Why PLAYOFFS!!!1 Isn't Good Enough

Joel Auerbach

How well do bad possession teams do in subsequent seasons?

By now it's fairly well known in Leafland that the Toronto Maple Leafs have not done very well this season by puck possession metrics like Fenwick or Corsi. At the moment I'm writing this Toronto sits second last in the NHL with a Fenwick close of just 43.8%, the 5th worst a team has had in the 6 seasons for which we have these statistics (since 2007-08). This has lead to a fairly significant number of arguments between those who favour statistiscal analysis, who claim that the Leafs' success is largely luck-based, and those who disagree, saying that the Leafs have earned their way into the playoffs through strong play. Those of us who favour statistical analysis have often been countered with the claim that the Leafs were making the PLAYOFFS!!!1 and other than that it doesn't matter.

I believe it does matter. I believe that NHL teams should be attempting to set in place a foundation for long term success, ideally culminating in a Stanley Cup victory. That leads to an obvious question about the effects of possession on success: how do teams with bad possession numbers do as far as qualifying for the playoffs?

I've collected data on all the teams that finished with a Fenwick Close of below 49% for every year that we have data for prior to this year, which works out to 5 seasons. A FenClose of under 49% equates very closely to being in the bottom 1/3 of the league; in the 5 seasons looked at here, 50 teams finished with a FenClose that low (though the distribution is not exactly 10 per year). I'm going to look at two things in that list: how many teams have qualified for the playoffs in a season in which they had a FenClose of under 49% and how teams made the playoffs the year following a season in which they had a FenClose that low. This should give us some idea how likely it is for a bad possession team to make the playoffs and how likely it is that they'll be successful in the future.

Of the 50 teams that have had a FenClose of under 49%, 20 have made the playoffs either that year, the subsequent year, or both, a rate of 40%. Here is the list of those teams, in reverse chronological order. It does not include Columbus, who may qualify for the playoffs this year but haven't as of yet. The numbers are all accurate as of last Sunday when I put this chart together.

Year Team FenClose Playoffs Playoffs Next Year? Next FenClose
2011-12 MIN 44.9 No Yes 47.9
2011-12 NSH 46.1 Yes No 45.8
2011-12 TOR 46.7 No Yes 43.8
2011-12 MTL 46.8 No Yes 53.4
2011-12 ANA 48.1 No Yes 47.6
2010-11 ANA 45.7 Yes No 48.1
2009-10 MTL 46.1 Yes Yes 51.6
2009-10 COL 46.9 Yes No 47.6
2009-10 ANA 46.9 No Yes 45.7
2009-10 TBL 47.4 No Yes 53.7
2008-09 PHX 45.1 No Yes 51.0
2008-09 COL 46.7 No Yes 46.9
2008-09 MTL 46.9 Yes Yes 46.1
2008-09 NSH 48.1 No Yes 51.7
2007-08 PIT 46.5 Yes Yes 50.0
2007-08 MTL 47.1 Yes Yes 46.9
2007-08 PHI 47.1 Yes Yes 49.1
2007-08 MIN 48.3 Yes No 46.8
2007-08 STL 48.5 No Yes 49.9
2007-08 VAN 48.5 No Yes 49.3

Of the teams with a Fenwick Close in the bottom third of the league, only 9 made the playoffs, just 18%, which is less than one in five. 16/50 teams made the playoffs the year following a season in which their FenClose was under 49%. Of those, 9 saw their possession numbers jump above 49%, taking them out of the bottom third of the league, so their better results would be expected. Of the remaining seven, three are from this shortened season and their results may not have been sustainable over 82 games. Previous results suggest that they probably would not have. So a very small number of teams (somewhere between 4 and 7) out of 50 were able to make the playoffs following a poor possession season. This should concern Leafs fans, unless the team can significantly improve its possession numbers next season.

This next chart may prove even more concerning for Leafs fans; it's the list of teams that qualified for the playoffs in a poor possession season and the subsequent season. There are only 5 of them:

Year Team FenClose Playoffs Playoffs Next Year? Next FenClose
2009-10 MTL 46.1 Yes Yes 51.6
2008-09 MTL 46.9 Yes Yes 46.1
2007-08 PIT 46.5 Yes Yes 50.0
2007-08 MTL 47.1 Yes Yes 46.9
2007-08 PHI 47.1 Yes Yes 49.1

Three of them improved their possession by a fair margin the next two seasons, and that leaves the 2007-08 to 2009-10 Montreal Canadiens as the only consistently poor possession team to make the playoffs multiple seasons in a row. This list skews heavily toward the 2007-08 season, but I have no explanation for that. At any rate, this list does not bode well at all for the Leafs.

It's pretty clear that being a poor possession club makes it unlikely for a team to qualify for the playoffs. However, some people will claim that while it may be true in general that poor possession numbers make it difficult to make the playoffs, that's not necessarily true in certain situations. Might not a coach devise a system that can beat these odds and consistently make the playoffs?

The results here certainly don't support that. 12 teams appear on this list at least once. Only 2, Montreal and Anaheim, successfully made the playoffs in more than one sub-49% FenClose season. Anaheim did it twice, but once was under Randy Carlyle and once will be this year under Bruce Boudreau. The Montreal Canadiens did it three times in a row, but all of those appearances were under different coaches - Carbonneau in 2007-08, Gainey in 2008-09, and Martin in 2009-10. If there's a coaching effect there, I'm not sure how we'd see it.

Lots of people seem to believe that Randy Carlyle has implemented a system in Toronto that affects shot quality, causing the Leafs to score at an elevated rate, stop shots at an elevated rate, or both. Maybe those people will look at the fact that Anaheim made the playoffs with a FenClose of 45.7% in 2010-11 as support for this theory. What do the numbers say? Is there any evidence that his teams can consistently beat the possession numbers? This chart should answer that:

Year FenClose Playoffs Playoff Record ES SH% ES SV% PDO
2008-09 50.1 Yes 7-6 8.6 919 1005
2009-10 46.9 No N/A 8.6 922 1008
2010-11 45.7 Yes 2-4 8.4 920 1004
2011-12 C 43.6 No N/A 7.4 900 974
2011-12 B 49.5 No N/A 8.4 921 1005
2012-13 47.6 Yes ? 9.6 930 1026

I've collected 2011-12 numbers for Carlyle's time running the team and Boudreau's as well. I've also included the numbers under Boudreau this year for comparison. One thing that's pretty clear is that Boudreau is a better coach than Carlyle is. Boudreau's Ducks have had much better possession numbers than Carlyle's did in the past couple of seasons even though they're working mostly with the same roster (I'd be willing to bet that a big chunk of the fall in FenClose this year is due to the loss of Visnovsky, who's having a great year on Long Island). The Ducks have also maintained percentages under Boudreau that are as good as anything Carlyle got, so based on the evidence here it's pretty tough to argue that Carlyle's systems were creating a unique level of shot quality.

While I didn't include these rankings in the chart, Anaheim's ES SV% over this time was roughly middle of the league most years and their SH% was in the top half but not much higher than 10th most years. The combined effect does create a PDO consistently over 1000, but not by much; roughly half a percent.

A shortened season can play havoc with percentages though, as you can see by Anaheim's numbers this year which are hugely out of line with what a similar roster has done in the past. The Leafs' 1032 is even more unsustainable. Both teams are in for a major reality check over 82 games next season if their rosters don't improve considerably.

So, to sum this all up, I think I've painted a pretty clear picture about why we should be concerned about the Leafs' fortunes moving forward. They have an almost historically low Fenwick Close, and teams with poor possession numbers very rarely make the playoffs, especially in consecutive years. There's also no good evidence that Randy Carlyle coaches a system that consistently inflates shooting or save percentages to a level that would overcome bad possession numbers on a consistent basis. And that's why those of us who favour statistical analysis are worried about the Toronto Maple Leafs.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Pension Plan Puppets

You must be a member of Pension Plan Puppets to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Pension Plan Puppets. You should read them.

Join Pension Plan Puppets

You must be a member of Pension Plan Puppets to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Pension Plan Puppets. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9355_tracker