs fan makes me bipolar.
“He’s had four full seasons to learn the game” people sa
These people would be amazingly stupid since he’s only been in the league three and a half seasons.
Cynically Sarcastic
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
I guess they like rounding up.
by Self Destructive Zones on Jan 14, 2012 12:04 PM EST up reply actions
Who would trade Schenn for Giroux?
JVR has basically the exact same stats as Giroux at the same age:
(I posted this in the other thread):
GPG/PPG
JVR……..Giroux
20 0.19/0.45…..N/A
21 0.28/0.53……0.21/0.64
22 0.30/0.59……0.20/0.57
The year after Giroux exploded. Now I am not saying JVR will necessarily explode the way Giroux did, the chances are he won’t. But what I think this does is highlight the logic in trading for a guy like JVR instead of Getzlaf. The idea is that you trade for a guy before he has reached his full potential while he costs less, is either an RFA or locked into a decent deal (won’t cost a fortune in cap hit), and will be in his prime longer. But why does he cost less? Because instead of being the next Giroux, he could be the next Blake Wheeler… (also FWIW I think JVR has more hype today than Giroux did 2 years ago…could be wrong).
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
That is an interesting comp. I’d also like to see other players who put up comparable numbers at similar ages and what they turned into.
In thinking about JVR I was looking at LeClair’s numbers. A quick eyeball suggested their paths so far have been pretty similar.
My degree is worthless
Age 21-23, since 2000, between .55 and .65 ppg.
Bryan Little, Hornqvist, Jeff Carter, Cheechoo, Stempniak, Hartnell, Marleau, Vanek, Frolov, Simon Gagne, J.P. Dumont, Huselius, both Kostitsyns…
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
I don’t disagree with anything you say, but I think we also have to evaluate things in terms of where he fits on the roster and where he fits in terms of our cap situation. $3.6 million is a lot of money to pay a guy to play 15 minutes a night against weak competition in the hope that he eventually becomes a 2nd pairing guy. That’s on Burke, not Schenn, but I think it has to be part of the equation.
Also worth noting is the fact that Cody Franson has essentially usurped Schenn as our #2 RD not just because Schenn has played poorly, but because Franson has actually played quite well lately. I think Franson is legitimately a 2nd pairing defender on most teams in the league right now. Franson is also considerably cheaper. Yeah, he’s up for a new contract at the end of the season, but based on Burke’s history with RFAs, I think Franson can probably be retained at something like $1.5 – $2 million per season.
In addition to that, the Leafs have Jesse Blacker coming up through the system, and they’re apparently pretty high on him, plus Mike Komisarek naturally plays RD as well. Schenn may turn into a great defender one day, but based on our current roster makeup and our cap situation, if I were Burke I would definitely be trying to find a way to package Schenn with something else to find an upgrade either to our #1 LD or #1C. I’m not saying he should just dump Schenn to the highest bidder, but I do think his trade value is probably considerably higher than his actual value to the team for the next couple of seasons.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 12:11 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Blacker’s been playing LD all season for the Marlies.
Assuming Gardiner gets sent down again soon Schenn will again be the youngest defenceman on the Leafs.
Cynically Sarcastic
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
Ahh, I just saw that he shoots R and assumed he was RD. I still think Schenn is at best our #3 RD, and he makes a lot of money to play that role.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 12:18 PM EST up reply actions
I believe, and I think the research Chemmy did bears this out, that Schenn’s upside is a first pairing, solid #2 on a contender, defenceman.
My degree is worthless
I meant for the next season or two. I don’t think Schenn is going to take minutes away from Franson any time soon.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 12:23 PM EST up reply actions
FWIW, I’m not sure you could find a scout or talking head who would suggest he’ll ever be that good.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
I think this is something the Leafs have tried because of the depth at RD. Holzer is there as well.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
Franson
has faced easy competition and has 56% OZ Starts… I’m not sure he’s as competent defensively as people think recently.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:31 PM EST up reply actions
He’s improved as the season went along.
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
yeah
but improving from absolutely horrible isn’t hard.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:33 PM EST up reply actions
He’s no Lebda.
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
very true
huge upgrade on Lebda.
But compare OZ starts to Schenn.
Schenn is at 44.1%, Franson is at 52.7% (my quote of 56 was off the top of my head and was wrong).
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:36 PM EST up reply actions
He’s less sheltered at ES than Phaneuf.
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
Phaneuf's OZ starts
53.5%
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
Phaneuf
faces the toughest competition on the team after Gunnarsson:
Corsi REL QoC for Gunnarsson is 1.008, for Phaneuf it’s 0.984
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:39 PM EST up reply actions
Good point
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
Though, I was surprised to see Phaneuf getting more offensive zone starts than Franson.
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
partially due
to the fact that he’s good and it’s often in the OZ when he’s on the ice.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:41 PM EST up reply actions
also
compare his Corsi REL QoC
Schenn isn’t amazingly hard at -0.024, but Franson’s is pretty damn easy at -0.647
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:38 PM EST up reply actions
the difference
between the avg Corsi REL Phaneuf and Franson face is -1.631… that’s HUGE.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:39 PM EST up reply actions
But if you go by QOC Franson comes out better than Schenn (-0.21 to -0.24)
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
if you go by
Corsi QoC Franson’s is lower not higher… -0.811 for Franson vs. -0.156
Overall the guys Franson is playing against take fewer shots on average and allow more.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:43 PM EST up reply actions
QoC
is a +/- based stat… which I ignore frankly.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:43 PM EST up reply actions
He’s been a bit sheltered, but his shots against and Corsi are both very good, and I think he’s been excellent on the powerplay.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 12:35 PM EST up reply actions
right
but he doesn’t kill penalties.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:36 PM EST up reply actions
we're comparing
apples to oranges. I prefer Franson to Liles if anyone gives a crap.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:36 PM EST up reply actions
Liles is having a great year.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
productive on the PP
which is fine without him btw generally speaking.
Defensively? not so much.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:44 PM EST up reply actions
Also, wow, I’m looking at Dion’s numbers, and even though they’ve fallen a bit since he stopped playing with Gunnarsson, he’s really just been outstanding this season.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 12:38 PM EST up reply actions
yeah
he’s propping Aulie up a bit.
btw – Aulie is pretty solid on the PK.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:40 PM EST up reply actions
Has he been that good?
Aulie’s SA/60: 56.8 (Worst among Leafs PK with at least 1.00 TOI/60 on PK)
Aulie’s MA/60: 2.8 (5th best among Leafs PK with at least 1.00 TOI/60 on PK)
Combined MA/60+SA/60: 76.7 (Worse among Leafs PK with at least 1.00 TOI/60 on PK)
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
Wait, something’s not right with the last measure. Let me recalculate
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
I put Aulie’s MF/60, not MA/60.
Aulie’s MA/60: 19.9 (3rd best among Leafs PK with at least 1.00 TOI/60 on PK)
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
yeah
which for a 22 year old? that’s pretty solid.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 1:07 PM EST up reply actions
He’s the worst at allowing a combination of shots and missed shots on net among the Leafs PK group that has had at least 1.00 TOI/60. He’s worse than Schenn (who is 6th worst on the team in MA/60 + SA/60), who we rag on about his poor PK play.
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
And I’m not stating that Schenn is good on the PK, either. Just that I wouldn’t call Aulie’s PK play “solid”.
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
Now
I do believe that Aulie can develop into a solid PK player.
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
His competition is no easier or harder than Schenn’s.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
Franson's
competition is easier than Schenn’s for 2 reasons – their Corsi REL is lower, and they’re starting in the D Zone more.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:40 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah the zone is different, but the QOC shows Franson slightly ahead.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
dude
it’s a +/- based statistic… why use it?
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:44 PM EST up reply actions
Because at the sample size it has it is not so bad.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
it's bad
to me because there’s no discussion around luck in it… and obviously it comes into play.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 1:06 PM EST up reply actions
Franson isn’t playing 2nd pairing minutes. 2nd pairing minutes is usually ~20 minutes. He has played 16:20 this season and he hasn’t cracked 20 minutes ever and 19 minutes only once.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
Wilson is basically giving Gunnarsson and Phaneuf big minutes and dividing them up among everyone else, but Franson has been 3/4 in ice time on defence lately.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 12:39 PM EST up reply actions
against
sheltered competition… he gets offensive minutes against 2nd and 3rd liners.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:40 PM EST up reply actions
I think if you match Franson with a steady defensive guy like Gunnarsson (or Gleason, if we can acquire him) he’d be capable of handling tougher competition.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 12:42 PM EST up reply actions
no idea
why we’d say that – he has yet to do so in his career.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:45 PM EST up reply actions
He’s played most of this season with either Liles or Gardiner, hardly the team’s most defensively reliable players. I think combining Franson’s puck moving skills with a guy who plays more reliably in his own end would work really well. That’s speculation on my part, I realise there’s no way to prove it.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 12:50 PM EST up reply actions
in the past 8 gp
Franson has been hovering around 17 to 18 minutes a night. He’s been 4th in TOI some nights, 6th on others.
I wouldn’t say he’s 3-4 in minutes.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:48 PM EST up reply actions
In fact
he hasn’t been over 4th regularly in TOI in the past 8 games at all… so throwing the 3 in there is sort of invalid.
He’s been 4th, 6th, 4th, 5th, 5th, 5th, 4th, 3rd.
He’s been 3rd in TOI ONCE in the last 8 games.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:52 PM EST up reply actions
He's regularly
playing fewer minutes than Aulie and that’s in games where the Leafs take very few penalties generally speaking.
He isn’t a 3-4 guy right now.
More like 4-5.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:53 PM EST up reply actions
OK, so he’s been a 4-5 lately. But his minutes have been increasing as the year goes on, and I suspect that continues.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 12:55 PM EST up reply actions
I dunno about that
Komisarek was out for much of that early stretch, and now Gardiner is out. Gardiner was outpacing him in TOI until he got benched in virtually every game.
Not sure why we’d assume Gardiner won’t come back in and take more minutes from him.
The main person that loses minutes when he jumps up the rankings is Aulie.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:58 PM EST up reply actions
Gardiner is LD, and I suspect he’ll be on the Marlies next week. Franson/Schenn/Komisarek are all fighting for minutes at RD (though Komisarek is LD at the moment . . .). I think Franson deserves them the most right now.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 1:00 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t think Franson will ever be known for his defensive prowess. To be honest unless one of Gardiner or Blacker develops a very good defensive game (or Aulie I guess…) we are shy of a defensive defender.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
I would really have liked to see what Holzer is capable of defensively at the NHL level. Although to be honest, I don’t know all that much about his game other than what I hear around this place .
by Self Destructive Zones on Jan 14, 2012 1:00 PM EST up reply actions
he's relatively mobile and physical
and he’s safe with the puck.
He doesn’t take a lot of risks, but he’s very reliable in his own end.
I’d be fine with him getting more of a look in the NHL if we don’t trade for a shut down guy.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 1:05 PM EST up reply actions
in many ways
he’s like a more physical Gunnarsson… which sounds weird but his offensive game is less productive probably.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 1:06 PM EST up reply actions
That sounds like the kind of player who would serve the line-up well.
by Self Destructive Zones on Jan 14, 2012 1:06 PM EST up reply actions
JVR out indefinitely with a concussion.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Defenseman are tricky. Not as tricky as goalies, but it’s not always easy to see what you have, especially with “defensive” defencemen. If I were a GM I probably wouldn’t ever draft a dman in the first round unless they showed obvious offensive talent. If you look at the elite d around the league, there aren’t many that were drafted that high.
Anyway, I completely agree we should be patient with schenn. That said, he’s certainly not untouchable like he was two years ago. I’m not sure if JVR is a good swap, but I’d consider it.
That's "Da-ooo". I killed a turkey once, with a shovel.
by daoust on Jan 14, 2012 12:19 PM EST via mobile reply actions
We'll trade you Andreas Lilja for Luke Schenn
Come on. Think about it. You know you want to.
Editor at SB Nation's Philadelphia Union blog, The Brotherly Game. Follow me on Twitter.
Cross JVR off the list
noahlove66 Noah Love
Luke Schenn to remain a Leaf indefinitely. RT @NHLFlyers: #Flyers announced that James van Riemsdyk is out indefinitely with a concussion.
"They build a statue, they knock it down and piss on it, and now they will be out there building it again."
by ThickSkinnedAlive on Jan 14, 2012 12:31 PM EST reply actions
Now there is nothing stopping you from a Schenn for Lilja swap!
Editor at SB Nation's Philadelphia Union blog, The Brotherly Game. Follow me on Twitter.
If the cost of Gleason
is too high – we can grab Allen from Carolina for less.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
I wish Minnesota didn't have their hot start
Would really like to see the Leafs to try to get Zanon
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
their dip
might see them ship him out – they had him as a healthy scratch earlier in the year.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 1:00 PM EST up reply actions
I’m not sold on Allen being all that useful. I think Gleason has put up more consistent numbers over the past couple of seasons.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 12:36 PM EST up reply actions
he wasn't consistent
over the past 3 years… Allen’s have been better defensively…
Last year Allen had better Corsi numbers with worse OZ% and comparable (though slightly easier) Corsi REL QoC.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 1:01 PM EST up reply actions
the year before that
Gleason faced MUCH tougher competition.
I’d prefer Gleason of the two of them, but my point about Allen is that he’d be the cheaper of the two, and might have a similar impact on the Leafs.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 1:04 PM EST up reply actions
It’s tough to play the stats game with Schenn, because yes, he HAS had almost 4 years in the league, but also YES, he started way too young, and so “comparable” players – using any measure – won’t tell you much. So this post picks some more successful players, but I suspect we could go back to previous decades’ young Leaf defenders, and find some development curves that didn’t pan out too well.
What I SEE (when I watch the games), is a guy who cannot seriously be compared, in terms of offensive ability, to the Keith’s and Seabrook’s of the world. So there’s no real sense in even having that discussion. Offensively, Schenn just plain does not have the foot speed, the maneuverability, the shot, the stick-handling ability, or the vision to really see him being a great addition. He should be able to get to 30 points and be solid, but you’ll be damned hard-pressed to remember any of his assists, because most of them will hopefully, just doing the right thing, in his own zone or wherever.
As for how he plays defense, he has just never looked comfortable out there to me. His stance, his skating, the way he fails to even look around at times, his instant decision-making – all of it feels frozen, forced. If I felt like he played NATURALLY, or that the things he was learning had finally been internalized and thus, were coming without trying to think too much, I’d feel better.
Maybe this just means, give him more time, it’ll all sink in, and he’ll become a machine. I hope so. But right now, I look at somebody like Franson, who is goofy as hell in ways, and I just see far more offensive tools, more defensive mobility, better ability with the puck, and he’s beginning to show he can really hit and move attackers around. He’s two years older, but sometimes I think I’d rather see him get the deep-immersion, serious playing time approach Schenn has gotten. Same with Gardiner. Far better offensive chops, incredibly calm out there, and on defense, he seems to react quickly, and seemingly instinctively. He may not become a shutdown guy either, but there are a number of fast, puck controlling defencemen in the league who take away the other team’s offense by owning the puck. Given a year or two, that could be Gardiner.
Shorter: I donno.
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 14, 2012 12:39 PM EST reply actions
actually
Seabrook was his best offensive comparable entering this year… oddly.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
by Steve Burtch on Jan 14, 2012 12:54 PM EST up reply actions
Not sure it’s actually a good comparison though. Seabrook had 4 seasons inJunior averaging over 40 points, Schenn had 3, never broke 30. Then Seabrook’s very first NHL season, he showed he had some offensive oomph, getting 32 points in 69 games, at age 20-21. Schenn was getting 14.
In short, and while the offensive gap is more compressed amongst defenders (i.e. 20 points is huge), Seabrook is a major step, or two, above Schenn offensively.
Also, it’s largely because Seabrook fell back in his 2nd year, to 24 points, that he looks at all comparable to Schenn (who still hasn’t broken 24.)
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 14, 2012 1:35 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
At age 20, Schenn had 12 even strengths points. Schenn at the same age had 17.
by stevesmith19 on Jan 14, 2012 1:41 PM EST up reply actions
IIRC Seabrook was getting PP time fairly early on in his career too, Schenn has never really gotten any PP time
by Chi-town leafs on Jan 14, 2012 2:03 PM EST up reply actions
I’d be suspicious that some of Seabrook’s production (at least recently) comes from being a big-minute defenceman on a team that has dominated Fenwick for several seasons.
I've been looking at the sky
by Back In Black on Jan 14, 2012 5:20 PM EST up reply actions
Skating has become a huge factor on defense. The thing that bothers me the most about Schenn’s skating is that he’s completely unable to buy time or space for himself with the puck. He’s actually not a bad passer, but his acceleration is so poor that when a forechecker is on him, he’s stuck. Unlike almost every other defender the Leafs have, Schenn doesn’t have the ability to skate himself out of trouble. I think that’s huge.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
Aulie.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
I think one of the reasons the Leafs brought Gardiner with them out of camp and not Aulie is because having Aulie, Komisarek, and Schenn all in the lineup at the same time bothered them.
However, Aulie is a better skater than Schenn.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
I’m not sure about that. He seems to get beat wide all the time, though that could mostly be bad positioning, which thankfully is easier to coach than skating is.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 5:23 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed, both about his poor acceleration, and also that – once he takes a look – he’s a pretty good passer.
But that’s becoming a tougher and tougher skill mix to play with, as teams upgrade their speed, boost 3rd and 4th line scoring, etc.
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 14, 2012 4:19 PM EST up reply actions
Franson's career numbers are weird
his +/- is sort of useless as a read – his rookie year he was going +2 in games where he played 11 minutes…
You can see he puts up points but he’s been amazingly sheltered in Nashville on an extremely deep Defensive team, and he’s being sheltered again on a much less defensively astute Leafs squad… which worries me.
He’s 2 years older than Schenn – you’d like to think by now he could face tougher competition than the “Lost” guy we’ve got in Schenn… but he isn’t facing harder competition.
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."
- Sir Winston Churchill
I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.
Franson hasn’t played against the toughest competition, but neither has Schenn really. But, Franson’s numbers are, in general, much better when all factors are taken into account.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HockeyAnalysis.com - Taking a Deeper Look at the World of Hockey
by HockeyAnalysis on Jan 14, 2012 1:40 PM EST up reply actions
Good post
Lots of people want to see Schenn traded because they don’t like his potential. Fair enough.
However, the problem is that they tend to focus on his mistakes and magnify them so that his errors seem comparatively worse than the other defensemen.
I’ve watched Gardiner fuck Schenn over so many times yet people still want him back in the lineup. Schenn also has more points per 60 minutes than Gardiner, who gets fed lots of o-zone starts against slightly easier competition. In other words, Gardiner has literally nothing to offer the team except looking fancy but he’s the golden boy this season while Schenn is a pile of shit.
We just need to patient with Schenn (as well as Gardiner).
Disclaimer: I like Schenn and hope he stays here to develop.
by stevesmith19 on Jan 14, 2012 1:26 PM EST up reply actions
I agree on Gardiner. He should be in the AHL learning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HockeyAnalysis.com - Taking a Deeper Look at the World of Hockey
by HockeyAnalysis on Jan 14, 2012 1:30 PM EST up reply actions
Gardiner had a great start to the season. when Franson and others weren’t playing well he deserved to be in the line-up. now that other guys have found their game and his has slipped a bit I guess he ‘should be’ in the AHL.
Move along. Nothing to see here...
by Van Ryn's Neurologist on Jan 14, 2012 1:37 PM EST up reply actions
Burke said on the radio the other day that if Wilson didn’t put Gardiner in the lineup soon, he will be on the Marlies. My guess is that if Gardiner doesn’t play tonight, we’ll hear on Monday that he’s been sent down.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 1:39 PM EST up reply actions
yeah, which is fine. i just don’t think he’s played so badly that he CAN’T play in the NHL. he’s a fringe-NHLer, maybe. But he’s got enough upside that I think he can play here.
i guess i just fear that few other D do as good a job as he can at skating with the puck up the ice.
Move along. Nothing to see here...
by Van Ryn's Neurologist on Jan 14, 2012 2:02 PM EST up reply actions
Below @1:40.
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 14, 2012 1:42 PM EST up reply actions
Gardiner has also bailed out his partners from time to time with his ability to get the puck out of the zone.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
Nothing? Jeez. Tough crowd. Kid shows up, 1st full year in PRO hockey, much less the NHL, he’s 21, averages 21 minutes a game, sports an horrific -1 plus/minus, gets 10 points halfway through the season, looks calm and cool, skates like a demon, shows can handle the puck, does this all while weighing about 173 lbs, and only converted a few years ago from forward.
He’s a nothing.
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 14, 2012 1:40 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
I’d say Schenn has a way tougher time with the crowd here than Gardiner.
Schenn has 13 points to Gardiner’s 10. He’s incredibly sheltered so he should be putting up points but he isn’t. Also he gets PP time while Schenn doesn’t So he should have even more points because of that. But, again, he doesn’t.
by stevesmith19 on Jan 14, 2012 1:44 PM EST up reply actions
When Gardiner is on the ice the team scores at a rate of 2.46 goals per 60 minutes at 5v5. When Schenn is on the ice they score at 2.82 G/60. Gardiner starts most of his shifts in the offensive zone, Schenn in the defensive zone.
For whatever reason, the Leafs do well offensively when Schenn is on the ice. My issue with Schenn is defensively.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HockeyAnalysis.com - Taking a Deeper Look at the World of Hockey
by HockeyAnalysis on Jan 14, 2012 1:49 PM EST up reply actions
Over the last 3 years Schenn has actually proven that he is pretty damn effective offensively at ES.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
Agreed, and yet Wilson has reduced his offensive role significantly this year and given him a more defensive role, which he hasn’t/doesn’t excel at.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HockeyAnalysis.com - Taking a Deeper Look at the World of Hockey
by HockeyAnalysis on Jan 14, 2012 1:53 PM EST up reply actions
Ummm, a tough time? Fropm what I’ve seen, Schenn basically has groupies here. You know, the whole lasers thing? OLAS?
I mean, yes, he’s young, but having 4 years to learn how a place plays, the rinks, the practices, the players, the situations – it counts. It’s an advantage. Whereas Gardiner? He didn’t get all the love from being a 1st Round pick, most people didn’t even know him, and 99% thought he’d start in the AHL. So it’s not like we’re all predisposed to love this guy.
And as for people being tough on Schenn, Ron Friggin’ Wilson is sitting him, again and again, and for good reason I think.
This bit about comparing stats, ok, great. But when your stats go Age vs Age of Birth, but completely ignore that it’s a 4th year guy versus a 1st year guy, to not take that into consideration just seems nonsensical to me.
Because, you know, in stats terms, it makes a difference – having 3 prior years in a league.
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 14, 2012 1:54 PM EST up reply actions
Granted, Schenn got a lot of hype. And I like the guy so there’s my admitted bias. But the lasers thing and OLAS are jokes. And Gardiner was a first-round pick. He was specifically targeted by Burke in a trade of our best defensive defenseman. People fell in love with Gardiner instantly because he looks flashy.
Schenn is being given 44% o-zone starts to Gardiner’s 56%. This means that they’re being developed for different aspects of the game. Schenn’s is tougher to perfect. It also doesn’t help to develop in front of Toskala for almost 3 years, where every mistake ends up in the back of the net so you end up having no idea what works and what doesn’t in the NHL.
by stevesmith19 on Jan 14, 2012 2:00 PM EST up reply actions
where every mistake ends up in the back of the net so you end up having no idea what works and what doesn’t in the NHL
Sorry this should say where even routine plays end up in the back of the net, so it’s harder to learn from experience. It’s as if negative reinforcement were being applied even to good behaviour, making it hard to differentiate between good and bad.
by stevesmith19 on Jan 14, 2012 2:02 PM EST up reply actions
Schenn basically has groupies here.
Confirmed. I am a one of these Schenn groupies
by ShahofToronto on Jan 14, 2012 4:44 PM EST up reply actions
I think it just goes to show that it’s a safer bet to draft elite offensive talent (regardless of position) and sign defensive talent as FAs, since that usually comes with age.
With Schenn, though, his development fits in with the Leafs’ window for contending, so I’d advocate for keeping him.
Side note: Chris Pronger was traded in his age 21 season for Brendan Shanahan in his age 26 season. Shanahan scored 44 goals for Hartford that year.
by Shift on Jan 14, 2012 1:48 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions
By which I mean, though I’m happy to keep him, if we can get that many goals back in a trade for him, we should do it.
by Shift on Jan 14, 2012 1:50 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
I don’t know, over the long term, I’d probably rather have young Chris Pronger (if we’re comparing Schenn to Pronger)
by Chi-town leafs on Jan 14, 2012 2:07 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t even think the point is draft offensive talent. I would argue it is to draft offensive talent earlier in the draft.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
yeah, early picks should be almost exclusively for players with a lot of offensive upside.
Move along. Nothing to see here...
by Van Ryn's Neurologist on Jan 14, 2012 2:03 PM EST up reply actions
This seems like a sound philosophy to me.
by stevesmith19 on Jan 14, 2012 2:09 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, that’s what I meant, but it’s an important distinction for sure.
by Shift on Jan 14, 2012 2:20 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
yeah, early picks should be almost exclusively for players with a lot of offensive upside.
This is the same logic that led Damien Cox to insist the Leafs erred by not staying put and taking Nikita Filatov instead of trading up to take Schenn. So, it’s not that simple.
My degree is worthless
Right, but no draft strategy is going to be 100% successful. But drafting for high offensive upside is going to have a higher hit rate overall and a better value for $. Also, signing defensively-skilled FAs might offer similar value (since offense is costly as FAs).
by Shift on Jan 14, 2012 3:11 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
If you look at top forwards vs top D/G, top forwards are way more consistently found in the top 3 picks, while D are pretty spread out.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
Even when it works out, it can still be questionable. I think Victor Hedman is and will be a very good defenceman for the Lightning, but would anybody today really pass up a Hedman-for-Duchene swap? Or even Hedman-for-Evander Kane?
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 3:51 PM EST up reply actions
Duchene for sure. Kane is questionable. To be fair (as this thread has shown) it will probably take Hedman a little longer to fully hit his stride.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
Burke denies that he has been shopping Schenn (or even offered him up)
(Birky put this into the thread he made into the FTB, but I missed it so maybe others did too)
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
what else would he say.
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 14, 2012 2:58 PM EST up reply actions
there’s a FTB?
Move along. Nothing to see here...
by Van Ryn's Neurologist on Jan 14, 2012 3:03 PM EST up reply actions
Birky changed the game recap into an FTB.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
ah ok.
it didn’t seem like anyone was over there. i just noticed on twitter that Gus might be starting tonight. seems like the wrong decision.
Move along. Nothing to see here...
by Van Ryn's Neurologist on Jan 14, 2012 3:07 PM EST up reply actions
I really think you’re right about getting Reimer in there to try to get him back to form. Gus’ performance last night aside, I think it’s important to try and get Reimer going again, even if he has less experience against the Rangers.
by Self Destructive Zones on Jan 14, 2012 3:23 PM EST up reply actions
If Gus starts it’s his thank you for carrying the team and being a team player. Win and maybe he keeps running with it. Lose and it’s the perfect storm to start giving Reimer a couple of starts. Tuesday against the Hens being the first.
"They build a statue, they knock it down and piss on it, and now they will be out there building it again."
by ThickSkinnedAlive on Jan 14, 2012 3:41 PM EST up reply actions
It is a back to back. This is the opportunity to give it to Reimer. I really don’t like goalies playing back to backs.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
I personally don’t really buy into the whole “gus has more experience against the Rangers” thing myself. I’m suspicious that it really means all that much, but that’s just me.
by Self Destructive Zones on Jan 14, 2012 4:25 PM EST up reply actions
Gus has won two in a row against New York to bring his career SV% against them to .899
Can’t let Reimer in here, nope.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
It isn’t even that. I just don’t see why you play a goalie back to back.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
Yeah that’s part of it, I agree.
The Roar of the Masses Could be Farts.
by Self Destructive Zones on Jan 14, 2012 5:03 PM EST up reply actions
Especially when he’s already had five games in a row, and your other goalie needs some work.
I've been looking at the sky
by Back In Black on Jan 14, 2012 5:29 PM EST up reply actions
I think if you listen to the whole interview (available in Siegel’s podcast archive) and read between the lines a little bit, it sounds like Burke is receiving offers for Schenn and is listening to them, but doesn’t have anything on the table right now that would convince him to make a trade. And yeah, you can say “GMs should always listen” but I’ll bet you a year ago Burke would have outright squashed any talk about Schenn being available or would at least have said something like “I’ll trade any player if I’m offered five first round draft picks”, so I think this is actually a pretty significant shift.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 3:49 PM EST up reply actions
Thanks PPP
Great timely post. It’s early. He’s good, better than we give him credit for ( and I did see the big miss on Buffalo’s 3rd goal). Give him the benefit of the doubt for now. Tradeables don’t include Schenn, unless we see a true unicorn.
Who else is on your untradable list?
To be honest mine starts with Kessel and ends with Phaneuf. I wouldn’t like to trade Reimer either if we don’t get a goalie back. That is it.
About time that people finally realized how awesome Gunnar is...
Certified Gunnar & Kule lover!
My new goal: To get the nickname Hebrew Hammer for Mike Brown to take off.
For me, at this point, Gunnar’s on that list. Unless he’s part of some complete fucking coup of a young, top tier talent at forward, I don’t want him leaving.
by Self Destructive Zones on Jan 14, 2012 4:26 PM EST up reply actions
Gunnar’s an interesting one in that he isn’t unbelievably good, but he is on a great contract and we’re not very strong at LD. His value to the team is likley much higher than it is in a trade. But I wouldn’t be against trading him to land, say, Ryan Suter.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 14, 2012 5:53 PM EST up reply actions
His value to the team is likley much higher than it is in a trade.
This is exactly how I feel about the guy. But yeah, I probably wouldn’t lose any sleep if he helped land someone like Suter.
The Roar of the Masses Could be Farts.
by Self Destructive Zones on Jan 14, 2012 6:06 PM EST up reply actions
When Schenn came into the league, I was excited that he might turn into a hard-hitting, shot-blocking shutdown guy like Mike Komisarek. Now I’m worried that he’s going to turn into a hard-hitting, shot-blocking frequent defensive liability like Mike Komisarek.
I've been looking at the sky
by Back In Black on Jan 14, 2012 5:33 PM EST reply actions 5 recs
so...
We’re just assuming Gardiner is going to exponentially improve every season without risk of stagnation in development in the coming seasons?
I think it’s really easy to right now to say Jake Gardiner is much better than Luke Schenn without much data. Wouldn’t it be more relevant to see how Schenn compares this year with his own rookie season when making an assessment on upside?
Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell
by bkblades on Jan 14, 2012 6:32 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions
It’s much easier to project dreams onto the new shiny defenceman.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
Great post. Great comments. Can’t wait to see how the next few days pan out.
Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads.
by LeafsLover on Jan 15, 2012 9:00 AM EST via mobile reply actions

by 

































