Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

The Leafs Best Shot Blockers

Photo

A little while ago I was in discussion with Cam Charron about Shot Blocking metrics and the problems of normalization, and he directed me to work by Daniel Wagner over at the Score and a recent posting by Derek Zona over at Copper and Blue, which in turn prompted me to dissect the shot blocking abilities of the Leafs roster. I did the actual data analysis over a week ago, but a busy end of semester schedule has prevented me from getting things typed out for your perusal.

One of the main issues with shot blocks is the numbers generally favour players that are on the ice without control of the puck. Skaters with poor puck possession skills tend to climb the rankings of the shot blocking stat sheet - with the most noteworthy example, Ryan Johnson, making an appearance on Coaches Corner before being dumped from the NHL for his less than stellar play.

Star-divide

Secondarily are the issues of arena bias, score effects, and situational play as a result of zone start etc. In an effort to mitigate against all of the above, Zona proposes that we look at shot blocks as a percentage of all attempts fired by the opposition. Thus we look at which players block the largest percentage of those attempts that ARE fired their way, in other words, it allows you to determine who is actually the best at getting in the way of opposition shots.

In addition to this, I had another thought, which is that good shot blockers would also get in the way enough that the opposition is also likely to miss more shots on goal. So I decided to factor in another little wrinkle. In addition to the blocked shot percentage, I also calculated the percentage of missed shots by the opposition.

So without further ado, I give you the stats I'm discussing - all data courtesy behindthenet.ca

First up - the forwards. This info is less meaningful than the ones for the D realistically, but it gives you an idea who covers the points well and does a good job clogging shooting lanes up high for the opposition.

Player Pos ES Att A ES BS For ES BS Ratio ES MS+BS Ratio
David Steckel C 370 30 8.10% 29.95%
Tim Connolly C 443 34 7.67% 33.28%
Joe Colborne C 105 7 6.68% 32.44%
Matt Lombardi C 286 16 5.60% 26.15%
Mike Brown LW 174 7 4.02% 26.97%
Joey Crabb RW 337 12 3.56% 29.73%
Philippe Dupuis C 198 7 3.54% 32.14%
Nikolai Kulemin RW 565 19 3.36% 27.05%
Darryl Boyce C 96 3 3.11% 27.13%
Mikhail Grabovski C 517 15 2.90% 25.88%
Tyler Bozak C 558 16 2.87% 24.03%
Clarke MacArthur LW 451 11 2.44% 24.42%
Nazem Kadri C 161 3 1.87% 21.49%
Joffrey Lupul RW 746 13 1.74% 24.05%
Matt Frattin RW 402 7 1.74% 22.69%
Jay Rosehill RW 80 1 1.25% 24.93%
Phil Kessel LW 745 8 1.07% 23.33%
Colton Orr RW 35 0 0.00% 28.57%
Colby Armstrong RW 79 0 0.00% 25.30%

Frankly the majority of this ranking shouldn't surprise anyone who has watched the Leafs this year. Obviously Tim Connolly's defensive skills in this area put him well ahead of the other scoring forwards on the team. While Joe Colborne was present for a brief time with the club, it bears pointing out that his shot blocking defensive abilities may help him fill a top line role in the future, particularly as his puck protection skills on offense develop. I do strongly feel that Colborne could be a legit top line threat in the future if allowed to develop patiently.

The worrying part about the above list for me is the number of Wingers near the bottom of the rankings. This speaks volumes about how difficult the Leafs find it to get in the way of shots from the point on their way to breaking out of the zone. Either way it should be mentioned that forwards block far fewer shots against than defenders, and also are on the ice for fewer shots against. Thus these numbers can be taken with a grain of salt.

Next up we have the Leafs blue line corps. Again I have included the Blocked Shot + Missed Shot ratio with the idea that being in the lane regularly should result in either more shot blocks and missed shots. Either result will reduce the number of shots against the Leafs goalies will face, and the ratio should let us see which defenders are actually good at getting in the way.

Player POS ES Att A ES BS For ES BS Ratio ES MS + BS Ratio
Mike Komisarek RD 328 42 12.80% 32.98%
John-Michael Liles LD 539 62 11.50% 33.98%
Carl Gunnarsson LD 714 79 11.07% 34.51%
Keith Aulie LD 240 22 9.18% 37.89%
Luke Schenn RD 685 55 8.03% 32.10%
Cody Franson RD 391 30 7.66% 27.55%
Dion Phaneuf RD 786 59 7.51% 31.74%
Jake Gardiner RD 611 39 6.39% 27.61%

So I should mention that in the Daniel Wagner posting I linked to earlier, Mike Komisarek ranked 4th in the NHL in this skill amongst D men. His 12.80% would still likely rank him in the top 10 in the NHL amongst D men in shot blocking ability at even strength. Komisarek is a very good shot blocker, that's one of the main reasons the Leafs added him - though the valuation the club placed on that skill might be a bit out of whack considering his other abilities (or lack thereof).

John-Michael Liles is the surprise on this list. Recently extended with a 4 year contract with a $3.85 million cap hit per season, this statistical measure belies his abilities to get in shooting lanes defensively, at least at even strength.

That being said, the Leafs top two shot blocking D men don't seem to be on the ice for a lot of missed shots in comparison to their peers. Komisarek and Liles actually rank 7th and 5th in Missed Shot Ratio amongst the Leafs eight defenders respectively. This makes me wonder a bit about scorer bias, and perhaps a touch of random variation in the numbers. Obviously scorers are aware of Komisarek's prowess for shot blocking, so this may factor into his high number of blocks.

Carl Gunnarsson and Keith Aulie both have done an excellent job overall defensively in terms of getting in shooting lanes, though they seem to do so in different ways. Aulie's size seems to force shooters to miss the net more often, while Gunnarsson's shot blocking ability seems to help keep the puck away from the front of the net.

Worrying from a defensive standpoint are - to varying degrees - Schenn, Franson, and Phaneuf. Phaneuf's numbers are fairly easily explained away as a result of facing the most difficult competition on the team. He still isn't a great shot blocker, but he's played reasonably well this year. Schenn's not facing horribly difficult competition, and he doesn't seem that adept at getting into shooting lanes to block shots. These results should give pause to those who are hopeful that he'll continue to develop into a shut down D.

Franson's numbers go a long way to explaining why he sees hardly ANY difficult defensive assignments. Yes he's been more physical as he's gotten more playing time, and yes his puck possession numbers are solid, but he has been fairly heavily sheltered in terms of both his zone starts, and his competition. Despite the sheltering, he is basically the worst Leaf's D man at getting into the shooting lanes. If the Leafs ever hope to increase his defensive usage these numbers have to improve.

Jake Gardiner is very young, and he's mainly known as a puck mover. He isn't expected to block a lot of shots, and generally he is still adjusting to the defensive aspects of the NHL game. Hopefully he continues to grow this aspect of his game.

So with these numbers in mind I leave it to you guys to dissect and discuss further. In the future, I'm hopeful we can access data from the PK as that may be a more relevant stat to the Leafs early season woes. Hope this provides some insight into this oft debated aspect of what we're seeing on the ice.

Comment 32 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Pension Plan Puppets

Marlies & Devils 2.0

May 2012 by JP Nikota - 109 comments

Marlies & Devils

May 2012 by JP Nikota - 681 comments

Marlies miss huge opportunity

May 2012 by birky - 30 comments

PPP Does Ricoh

May 2012 by PPP - 16 comments

How Do You Spell Denial? J-E-T-S

May 2012 by SkinnyFish - 389 comments

Comments

Display:

Nice post

I am curious though just how valuable shot blocking actually is.

Using Komi and Gardiner as examples – Komi blocks/misses 33% of shots while Gardiner blocks/misses 27.6%.

Around the 175 shots mark, Komi will have blocked/missed 10 more shots than Gardiner (57.75-47.25 = 10.5). Assuming you have a .900 goalie – this would mean Komi has saved you 1 goal versus Gardiner.

Now just eyeballing the chart, a 2nd pair dman probably faces 1200 shots/year – dividing 1200/175 = 6.85 or basically 7. So Komi’s shot blocking ability saves us an additional 7 goals over a year versus Gardiner’s shot blocking.

How much that is actually worth, I don’t know.

by Dr_Furious on Jan 26, 2012 10:45 AM EST reply actions  

6 goals

is approximately one win in the standings… but there’s another side of things – the offensive end.

What you should really consider is the net results of their offensive and defensive skill set in combination.

Gardiner’s offensive and puck possession abilities outweigh those of Komisarek in all likelihood… particularly in the long term.

So while Komisarek is quite possibly going to prevent 7ish goals in comparison to Gardiner through BS and MS alone, the offensive chances Gardiner generates will be far ahead of those generated by Komisarek.

Also, this is only at ES, we don’t know what the PK and PP numbers are like at this stage.

So realistically we know who is good at this – but we can also eye ball who is also good at other things – this is why Gunnarsson has had so much value to the team this season. He’s a good defensive player, but he controls the puck well, makes solid passes, and produces offense… overall he’s one of the two best D men on the team right now, and he’s probably better than Phaneuf defensively in a number of regards.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 26, 2012 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

The other question is, how many times does a shot blocker cause a shot deflection on a failed shot block attempt or miss blocking the shot altogether and end up just screening the goalie?

Also, blocked shots usually come from shots from the point and goalies have a much higher save percentage on those shots.

While Komisarek may block a lot of shots, he has awful defensive stats otherwise. If blocking shots is a significant positive for Komisarek, what does that say about the rest of his game?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HockeyAnalysis.com - Taking a Deeper Look at the World of Hockey

by HockeyAnalysis on Jan 26, 2012 11:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Defencemen shouldn’t block shots..

They should just clear the crease of opposing players and let the goalie see the shot.

Forwards are the one’s who should be blocking shots.

Changing my "Goat of The Year" player from Armstrong to Kulemin

by Gebx on Jan 26, 2012 11:49 AM EST up reply actions  

everyone should block shots if the right scenario plays out

Resident Internet Tough Guy

by JaredFromLondon on Jan 26, 2012 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

shot blocking

has been a large part of reducing shots against… fronting being thrown out as useless is relatively baseless… nobody is quantifying how it’s a useless effort. There’s a lot of supposition going on without much effort to assert whether or not it’s a serious problem.

Anti-fronting and Anti-shot blocking viewpoints have a hypothesis – they need to test it to assert whether or not said hypothesis is correct.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 26, 2012 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

The problem is that the anti-fronting hypothesis can’t be tested because it’s a counter-factual claim; they are making claims about what would have happened had a player acted differently than he did.

We have seen goals where a shot is tipped by a dman in the net, or where the goalie can’t see the point shot and it goes in. It’s not absurd to suggest that fronting contributes to this, but it’s impossible to way the costs and benefits of such a system without actually playing both and comparing.

In the court of public opinion, Steve Simmons is Lionel Hutz.

by The Bag on Jan 26, 2012 12:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Unfortunately

nobody is tracking those stats, so while we know they happen, I’m guessing it’s not as frequent as the blocks themselves since the GA ON/60 are lower than the BS F/60.

I’m not sure saying someone blocks shots means anything about the rest of their game – they’re completely distinct statements.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 26, 2012 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

also

defenders “tipping” shots while trying to block are just as likely to deflect one in as offensive players trying to tip them in also?

Not sure how you propose to dissect that aspect without watching every goal against on the Leafs so you can assign blame… I’m not about to do it due to time constraints atm – but feel free.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 26, 2012 11:51 AM EST up reply actions  

I was mostly trying to suggest that the 7 goals Komisarek isaves by blocking shots is probably a high number.

I do know that Komisarek’s defensive numbers are awful, so if his shot blocking ability is saving 7 goals, his abilities elsewhere have to be that much worse.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HockeyAnalysis.com - Taking a Deeper Look at the World of Hockey

by HockeyAnalysis on Jan 26, 2012 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

This is a great post.

by Ben Schnell on Jan 26, 2012 11:30 AM EST reply actions  

Just noticed this morning - Mind Boggling Stat

Maybe I’m not reading this right, but Toronto’s win percentage is 38% when they are OUTSHOOTING their opponents.. it goes up to 59% when they are being outshot.

Anyone have an idea why that is?

Changing my "Goat of The Year" player from Armstrong to Kulemin

by Gebx on Jan 26, 2012 11:52 AM EST reply actions  

Here’s the link –
http://www.nhl.com/ice/teamstats.htm?fetchKey=20122ALLSAAAll&sort=winPctOutshootOpponent&viewName=summary

Changing my "Goat of The Year" player from Armstrong to Kulemin

by Gebx on Jan 26, 2012 11:52 AM EST up reply actions  

because

teams with the lead tend to get outshot by the trailing team… score effects have a huge part to play in shot counts.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 26, 2012 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

what you should look at

are shot totals when the score is tied or close if you want to assess how a team is playing.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 26, 2012 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

How is “close” defined?

I will stand beside him with an axe!

by theninjagreg on Jan 26, 2012 12:00 PM EST up reply actions  

within 1 or 2 goals, I think. Though if you wanted to be even more sophisticated about it, you should have a higher threshold for “close” in the first period than in the third. 3-1 with forty minutes left is a whole lot less safe than 3-1 with four minutes left.

Glory glory Man United, AND the other MU, AAAAnd the Leafs. Experiencing cheering whiplash for decades..

by Wan Ihite on Jan 26, 2012 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

The definition I use, and I think others do to, is within one goal in the first and second periods and tied in the third.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HockeyAnalysis.com - Taking a Deeper Look at the World of Hockey

by HockeyAnalysis on Jan 26, 2012 12:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Score effects. Teams with the lead usually get outshot.

The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
I also write things about stuff over at the Leafs Nation

by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jan 26, 2012 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Score effects.

The First Certified Grabbo Lover

by SkinnyFish on Jan 26, 2012 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

John-Michael Liles is the surprise on this list. Recently extended with a 4 year contract with a $3.85 million cap hit per season, this statistical measure belies his abilities to get in shooting lanes defensively

I think you means “underlines” rather than “belies”. To belie something is to conceal it, or contradict it. It essentially means “puts the lie to it”.

Glory glory Man United, AND the other MU, AAAAnd the Leafs. Experiencing cheering whiplash for decades..

by Wan Ihite on Jan 26, 2012 12:12 PM EST reply actions  

be·lie/biˈlī/
Verb:
(of an appearance) Fail to give a true notion or impression of (something); disguise or contradict: “his alert manner belied his years”.
Fail to fulfill or justify (a claim or expectation); betray.

I will stand beside him with an axe!

by theninjagreg on Jan 26, 2012 12:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I wasn’t surprised to see Liles. He’s was leading / near the top of the Leafs D in shots blocked for a good portion of the season.

No no, dig UP stupid.

by nhlcheapshot on Jan 26, 2012 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

yep

my bad – i meant indicates the opposite of the expected.

as for expecting him to rank highly I didn’t assume – prior to this – that his shot blocks were a result of much beyond his poor corsi. Now we know there’s either some skill or luck involved – maybe both.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 26, 2012 1:27 PM EST up reply actions  

pe·dan·tic/pəˈdantik/
Adjective:
Of or like a pedant.
Synonyms:
punctilious – donnish – priggish – meticulous

I will stand beside him with an axe!

by theninjagreg on Jan 26, 2012 12:31 PM EST reply actions  

ped·ant   [ped-nt]
noun
1.a person who makes an excessive or inappropriate display of learning.
2.a person who overemphasizes rules or minor details.
3.a person who adheres rigidly to book knowledge without regard to common sense.
4.Obsolete . a schoolmaster.

I will stand beside him with an axe!

by theninjagreg on Jan 26, 2012 12:31 PM EST up reply actions  

con·de·scend·ing/ˌkändəˈsendiNG/
Adjective:
Acting in a way that betrays a feeling of patronizing superiority.
(of an action) Demonstrating such an attitude
Example: I am being condescending, that means i’m talking down to you
:P

At least it's not Lebda.

by Nifty Mittens on Jan 26, 2012 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

The fact that ‘pedant’ originally referred to schoolmasters and teachers is very telling.

In the court of public opinion, Steve Simmons is Lionel Hutz.

by The Bag on Jan 26, 2012 1:37 PM EST up reply actions  

i am

one.

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm."

- Sir Winston Churchill

I'm pretty sure he's talking about the Leafs.

by Steve Burtch on Jan 26, 2012 1:39 PM EST up reply actions  

A pedant or a teacher?

I meant that charges of pedantry have the same feeling of hostility that teenagers direct at their teachers. It’s a bizarre notion that rules and standards should only apply when it feels right. It wasn’t a slight directed at you or anyone else, just an observation that the etymology makes perfect sense.

In the court of public opinion, Steve Simmons is Lionel Hutz.

by The Bag on Jan 26, 2012 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Both

The Leafs are my Rushmore
Certified Grabbo Lover and member of the PPPPP
I also write things about stuff over at the Leafs Nation

by Plea From A Cat Named Felix on Jan 26, 2012 3:07 PM EST up reply actions  

The worrying part about the above list for me is the number of Wingers near the bottom of the rankings. This speaks volumes about how difficult the Leafs find it to get in the way of shots from the point on their way to breaking out of the zone.

How? Why is this worrying? Most point shots are taken from the centre or near centre of the ice, which is the area the defensive centre is responsible for. Hence Colboner being so high on the list. I think that’s a result of position as opposed to proof of his defensive acuity. That’s how I’m seeing this, anyways.

"I myself am made up entirely of flaws, stitched together with good intentions."

by Blinky on Jan 26, 2012 4:00 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Your best source for quality Toronto Maple Leafs news, rumours, analysis, stats and scores from the fan perspective.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

N907005365_1934770_7971_small
PPP Salary cap Challenge - Paper bag Leaf fan
Lifeasaleaffan_small
(Old) Marlies Game Photos
Newman_small
PPP Salary cap Challenge - samspade
Small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge - DaSim85
Globeatar_small
How Much Should You Spend On A Top 4 D?
Phaneufkessel_small
TOI-weighted NHL Team Ages
48839cd14228986f0ad0d2e405f1_small
Casting Call
Petering_small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge - Self Destructive Zones
Globeatar_small
The Fancystats Exchange, Part 1
Or-wallpaper-1680x1050__1__small
PPP Salary Cap Challenge-BCapp #2

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

StatCounter

wordpress visitor


Chief Blogging Officers

Calvin_small PPP

Aen1_small Chemmy

PPP's Girlfriends

Don_t_panic_small SkinnyFish

Picture_1_small JP Nikota

Fg_small birky

Christian-hanson-wrecks-brian-o_1__small Bower Power