When the Leafs were abjectly awful, which was seven months ago, they were rumoured to be trading everyone for picks. They didn't, and now they aren't (awful), so they're in every conversation about trades, waiver claims or magic incantations to acquire players.
Might they?
Well, they aren't doing a waiver claim because they have no SPC space, but that is a good reason to consider a trade. Another is the uncertainty around the health of their LTIR duo of Elvis Merzlikins and Max Domi. I would bet Merzlikins will be healthy and ready to play first, and if he is, the Leafs have to deal with that in some way – a trade, actually playing him in the NHL or AHL or something more creative.
They have too many depth defenders (still) and not enough actual top pairing defenders (still). They are missing some forward strength, would benefit hugely by Nick Paul of a few years ago and could also like handle a depth winger. They have Miles Wood, an unknown quantity, who may get to become more known soon. There's no reason to believe the team is very enthusiastic about that.
And all of this is happening while teams loudly refuse to trade for picks or very young, unlikely prospects.
Enter the talk about Easton Cowan – no they aren't trading him, it seems impossible that would make sense. And more talk about Ben Danford. I don't know, do you want to do the Fraser Minten deal again? You can, because that deal was a valid win now not later deal that blew up in Brad Treliving's face.
And consider that the Leafs haven't played 10 games yet, and they don't exactly look like contenders, so maybe pump the brakes on expectations for more exciting moves. Do they need defence:

Yes. Can they just conjure it up? Seems like it would be a bit difficult, and the above has no magic solution.


This fun confluence of "how can this be about the Leafs" and actual team needs is going to subside once they play some more and there are things like faceoffs and fights to talk about.
Comment Navigation & Markdown
Navigation
cc to focus on comments section
c next comment
x previous comment
z next unread comment
Inline Styles
Bold: **Text**
Italics: *Text*
Both: ***Text***
Strikethrough: ~~Text~~
Code: `Text` used as sarcasm font at PPP
Spoiler: !!Text!!