Leafs 3 v. Blue Jackets 1: FTB Edition
GO LEAFS GO! So, the Leafs once again win a game that at the start of the year should have been expected. Of course, last night it certainly wasn't wanted but that's the way the cookie crumbles. I actually fell asleep after the first and woke up with 5 minutes left in the third so I can only assume that the hockey continued on its exciting path after the first.
A correspondent was at the game (in a corporate suite with a bunch of suits that could have cared less about the game) and helped fill in the blanks for me:
3 takeaways...
- Weekday games are embarrassingly quiet...I yell at the TV louder than Leafs fans at the ACC. Only once did I heard a worthy "Go Leafs Go!"
- The Buds are much better with the lead now,not that they could get worse, but they seem to have bought into solid defensive positioning and sound decision making.
- Our team hates us. This recent hot streak is the exact opposite of what the Buds need.
The Leaf goals were a nice reminder of what could have been. Carlo's 46 missed games meant that Andy Wozniewski played forty-eight games which was about 48 games too many. Antropov's powerplay goal after 6 seconds makes you wonder what might have been if Maurice had tinkered with a sputtering powerplay more often. Kilger's goal was a nice contribution from a fourth line that has been one of the team's best over the last stretch. It makes you wonder what might have been if the team had started the season off healthy with a full roster that didn't feature players in roles above their station.
But that kind of thinking is what led to this team being put together and despite any lingering hypotheticals it just is not good enough. Cliff now has six days to get things moving. Let's cross our fingers. Here are some articles to read as you while away the day wondering which team in the West will blink first and start off a freeding frenzy on Maple Leafs.
- Sean wonders why it's so hard to find out the details of a player's contract. It would certainly help out the mittenstringers who are just guessing at this point.
- Ryan has the answer to the problem: hire a document scanner. It would certainly make it easier for Eklund to make up rumours.
- Ryan also explains the difference between no-trade clauses and no-movement clauses for the uninitiated. Why McCabe got the latter is still beyond me.
- Paul Hunter takes the shine off of the win with news that some Leafs were injured. Actually, I guess that would actually be putting the shine back on.
- Glove tap to Penaltyshotsca for finding this Burnside article which is actually probably the worse thing I have ever read. I can't wait to see what the boys at Cox Bloc have to say about it.
I'd especially love to read what you guys thought about that last article. Mind-boggingly stupid is the nicest thing I can think to say along with it's no surprise that he works for ESPN.
0 recs |
12 comments
Comments
Oh Crap
I wanted to slack off again today, but it looks like something needs to be done about that Burnside column. Up and atom...
by Kim Jorn on
Feb 20, 2008 10:13 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
No Kidding
I can't believe how a journalist can (much like yesterday's bit of irony) slam teams for treating players like chattel and then turn around and exhort them to threats in order to make trades.
Strip the 'C' from Mats?!?!? I'd lead the pitch-fork wielding mob to the ACC.
by PPP on
Feb 20, 2008 10:48 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
burnside article
Just for the headline I want to kick this guy in the teeth. I bet he stayed up all night to think up that one.
by loser domi on
Feb 20, 2008 11:11 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Burnside
The article reads like it was written for the sole reason of being controversial. If I didn't feel sorry for the guy being willing to write anything to be printed I'd be hella mad.
by jaredolondon on
Feb 20, 2008 11:13 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Burnside
Sole reason of being controversial? Sounds like every writer/on-air personality at ESPN.
Seriously though, Burnside, what an idiot. What do you expect from a guy who covers the Thrashers full time?
by Evening News Team on
Feb 20, 2008 11:32 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Everyone At ESPN
Would have been a great byline for that article.
Poor Thrashers fans.
by PPP on
Feb 20, 2008 11:41 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Burnside
It's an open secret in the world of columnists that sometimes you write what you believe, and sometimes you write just to get a reaction. An editor wants his columnists to evoke some sort of reader reaction -- love, hate, respect, scorn, it doesn't really matter as long as it's not apathy.
So sometimes a writer will throw something out there just to tick people off. Simmons is the master of this, and Cox will do it often as well. If its done right, the columnist gets some attention, the paper/web site gets talked about, and the reader gets to feel that righteous indignation that we all love. Everybody wins!
The danger is that occasionally you take it too far. Like the kid who tries to jump his bike over a creek, but gets up too much speed and ends up overshooting and flying into a tree.
In this column, Burnside has slipped the surly bonds of credibility to touch the face of dear-god-this-man-has-suffered-brain-damage.
(Thanks for the DownGoesBrown link, by the way.)
by Down Goes Brown on
Feb 20, 2008 12:05 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
great writing
is this: In this column, Burnside has slipped the surly bonds of credibility to touch the face of dear-god-this-man-has-suffered-brain-damage.
You run a great blog, by the way
by loser domi on
Feb 20, 2008 2:13 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hilarious
If its done right, the columnist gets some attention, the paper/web site gets talked about, and the reader gets to feel that righteous indignation that we all love. Everybody wins!
There are no blogs without righteous indignation!
No worries about the link. Thanks for giving me something to link to!
For such a huge fan base our blogosphere is pretty small but growing.
by PPP on
Feb 20, 2008 3:30 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks...
Glad to like the blog. Let's see if you still think so after today's Courtnall/Kordic entry -- I'm sure some people will think I've gone Burnside.
by Down Goes Brown on
Feb 20, 2008 4:42 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Very Interested
Now I have to go check this out. Unless you said that Kordic was the best thing ever I probably won't agree with you ;)
by PPP on
Feb 20, 2008 5:00 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
lol
burnside is a douche!
strip sundin of the "C" - at least that's one i haven't heard yet.
what a joke.
go leafs go. reach for the stars. and by stars i mean 8th.
by eyebleaf on
Feb 20, 2008 3:11 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs


















