The Other Stempniak
Sure this isn't really Leafs related anymore, but it's too funny not to bring to light.
Saturday night Lee Stempniak "somehow" scored himself a hattrick, and Greg Wyshynski noted this odd feat in the title of his Saturday recap over on Puck Daddy. Well wouldn't you know, this caught the ire of Lee Stempniak's boozer brother Jay. The conversation unfolded on Twitter as such:
@wyshynski "stempniak somehow tallies hat trick" nice backhanded compliment. Searching the internet can't seem to find your career stats pal
@JAYSTEMP Rounded to the nearest ten, how many times have you had to defend your brother's career on the Internet?
Key word there is CAREER @wyshynski I love your blog bud good stuff. Does typing your uneducated opinion on the internet pay the bills?
@JAYSTEMP I don't think you love our blog. Nor do I think we're buds. I can't converse with the disingenuous.
Took you an hour to come up with that @wyshynski? About as creative and insightful a your blog keep up the good work you jock sniffer
@JAYSTEMP For what it's worth, I can now cross "getting chirped by Lee Stempniak's never-was brother" off my bucket list.
You're not allowed to use the term 'chirped' @wyshynski its reserved for people who actually laced em up Not jock sniffer freelance bolggers
and then Ryan Lambert, aka twolinepass, won the Internet:
imagine being the brent gretzky of the stempniak family
Your links after the jump.
Leafs Links
BCP want to bring attention to the Leafs' goaltending situation.
The Leafs: Working Pretty Hard Versus Unrelenting Competitiveness
Mike from VLM wonders where all the truculence has gone.
522 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Ha. Oh silly NHLPBA members.
Also, I tried practicing the Grabovski spin-o-rama on saturday night. i fell on my ass every time.
Resident teetotaler married to a habs fan. Who is also not a fan of most dogs.
Haha
I managed to pull it off at a high school skills competition last year at the Gwinnett Gladiators’ (ECHL) arena in front of around 1000 people. Coolest I’ve ever felt in my life xD
"I myself am made up entirely of flaws, stitched together with good intentions."
It’s all in the hands. You need to try and put your top hand on the stick into your opposite armpit, and your bottom hand past the opposite elbow. Then your feet just follow your hands.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
These sound like yoga instructions.
I like to just walk in, wind up, and unload the cannon from about 10 feet.
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 23, 2012 9:46 AM EST up reply actions
let me guess you’re one of those guys who enjoys aiming for the goalies head… jerk
by WizardofNaz on Jan 23, 2012 10:10 AM EST up reply actions
shoulder fake low side, then fire a Glove high wrister off the crossbar and in.
favourite move.
Dion Phaneuf: turning the tunes up since '10
by thenumber14 on Jan 23, 2012 10:19 AM EST up reply actions
They got the easiest job on the ice, and the most protection.
Sooky-babies.
Let ’em know what real life in the trenches is like.
/hardworkingfeetmovingGodfearingtaxpayingwinger
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 23, 2012 10:33 AM EST up reply actions
hah easiest job my ass, I could suit up as a winger and hold my own but I dare you to try and go in net and see how you do
by WizardofNaz on Jan 23, 2012 10:41 AM EST up reply actions
I’m just funnin’ ya, son.
By the way, I was a catcher in baseball for 20 years. I can handle things coming at me at 90 or 100 mph. so, no, shots wouldn’t scare me.
Skating around with those goddamn leg pads on would though. Fall on my ass and look like a fool. Much more embarrassing. ;-)
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 23, 2012 10:57 AM EST up reply actions
simply wrap your left leg over your neck like a scarf, now relax……… and breathe
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 10:57 AM EST up reply actions
I’m confused just reading that, but sure, I’ll give ’er a shot.
Resident teetotaler married to a habs fan. Who is also not a fan of most dogs.
Do that with your hand right now as if you were holding a hockey stick. You’ll notice how you can roll over your wrists and the stick so much more in this position. It lets you curl the puck more and therefore lets you more easily follow the puck around as you spin 360.
Get a stick/broom and practice a couple times just walking around. You’ll notice that you can magically turn tighter and quicker.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
Are you… like…. a New Age Howie Meeker?
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 23, 2012 10:58 AM EST up reply actions
Dude. That’s just… doubly sad.
Leaf that won the Calder. Plus 4 Stanley Cups. Got 5 goals in a game as a rookie.
Then went on to a HNIC career where he was the 1st guy to really use the telestrator to teach kids how to play. After the 1972 Soviet debacle, he opened up a whole series of hockey camps to teach kids to skate, pass, and play without the dirty stuff. Did instructional films. Had this squeaky as hell voice, but did as much or more than anyone to turn the game toward a higher-speed, higher-skill style.
Fuck I’m old.
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 23, 2012 11:08 AM EST up reply actions
I actually have a pair of his old skates (he gave them to my grandfather back in the 70’s)
by Chi-town leafs on Jan 23, 2012 11:10 AM EST up reply actions
Ding
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 23, 2012 1:18 PM EST up reply actions
Golly geez!
Either you have an enviable memory, or a pitiable life, to know nothing of regret.
- Sten, of the Qunari
by GreatKingRat on Jan 23, 2012 11:18 AM EST up reply actions
Ding ding ding!
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 23, 2012 1:18 PM EST up reply actions
My dad would always refer to Howie Meeker when teaching me how to skate and play hockey as a kid.
Riding the Leafs bandwagon since 1991.
Check out my art!
by CanadianMaple09 on Jan 23, 2012 12:35 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah my dad always got mad at me because I like playing with a really long stick. Said with a short stick I’d have a lot more control, because that’s what Howie Meeker says. In grade 8 I was about half a foot taller than half the kids on my team, and with a long stick I had ridiculous reach. I’ve tried short sticks over the years, can never get used to them.
Riding the Leafs bandwagon since 1991.
Check out my art!
by CanadianMaple09 on Jan 23, 2012 12:41 PM EST up reply actions
Nope, could never stickhandle worth shit, short stick or not!
Meeker was hilarious to watch! That laughing is absolutely insane… I imagine Not Norm laughing in the same manner,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGUaVGu7drs
Riding the Leafs bandwagon since 1991.
Check out my art!
by CanadianMaple09 on Jan 23, 2012 12:48 PM EST up reply actions
Great video.
Howie, however, is a little guy. And has that “little guy” laugh.
Whereas I’m a big bastard, and criminally insane really quite pleasant.
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 23, 2012 1:21 PM EST up reply actions
seriously?
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 11:10 AM EST up reply actions
but
1. you’re a hockey fan, a big one at that.
2. you’re a Leaf fan, a big one at that.
3. You know about pro line sports gut, and that’s Canadian.
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 11:20 AM EST up reply actions
I’ll try it at home. good thing i just cleaned out the basement.
Resident teetotaler married to a habs fan. Who is also not a fan of most dogs.
It’s all about following the puck. The tighter you can turn the puck, the tighter you can turn yourself.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
I mean, it’s a shootout not a breakaway and I’m guessing Cujo isn’t up for a groin pull. Maybe do the super slow skate with constant dekes?
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Wait, did elseldo win that shootout Curtis Joseph challenge thing?
by Tickle Me Aulie on Jan 23, 2012 12:19 PM EST up reply actions
although there are other goalies there too, Sami Jo Small, Billy Smith, and that guy the habs gave away Roy for.
Resident teetotaler married to a habs fan. Who is also not a fan of most dogs.
hah, so that’s your /r/hockey post?
RIP Former-and-forever Leaf Wade Belak
Me on Twitter
by Bower Power on Jan 23, 2012 12:50 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, I feel like he probably gets punched in bars a lot. He has the kind of one liners that pretty much end any verbal debate.
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
I seriously doubt he acts like that in the flesh. This is the Internet, after all, I’m free to say exactly what I think because I’m not going to get punched.
I'm with the Hebrew Hammer. Why aren't you?
Unless someone pulls a Jay and Silent Bob
by Chi-town leafs on Jan 23, 2012 9:53 AM EST up reply actions
We will make you eat our shit, then shit out our shit, and then make you eat your shit that is made out of our shit
by Chi-town leafs on Jan 23, 2012 9:57 AM EST up reply actions
Lambert is a smooth mother fucker is person, and yes he does talk and act like that in the flesh because that’s who he is. So say he puts a guy down, what’s that guy going to do, punch Lambert? Fine whatever, he’ll go to jail for assault. Lambert doesn’t care.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
i still say he got his ass handed to him a lot as a kid
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
Whatever. Now he’s an adult and beating up on other adults brings with it bigger consequences than detention. Fuck ‘em if they can’t take a joke/insult.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
fuck lambert.
Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?
by ohshrit on Jan 23, 2012 12:51 PM EST up reply actions 5 recs
I do have to ask, how would folks here act if he was trolling the Leafs in a similar fashion to how he trolls the Jets?
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
It’d just be white noise
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 1:19 PM EST up reply actions
I seriously doubt he acts like that in the flesh.
Incorrect.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Gotta love meat heads who think it’s kosher to just punch another adult over something they said. Enjoy jail buddy.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
Would I punch him for saying something, no, but some people would. Some people are idiots
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
gotta love assholes who think it’s cool to deliberately post provocative messages with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument. Enjoy being a terrible human being.
Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?
Where is this coming from?
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
It’s kind of a fair response to what SF is saying. You can call people who use violence meat heads, but you can just as easily call people who are angry sarcasts assholes. I feel no more sympathetic towards one than the other personally.
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
by Curt S on Jan 23, 2012 12:56 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I didn’t know reading something you didn’t like about your hockey team means you should beat someone up.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
it doesn’t. And that’s not what they’re saying. They’re saying if you provoke people you’re an asshole and a terrible human being.
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 12:58 PM EST up reply actions
It doesn’t necessarily. But being verbally confrontational and physically confrontational are birds of the same feather, in my opinion. So if he behaves this way in real life, I don’t think much better of him than I would of the jerk that punched him for it
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
stick and stones and all that shit.
Ya if you punch a guy for calling you a name, then enjoy jail or anger management dude
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
I don’t think intentionally provoking people makes you any better than the people who do the punching. And if you think that most people who hit people end up in jail, you’re fooling yourself.
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
by Curt S on Jan 23, 2012 1:02 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
That’s the same shit I hear from people who think there’s only physical bullying
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 1:20 PM EST up reply actions
That’s kinda my point (and I think Oh Shrit’s as well). The world would be a better place if we were all a little bit better to one another.
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
by Curt S on Jan 23, 2012 1:27 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
The Internet would be a much nicer place if this was even a little true. Unfortunately it isn’t and I don’t think it will change any time soon
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 1:36 PM EST up reply actions
the defense of lambert, and I know he’s a friend of yours and skinny’s. But I don’t think it’s cool to be a troll. That’s just me though. If you guys can defend him, I can take the other side, can’t I?
Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?
He’s funny. You shouldn’t take the internet so seriously.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
If he’s like that in real life – like you both said, then he’s an asshole.
Who wants to hear a funny ass joke?
by ohshrit on Jan 23, 2012 12:59 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
If Lambert’s desire was to draw attention to his post and get publicity for himself/his blog, he had tremendous success. So, it’s understandble why he might do it. But in the end, if you’re intention is to post something insulting that will illicit a reply, yeah, I could easily see how said person might be considered a douche.
by gettingcozywithsarkozy on Jan 23, 2012 1:02 PM EST up reply actions
*Understandable.
/Ialmostmadethesamemistakewhenpostingthecorrectionreply
by gettingcozywithsarkozy on Jan 23, 2012 1:03 PM EST up reply actions
…and this is what I get when trying to type inbetween actual work assignments. I respectfully bow out of this conversation :(.
by gettingcozywithsarkozy on Jan 23, 2012 1:10 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t know Lambert at all but his trolling to me seems like he just tries to get under the skin of people who take things so seriously.
Either that… or he’s just a caustic misanthropic bastard with a healthy appetite for schadenfreude. Not that that’s a bad thing.
I follow him on Twitter, and I find his humour hit and miss. Considering the kind of crap that floats around the Internet he’s pretty harmless
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 1:24 PM EST up reply actions
Brent also had a tweet about pounding some PBR’s. Classy guy all the way
Follow me on twitter @CoolJ90
Maybe he was having a few PBR’s when he was tweeting Wysh. How else can you explain him misspelling blogger as bolgger?
Maybe he didn’t go to class because he was too busy being a D-3 student-athlete.
Follow me on twitter @CoolJ90
D3
As in Charlie, Adam Banks, or Goldberg?
by gettingcozywithsarkozy on Jan 23, 2012 4:09 PM EST up reply actions
….there’s no hockey for a freaking week after Wednesday?
goddamn all star game
Resident teetotaler married to a habs fan. Who is also not a fan of most dogs.
at least there’s 2 in a row here. And after the all-star break the trades should really start happening….
by Goosemonster on Jan 23, 2012 8:28 AM EST up reply actions
So few links!
Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads.
by LeafsLover on Jan 23, 2012 8:42 AM EST via mobile reply actions
My gut tells me...
Brian Burke finally fires Ron Wilson after running out of excuses not to fire him after the Leafs lose back to back games against the Islanders.
Unfortunately for the Leafs, the Islanders are playing well right now having gone 5-2 and out scoring their opposition 22-11 in their last 7 games including wins against Detroit and Philadelphia.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HockeyAnalysis.com - Taking a Deeper Look at the World of Hockey
And what do you say about his recent contract extension?
Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads.
by LeafsLover on Jan 23, 2012 8:59 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Did we ever hear any official details about it? Rumours were it was a one year deal which is hardly a vote of confidence and more of a ‘lets get rid of his lame duck status and hope the players get the message’ deal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HockeyAnalysis.com - Taking a Deeper Look at the World of Hockey
by HockeyAnalysis on Jan 23, 2012 9:06 AM EST up reply actions
Aw come on he wouldn’t tweet that if it wasn’t for real.
Its an insurance move from Burke so that Wilson won’t make any drastic stupid decisions that could hurt the team just so that he can keep his job (if he quickly changes things up and they turn out well). He’ll ride the season out knowing that he won’t have to worry this year and can properly focus on the benefit of his team (which in turn benefits his job, obviously) without making any rash decisions.
Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads.
But if we beat the islanders then its because they’re a basement team right? Not because we’re good and beat a team that’s 5-2?
Every win is a good one. Just wish there were more of them. But yeah, a pair of wins against the Islanders is important. If the Leafs lose them both the Islanders will be just 3 points back with a game in hand. Leafs had a chance to bury the Sabres, and failed. They had a chance to bury the Canadiens, and failed. Let’s not miss this chance to bury the Islanders.
On the other side of the coin, if they hadn’t blown that 2-0 lead against the Senators they’d be within striking distance of catching Ottawa (5 points back with 3 games in hand) but they failed there too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HockeyAnalysis.com - Taking a Deeper Look at the World of Hockey
by HockeyAnalysis on Jan 23, 2012 9:26 AM EST up reply actions
That’s what I want to hear. Completely agree with you, they have to be better against the teams both below and above them, a win is a win and they haven’t been getting them.
A win is particularly important against teams just above and below you. And as was pointed out, we failed to put down both the Sabres and Canadiens, and failed to beat a team just above us (Ottawa). I’m willing to wager that will come back to haunt us.
by Goosemonster on Jan 23, 2012 9:39 AM EST up reply actions
Especially because those are all division games, and we’re competing with them even more than the rest of the conference
it looks like without going on a tear we won’t making the playoffs.
by Goosemonster on Jan 23, 2012 9:52 AM EST up reply actions
At the moment, we only need one, but the way the Leafs are playing we probably need 2 or 3 teams to collapse
by Chi-town leafs on Jan 23, 2012 10:31 AM EST up reply actions
looking at the teams we’re playing in the months ahead, we definitely need two or three to collapse.
by Goosemonster on Jan 23, 2012 10:33 AM EST up reply actions
and what if they win both games? What kind of pace will they be on? Will those games count?
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
No, it’s not November.
Kulemin so hot right now, Kulemin.
by PassivelyTruculent on Jan 23, 2012 9:21 AM EST up reply actions
A) That meme is dead
B) The joke, you missed it
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
We’re gonna need Elton John to change the lyrics.
Kulemin so hot right now, Kulemin.
by PassivelyTruculent on Jan 23, 2012 9:26 AM EST up reply actions
No. It isn’t a meme.
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
And yet another joke will be ruined
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
Only in November.
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
When it matters
"They build a statue, they knock it down and piss on it, and now they will be out there building it again."
by ThickSkinnedAlive on Jan 23, 2012 9:51 AM EST up reply actions
I’m quite well aware of the joke.
Kulemin so hot right now, Kulemin.
by PassivelyTruculent on Jan 23, 2012 9:26 AM EST up reply actions
FIRE WILSON
CLAP CLAP CLAPCLAPCLAP
Dion Phaneuf: turning the tunes up since '10
by thenumber14 on Jan 23, 2012 9:14 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
if we do lose both games to NYI, given where that would leave us, it remains a minor – very very minor – possibility.
by Goosemonster on Jan 23, 2012 9:26 AM EST up reply actions
My gut tells me to bet on the Leafs beating the spread.
LISTEN TO YOUR SPORTS GUT!
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
by SkinnyFish on Jan 23, 2012 11:01 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
If the Leafs lose both games to the Isles it won’t really matter what happens to Ron Wilson. They won’t be going to the playoffs, might as well let him finish the season.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
ugh. Just looked at the schedule.
After the Isles games, 20 of final 33 games are against playoff teams. 11 of those 20 games are on the road.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
Only 8 of the Leafs 23 wins this season are against playoff teams.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
Tank!! Maybe we can preserve a top 10 pick.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HockeyAnalysis.com - Taking a Deeper Look at the World of Hockey
by HockeyAnalysis on Jan 23, 2012 9:50 AM EST up reply actions
What top 10 pick?
Burke will package it with Schenn and Kadri for some aging power forward in order to save Wilson’s bacon.
Next season of 24/7: "I am named Mikhail. I watch video to fold together strategy. I want outdoors to fight bravely."
by Peter de Chatham on Jan 23, 2012 11:19 AM EST up reply actions
Has Burke done that yet?
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
he’s made it clear through the media (really an announcement to any potential trade partners) that the Leafs pick is on the table in trade talks.
Cox is right – Burke will attempt to shake up the roster before he is forced to fire Wilson. To get anyone of significance, he needs to deal our pick, plus a couple of youngins. Yeah, maybe the Unicorn won’t be old but it’ll be another 1st rounder out the door.
And knowing the Leafs luck, they’ll nosedive in teh standings anyway.
Next season of 24/7: "I am named Mikhail. I watch video to fold together strategy. I want outdoors to fight bravely."
by Peter de Chatham on Jan 23, 2012 11:25 AM EST up reply actions
Would you trade a package of our first schenn/kadri or whoever for Getzlaf? I sure as hell would
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
Point is, a 1st may be good or we could get someone we know is good OR we can just shut up about GM’s did in the past and not what they current GM is doing and not make yourself sound like an idiot
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
So it takes two first rounders to get a Kessel, and another two + to get Getzlaf. Cool. We can keep doing this “rebuild on the fly” for another 8 years and then maybe we’ll finally have a top-6.
Next season of 24/7: "I am named Mikhail. I watch video to fold together strategy. I want outdoors to fight bravely."
by Peter de Chatham on Jan 23, 2012 11:35 AM EST up reply actions
or we can wait 8 years for those picks to bust themselves out of hockey. And then we’ll have nothing in 8 years.
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 11:36 AM EST up reply actions
The Kessel trade has made people excessively discount the value of a lottery pick. Yes, there are teams that have tanked and not gone anywhere like Columbus or Edmonton or Atlanta, but it’s not binary.
Tanking doesn’t always lead to spinning your wheels. It must be a component of a larger strategy and vision that requires smart management.
And I’d argue the difference between Toronto and places like Columbus, if you go the burn-it-down rebuild route, is competent management. Saying “the lottery is a crapshoot, look at Columbus” is simplistic
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 11:45 AM EST up reply actions
In fairness, most teams that have been in the lottery consistently, still aren’t particularly good teams. When it works out, it’s seems to be a product of landing generational talent (Washington, Pittsburgh). Chicago is the only example that springs to mind of being a lottery team, not getting a generational star, and managing the team well in tandem.
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
They did miss the playoffs 5 consecutive years...
2007 1 Patrick Kane
2006 3 Jonathan Toews
2005 7 Jack Skille
2004 3 Cam Barker
2003 14 Brent Seabrook
Sure no one super great but that’s a nice haul.
OPERATION TANK IS A GO. It’s the only explanation for Mike Weber. He’s on a secret mission.
They also got lucky in 2007.
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
Oh there’s definitely an element of luck in there. I think another difference is that I can’t say for certain that Chicago did that whole tank thing on purpose. Sometimes a team just stinks for a while, like Philly did that one year they ended up with vanRiemsdyk. They were back in the playoffs the year after
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 12:01 PM EST up reply actions
Oh for sure. But nobody generational, and there were some solid additions made to that team in later draft rounds as well as via free agency. I would say they’re a good example of strong management and bottoming out. My point is, they’re really the only example.
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
It’s a component. It’s not a completely invalid strategy like some people seem to believe, but it has to be part of a larger strategy. And I think the rationalization that was necessary from losing out on a #2 pick created some of that overcompensation
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 12:02 PM EST up reply actions
I was only going along with the thread even though i disagree with that premise. I mean, they didn’t get Crosby i guess…
OPERATION TANK IS A GO. It’s the only explanation for Mike Weber. He’s on a secret mission.
They only got 1 of the best centers in teh game.
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
I tend to think that Toews is underrated because he doesn’t put up huge numbers. But he is about as solid defensively as you can get without being Pavel Datsyuk
by Chi-town leafs on Jan 23, 2012 12:10 PM EST up reply actions
Kane scored like 89 Pts the year they won the cup. They don’t win it without him. He was a gift.
Ironically it was Philly who should have had him. Then he ends up scoring the cup winner against them. Tremendous burn.
That's "Da-ooo". I killed a turkey once, with a shovel.
by daoust on Jan 23, 2012 12:19 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
My point is, if the “tank” strategy were ever going to work, it would be with a team like the Leafs: stable ownership and a bulletproof GM who isn’t an idiot.
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 11:59 AM EST up reply actions
I agree, I just think it’s a huge ‘if’. Lottery teams tend to suck for a long, long time.
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
Every strategy carries an “if”. Do you really think Burke’s rebuild on the fly or whatever it is has a lower risk quotient? I don’t.
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 12:04 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t know. It would be interesting to see what, statisitcally, is the most successful way to pull a team out of the middle.
Bad teams generally stay bad, good teams generally stay good. How do you get a mediocre team to be a good team?
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
Time. I know it sucks to wait it out, but the Red Wings didn’t get where they are today overnight. Continually making our team better is what Burke is trying to do and even if it doesn’t reflect in the standings right away, I still think that he’s done a very good job improving the Leafs.
by holymackinaw on Jan 23, 2012 12:28 PM EST up reply actions
They simply drafted two of the best players of a generation; got Soviets to defect to the US; and got every coveted free agent to sign with them.
totally doable.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
It's easy to build a team like the Red Wings. Just draft a Lidstrom...
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
Columbus tried it in ’02!
Kulemin so hot right now, Kulemin.
by PassivelyTruculent on Jan 23, 2012 12:48 PM EST up reply actions
I’m not saying a lottery can’t be successful I’m just saying I’d rather have 1 known commodity than a couple of unknown ones.
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 11:49 AM EST up reply actions
For a player like Getzlaf or Ryan, yes I would too. It’s definitely a safer assumption now than it was at the time of the Kessel trade that this team won’t end up in the lottery, but it’s always an assumption.
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 12:05 PM EST up reply actions
Do you really think Kadri is gonna become a top line player? Cuz I dont. I would package him and a first and more for a legit top line centre like Getzlaf.
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
I don’t doubt that the pick is on the table, but I would be surprised if he used it to bring in a busted up power forward. Is he trying to use it and other assets to land a Bobby Ryan type? Almost certainly. Will it work? Maybe not. He wont be trading our first for Dustin Penner, that’s for sure.
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
Does a Penner include a case of maple syrup?
"They build a statue, they knock it down and piss on it, and now they will be out there building it again."
by ThickSkinnedAlive on Jan 23, 2012 11:43 AM EST up reply actions
- Penner trade *
"They build a statue, they knock it down and piss on it, and now they will be out there building it again."
by ThickSkinnedAlive on Jan 23, 2012 11:43 AM EST up reply actions
Cox is never right. Flagged.
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 11:27 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
yes, he’s clearly on that path. He’s made one trade with a pick so far and it was to get an aging busted, over the hill Phil Kessel.
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 11:21 AM EST up reply actions
I understand the frustration around the team right now, but let’s not get cynical. Burke hasn’t made an awful deal yet, and even his worst deals have brought in young, talented players. Let’s just relax a bit.
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
whoosh
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 11:23 AM EST up reply actions
That wasn’t a pick, it was three picks. And (knock on wood) will Kessel age well?
Next season of 24/7: "I am named Mikhail. I watch video to fold together strategy. I want outdoors to fight bravely."
by Peter de Chatham on Jan 23, 2012 11:29 AM EST up reply actions
will he age well? I donno. He is balding and has already lost a testicle. Will Seguin ever score 30 goals 4 straight times? Did Burke somehow fuck over the Leafs by trading those picks for Kessel? I don’t believe so. Is trading picks a sin? I don’t believe so. Are picks somehow guaranteed to succeed and make your team better? I don’t believe so. Is Burke going to trade a pick and 2 youngsters for your old busted power forward? I don’t believe so. Has Burke done a single trade in his Leaf career that made you feel like we lost the trade? I don’t believe so.
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 11:34 AM EST up reply actions
Did Burke somehow fuck over the Leafs by trading those picks for Kessel?
You better believe that he did. Kessel is not worth all those picks, not even close. Here is teh copper and blue article on 1st round pick value.
http://www.coppernblue.com/2011/4/4/2082829/nhl-draft-pick-value-first-round
2nd overall pick – .882 chance of being an impact player.
9th overall pick – .412 chance of same
32nd overall pick – ..149 chance of same.
Add it up, and Burke gave up Kessel, who let’s for arguments sake has a 100% chance of being an impact player, for 1.443 impact players.
Burke screwed up. He significantly overvalued the Leafs entering his first full year as GM. If the Leafs had instead finished 9th or better from the bottom in that first year, then the trade is just about a wash and makes sense. But it wasn’t and Burke deserves to wear the responsibility for that.
Next season of 24/7: "I am named Mikhail. I watch video to fold together strategy. I want outdoors to fight bravely."
by Peter de Chatham on Jan 23, 2012 11:45 AM EST up reply actions
We are quantifying how much of an impact player Kessel for other players?
This is getting out of hand
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
I’d argue that the only point I agree with Peter on is that we can’t just compare Kessel with Seguin, we have to compare his impact as a single player with the value of three players. For the Leafs to “win” the trade Kessel has to outvalue those three players combined. But it is way too early to be able to say that in any way. Hell Seguin could be a flash in the pan for all we know
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 11:48 AM EST up reply actions
Also, once you start trying to quantify the franchise value of three players the variables become too numerous to mention, especially if any of them end up as components of subsequent trade. The mind boggles
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 11:49 AM EST up reply actions
The team’s problems are bigger then Kessel. At this point, reversing the trade doesn’t help (and probably hurts) the leafs standings position this season. And if the we are looking at impact on the future vs today that other trades need to be considered as well (kaberle, beauchi, phaneuf etc).
And instead of looking for a centre, we’d be looking for a winger. I’m not saying the Leafs would be better off without Kessel, but I’m saying that Burke created a situation where Kessel has to outperform three players to be deemed a success. He certainly has the talent to do so
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 12:07 PM EST up reply actions
Kovalchuk, Ovechkin, Crosby, Gaborik, Nash, Hossa, Jagr, kariya, Lindros, parise, E Staal
Defence rests, yo.
Cynically Sarcastic
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
1.433 IMPACT PLAYERS
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
That makes no sense.
If your define an impact player as you are, you can’t add draft picks together like that. It’s either they become an NHL player or they don’t and those players don’t affect each other in any way. For argument’s sake let’s say Seguin will turn out to be just as good as Kessel, then you have the other two draft picks who still may or may not turn out to be good players. You still have to wait to see if they will though, and you can’t add their potential value in a percentage of turning into a good player, since you can’t see the future. We will just have to wait and see.
The argument I would make for Kessel being a good trade would be that it reduced the time it would take for a draft pick to turn into something and also gave Burke a part of the core to build around. You can’t just say that Seguin would have been that guy either because he is still very young, and Burke didn’t know where we would draft in that class. I think it made a lot of sense when it happened because now we have a solid player who will be a big part of the team moving forward and it saved us from becoming a team like Edmonton, who perennially suck (despite their young stars).
by holymackinaw on Jan 23, 2012 12:17 PM EST up reply actions
He’s right on the math. You’re saying they are guaranteed one impact player with a 40% chance at a 2nd when they aren’t guaranteed those at all.
by WizardofNaz on Jan 23, 2012 12:21 PM EST up reply actions
Exactly. They’re likely to get one, may get another, and would have to be very very lucky to get a third.
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
Right, so we traded one impact player for another. Then the difference is the fact that we got an advanced two years of Kessel, which (I think) is worth the 40% chance of another good player and a small chance of a third, if you consider that Kessel has been a cornerstone of the Leafs for those 2 years.
by holymackinaw on Jan 23, 2012 12:34 PM EST up reply actions
I think if we’re trying to declare a winner on the trade after the fact, we need to wait until Boston’s kids develop.
If we look at the trade at the time the trade occurred, I would have said the Leafs won.
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
Yeah but what about the fact that they won the cup and didn’t even need Kessel to do it? And they snagged a top six 6 and a potential top-pairing D out of it (stop me if you’ve heard this before). Pretty clear that it was a very, very good trade for them. In my eyes the only thing left to figure out is if it was a good trade for us*.
- I’m NOT knocking Kessel whatsoever, but if the organization fails to make the playoffs and/or do some damage for the duration of Kessel’s 5 year contract, to me that’s a colossal failure.
I don’t see how them winning the cup enters the Kessel trade debate at all. The Kessel trade made them instantly worse and they still won the cup in spite of that. Kessel/Seguin make no difference whether Boston wins or not.
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 12:53 PM EST up reply actions
I’m not saying that trading Kessel was related to them winning the Cup, I’m saying they made a smart/lucky decision to move the player for what turned out to be a high ransom, and still were able to achieve their goal. The trade was a good organizational decision at the right time for them.
Only if they win more cups than they would have had they not moved Kessel (or at least not fewer)
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
There’s no way of knowing that.
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 1:05 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed. Which is why saying “they won the cup so they won the trade” is a farcical argument
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
it was a good move by Boston no doubt.
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 1:00 PM EST up reply actions
1.433 IMPACT PLAYERS
Man this is the best! So conversely, does that also mean that Burke traded Kessle for picks that just that have -1.627 chance of being an impact player? Win no?
"There's been four different Cup winners the last four years, and I got one of them (Anaheim) and it was a fighting team. We're playing it that way regardless." - B. Burke, Toronto Maple Leafs GM
He significantly overvalued the Leafs entering his first full year as GM
That’s about the only point in there that I agreed with.
Cynically Sarcastic
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
I know the Kessel trade was post free agency day but......
Sedin-Sedin-Kessel was his basis for an execellerated rebuild. When the Sedins didn’t reach free agency I’m pretty sure (hope) Burke dropped that idea. Anyways I don’t have anything relevent to say, but thinking about this potential top line is a lot more for than rehashing the Kessel trade for the billionth time.
As a Toronto sports fan I proudly follow the lessons of lachrymology.
"Vancouver, BC: A massive inferiority complex with a city." - TheOtherAndrew
William of Nassau am I, of Dutch blood. Loyal to the fatherland I will remain until I die.
for arguments sake? Kessel is an impact player and a hell of a fucking player period. We also got 2 years of Kessel over Seguin plus 3-4 years of Kessel over the other picks. Also we didn’t know where we’d finish so that could have been 2 mid first rounders which would have made i a win for us. so basically we lost the trade in hindsight and that’s only if the other 2 picks become important players and Seguin’s hip doesn’t require replacement. I’ll still do the trade today.
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 11:52 AM EST up reply actions
Yay for hindsight bias making the Kessel trade look bad.
by Chi-town leafs on Jan 23, 2012 12:15 PM EST up reply actions
The biggest question is ifyou think Seguin can be the type of player he is without an outstanding supporting cast. Could he be PPG playing with Lupul and no other consistant scoring threat? My guess is no
by WizardofNaz on Jan 23, 2012 11:57 AM EST up reply actions
Hard to say. I don’t doubt he will be a 2nd/1st line C in the future, I mean you just have to watch him play objectively and you can see that he has the individual skill set. He’s in a perfect situation over there. I don’t know what kind of QoC he’s facing but regardless, the myriad of productive forwards in BOS means that Seguin is in a great position to put up numbers and succeed.
If the Leafs hadn’t been second last the deal would have looked genius. Hindsight’s 20/20
My rambling tweets
Winning is a habit. Unfortunately, so is losing - Vince Lombardi
Assuming Kessel scores 5 more goals in the next 25 games, he will score 30 goals for the 4th time before he turns 25.
Since 1994-95, here’s the list of players to complete that feat
Kovalchuk, Ovechkin, Crosby, Gaborik, Nash, Hossa, Jagr, kariya, Lindros, parise, E Staal
Cynically Sarcastic
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
Damn, Kessel’s odds of getting a serious, career-altering injury are pretty high.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 23, 2012 11:43 AM EST up reply actions
Oh good. I was worried we didn’t have enough people prediciting worst-case scenarios.
Thanks for your valuable input. Feel free to lead the charge of jumping off buldings.
Cynically Sarcastic
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
geronimoooooooooooooo
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 11:35 AM EST up reply actions
Remember when we were all in good spirits around here?
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
I’m hopeful they can turn it around, but my brain looks at the schedule and their record so far and cries in the corner.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
You have a point…
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
Considering how wide open the East is this year, not making the playoffs would be unacceptable.
by Goosemonster on Jan 23, 2012 9:51 AM EST up reply actions
The Leafs need a lot of help, it would seem, to get in. Certainly there would be a lot of pressure entering next season to ensure another collapse doesn’t happen.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
I really do think our team is good enough, on paper, to make the playoffs. It seems to me these past we games we never played like a desperate team, we played like on that really didnt need the points as desperately as we actually do.
by Goosemonster on Jan 23, 2012 9:55 AM EST up reply actions
The really, really frustrating thing is: the Leafs team SV% has been hovering around .895 all season. Suddenly in January, they’re getting .921, which is insane (for Toronto at least). They’re finally getting the goaltending to string some wins together and what happens? The goal scoring dries up.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
I’m starting to wonder if there’s a curse on this team, and part of the curses’ fun is to make us think we can do so well and then mercilessly cut us down midseason. The sad thing is my hope being crushed isn’t all that bad, because it’s pretty much the norm.
by Goosemonster on Jan 23, 2012 10:03 AM EST up reply actions
I don’t know about any curse….they’re just still not very good.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
Meh, it’s been like this more or less since the lockout, with a rotating cast of characters.
by Goosemonster on Jan 23, 2012 10:13 AM EST up reply actions
We had a discussion on twitter on Saturday about this. I realize Burke & Co have revamped the roster, front office, scouting dept, prospect pool, etc, but the Leafs are still in the same place they were when JFJ was here. 9th-10th place in the standings.
Now, I don’t think Burke should be or will be fired. But when you pay your GM $5m a year, and your assistant GM is making what most GMs around the league make, and you’ve got a huge management group who all make big money….ownership expects results. Brian Burke wasn’t brought in to rebuild the Leafs. He was brought in because MLSE thought he could win. And deep pockets or no deep pockets, when you make that kind of financial investment, you expect returns. in the case of the Leafs, those returns are playoff revenue. I mean, the Leafs have probably spent upwards of $40 million dollars on Burke and his management team and I’d have to wonder if they’re made MLSE any more revenue than before their arrival (can’t look at MLSE books, obviously I’m guessing here). You have to think that missing the playoffs again would seriously turn the heat up on Burke.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
This scares me more than anything. I honestly cannot think of a better GM or GM team out there in the NHL that would be available for the Leafs, regardless of how much money they could throw at him (Would Shero leave the situation he’s got going in Pittsburgh?)
The only GM I’d conceivably like to have other than Burke would be Poile (maybe Chiarelli, but good luck getting him out of Boston).
by Chi-town leafs on Jan 23, 2012 10:26 AM EST up reply actions
I dont’ think its fair to blame Burke for it all right now. I mean our Roster is unbelievably better than the one two years ago, and really as a group should be better than any other post-lockout team, given we mostly had a ton of underperforming, mediocre players and Mats Sundin.
I am really hopping off the fence towards the “Fire Wilson” side though, because this team has not shown improvement in several key categories (notably PK) over a sustained period of time. And when you look at the team, we might be a bubble team but we’ve lost games against other bubble teams over and over.
by Goosemonster on Jan 23, 2012 10:32 AM EST up reply actions
The fact that Wilson is running special drills for the PK… and now, for the players to go to the net… just feels like really really bad coaching to me.
Why? Because IT’S ALMOST FEBRUARY. Sure, coaches need to tune stuff up as the year progresses. But this is a team that has had an APPALLING PK for a long time. And a team with almost NO net presence for a long time.
Either get your players hammering the net, or bench or demote them, or make a goddamn trade. But I’ve seen almost nothing this year from the Leafs on this front, and we’ve ALREADY pissed a half-dozen one-goal games away, when we outshot and outplayed the other guys, but then lamented that we weren’t driving the goddamn net enough.
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 23, 2012 10:37 AM EST up reply actions
Expecting a speedy, rush and counter-attack team to suddenly change their game and become crash-and-bangers a week before February is just as ridiculous. Sure i’d love to see them crash the net and score some ugly goals too, but this is not that kind of team. And yelling at guys like Lupul and MacArthur to suddenly start doing that is the equivalent of complaining that Kadri is too short and telling him to grow 6 inches
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 10:41 AM EST up reply actions
1. There’s no such thing as a team that is just X or just Y. There’s always a mix. And in my books, Wilson and Burke have the mix wrong.
2. In fact, I’m willing to bet a sack of my favourite potatoes that there’s been a bit of a divergence between the two on this issue. You could hear it in Burke’s views on Orr.
3. But in the same way as you ask bangers to work on their skills, you have to get the skilled guys to take the heat and get in front. Some guys are doing it less this year. I pointed to MacArthur as a guy whose “hits” have fallen off the charts compared to last year. Lat year, he led the Leaf forwards in hits, this year he’s 11th. Or Kulie. There’s a video up of all hi goals from last year, and watching it, you can see he scored at least HALF of them from within about 10 feet. Not sure he’s there this year.
So even though it’s not gonna be their primary thing, they have to do it as much as they can stand. A bit like teaching offensive players to backcheck. Nope, they’re never gonna be a bob Gainey, but…. they can improve.
4. Most of all though, we need a trade. A change in the mix.
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 23, 2012 10:56 AM EST up reply actions
I get your frustration. I feel the same way. But the kinds of things you’re talking about aren’t a simple matter of Wilson realizing “OH maybe if I said it out loud they’ll do it.” It’s the same reason why Gretzky didn’t make a good coach: he still knows how to play in his mind, but other than saying “play better” there’s no way to enunciate it. Yes, Kulemin played better last year. But what do you want Wilson to do, yell “try harder! Score more!” while he’s on the ice?
And yes, there are things players can work on, but the size and skillset of our forwards is not the same as the Boston Bruins. It’s reality. You can’t expect Kessel and Lupul to suddenly start playing like Horton and Lucic, and it is not a simple matter of “working on it” in practice. Burke has built this team on a perimeter game, on fast counter-attacks on the rush, and that is what the team is for the year.
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 11:09 AM EST up reply actions
Disagree completely. There are tonnes of things coaches do to change how players play. Hell, players get converted in terms of what they do all the time – e.g. they change from being scorers to checkers as their career goes on, etc.
So, no, we’re not 100% locked into being “a perimeter team.” We don’t always lay there now. With good coaching, you can drum into players that they need to turn INTO traffic and go get the puck more often, or they’ll sit on the bench. I’m not asking Kessel to turn into Lucic, I’m asking that each guy change what they do by a few %. Same as a coach does with backchecking.
But yes, i think we need a trade or two, so we start with a player mix that has a bit more intensity, grind, toughness in it. Not a total change of the tam, but just to add some grit to the mix.
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 23, 2012 3:25 PM EST up reply actions
I think hoping that players will change the way they play to the extent that you’re talking about is sort of like when you think you can change your significant other. By all means try, but I’m not holding my breath
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 3:56 PM EST up reply actions
Yup, god damn Burke for not just snapping his fingers and making trades for game-changing two way players and big bodied power forwards who can score. Fuck him.
Hello? We’re 3 years or so in. He’s had time to trade for someone. He hasn’t. Wilson has had time to ask for someone. He hasn’t.
These kinds of guys are all kinds of happy to talk about accountability and blah blah blah. In my view, the right response to them at this point is “Either fix it, or fire yourself. Cause it’s needed, and it ain’t there, and you’re the ones running the show.”
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 23, 2012 10:49 AM EST up reply actions
No one fires themselves because they always think they have the solution and can implement it.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
That, and, they probably want to keep getting a paycheque…
by GettinGiggy on Jan 23, 2012 11:51 AM EST up reply actions
Who was he supposed to trade for in the last 3 years that would have actually been possible? Up until last year the Leafs didn’t even have a single expendable body in the entire organization that could return a significant asset. Burke could go out and trade Schenn, Kadri, etc. for immediate help but he doesn’t see the value there. Whether or not he’s right doesn’t matter, he’s the guy calling the shots right now.
In 4 years here Burke’s team has been 1) shite 2) utter shit 3) shit and 4) mediocre. But like I said in my post below, the VAST majority of changes made to this team have been behind the scenes and/or meant to bear fruit in the future. The fact that we can actually envision this team making the playoffs this year is attributed solely to Burke.
Why you all friggin’ wired up about Burkie? My post was about WILSON, whom I do not think is a good coach. I get the team rebuild concept. And I get that now may be the first time he may have had the resources to really go get that big forward – a premier one, which is what he’s hunting.
But can we not do the “who could he have traded for that would have been possible” schtick? The guy has made numerous free agent signings. Other free agents, he’s missed. Some were big wingers. Again, he’s made trades. Big wingers have been traded. So… we coulda done something. I doubt that WILSON wanted the players though.
At this point, I think they’ve seen their run-n-gun game hits a ceiling without a few bangers or garbagemen. And now, they have the resources to make a trade. So… bring it.
And also, I still don’t think Wilson is a very good coach.
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 23, 2012 11:02 AM EST up reply actions
Well I’m bringing up Burke because the way I read it, your original comment referred to both Wilson AND Burke.
Either get your players hammering the net, or bench or demote them, or make a goddamn trade.
I’m not with you on the whole “Wilson’s a bad coach” thing, for two reasons. 1) I concur with Burke when he says he hasn’t given Wilson the personnel to get it done (to me the bad PK and lack of net crashing is a personnel issue more than a coaching issue) and 2) track record.
Does the team need a big scoring presence in front of the net? Yes. But this is with hindsight talking, and only because the way Burke built this team for success, which worked through the first half of the year, has stopped working at the moment. But to say Burke has had three years to bring in a power forward and the LEAFS ARE CRAP RIGHT FRIGGING NOW BECAUSE OF THIS is reactive. Overreactive.
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 11:12 AM EST up reply actions
I’m not sure if the downswing is the result of the shooters getting colder (SH% drop) or teams adapting to Wilson’s game plan are now defending better. If the second, then Wilson appears stubborn and inflexible in his strategy. If the first, then he may have failed to notice that the team was getting lucky earlier in the season and that was covering up the problems with the defensive lapses, turnovers and play consistency that has been around all year but more noticeable once the team started to lose.
In fairness
We badly outplayed Ottawa and, in my opinion, outplayed Montreal as well. But for good goaltending/bad bounces/bad calls, we could have won three times last week.
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
Just purely from observation, but in both games it looked like the Leafs dominated in the first and second periods, the other team bent but didn’t break, then won the third when the Leafs ran out of gas. More so against Ottawa than Montreal, but it seems like the Leafs are running out of steam in the third a lot lately
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 11:51 AM EST up reply actions
It’s not reactive at all. From Day One, some people have said we need to have a bit more size and grit in the mix. Simple. And I’d argue it has cost us games, both earlier in the season as well as now. This is nothing new.
I shot a moose once, in upstate New York.
by not norm ullman on Jan 23, 2012 3:27 PM EST up reply actions
Could this team use bigger, stronger forwards with the same skills and talent we have now? Sure. So can every team.
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 3:58 PM EST up reply actions
Track record? This is Wilson’s 18th season of coaching. He’s made it past the second round twice.
Either you have an enviable memory, or a pitiable life, to know nothing of regret.
- Sten, of the Qunari
by GreatKingRat on Jan 23, 2012 12:55 PM EST up reply actions
The only statement Burke and team made was that playoffs is the goal. I can deal with the team if factors conspire that they don’t make the playoffs. That said, I don’t like the way the team is not making the playoffs this year.
Maybe fans need to have even more patience, the team is young, there is some improvement, etc but then I have to say I’m also annoyed at those that promised me the Sens and Flames would have years of leaf life misery.
Brian Burke wasn’t brought in to rebuild the Leafs. He was brought in because MLSE thought he could win.
Come on, haven’t we touched on this 8236235 times already? Nevermind his bluster about “fuck a 5 year plan”, most rational people didn’t expect Burke to win anything thus far. Apart from maybe a draft lottery or two. The vast majority of changes that have been made over his tenure are not changes that immediately bear fruit. We know that, MLSE knows that. The Leafs were never going to make the playoffs again, period, if Burke didn’t do what he did in his rebuilding phase. If MLSE has to spend $40-50M to get the management team they want in place to get this team into the playoffs, that’s chump change compared to what they’re going to make when that time finally comes.
I think if you asked Burke, he’d be surprised the Leafs aren’t a better team by now. And if that’s the case, then MLSE is surprised too.
Again, not saying Burke should be fired. But do I think he’ll be under more pressure to produce a winner going forward? Absolutely.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
I think Burke over-estimated the roster when he first came aboard, but since then he seems to have realized that the team was actually kind of not that good and has done a lot of work to overhaul the roster.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 23, 2012 11:29 AM EST up reply actions
Hold on for a second… You must be one of those fans that thought the Leafs before Burke got here was good or something. I think its really unfair for fans like yourself to place such an unrealistic approach to the rebuild. You really think in the THREE years that he’s been here, that you should be expecting more with all considering? Do you think those two first picks would mean the team would be better now, since only three years in and you want to see results because if you can wait now, you (and fans that share your sediment) have shown me that you wouldn’t be patient then either no matter how much you say you will. Sorry seen that movie.
I think as Leafs fans we can only gage by progress, So far I can say I see some progress, is it enough to make everyone happy, I guess not.
"There's been four different Cup winners the last four years, and I got one of them (Anaheim) and it was a fighting team. We're playing it that way regardless." - B. Burke, Toronto Maple Leafs GM
I’m kind of torn. While I don’t have unrealistic expectations for the team, it’s always hard to believe the same BS that we’re fed: “rebuilds are slow” and “they take years and years”. Aside from Columbus, Atlantapeg, and NYI who everyone always like to point to in order to back up their arguement, can we get some stats on which teams missed the playoffs for more thatn say 4 years in a row. And (if we really want to take it a step further) then look at “staying power” to see which of those teams were or weren’t “one and done” in terms of playoff appearances?
I really don’t think the average ‘re-build’ time is over 5 years. But that number is completely made up, so I could be way off.
by gettingcozywithsarkozy on Jan 23, 2012 12:38 PM EST up reply actions
Atlanta, Columbus, Florida, Los Angeles, NYI, Tampa Bay, and Washinton are the common lottery teams over the last 15 years.
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
Teams with the most conference finals appearances in the last ten are: Detroit, Philadelphia, Anaheim, Carolina, Colorado, New Jersey, Pittsburgh
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
Anaheim and Pittsburgh are the only teams that score high in both lottery appearances and conference finals appearances
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
Okay, I’m an incramental kind of guy. “Conference finals” with regularity at this point is a pipe dream. Can we widen the field a little? Say, 3 straight years of making the playoffs?
by gettingcozywithsarkozy on Jan 23, 2012 12:49 PM EST up reply actions
Sorry, this is a spreadsheet I made a while ago and only captures what I shared. Conference finals puts you in the top 12 pct of the league and should be considered ‘success’. Making the playoffs means you’re better than half…
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
That’s fine. Don’t get me wrong, if this slow rebuild will turn into “regular conference finals appearances” in a few more years, i’ll be happy. I just don’t see our window being open for that long.
by gettingcozywithsarkozy on Jan 23, 2012 12:55 PM EST up reply actions
Anaheim’s lottery pick was Bobby Ryan, and their conference final appearances came before him.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
So does this mean we can all agree the team is where it ought to be, maybe better than it should be on and off ice and we just need to wait a bit before we reach for our torches and pitchforks?
"There's been four different Cup winners the last four years, and I got one of them (Anaheim) and it was a fighting team. We're playing it that way regardless." - B. Burke, Toronto Maple Leafs GM
[birky] must be one of those fans that thought the Leafs before Burke got here was good or something.
You must be new here.
RIP Former-and-forever Leaf Wade Belak
Me on Twitter
Fans that share your sediment? No need for mud slinging.
Either you have an enviable memory, or a pitiable life, to know nothing of regret.
- Sten, of the Qunari
by GreatKingRat on Jan 23, 2012 1:09 PM EST up reply actions 6 recs
No mud slinging at all… my points are directed to any one person but rather to envole all readers that share his sediments to engage the discussion.
"There's been four different Cup winners the last four years, and I got one of them (Anaheim) and it was a fighting team. We're playing it that way regardless." - B. Burke, Toronto Maple Leafs GM
Whooosh.
Cynically Sarcastic
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
by clrkaitken on Jan 23, 2012 1:12 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
dude, you’re digging a hole.
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 2:09 PM EST up reply actions
people need to stop taking puns for granite
Resident Internet Tough Guy
by JaredFromLondon on Jan 23, 2012 2:26 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
If he calcite some statistics to back his point up, why stop?
Riding the Leafs bandwagon since 1991.
Check out my art!
by CanadianMaple09 on Jan 23, 2012 2:29 PM EST up reply actions
you just came in here and immediately hit the ground running.
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 2:38 PM EST up reply actions
I think that in within the three years he’s been here, a lot of people (media, fans) are already calling for Burke to overhaul a chunk of the roster a second time due to lack of progress. A lot of that is from a lack of patience, but not all of it. Are the Leafs moving forward with Clarke MacArthur, Mikhail Grabovski, Tyler Bozak, and Nik Kulemin as integral parts of the top 6? It’s not like the Leafs are waiting for Kulemin or Grabovski or others to develop anymore. Those guys are in their mid-20’s and have hundreds of games of NHL experience. People really like to talk about how young the team is and how they need to grow, but the only really “young guys” on the club right now are Kadri, Gardiner, and Aulie. Everyone else has at least 150 games or so of NHL experience. I never said tear it all down or mentioned the Kessel trade. I never said three years is enough time for Burke to build a contender.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
I think age is relevant too, not just experience. Luke Schenn shouldn’t have been in the NHL as soon as he was. I think playing so many NHL games so early may have hurt his development more than it helped. I’m not sure GP is the best indicator of where we should expect a player’s development to be.
As for top 6, I think Grabovski and MacArthur are both reasonably good 2nd line players. I would have said Kulemin was up until recently, and I don’t know what’s wrong with him. I don’t think Bozak is a top 6 guy either. So we still need to add a top line centre and a 2nd line winger. Kadri is likely that 2nd line winger in a year or two. If a team that’s 1.5 years removed from finishing 2nd last in the league is only one player shy of a good top 6, I’d say that’s pretty good progress.
Now our defence and goaltending are another issue entirely . . .
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 23, 2012 2:00 PM EST up reply actions
I didn’t even touch on the defense and goaltending, but if you want to point at the one spot where Burke has been asleep at the wheel, it’s taking care of the Leafs’ net.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
If wondered if Burke relies too much on Allaire, under the assumption that he can turn Reimer, Gustavsson, or anyone into a “franchise” goaltender.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
It’s weird that he considers it acceptable to stock up on prospects and ignore short term options. It doesn’t really fit with how he was trying to treat the D or F.
RIP Former-and-forever Leaf Wade Belak
Me on Twitter
Reimer had a .912 SV% before he got concussed. He’s had .892 since then. 3SA, but it looks like our goaltending might not have been such an issue if Reimer hadn’t gotten Gionta’d.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 23, 2012 2:11 PM EST up reply actions
On Goaltenders
No doubt Burke probably should have let go of Gustavsson last season and brought in a more dependable 1B type goalie. That is his biggest and most obvious error.
But Burke has a) gotten rid of Toskala, b) tried Giguere although that failed, it was a creative enough move. c) lucked out with Reimer and not unreasonably so, expected him to be a solid 1A starter this year. d) stocked our goalie development pipeline with solid prospects without using draft picks.
I think he as much as anyone likely believe we need help in goal but to say he’s been asleep at the wheel is a bit shortsighted IMO.
How do you get rid of Gustavsson though? If you send him to the minors he takes playing time away from the other prospects. If you buy him out it’s a waste of money, plus you don’t know that what you could get on the market would be markedly better for the price. It all depends on what happens with Gustavsson at the end of the season. I have a hard time thinking he gets re-signed
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 2:13 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t think (good or bad) Burke’s the kind of guy that’s willing to do that. In addition to not wanting a guy who’s been demoted and benched at an AHL level around the young guys, I just don’t think Burke wants to do that to a guy
by Chi-town leafs on Jan 23, 2012 2:24 PM EST up reply actions
Totally agreed. I think Burke’s probably the last GM who’d do that. I’m just saying that it can be done. But if you really want to insulate your prospects from a disenchanted goalie, you might be better off sending him straight down to the ECHL.
(This is about my third consecutive post where I’ve mentioned the ECHL, for some weird reason.)
It can be done, but as you said above (and I should have thought of that as well) doing that to a guy provides a strong disincentive for free agent goalies to sign here, knowing that if they don’t play well they’ll end up riding the pine in the ECHL
by Chi-town leafs on Jan 23, 2012 2:31 PM EST up reply actions
Another thing: he makes $1.4-million. Sure MLSE has a lot of money but there’s no way they go along with paying someone a million dollars to not play.
Again.
Damnit Tucker
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 3:03 PM EST up reply actions
He brought in a Conn Smythe winner, the best goalie not playing in the NHL, the best unsigned goalie in college hockey, a top Finnish goalie and Mark in da Park. It’s not like he hasn’t made any attempts to shore up the position.
"They build a statue, they knock it down and piss on it, and now they will be out there building it again."
by ThickSkinnedAlive on Jan 23, 2012 2:14 PM EST up reply actions
To be fair
There aren’t a lot of rational Leafs fans out there.
99% of player salaries are payed out to only 1% of players. #OccupyNHL
I'm a Twitter twat.
CanadianMaple09 is an effective Facebook stalker.
The flipside to that is Bryan Colangelo, who was also brought in to win and has done the kind of giant trades and big-ticket signings that fans seem to demand from Burke. The result is a team that has completely changed in personality and style each year, and gotten progressively worse. Colangelo’s problem is he is only just now realizing that the Raptors need to be burned to the ground and rebuilt, but it is increasingly unlikely he’ll be around to see it through
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 10:39 AM EST up reply actions
I’m the anti-expert when it comes to basketball but from what little I gather, it seems like the trade landscape in the NBA is vastly different from NHL or other leagues. Also no one gives a fuck about basketball so who cares if the Raptors burn to the ground?
It matters in this context insofar as the Raptors are also an MLSE product. Remember, the board first hired JFJ and Babcock as cheaper GM options to run the two teams. When that didn’t work and they got lambasted in the media for it, they caved to what the MSM was calling for and spent big dollars to bring in Colangelo and Burke. Yes, the details are different but it does make for an interesting comparison.
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 11:15 AM EST up reply actions
mirrors all over the place
playoff team – inexperienced gm- terrible trades- basement team – flashy gm – still losing
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 11:22 AM EST up reply actions
… both named Bryan / Brian …
/eeriemusic
by GettinGiggy on Jan 23, 2012 11:54 AM EST up reply actions
Jays are also similar. Riciardi looted the farm system to try and build a team who had a shot at the playoffs, then they had to bring in someone to rebuild the entire org because the whole cupboard was barren
by WizardofNaz on Jan 23, 2012 12:02 PM EST up reply actions
I hate how some fans call for Burke’s job because we haven’t made the playoffs yet. We needed, and still need to rebuild.
As a Toronto sports fan I proudly follow the lessons of lachrymology.
"Vancouver, BC: A massive inferiority complex with a city." - TheOtherAndrew
William of Nassau am I, of Dutch blood. Loyal to the fatherland I will remain until I die.
do they not remember our top 2 prospects when JFJ was fired were Jiri Tlusty and Justin Pogge… and they had a huge gap over the next level…
by WizardofNaz on Jan 23, 2012 12:17 PM EST up reply actions
Odds of Burke getting fired have got to be pretty low. He makes something like Kessel money for (I think) 3 more seasons. Ownership would have to eat way too much money to get rid of him.
And I sure as hell hope management doesn’t “turn the heat up” on him to start looking for quick fixes. Don’t we all agree that was a huge part of what went wrong during the JFJ regime – constantly making bad trade-offs just to try to edge into the playoffs? Part of the reason Burke got the contract he did was so that he could insulate himself from that kind of pressure. Ownership needs to stay out of hockey decisions.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 23, 2012 11:32 AM EST up reply actions
And for all we know that’s happening. Remember when we used to constantly bitch about Peddie doing interviews about the teams? I haven’t seen anything approaching that since Burke took over. Peddie’s retired now, as well, but we haven’t heard a peep about who’s replacing him
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 11:53 AM EST up reply actions
but the Leafs are still in the same place they were when JFJ was here. 9th-10th place in the standings.
That’s pretty ingenuous when you’ve just acknowledged he’s revamped the roster and prospect development system.
Leafs are what, the 2nd youngest team in the league? Basically everyone under the age of 25 can’t really be expected to be consistent, night-in night-out performers yet because they don’t have the experience to do so yet.
Cynically Sarcastic
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
How many games are needed for the experience to be night in, night out guys? Schenn has 277 gp, Kule has 280, Franson has 173, Bozak has 157.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
Considering defenceman have longer developmental curves than forwards, I don’t think Schenn or Franson can be considered “experienced” yet.
Cynically Sarcastic
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
Would you consider Marc Staal an experienced NHL defenseman?
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
I’m not trying to be a dick here. But I would consider Marc Staal an experienced NHL defenseman and he only has 50 more games played than Schenn.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
Can we argue that Staal is also a more talented player than Schenn? Talent can cover positional shortcomings in younger players, and it’s the positional stuff that comes with time
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 11:55 AM EST up reply actions
Yea I’d consider Staal an exception to the rule.
As a Toronto sports fan I proudly follow the lessons of lachrymology.
"Vancouver, BC: A massive inferiority complex with a city." - TheOtherAndrew
William of Nassau am I, of Dutch blood. Loyal to the fatherland I will remain until I die.
He’s also had 2 years of more hockey than Schenn… he played 4 CHL seasons to Lukes 3 and that 4th year can be huge for players, and he has an extra NHL season.
by WizardofNaz on Jan 23, 2012 12:05 PM EST up reply actions
In response to the first part of your post, I have some concerns. The Leafs do have some young pieces…Kadri, Gardiner with limited experience. But the bulk of their “young guys” are in their mid 20’s already. That’s prime production time for most NHL forwards. Kulemin, Bozak, Frattin, Kessel, MacArthur are all 24 or older. Sure the Leafs got younger, but it’s not like these guys are all around 20. These guys are, statistically at least, entering or in their prime production years. So yes, the Leafs got younger, but not in the same manner I would normally think of as “getting younger”, if that makes any sense.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
Agreed. Also, there’s a difference between young and young with upside. For some of our young guys, such as Kulemin, Bozak, Schenn etc., I wonder what their ceiling really is. Can we expect Kulemin to ever surpass his 30-goal season from a year ago? Can we ever expect Bozak to be substantially more than what he is?
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 11:56 AM EST up reply actions
Maybe not, but if you can keep a steady stream of young talent pushing up from below you always have a chance.
I think most are expecting Colborne to be some sort of an impact player, a legitimate 2C in the near future. Kadri’s 21 and starting to figure it out. Schenn’s still 22. We have guys like Blacker, Frattin, Holzer etc. still waiting for a shot. If Burke and co. believes in the development of these players, then that means that the look of this team is again going to chance significantly in the next couple of years.
I still think Frattin should be with the Leafs
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
Sure when he learns to score… remember even RW thinks he’ll be a better scorer than Kadri.
"There's been four different Cup winners the last four years, and I got one of them (Anaheim) and it was a fighting team. We're playing it that way regardless." - B. Burke, Toronto Maple Leafs GM
“learns to score”?
The dude hit like 5 posts in the first month and a half. Terribly unlucky
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
Ya last time I checked, those don’t count. Luck or not, he needs to fix that. Calling it bad luck, rightfully or not, isn’t how you want a developing player thinking nor is it a completely valid point, if so many bad outings can be caused due to luck or lake thereof, right?
"There's been four different Cup winners the last four years, and I got one of them (Anaheim) and it was a fighting team. We're playing it that way regardless." - B. Burke, Toronto Maple Leafs GM
The guy was playing solid hockey. Keep looking at the g/a column to see if a player is playing well
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
A lot of aspects in hockey can be attributed to luck.
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
I’m not a fan of the luck argument, but for crying outloud.
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
Wow, do say the wrong thing about a player that is coveted here, sheesh.
How old is he again? Can he use more time to define his skills in a lesser league and that will benefit him? I think so… is it so bad that I think the luck excuse is BS not that luck has absolutely nothing to do with it? Using the luck excuse to keep him up isn’t one that sits well with me… Think of it like a goalie… has the skills but not the luck – do you say you keep him up as well?
"There's been four different Cup winners the last four years, and I got one of them (Anaheim) and it was a fighting team. We're playing it that way regardless." - B. Burke, Toronto Maple Leafs GM
Here’s another excuse: This is his first professional season. Even older rookies tend to struggle.
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
want another? He’s basically played as many games this season already than he has in any other season in his life…
Exactly! Then why are we making up excuses? Is it sooooo bad to having him playing in the AHL to get better, to find his way out of “bad luck” situations and not hurt the team. Shit it doesn’t mean the guy sucks or anything negative, its actually a good thing, long term. Do I as a fan wish other wise? Hell yes – I wish I can crack open my new box of crayons to plan my route by now too.
"There's been four different Cup winners the last four years, and I got one of them (Anaheim) and it was a fighting team. We're playing it that way regardless." - B. Burke, Toronto Maple Leafs GM
Well on the plus side Frattin takes more shots per game than Nikolai Kulemin.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Kulie?
I dunno man. To my eyes, there are games where he is engaged and forechecking but its very sporadic.
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
I don’t see that being the problem.
Work ethic wise, I don’t really see a difference between this year and last. The kid works hard; that’s never been his problem
He’s not scoring because he’s not shooting. His shots/game are down massively? But why isn’t he shooting?
Cynically Sarcastic
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
It’s annoying but not surprising, I think. If we look at the roster, we can’t honestly say that we should be a top half team either offensively or defensively and our goaltending was a huge question mark coming into the season.
It’s weird that we would get feast or famine on both sides but it’s not surprising that we are where we are.
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
I disagree. With the current roster, the Leafs should be able to say they’re a “top half” team. Leafs are 7th in the league in total goals. On paper, the defense is “top half”; it’s in practice where they fail miserably (26th in GA).
by gettingcozywithsarkozy on Jan 23, 2012 12:17 PM EST up reply actions
Leafs are bottom third in shots on goal. Our offensive output is an illusion and our current struggles are likely our goal totals regressing towards our shot totals.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
And we overvalue our D, in my opinion. We have a lot of guys with potential but not a lot of guys who actually deliver. I wouldn’t say we’re top half at this point.
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
I thought we’re talking about where we “should” be? I still believe “on paper” this team should be in the top 15 in the league. Problem right now is that none of the pieces are clicking at the same time (or consistently).
by gettingcozywithsarkozy on Jan 23, 2012 12:32 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, I guess I disagree with that. I think Franson, Schenn, Gardiner will all be good but are currently below average defensemen on the whole. Gunnarsson, Phaneuf are better than average, Liles probably is average, Komisarek is a dud. That puts us probably around 20th.
http://bluechipprospects.blogspot.com
That’s sounds about right; that’s only 5 places off the “half-way” mark. I think our offensive should balance that out. Once again though, that’s why games are played.
by gettingcozywithsarkozy on Jan 23, 2012 12:41 PM EST up reply actions
We’re not top half in any category except “shooting percentage” which isn’t a repeatable skill at the team level.
The East sucks and we’ve had a ton of good bounces so far this season. Maybe Burke brings in a real defenseman who limits shots and chances and Reimer gets to play hockey and we squeak into the playoffs.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Leafs are still top 5 on the PP aren’t they?
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 1:10 PM EST up reply actions
Offense: 20th in SF/gm
Defense: 19th in SA/gm
Goaltending: 26th in SV%
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Stats are always good in hindsight. I’m just trying to put myself in the position of October 5, 2011. I would have found it hard to rank our defense as poorly as they’ve played so far. For the offense, who could have imagined the dramatic drop off in the game of guys like Kulimen, Schenn, etc. I know there were projections that we talked about on here that had the Leafs ranked anywhere from 6th to 10th at year end.
by gettingcozywithsarkozy on Jan 23, 2012 12:46 PM EST up reply actions
October 5, 2011. I would have found it hard to rank our defense as poorly as they’ve played so far.
Why? They were drastically getting outshot in games since the Beauchemin trade the previous season. They only had JML to the team and nobody thought he was a great shut down guy. The only thing that kept last year’s Leafs out of the lottery was the insane play of James Reimer………the goalie currently riding the pine for some reason.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
In my mind JML + Franson + maturation of guys like Schenn and yes, (lol’ing now) Aulie would have equaled some sort of improvement on the back end. I guess I was pretty much wrong on all accounts.
by gettingcozywithsarkozy on Jan 23, 2012 12:52 PM EST up reply actions
the goalie currently riding the pine for some reason.
His play has the most to do with that. He needs to show he has improved his complete game, not just his ES play but his PK play. Right now, Gus is playing better, not much but still…
"There's been four different Cup winners the last four years, and I got one of them (Anaheim) and it was a fighting team. We're playing it that way regardless." - B. Burke, Toronto Maple Leafs GM
.930 over how many games… what’s his PK SV%? Are we comparing similar numbers or cherry picking again?
"There's been four different Cup winners the last four years, and I got one of them (Anaheim) and it was a fighting team. We're playing it that way regardless." - B. Burke, Toronto Maple Leafs GM
It’s not cherry picking if there’s an honest reason for exclusion. PK SVP is not an indicator of talent.
RIP Former-and-forever Leaf Wade Belak
Me on Twitter
I get it, you want Reimer in net. Still nothing points to why Gus shouldn’t be getting the starts. If he gives the team an chance to win we should be playing him. The same can be said with Reimer but so far the team wins more with Gus in net than not… one of the most important stat to me… No need to get into the Raycroft wins record… no need to be insulting.
"There's been four different Cup winners the last four years, and I got one of them (Anaheim) and it was a fighting team. We're playing it that way regardless." - B. Burke, Toronto Maple Leafs GM
Still nothing points to why Gus shouldn’t be getting the starts.
His season performance at even strength has not been as good as Reimer’s. The best indicator of goaltender ability suggests that Reimer should be getting the starts. Wins, the worst indicator for a reason you’ve already highlighted, is irrelevant.
RIP Former-and-forever Leaf Wade Belak
Me on Twitter
I’m glad that Gustavsson is playing better.
Gustavsson playing better is still worse than Reimer playing okay.
Reimer’s record since his return from injury looks worse than it is because of a catastrophically bad penalty kill and the Leafs not scoring any goals. Even over that span of not great play from Reimer he was stopping 93% of his shots at ES.
Put Reimer in front of a suddenly competent PK and we might actually get goaltending capable of covering up the other deficiencies.
If nothing else, Wilson’s constant erratic lineup choices are the most frustrating component of his coaching.
Cynically Sarcastic
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
boooo! I did too… to sum it up:
1. you win you’re in… Gus lost so wtf?
2. Remier lost a close game to our divisional rivals which we needed to win but lost… not his fault.
3. since we have played better for the PK with Gus in net, since Reimer has a .930 sv% at ES with a new looking PK that horrific .771 SV% will improve, just because of said factors…
So why not start Remier… RW hates you.
"There's been four different Cup winners the last four years, and I got one of them (Anaheim) and it was a fighting team. We're playing it that way regardless." - B. Burke, Toronto Maple Leafs GM
Stats are always good in hindsight.
And they were good at the time: we were being outshot and out goaltended but it didn’t matter because Kessel was shooting 30%.
This isn’t “hindsight is 20/20”, this has been a recurring issue for the Leafs and everyone saw this coming.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
Leafs shooting percentage has fallen .64% over just the last 7 games.
The First Certified Grabbo Lover
Leafs second in the league in shooting percentage.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
On the plus side our PDO is 1006 now, though I still think that it should be adjusted for goaltending.
Pension Plan Puppets*
* Blog contains less than 2% puppet content by weight.
“We’re not firing on all cylinders”
"I will actually score as many times as Kulemin assists me."
-Mikhail Grabovski
by MapleLeafMole on Jan 23, 2012 10:04 AM EST up reply actions
It’s like the team is a large, leaky cup. If you cover one of the holes, others are exposed and start leaking. If you try to cover up those holes, the previous ones begin to leak again.
Don’t know if that made sense.
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
It does and I’d take a wild stab that all the hard work they’ve done to play defense this month will be lost as Wilson tries to open up the offense.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
Defence is already pinching and taking chances. They already play a somewhat open style.
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
Ron Wilson is a caulk?
Either you have an enviable memory, or a pitiable life, to know nothing of regret.
- Sten, of the Qunari
by GreatKingRat on Jan 23, 2012 2:06 PM EST up reply actions
God
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
A coach who is currently established in the NHL and has had or is currently having success. Leafs have tons of money. Throw it around.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
sure. I just worry that people are only thinking of step one – fire the coach. And if you don’t think of step two – hire new and better coach, you end up fucked like Montreal.
Emo Girl Wing of Leafs Nation
by Fergus30 on Jan 23, 2012 10:15 AM EST up reply actions 5 recs
oh yeah you don’t fire until you have someone else lined up.
by Goosemonster on Jan 23, 2012 10:33 AM EST up reply actions
Boudreau and Hitchcock have been surprisingly effective changes.
Habs, kings, canes, caps coaching changes are a mixed bag so far
??? Boudreau’s Ducks still sittin’ pretty at 13th in the West and I thought there was a discussion somewhere here that the Blues were just having horrible “puck luck” because they had some pretty good stats, and their fortunes should be turning any time (which they did).
by gettingcozywithsarkozy on Jan 23, 2012 12:19 PM EST up reply actions
A lot of people seem to think that Dallas Eakins is ready for an NHL job, so it’s possible they could put him in charge. Short of that, though, I don’t think there’s anyone currently available who’s worth bringing in.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 23, 2012 11:34 AM EST up reply actions
God, we’re going to end up with Marc Crawford.
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 11:16 AM EST up reply actions
If they were to, chances are they would replace with him Eakins
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
possible, though I have to think they will be keeping him with the Marlies for at least the season, given how well they are doing in the AHL. I could see him added as an assistant coach sometime soon.
by Goosemonster on Jan 23, 2012 10:16 AM EST up reply actions
I like Eakins, but I’m not sure that the Leafs primary plan should be to promote an unproven coach at the NHL level to the head coaching position. The primary plan should be to throw money at a well-established coach who has a proven track record at the NHL level and maybe bring Eakins up as an assistant
by Chi-town leafs on Jan 23, 2012 10:48 AM EST up reply actions
Coaching changes are a risk, and while he does have familiarity with a lot of the younger players, promoting him seems like an added risk on top of any coaching change
by Chi-town leafs on Jan 23, 2012 10:52 AM EST up reply actions
Shouldn’t Eakins have to make the playoffs with the Marlies first before getting an NHL gig?
The AHL coaches that get NHL jobs AND ARE SUCCESSFUL are ones who have taken AHL teams on long Calder Cup runs. The Marlies haven’t even made the playoffs yet.
Think we’re getting a little carried away with Eakins’ success on the PK by just handing him the job.
If Wilson is in fact getting shitcanned I’d go to Scott Gordon as the interim guy.
Cynically Sarcastic
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
I’m not saying it was the right choice, just stating who the probable change would be
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
When the Marlies made the conference finals a few years ago was that under Eakins?
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 11:17 AM EST up reply actions
No that was Greg Gilbert, who got shitcanned for riding the AHL vets to that Conference Finals appearance and parking their top prospects like Justin Pogge.
Cynically Sarcastic
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
I remember that
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
ahem “top prospect” Justin Pogge
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 11:57 AM EST up reply actions
Dear God, look at that team.
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
I would be very surprised to see Wilson fired before the end of the season unless the Leafs fall into lottery pick territory.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 23, 2012 11:32 AM EST up reply actions
The Leafs are too far ahead to fall into lottery pick territory at this point knock on wood
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 11:58 AM EST up reply actions
I don't know about you guys
But Dallas Eakins has the Marlies playing some awesome hockey. I thoroughly enjoyed that outdoor game against Hamilton.
Dion Phaneuf: turning the tunes up since '10
fuck the Marlies. Let the guy coach the Leafs.
Move along. Nothing to see here...
by Van Ryn's Neurologist on Jan 23, 2012 12:18 PM EST up reply actions
It’s an old story, but I just found it – Curtis Joseph is an awesome guy.
RIP Former-and-forever Leaf Wade Belak
Me on Twitter
My Leafs coming of age occurred during the Cujo era. Several times he dragged us kicking and screaming into the playoffs and up through the playoffs – helping us win games we had no business winning.
by Goosemonster on Jan 23, 2012 9:33 AM EST up reply actions
Cujo was more than happy to sign all of the equipment for us, and he had brought along a silver pen for signing hockey pucks and made sure everyone involved got as many as they needed. We all decided he had to sign the jock too, just for a goof. He happily signed it, and when we looked, it simply read, "You couldn’t carry this."
As a Toronto sports fan I proudly follow the lessons of lachrymology.
"Vancouver, BC: A massive inferiority complex with a city." - TheOtherAndrew
William of Nassau am I, of Dutch blood. Loyal to the fatherland I will remain until I die.
What are the odds of the Shannabanhammer falling hard on Ovechkin today? He is a repeat offender and it looks like a suspension is warranted.
"They build a statue, they knock it down and piss on it, and now they will be out there building it again."
by ThickSkinnedAlive on Jan 23, 2012 9:58 AM EST reply actions
I never know anymore when the Shanaban is going to drop, nor the number of games someone will get. Still extremely haphazard.
by Goosemonster on Jan 23, 2012 9:58 AM EST up reply actions
It depends, is he technically an all-star?
Then no.
by Chi-town leafs on Jan 23, 2012 9:59 AM EST up reply actions
Also, not saying that his elbow was worse than Ovechkin’s hit, but how bad is it going to look if Michalak get’s suspended and Ovechkin doesn’t?
by Chi-town leafs on Jan 23, 2012 11:01 AM EST up reply actions
By now, Shannahan has morphed into his predecessor (plus some nicely choreographed videos). Circle of life: complete.
by gettingcozywithsarkozy on Jan 23, 2012 12:22 PM EST up reply actions
Good Morning!
Hey Guys, Just wanted to take a moment and share this with you. I’m sure everyone in here knows Steve “Dangle” Glynn and his LFR videos. Well, recently a member of his his family passed away (Saturday Morning) . I took it upon my self to make an online card for him and his family. Feel free to sign it and pass it along. ((He doesn’t know about it right yet, because I wanted to get a few signatures on it before I passed the link along to him))
You don’t have to sign it, but if you pass it along to others, it would be greatly appreciated
Thanks!
Link to the card
and here’s how you sign in to leave a comment
I don’t know if anybody here has heard of the “I’m 1in5” campaign but in an effort to raise awareness, I did a fan post. here. If anyone could just give it a read that would be great. It’s a great cause and they are doing some great work, and I just want to see them get all the help they can. Thanks a lot you guys
If you look up "Loyalty" in the dictionary you'll see a picture of a Leafs fan wearing a Todd Gill jeresy looking like he just got punched in the stomach
Jay Stempniak, Steve Kariya, the other Staal and Brent Gretzky should start a cover band that exclusively plays Wings songs
Unabashed fan of the surprise 2012 Stanley Cup champs
No. We’ve all seen his web design capabilities.
RIP Former-and-forever Leaf Wade Belak
Me on Twitter
by Bower Power on Jan 23, 2012 11:05 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
No Surprise here...
jonasTSN1050: Gustavsson appears to be tonight’s starter vs. Islanders. Optional skate for Leafs.
Come get your duds in order 'cuz we're bound to cross the water, HEAVE AWAY, me jollies, HEAVE AWAY -- There's a Loblaws on Carelton?!
That soft goal gave me a hard Colboner...
That doesn’t seem to mean anything, as per the back-to-back last week. They’re showcasing the Monster…
Come get your duds in order 'cuz we're bound to cross the water, HEAVE AWAY, me jollies, HEAVE AWAY -- Bowl of Fruit Lups in the evening gets the playoffs started!!
Tampa? They’re goaltending is worse.
So, apparently I can now be followed.. but no stalking. @alsonamedphil
WHy would they be showcasing him? Gustavsson has outplayed Reimer the past month or so
Fairweather fans can go to hell
Equal oppurtunity asshole and a proud member of the PPPPP
Follow me on twitter: leafer1984
Very true, but it sure doesn’t feel like the organization is going to choose the Monster over Reimer for the long-term plan
Come get your duds in order 'cuz we're bound to cross the water, HEAVE AWAY, me jollies, HEAVE AWAY -- Bowl of Fruit Lups in the evening gets the playoffs started!!
he’s a UFA after this year, I highly doubt we re-sign him.
by Goosemonster on Jan 23, 2012 11:18 AM EST up reply actions
Reimer said something last week that hinted that he was still recovering from an injury. That’s the only logical explanation I’ve got.
The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".
Internet Champ. I'm on Twitter too! - draglikepull
by Draglikepull on Jan 23, 2012 11:36 AM EST up reply actions
and/or Reimer starts tomorrow night away from the pressure of the ACC
"They build a statue, they knock it down and piss on it, and now they will be out there building it again."
by ThickSkinnedAlive on Jan 23, 2012 11:40 AM EST up reply actions
OPERATION TANK IS A GO
OPERATION TANK IS A GO. It’s the only explanation for Mike Weber. He’s on a secret mission.
Pass. Operation sell assets should be considered though.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
I wouldnt sell for the sake of selling but I wouldn’t mind trading off assets and seeing if we can ride the kids the rest of the season… Liles (the 6 we have now..), Mac (Frattin), Lombo (Army’ll be back soon/Crabb) and one of the centres to open up for Colborne will bring us back good assets who we might be able to package for a Bobby Ryan or a top young D like we need.
by WizardofNaz on Jan 23, 2012 12:12 PM EST up reply actions
This team cannot afford to be a buyer at the deadline, even if Gustavsson puts up 6 straight shutouts.
RIP Former-and-forever Leaf Wade Belak
Me on Twitter
Fuck that sex panther, I WANT REIMER.
by Tickle Me Aulie on Jan 23, 2012 12:14 PM EST up reply actions
I like the idea of pursuing Harding in net, who appears to have never once had season below .904. Minnesota is also looking for scoring depth, and we do have guys like Grabbo who are UFA who may help them there.
He’s never had a season below .904 or a season above 29 GP. I like Harding, but if the Leafs are bringing in another goaltender, it needs to be someone more established. And if we’re moving Grabovski, I’d like it to be in order to deal with the holes at F and D, either in the short or medium term. We can’t really afford to burn assets on “maybe this will work” when elite talent is so hard to acquire.
RIP Former-and-forever Leaf Wade Belak
Me on Twitter
by Bower Power on Jan 23, 2012 11:01 AM EST up reply actions
Yeah I’m sick of “maybe this will work” when it comes to goaltending.
I think Bryz shows that there aren’t really definites in terms of Goaltending signings, but I’d rather go for someone slightly more proven
by Chi-town leafs on Jan 23, 2012 11:03 AM EST up reply actions
Don’t know if anyone else saw this, but apparently some guy on Sportsnet reported that the Leafs are going to call up Korbinian Holzer and give him a shot on D.
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
Depends. Who comes out? I’m guessing Schenn (11:05 TOI Saturday), so Holzer can’t do much worse.
by Chi-town leafs on Jan 23, 2012 11:04 AM EST up reply actions
I heard that panel discussing it during the outdoor Marlies game on the weekend, but I didn’t really get the sense (at that point anyways) that they were saying anything definitive about Holzer, just that the Leafs apparently would like to get him playing at some point.
The Roar of the Masses Could be Farts.
by Self Destructive Zones on Jan 23, 2012 11:08 AM EST up reply actions
anything less than
a sweep of the islanders will be a disappointment. 6 points should be the minimum from the last 5 games…
Move along. Nothing to see here...
by Van Ryn's Neurologist on Jan 23, 2012 11:53 AM EST reply actions
JoeYerdonPHT Joe Yerdon
New PHT – Report: Oilers to extend GM Tambellini’s contract
As a Toronto sports fan I proudly follow the lessons of lachrymology.
"Vancouver, BC: A massive inferiority complex with a city." - TheOtherAndrew
William of Nassau am I, of Dutch blood. Loyal to the fatherland I will remain until I die.
And suddenly I’m reminded things could be much, much worse.
Cynically Sarcastic
Сертыфікаваны Grabbo Палюбоўнік
Shawn Mitchell via twitter:
Recently signed Brett Lebda will make his debut tonight, and will be on the top pairing with Fedor Tyutin.
Why are the words “Brett Lebda” and “top pairing” in the same sentence?
by holymackinaw on Jan 23, 2012 12:23 PM EST up reply actions
Someone call for the Sex Panther?

"They build a statue, they knock it down and piss on it, and now they will be out there building it again."
by ThickSkinnedAlive on Jan 23, 2012 1:02 PM EST reply actions 5 recs
Maple Leafs Panel
This week’s edition of Maple Leafs Panel at The Hockey Writers, on Kadri, Kessel & Lupul and the playoffs.
http://thehockeywriters.com/maple-leafs-panel-kadri-kessel-lupul-playoffs/
7 Thoughts of the Week:
http://50missioncap.wordpress.com/2012/01/23/the-week-that-was-7-thoughts-on-jan-16-22/
TWEET AT ME BRO
DAAAAA BLOG
Leaf fan for life! (No, really. They gave me a no-trade clause when I was born.)
by FiftyMissionCap on Jan 23, 2012 3:25 PM EST reply actions
They're removing cammilerri from the bell centre

Emo Girl Wing of Leafs Nation
by Fergus30 on Jan 23, 2012 3:33 PM EST reply actions 5 recs
is that Tyler Myers in a habs jersey? wtf?
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 3:47 PM EST up reply actions
So Tim Thomas didn’t go with the Bruins and is posting an explanation on his facebook page tonight.
I will retract this if he has a legitimate reason, but if it’s for a political reason, that’s bullshit. Your team gets invited to the White House for winning the championship, you go, simple as that. You are an athlete who is being celebrated for winning a championship, I don’t care if you don’t like the President, shut up and accept the honor.
Once again, if he had a legitimate reason, I apologize. Otherwise Fuck Him
why? I’m going to use an extreme example but fuck it If Max Baer refused to meet with Hitler would you still shit on him or would you call him a hero? I don’t think personal political views have to be censored in hockey.
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 3:52 PM EST up reply actions
Dude did you just compare Obama with Hitler?
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 3:59 PM EST up reply actions
It might be a record
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 4:02 PM EST up reply actions
comparing? no. using a provocative leader in an example? yes.
Resident teetotaler married to a habs fan. Who is also not a fan of most dogs.
by elseldo on Jan 23, 2012 4:01 PM EST via Android app up reply actions
Calling Hitler provocative is like calling Kim Jong Il arrogant
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 4:03 PM EST up reply actions
And that is all I will say about that because there’s no way this ends well
Professional cusser causer.
by T is for Truculence on Jan 23, 2012 4:04 PM EST up reply actions
I couldn’t think of another word.
Resident teetotaler married to a habs fan. Who is also not a fan of most dogs.
by elseldo on Jan 23, 2012 4:09 PM EST via Android app up reply actions
I’m going to use an extreme example
I used to love the Leafs... I still do... but I used to, too.
by Chuck Diesel on Jan 23, 2012 5:48 PM EST up reply actions
I respect his right to protest, but i can still hate him for it.
OPERATION TANK IS A GO. It’s the only explanation for Mike Weber. He’s on a secret mission.
exactly. I respect he’s doing what he believes in, I just find what he believes in kinda dumb… For instance my one friend for the longest time believed Dinosaur never existed and the bones were planted by god. I couldn’t help but laugh at him, although I still respected him and allowed him as many chances as he could to prove himself right.
a few guys over at lighthouse hockey really don’t like Kadri
Resident teetotaler married to a habs fan. Who is also not a fan of most dogs.
by elseldo on Jan 23, 2012 4:37 PM EST via Android app reply actions
RealBillWatters Bill Watters
NHL plus minus statistic speaks volumes about what will happen come mid June.
lol.
RIP Former-and-forever Leaf Wade Belak
Me on Twitter





































