Mar 03, 2012; Montreal, QC, CAN; Toronto Maple Leafs goalie James Reimer (34) and Montreal Canadiens goalie Peter Budaj (30) before the first period at the Bell Center. Mandatory Credit: Jean-Yves Ahern-US PRESSWIRE
Twitter can be great sometimes. I had a pretty good laugh when I came up with this one last night for "#RemoveOneLetterFilms". It seemed exceptionally accurate for some of the daily discussions that happen on that platform (and here as well). If you're not a stat fan, I suggest skipping on ahead to the links now, as we've got a new one to discuss:
So what I've tried to do is take save percentage and put it on a similar scale [to ERA+], and for demonstrational purposes here I'll (unoriginally) call it Adjusted Save Percentage, or SV%+. It does the same thing as ERA+, in the sense that someone with a SV%+ of 100 is league average and anyone above that is better while anyone below that is worse. To think of it another way: if a goalie has a SV%+ of 105 based on their raw save percentage, then he'd give up 100 goals in the same number of shots against that it would take a league-average goalie to allow 105.
Pretty interesting stuff. Note that this uses total SV%, and not just ES SV%, but the data it turned up was pretty neat. I'd suggest you head over to Broad Street Hockey and check it out. Spoiler alert - the Leafs goaltending stinks using this metric too.
In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.